User talk:Armenak Margarian/Archive/2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Azerbaijanilanguage2013.png[edit]

File:Azerbaijanilanguage2013.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A2D2 (talk) 02:11, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijani dilli.png[edit]

File:Azerbaijani dilli.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A2D2 (talk) 02:13, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azerbaijani languages.PNG[edit]

File:Azerbaijani languages.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A2D2 (talk) 02:14, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AzerbaijanianTurkish.png[edit]

File:AzerbaijanianTurkish.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A2D2 (talk) 02:15, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aserbaidschanisches Sprachgebiet.PNG[edit]

File:Aserbaidschanisches Sprachgebiet.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A2D2 (talk) 02:27, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Artyom Petrosyan2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The circumference on the right could have been slightly sharper. (No tripod used?), But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Мonument Music.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:15, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pushkin statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:54, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Привет из Гюмри[edit]

Привет! Спасибо большое за добрые слова! Я очень рад:) Передаю привет из Польши! --Halavar (talk) 22:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Archer statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anania Shirakatsi statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment There are too much pink and magenta colours. Please change temperature of White Balance or decrese pink and magenta colours. --Halavar 17:31, 4 January 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done White balance changed, CA fixed --Armenak Margarian 18:39, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. QI for me --Halavar 19:02, 4 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeghishe Charent statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Suffisant pour moi mais c'est dommage que l'embase ne soit pas nette. --Basotxerri 17:58, 5 January 2018 (UTC) je pense que il est le temps d'acheter un trepied, merci Basotxerri --Armenak Margarian 19:41, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hovhannes Shiraz statue2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:09, 5 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 8 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture in victory park.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --A.Savin 13:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture Symposium1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Minor perspective issues. --XRay 17:37, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soghomon Tehleryan statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --PumpkinSky 01:50, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garegin Nzhdeh statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Peut-tu élever les niveaux des ombres et peut-être diminuer les lumières? Il faut aussi corriger la perspective, les verticales de la base ne sont pas verticales maintenant. --Basotxerri 09:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done j'espère que c'est bon, merci --Armenak Margarian 08:59, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Parfait, merci! Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:15, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Armenian woman monument in Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Halavar 00:27, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue Mosque3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--PJDespa 19:59, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jivani and Sheram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments On the dark side. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 17:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sayat Nova statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done please can you review? --Armenak Margarian 16:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC) Much better, thank you! --Trougnouf 19:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar Surb Nshan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  CommentI´m not sure, tending more to decline. What kind of sharpness and WB you use? Nice setup and good composition, but imho to much purpble or magenta for this light at the snow (looks like morning or late pm). Sharpness right looks overdosed (Looks like Gimp, but it´s PS) maybee it´s coming from the cellphone Sensor)--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:32, 11 February 2018 (UTC)✓ Done White balance correction, thank you Hans-Jürgen Neubert--Armenak Margarian 18:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)Weak Pro- For me it´s good enough, but I love stones and I still don´t like the right background...Normally something for discussion --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 04:12, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church Katoghike Yerevan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture Symposium4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 21:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sasuntsi Davit statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:32, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this survey on the project page and see how your feedback helps the Wikimedia Foundation support editors like you. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement (in English). Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through the EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys to remove you from the list.

Thank you!

WMF Surveys, 18:22, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Shiraz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality IMO --PJDespa 17:15, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Share your feedback in this Wikimedia survey[edit]

Every response for this survey can help the Wikimedia Foundation improve your experience on the Wikimedia projects. So far, we have heard from just 29% of Wikimedia contributors. The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes to be completed. Take the survey now.

If you have already taken the survey, we are sorry you've received this reminder. We have design the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. If you wish to opt-out of the next reminder or any other survey, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement. Thanks!

WMF Surveys, 01:20, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 23 April, 2018 (07:00 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We will not bother you again. We have designed the survey to make it impossible to identify which users have taken the survey, so we have to send reminders to everyone. To opt-out of future surveys, send an email through EmailUser feature to WMF Surveys. You can also send any questions you have to this user email. Learn more about this survey on the project page. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this Wikimedia Foundation privacy statement.

WMF Surveys, 00:29, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bear statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:56, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spider street Art Yerevan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:09, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar St.Abovyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The car should not have been there. But the quality of the photo is good enough for me.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:21, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross-stone tatev.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Could have had a lower angle but otherwise OK. --Peulle 10:39, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odzunchurch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the dust spots. --Ermell 06:37, 29 August 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done thank you. --Armenak Margarian 12:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:37, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross-stone Noravank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:09, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Surb Nshan1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 22:33, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:03, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Cross-stone near Saint Sargis Church in Armenia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komitas pantheon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:04, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar memo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:38, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hogevank.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:29, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rustavelli.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:39, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Earthquake memo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1, but photo might have been sharper --Michielverbeek 07:58, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kristapori church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aragats mount.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, could use some sharpening on the buildings and a little bit of denoising in the sky, also I'm not sure if that's a normal reflection or red CA on the edge of the tallest building. --Trougnouf 23:21, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theatre Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:21, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 22:35, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drinking fontain2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:52, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fortress Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:44, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tatev monastery1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:59, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soghomon Tehlirian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK, statue is sharp enough --Daniel Case 07:17, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sose Vardanyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:13, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Fortress1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, a tighter crop all round would improve the composition (see note). --C messier 17:42, 9 November 2018 (UTC)✓ Done Thanks--Armenak Margarian 06:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK. --C messier 12:59, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aznavour statue1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 20:36, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erevan church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:03, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noravank Armenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment needs more categories. --MB-one 17:12, 12 November 2018 (UTC) ✓ Done Thank you --Armenak Margarian 09:14, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --MB-one 18:25, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Russian church4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sargis Lukashin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haykadzor Cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garni1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. You could have a better image with lower ISO values and aperture < f/14 --Moroder 17:06, 24 November 2018 (UTC) Thank you --Armenak Margarian 19:19, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirk Kerkorian.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akhurian river.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and good lighting --Michael32710 21:17, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmashen smaller church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:31, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Derivat Work[edit]

I uploaded an other version of Khatchkar_noravank.jpg

Feel free to check it out. Saludos, Hans-Jürgen

Thank you Hans-Jürgen i think you version is the best.--Armenak Margarian (talk) 19:12, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alex Spendiaryan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Surb Nshan church in Gyumri, Armenia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list#December 3, 2018[edit]

Hello! The author has uploaded a new version: File:Заброшенный костел.jpg. Would you be so kind to have a look at it now? --アンタナナ 14:37, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you.--Armenak Margarian (talk) 14:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry but it's not acceptable you or autor need to redo it again--Armenak Margarian (talk) 16:22, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Christapor Mikaelian statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marmashen cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Seven Pandas 22:16, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 8 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vardenis Khatchkars.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkars Kristapori church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:35, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Noravank cross.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:53, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Gyumri Railway Station[edit]

Well, that didn't work. User:Archaeodontosaurus, do you have any advice for Armenak on how to correctly substitute a file in the VIC nomination in the category of Gyumri Railway Station? Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:11, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek Thanks for everything you do on wikicommons. I really appreciate your contribution. --Armenak Margarian (talk) 20:49, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just trying to help. I wish I knew what went wrong and how to fix it. I guess the link was broken when you substituted another file, but there's a way around that, and I don't know what it is. Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:23, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Urartian cuneiform.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check your image. It's leaning in and tilted CCW. --XRay 11:33, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your help ✓ Done--Armenak Margarian 12:23, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It's better, but please have a look to the building in the background on the right. --XRay 12:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done i hope it's good now--Armenak Margarian 15:44, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support IMO OK now, thank you. --XRay 16:08, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halidzor village.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments maybe the pictures could have been a little sharper. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:38, 8 December 2018 (UTC)Thank you for your comment and your support--Armenak Margarian 12:29, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

For VI[edit]

You can put in competition the second image, it will be this time well received. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Օk, thank you Archaeodontosaurus but I would like to wait a bit. I'll take a better photo soon.--Armenak Margarian (talk) 12:05, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheram Schools.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 08:02, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Alexander Spendiaryan monument.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khatchkar memorial.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support For its size, good --Daniel Case 05:52, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drama Theatre in Gyumri, Armenia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church of the Holy Saviour.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 15:42, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lazarev Ivan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
IMHO, it needs a bit of cropping to the right to get a centred composition. --C messier 19:23, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneThanks--Armenak Margarian 11:03, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK for me. --Basotxerri 14:53, 15 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cuneiform of king Sarduri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:16, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Train station in Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 15:53, 16 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 19 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Statue of Pushkin in Gyumri, Armenia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harichavank Armenia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:59, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cross-stone near monastery St. David.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 17:14, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! World War II memorial in Gyumri.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Could you straighten the verticals, remove CA and give the file more specific name? --Podzemnik 23:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you--Armenak Margarian 15:12, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Better, thanks. Bottom crop is a bit tight but good enough for me --Podzemnik 21:33, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aram manukyan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo could have been sharper on the horizon. (No tripod used? But for me good enough.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:07, 26 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Armenak_Margarian/Archive/2018&oldid=345657134"