User talk:Aymen FANTAR

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Aymen FANTAR!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 23:23, 23 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Bonjour Aymen,
Merci de tes contributions dans Wikimedia Commons, vivement le concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Cordialement — Habib M'HENNI [Message] 11:06, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your nominations for Quality Image[edit]

Hello, we really need your help with the pictures you nominated at Commons:Quality images candidates. Please go to the page and have a look. Thanks!

Bonjour, nous avons vraiment besoin de votre aide avec les photos que vous avez nominé au Commons:Candidats pour les images de qualité. S'il vous plait, aller à la page et jeter un oeil. Merci!

--cart-Talk 15:28, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, nice to see that you figured out how to fix the description, applying for a new file name and adding categories. However, if the categories turn up in red text they don't exist and you have to find the right ones. On your file File:Thomisidae feeding Hymenoptera.jpg the categories yu added did not exist and those have been corrected by another kind editor. Please have a look now and try to get familiar with the system. New categories can also be created if suitable ones doesn't exist. cart-Talk 13:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for helping mee i'm a new user i'll try to fix them, please how can i change the nomination. thanks for all Aymen FANTAR (talk) 13:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Things are looking much better. You don't have to change anything about the nominations, that is done by the administrator who takes care of the name change after your requests. All you have to do is work on the files' pages. I see that the File:Eggs of Eurydema ventralis.jpg has been renamed and I will take another look at that nomination now. When you leave comments at QI please try to do so at the right place inside the discussion not after it. I will move your texts so that they come to the right place. cart-Talk 13:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomisidae feeding Hymenoptera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Top view of El Houaria's lighthouse Tunisia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The image has acceptable quaility, but the filename must be meaningful. --XRay 05:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC): File name changed and geotag added --Aymen FANTAR 16:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Support Thank you. May be better with more contrast, but IMO still acceptable. --XRay 17:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rocky Coast El Houaria Tunisia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment The image itself has good quaility, but the filename must be meaningful. --XRay 05:21, 3 September 2016 (UTC): File name changed and geotag added --Aymen FANTAR 16:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. IMO OK now. --XRay 17:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eggs of Eurydema ventralis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please provide a better description, more accurate categories and preferably a geo tag. The file also needs a better name. W.carter 18:30, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --W.carter 14:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Little fishing Boat from Tunisia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good picture, but it needs a better description and preferably a geo tag. The file also needs a better name. W.carter 18:27, 2 September 2016 (UTC):Better description and geo tag addes Aymen FANTAR 13:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! You are a good photographer, you only need to learn the procedure here. :) Good quality. --W.carter 14:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammam Tunisia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammam interior - frigidarium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hammam interior - caldarium.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rolls Ryce hood ornaments.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support DoF could be better (ISO speed rating: 400), but very good background. QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:02, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statue of Honor, American Cemetery and memorial in Tunisia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI, but don't overcategorize your pictures --Poco a poco 14:19, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotunda Damous El Karita - view from the eastern stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Top view of the Rotunda Damous El Karita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:42, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Interior of the Rotunda Damous El Karita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 17 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotunda Damous El Karita - view from the western stairs.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Western view of Basilica Damous El Karita.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:37, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, — Racconish💬 06:28, 11 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]