User talk:ArildV/Archive 2016

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionsplatsen September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ. --Palauenc05 21:05, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Röda sten September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strange crop, but ok --Poco a poco 21:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Röda sten September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:40, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionsplatsen September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:14, 18 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 21 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ornö kyrka August 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Masthuggskyrkan September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 10:51, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionsplatsen September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:11, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Clarion Hotel Post 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:15, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalens gammelgård October 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:11, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalens gammelgård October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good picture although the contrast is a little bit harsh --Elrond 08:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)  Done Thank you, I agree. New version uploaded. --ArildV 12:55, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lantmätartjärnen October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good landscape --Elrond 08:46, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangatan October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:48, 20 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalens gammelgård October 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bangatan October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschebergsgatan September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 14:20, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lidingöbron October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:17, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paula Hawkins Göteborg Book Fair 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 07:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slott October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 09:54, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ståthållarbostaden October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lidingöbron October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:27, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Göteborgs centralstation September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly tilted ccw, elsewhere good. --Cccefalon 08:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you, the new version is also slitghty brighter.--ArildV 08:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC) Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:24, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalens gammelgård October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.--Famberhorst 06:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments contrast a bit low, but otherwise good --Carschten 23:46, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ekebyhov October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slott October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Björken 18 October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 07:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support WOW! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalens gammelgård October 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenhyggarbyn October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 14:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Utö kyrka October 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utö kyrka October 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Victoria tower October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 15:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxö August 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. May a little bit to blue. --XRay 11:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC) Done thank you, less blue version uploaded.--ArildV 14:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet October 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 14:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stena Scandinavica September 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Laitche 19:32, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet October 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Your favourite scene this year! I´m waiting for the november versions ;-) --Hubertl 14:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvsborgsbron September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan August 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportExcellent, IMO.--Jebulon 10:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stena Scandinavica September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 13:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färentuna kyrka September 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Really very good, IMO --Hubertl 09:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adelsö September 2014 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 05:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aschebergsgatan September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stena Scandinavica September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ingo September 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

File:Sabbatsberg 24 October 2015 13.jpg

Hello Arild, I just wanted to notice say to you I noticed a bit of purple CAs, see note. I will not push it at CR as it is QI even with the CAs. A nice image! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:14, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you Christian! I had forgot to remove CA.  Done now. Regards --ArildV (talk) 22:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Shallow DoF at Barbican lakeside

Re this: I think that f/4.5 was just what the camera picked out ... I don't think I expected the picture to turn out quite so usable, or I might have tried something deeper. A lesson learned. Daniel Case (talk) 15:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

the photo is very intresting otherwise imo, like a post card from the 1960s (trying to show the new modern world). A few years ago it was a very successful swedish book called "tråkiga vykort" (boring postcards) with postcard from the 1950s and 1960s.--ArildV (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

You're welcome ... I remember thinking that during that Wikimania, that the sights of everyone happily sitting around the lakeside in the sun eating lunch and socializing amid these supposedly unspeakably ugly concrete towers actually looked like how brutalism said it was supposed to.

It wasn't the first time or even second time in London that trip, nor was London the the first place, in recent years when I felt like I was in the past's vision of the early 21st century ... you know, the world you used to see on the cover of sci-fi paperbacks in the 1970s (at least in the U.S.)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Arkitekturskolan October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 23:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabbatsberg 24 October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:26, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sabbatsberg 24 October 2015 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 11:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen October 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 15:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedeviken September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 11:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 10:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 10:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 11:36, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet November 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:04, 22 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet November 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:48, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götska tornet November 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done thank you for review. --ArildV 10:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC) *  Comment I don't want to bother you, but IMO it's still looking strange to me. Start again with the postprocessing. I think its ok and much better, when the top of the tower is decreasing --Hubertl 10:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC) *  Support it's ok for me now.--Hubertl 00:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 15:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 26 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stena Scandinavica September 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 13:27, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedeviken September 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 11:57, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonfjället September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO a part of the shadow at the bottom should be cropped out. --XRay 11:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC) Done Thank you, new version uploaded (I hope you see the new version, I still see the old version.--ArildV 14:20, 27 November 2015 (UTC)  Support IMO OK. --XRay 09:23, 28 November 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Ljungdalen October 2015 05.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ljungdalen October 2015 05.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 1 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älveli Setember 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:58, 2 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 08:59, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvfrida September 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:55, 3 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pampas marina July 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:18, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsbroplan 3 July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:46, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bojen 4 july 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reimersholme July 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:55, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamla stans tunnelbanestation July 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:57, 6 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Mariaberget September 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mariaberget September 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 9 December 2015 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bogesunds slott February 2013 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bogesunds slott February 2013 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 11 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bagarmossen Metro station October 2014 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Duvbo Metro station September 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 20:28, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danviksbron December 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:44, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora sjötullen December 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:48, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsgatan December 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 01:47, 14 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungsgatan December 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:28, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:44, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wedholms fisk December 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora sjöstullen December 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:20, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qing Feng Ling December 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:58, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. well balanced! --Hubertl 20:54, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qing Feng Ling December 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Medium69 12:03, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjövägen December 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Atmospheric evening shot. Please have a look at the left vertical. Is it leaning slightly out? --Cccefalon 09:18, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los koboltgruva October 2015 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qing Feng Ling December 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:52, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Wonderful holidays

Merry Christmas and a happy New Year! --Tremonist (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

*** Happy holidays! *** 2016! ***

		* * * Happy Holidays 2016 ! * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:18, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los koboltgruva October 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Qing Feng Ling December 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:50, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The traditional greeting

	Dear friend
	Happy New Year and best wishes!! Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:23, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

QI Tunisia training

As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 19:27, 3 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! T Centralen September 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:49, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Roundhouse wipers.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roundhouse wipers.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 20 January 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgården 4 January 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 14:29, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Berliner Fernsehturm November 2013.jpg

File:Berliner Fernsehturm November 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2003:8C:4F1C:6EBF:8823:26AB:9191:9904 20:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunkebergstorg mars 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Tack för alla bilder

Hej! Jag går igenom bilderna för POTY-tävlingen och noterar att det är många fina bilder från Stockholm. De verkar ha gemensamt att de är tagna av dig. Bra jobbat, tack för det! Plrk (talk) 15:43, 1 April 2016 (UTC)

Hej,

Ursäkta sent svar. Tack så mycket för de vänliga orden!--ArildV (talk) 08:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Linje 85 January 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. The foreground is a bit dark. It would be perfect if you would lighten the shadows a bit. --ElBute 14:32, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra länken December 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:37, 25 April 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Hello Arild. Your snapshot of Slussen Stan is truly magnificent. :) Darthbhyrava (talk) 20:27, 16 May 2016 (UTC)

Thank you!--ArildV (talk) 08:10, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamns stadshus May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamns vattentorn May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:16, 15 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 18 May 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doktorsvillan May 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:43, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands sjöfartsmuseum May 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doktorsvillan May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamns vattentorn May 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 07:00, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:01, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 12:34, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands sjöfartsmuseum May 2016 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 15:57, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamns vattentorn May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doktorsvillan May 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hotell Adlon May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough to be a Q!photo. Good position to take a photo from the hotel --Michielverbeek 11:50, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Görans kyrka May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 01:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands lyceum May 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:05, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Doktorsvillan May 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tele2 Arena May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 06:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Övernässtugan May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:06, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navigationsskolan Mariehamn May 2016 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 09:40, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks pretty good. The tree is obscuring the subject a bit, but I guess chopping it down to get a better photo would be overkill. QI for me. --Peulle 10:03, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands sjöfartsmuseum May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:01, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Segelpaviljongen May 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:57, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 19:23, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:44, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gamla tullhuset May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:04, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands sjöfartsmuseum May 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:11, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergelgatan May 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:57, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryska konsulatet Mariehamn May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:59, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 43.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:51, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:02, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen metro station May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:13, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 48.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 14:11, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 36.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sergelgatan May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tsungam 10:25, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 49.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:57, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 07:28, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Beautiful motive. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:53, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:52, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ålands sjöfartsmuseum May 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:00, 8 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok, it has now the usual high quality. --Smial 11:32, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariehamn 2016 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very short distance but QI for me -- Spurzem 11:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statens ämbetshus Mariehamn May 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Navigationsskolan Mariehamn May 2016 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not the best light for a photo but still good quality. --Basotxerri 17:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Idrottsparken Mariehamn May 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Email

Hi Arild, I've sent you an email (last Friday). Can you reply when you get a chance? Thanks! :-) Ed Erhart (WMF) (talk) 19:16, 14 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Badhusparken May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The house is leaning a bit? Also, too much bottom, I would crop away the road --A.Savin 02:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)  Done I agree, new crop and tilt correction. Thank you--ArildV 07:50, 12 June 2016 (UTC) Perfect --A.Savin 03:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 13:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gorgeous composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:04, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition in every particular. Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:47, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Sandhamn August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments E la nave va. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:39, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SY Pantagruel August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 09:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isabelle August 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:59, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sandhamn August 2016 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandhamn August 2016 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Kanske FP

Hejsan! Såg den här bilden bland QI. Fantastisk! Om det inte varit för alla regnbågsfägerna på vågglittret så hade jag nominerat den till FP direkt. Vet att dom kan vara rätt kinkiga på sådana "posterizations" där, men har du lust att testa så skulle jag definitivt rösta ja på den bilden. Häls! --w.carter-Talk 10:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Hej!

Tack så mycket. Jag laddade upp en ny version. Nominera gärna bilden om du vill. Vänligen --ArildV (talk) 07:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

 Done, som dom säger här. w.carter-Talk 08:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SY Pantagruel August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Sandhamn August 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:31, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Zcebeci 07:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finntorp November 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:44, 8 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 11 August 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:15, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 August 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Globen metro station May 2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Globen metro station May 2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Sandhamn August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 09:43, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandhamn August 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:01, 2 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort fyr August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 15:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 12:26, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:30, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 15:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 14:18, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stångskär August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- Spurzem 08:04, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:08, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort fyr August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:38, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 06:02, 4 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Maybe a bit underexposed, but still IMHO, OK for QI. --C messier 12:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you C messier, I agree. New version uploaded (+0,5 ev).--ArildV 16:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC) ArildV, exposure is better, but the new version has jpeg artifacts. Please upload a higher jpeg quality version. --C messier 12:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry C messier, new computer and stupid default settings in lr. New version uploaded.--ArildV 17:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, good capture. --Code 05:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and very nice light. --Code 05:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Excellent composition. --Code 05:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sandhamn August 2016 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sandhamn August 2016 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:08, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Info Some CA removed. --ArildV 16:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC) You need to go over it once more, see my notes, after that it is "fair winds and following seas". W.carter 18:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC) Done--ArildV 21:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC) Good enough. QI. Klart skepp Kapten! --W.carter 21:29, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Centralpalatset February 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 21:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:45, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Pudelek 21:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great composition. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:43, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Siljan July 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:42, 8 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ulriksdal slott October 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and cute. Clear QI IMO--Lmbuga 13:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningens paviljong October 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice!

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Landsort August 2016 04.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landsort August 2016 04.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen January 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stångskär August 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect. --Ermell 19:48, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:01, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hovmarskalksflygeln May 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:14, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningens paviljong May 2015 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 10:43, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sundbybergs kyrka January 2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Comment Some dustspots in the clouds should be removed.--Ermell 07:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 10:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 14 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen January 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment IMO the categories should be improved. The image is leaning out and/or tilted CCW. --XRay 13:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC) New version uploaded, some new categories added ("Beckholmen" is also a sub-category to some relevant categories). --ArildV 12:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)  Support OK now. Thank you. --XRay 15:30, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Drottningens paviljong October 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningens paviljong October 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:17, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts kapell August 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:33, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you --ArildV 09:58, 17 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gripsholms slott May 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 11:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 06:26, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningens paviljong October 2015 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo. Good perspective and beautiful autumn colours. However I think it would have been better (if possible) if you would take have taken the photo four to six hours before.--Michielverbeek 06:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts kapell August 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:06, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 07:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good. Minor problems: the stars. IMO you should clone out the couple of stars. --XRay 13:13, 9 September 2016 (UTC)  Done Sorry for late response, thanks for review.--ArildV 09:54, 17 September 2016 (UTC)  Support No problem. It's OK now. --XRay 07:41, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldemarsudde February 2016 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 19:07, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:54, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Shishirdasika 13:21, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka October 2015 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:13, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ståthållarbostaden October 2015 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 09:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nyköpingshus Feburary 2015 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 15:26, 20 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The plant and the wall in the foreground are too unsharp, IMO. Not sufficient for a QI, sorry. --Basotxerri 18:20, 21 September 2016 (UTC)  Comment I disagree. Sharpness is good enough for a 24mp images, the plants are blurred by the wind. --ArildV 18:27, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Did you review the wrong image? I will be happy to remove any dust spot--ArildV 18:29, 21 September 2016 (UTC)  Done All (I hope) dust spots removed.--ArildV 18:37, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Hello ArildV, I'm very sorry, I've mixed your two images. Logically, I won't decline an image for a removable dust spot (this image). --Basotxerri 18:44, 21 September 2016 (UTC) I uploaded a third version, thank you for notes! I have removed over 30 dust spots, time to send the camera to cleaning.--ArildV 18:53, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 17:41, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 26.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 18:01, 21 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunilla Linde Bjur Göteborg Book Fair 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 10:02, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksborg September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 06:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Amerikahuset September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 06:28, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feskekôrka September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! --Ermell 06:27, 25 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 28 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Direktörensens villa Trädgårdsföreningen September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 20:05, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 19:26, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksborg September 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 11:46, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rebecka Edgren Aldén Göteborg Book Fair 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stigbergsliden September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 12:57, 26 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frilagerhuset September 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd welcome a second opinion, but this looks very good to me, and I also like the composition, overall. -- Ikan Kekek 08:25, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:09, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Direktörensens villa Trädgårdsföreningen September 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 08:19, 27 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 30 September 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Palmhuset September 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frilagerhuset September 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 09:12, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stenpiren September 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:54, 29 September 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Feskekôrka September 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 20:05, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 09:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 28.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Aeou 10:15, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ERSTA August 2016 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 07:10, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 32.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments - Beautiful. Potential FP. -- Ikan Kekek 07:38, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stångskär August 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 06:03, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr August 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There's a dust spot in the upper left corner. --Code 19:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Thank you for review, I will try to fix it tomorrow.--ArildV 19:24, 26 September 2016 (UTC) New version uploaded--ArildV 20:39, 26 September 2016 (UTC) Good quality. --W.carter 15:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 16:16, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 8 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ERSTA August 2016 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Personally I'd crop a bit tighter, but this meets the QI criteria for me. --Crisco 1492 01:32, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lidingöbron October 2015 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Crisco 1492 01:34, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 18 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västra Skogen February 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 08:46, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hudiksvall July 2014 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lidingöbron October 2015 03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lidingöbron October 2015 03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm October 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:51, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta kapell och krematorium October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 21:37, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Clarion Hotel Post 2015 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clarion Hotel Post 2015 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta kapell och krematorium October 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 17:43, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Confidence October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta kapell och krematorium October 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:33, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I taste the autumn, quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 14:43, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kina slott October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:44, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna museum October 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cozy place. Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:18, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råcksta kapell och krematorium October 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:15, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackebergs tunnelbanestation October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 12:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blackebergs tunnelbanestation October 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slight CA around chrome details, please fix. --W.carter 12:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)  Done, thanks for review.--ArildV 12:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Fastest CA removal I've ever seen!! :) Good quality. --W.carter 12:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna museum October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. A bit dark, but a special scenery. IMO good enough for QI. --XRay 11:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna October 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Some parts a bit dark but the detial is there. --W.carter 11:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna October 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There's a dust spot in the sky, not very noticeable but it's there, on the upper left handside. --Basotxerri 08:35, 5 November 2016 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 13:51, 5 November 2016 (UTC) OK now, good quality! --Basotxerri 15:50, 5 November 2016 (UTC) ArildV can you please take also care of my comments? It isn't a QI to me like this --Poco a poco 09:28, 6 November 2016 (UTC) I was trying but I will try again tonight--ArildV 12:47, 6 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment @ Poco a poco: sorry, I didn't see your review when I set this to Promotion... I change it to Nomination again until the perspective is corrected. --Basotxerri 15:45, 7 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks Poco a poco 19:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)  Done New version uploaded.--ArildV 20:42, 8 November 2016 (UTC) The perspective is OK now, thank you! --Basotxerri 18:18, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort August 2016 30.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 09:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna October 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. File name is not a reason of decline although better to rename if that would be needed :) --Laitche 15:04, 12 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment @Laitche: I did not decline, and before you disregard my concern, please have a look at point #3 in the QI Guidelines.--Peulle 15:57, 12 November 2016 (UTC) Yes you are right, but I think this photo should be promoted if the file name would not be renamed, the rule is not absolute :) --Laitche 16:14, 12 November 2016 (UTC) It is a meaningful name IMO, both location (the very small town of Sigtuna) and date (October 2016). I think we should use description (multilingual capabilities!) and categories for more detailed classification. I don't think it is very helpful to rename the image to "File:A small tree jetty with benches on the shore of Lake Mälaren in the south part of the small town of Sigtuna.jpg. And I use the correct local name of a building if it is known (1, 2) but here is a non-famous jetty with no name and a building (next photo) with no known name.--ArildV 20:35, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna October 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks good, although the file name could be more accurate. Please see this page.--Peulle 09:23, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna stadshotell October 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:22, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin October 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:31, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna museum October 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:04, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Feskekôrka September 2016 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Feskekôrka September 2016 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österhamn Landsort December 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, Nice composition. --Laitche 00:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lotsbåtar Landsort December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 23:20, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:12, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker Landsort December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:51, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort fyr December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The image is tilted, could you fix that, please? --Basotxerri 09:02, 4 December 2016 (UTC)  Done Thank you. --ArildV 09:09, 4 December 2016 (UTC) OK now! Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:37, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österhamn Landsort December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 08:59, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort fyr December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp photo, good composition --Michielverbeek 06:11, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 18:06, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support People are disturbing, but OK.--Jebulon 17:02, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts lotsutsikt December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker Landsort December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:42, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort hostel December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Typical "golden hour" at midday in December...;) --W.carter 21:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 21:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Träviksskär December 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Roland Svensson strikes again! :) --W.carter 21:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fågelstation December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 10:45, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kustartilleri Landsort December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:48, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 10:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr December 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 09:34, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österhamn Landsort December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:23, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort December 2016 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:13, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fågelstation December 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 18:06, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västhamn Landsort December 2016 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:38, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krokskär December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bunker Landsort December 2016 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 22:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts lotstorn December 2016 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västhamn Landsort December 2016 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Slightly leaning out on the left... --Basotxerri 10:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC) Thank you, new version uploaded. I think the perspective was over-corrected. --ArildV 17:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC) OK now, good quality. --Basotxerri 18:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsorts fyr December 2016 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 21 December 2016 (UTC)