User talk:ArildV/Archive 2013

Bildförbättring

Hej! Jag tror att File:2012-12-29 Bobby Ryan 01.jpg blev bättre av en hantering i Lightroom (laddade hem provversionen) än i UFRaw, men skulle vara glad över din åsikt. Vad tror du? Jag ska nog köra de andra genom detta program också, om inte annat är det ett par stycken som är överskärpta, så de ändå behöver laddas upp igen. V-wolf (talk) 20:16, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Hej!

Jag tycker det är en stor förbättring . Två saker jag tänkte på, du skrev i kommentaren när du laddade upp den näst sista versionen att du använt "oskarp mask", betyder det att du gör skärpningen i något annat program (GIMP?) efter att du har exporterat den som JPG? Jag tycker att resultatet ofta blir bättre om man fixar till skärpan i Lightroom (bland annat slipper man problem med kanter, alltså att exempelvis en byggnad omges av ett ljusare band längs kanterna mot himlen).

Du har kanske redan sett det (det tog flera månader innan jag såg det), men när du öppnar RAW-filen i LR så väljer programmet inte automatiskt kamerans färgprofil utan "adobe standard", du kan längst ned bland framkallningsalternativen under kamerakalibrering välja profil och ändra till någon av kamerans profiler.--ArildV (talk) 11:23, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Hej! Jag har inte hittat alla verktygen i LR än, bland annat var det först idag jag såg att det går att rotera bilder med andra grader än 90/180 däri. Därför gjorde jag några justeringar på jpg-filerna, för att öka kantskärpan (med mer eller mindre halo som bieffekt). V-wolf (talk) 12:38, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 36 AB September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:14, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baptist Church Örbybyhus May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat dull colours, but still QI --Smial 20:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC) Thank you your review. I uploaded a new version. --ArildV 22:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örbyhus May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --Rjcastillo 19:31, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gruvlokalen Dannemora May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 20:09, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobo 2012e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:45, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl XII Kungsträdgården December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra Stavsudda December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:02, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pilot boat at Landsort April 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:35, 2 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympen October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 17:34, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:23, 6 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra teatern January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--JLPC 17:49, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's too dark, you need a much brighter, clean noise and add sharpness ... --Aleks G 21:48, 6 January 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded, brighter, better wb, full resolution, and more sharpness.--ArildV 18:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC) be even lighter ...  ;) --Aleks G 20:56, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Harmaja January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment remove dust spot. See note. OK for me --Rjcastillo 13:31, 8 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks,  Done.--ArildV 23:05, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mosebacke torg January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not happy about the truck, but OK for QI --A.Savin 11:08, 9 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pilot boat at Landsort April 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pilot boat at Landsort April 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:08, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! ST1 Sickla January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:36, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about reflections, but allowable because it's otherwise fantastic. --Mattbuck 16:19, 12 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drakenbergsområdet December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:12, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 35.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted. Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC)  Done. --ArildV 09:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora IK vs Leksand in Stockholm 2013-01-05 38.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted, and needs a bit of crop on the left to remove that stray leg. Mattbuck 03:44, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Done. --ArildV 09:04, 16 January 2013 (UTC) Better. Mattbuck 20:42, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biocentrum SLU January 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 05:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biocentrum SLU January 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 05:18, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Scots Pin Utö, January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. Kruusamägi 00:59, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Skarpö January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:14, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 17:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SLU January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 10:46, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biocentrum SLU January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:19, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:47, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka January 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice light and shadows on the fassade. --Tuxyso 10:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice light and shadows on the fassade. --Tuxyso 10:00, 20 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katarina kyrka January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katarina kyrka January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:13, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 10:52, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka January 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:58, 21 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:56, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SLU January 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Gopod Quality --Rjcastillo 13:59, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 19:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, remember add geotag --The Photographer 12:46, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks,  Done.--ArildV 13:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SLU January 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:03, 24 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Lisen January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:35, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 10:48, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sea smoke January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, please see notes and add geotag --The Photographer 20:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I will try to find the exact location, it is taken from a ferry. I dont know about the note, maybe a sign.--ArildV 12:15, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö January 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Qi for me. --Tuxyso 14:00, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Skarpö January 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:09, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Skarpö at Årsta brygga January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments See notes and add geotag --The Photographer 20:19, 24 January 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. Geotag added.but I'm not sure of the tilted, the structure in front of the ship is probably not completely straight and if I correct the image, I had to crop the radio mast (?) on the ship. I prefer to keep the image as it is.--ArildV 12:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC) It is tilted, the lake should be flat. Mattbuck 15:34, 26 January 2013 (UTC)  Info I find no reference point, perhaps we will never know if this tilted or not. QI for me --The Photographer 05:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Skarpö January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Promotion once dust is fixed. Mattbuck 05:51, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks,  Done.--ArildV 11:49, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Good. Mattbuck 08:45, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biocentrum SLU January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Promotion once dust spot is fixed. Mattbuck 05:09, 25 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks,  Done.--ArildV 11:50, 25 January 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 17:05, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Scots Pin Utö, January 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Scots Pin Utö, January 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:07, 29 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --A.Savin 11:28, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Remember add geotag --The Photographer 12:47, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Done--ArildV 13:45, 23 January 2013 (UTC) Dust spot. Mattbuck 17:19, 27 January 2013 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 21:34, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Lisen January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor perspective issue but acceptable. --Mattbuck 06:56, 28 January 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Set

Congratulations!
The set of images you nominated for valued image set was reviewed and has now been promoted to the Valued image set: Högalidskyrkan.

It is considered to be the most valued set of images on Commons within the scope:
Högalidskyrkan.
If you would like to nominate another image set, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Good work. Yann (talk) 12:02, 23 December 2012 (UTC) Result: 1 support

=> Promoted. -- Godot13 (talk) 03:36, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

-- Godot13 (talk) 04:00, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Katarina kyrka och kyrkogård January 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Katarina kyrka och kyrkogård January 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Biologiska museet, Stockholm.

Hello, can you add "exterior" in scope? That would be perfect. Regards --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

 Done Thanks. Regards--ArildV (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Man, is that beautiful. Some dust spots on the sky just above the buildings should be removed. --A.Savin 22:29, 30 January 2013 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version. I hope I had removed all dust spots.--ArildV 22:51, 30 January 2013 (UTC)  Support good quality. --A.Savin 23:01, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen January 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:10, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalsbryggan January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:46, 30 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sickla Udde January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:00, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sickla Udde December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:07, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lumafabriken Jaunary 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice -- George Chernilevsky 06:44, 31 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 35-41 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 04:27, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 49-57 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 00:29, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 49 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:08, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirkus January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 18:57, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spårvagn Djurgårdsvägen January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:16, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biologiska museet January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bünsowska huset January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:06, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

Comment in QIC

Hi Arild, I have read your comment on one of my nominations but I haven't really understood how I can improve that picture. What do you mean with "shadow adjustements"?. Cheers, Poco a poco (talk) 18:43, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi Diego,

The dark parts are slightly too dark imo. Regards--ArildV (talk) 18:55, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Ok, I lighten a bit up the darker areas Poco a poco (talk) 19:28, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Biologiska museet, Stockholm (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support all criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:15, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope, I think. cmadler (talk) 17:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:16, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spritmuseet January 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 17:22, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 35 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI, --Isiwal 13:01, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mårtendal February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment would be better with the complete crane. Good Quality --Rjcastillo 01:28, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 54.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 06:25, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 55 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good -- George Chernilevsky 06:27, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 53 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 06:36, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 36C February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 19:38, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

File:University Park MMB Z6 The Downs.jpg

I have uploaded an even brighter version of this. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:44, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry. But the problems remains the same, parts of the forest (almost black) and the building is clearly underexposed.--ArildV (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Bgag 16:29, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 50 February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Christian Ferrer 19:51, 10 February 2013

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:57, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet February 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:52, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Magdalena kyrka February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Julian Herzog 15:58, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 43-47 January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be great with geocoding Kirua 14:25, 8 February 2013 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 13:38, 9 February 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 22:47, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarbybacken February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you. I uploaded a new version, but I'm not sure about the new version.--ArildV 20:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cirkus January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit dark, and too much sky. Mattbuck 12:18, 8 February 2013 (UTC) New version.--ArildV 10:37, 11 February 2013 (UTC) Colours are better, but needs less sky. Note added. Mattbuck 17:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)  Done--ArildV 15:42, 16 February 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 19:11, 16 February 2013 (UTC) Good quality.--Mehdi 11:18, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--ArildV 22:10, 23 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Christ the Saviour Cathedral Pristina February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you, done.--ArildV 16:19, 24 February 2013 (UTC) QI Poco a poco 15:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 22:36, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mimar Sinan tomb February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Süleymaniye Mosque February 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:21, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Newborn Pristina February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please add Please add a blank line between nominations --The Photographer 20:24, 26 February 2013 (UTC) Good qualitiy --Arcalino 10:10, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sultan Ahmet Mosque February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 23:11, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kız Kulesi February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:10, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üsküdar Radar Tower February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagia Sophia Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:32, 1 March 2013 (UTC)  Comment lots of dust spots in the sky --Carschten 22:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)  Done-ArildV 22:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Horn Metro Bridge Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you. Done--ArildV 23:06, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Very fine, but still many dust spots in the sky (see annotation) --Kreuzschnabel 05:20, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Thanks for note. New version.--ArildV 10:14, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Definitely QI now :-) --Kreuzschnabel 16:24, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karaköy Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment dust spots --Carschten 22:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)  Done-ArildV 22:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 20:45, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karaköy Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment dust spots --Carschten 22:16, 1 March 2013 (UTC)  Done-ArildV 22:55, 1 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality now. --NorbertNagel 20:47, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üsküdar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Süleymaniye Mosque February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Prenn 07:42, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grönskär February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Comment: Horizon seems tilted by around 0.01 radians on average; more tilted on the right side than left, not sure if curvature of the Earth or barrel distortion. Sharpness is fine, some noise is ok. Composition is ordinary but depicts subject well from a good vantage point. Purpy Pupple 01:09, 24 February 2013 (UTC) I uploaded a new version, rotated. --ArildV 20:48, 26 February 2013 (UTC) QI to me --Óðinn 20:16, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västra Skogen February 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 22:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üsküdar Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Yes, too yellowish. I uploaded a new version. Thanks for pointing out.--ArildV 21:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:39, 3 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hagia Sophia (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in rich scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:01, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 02:53, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeå konsthögskola February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:58, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:43, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dolmabahçe Mosque Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fındıkzade Mosque 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the composition very much. The embeeding of a religious building in between living quarters. At the right side the wide view over the town - well done!

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fantasy Land February 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina February 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:24, 6 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kız Kulesi February 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagia Sophia Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments No reason why this should not be QI. Thus it is QI :) --Tuxyso 21:14, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haydarpaşa protokol camii Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A very little distorsion on the left but it seems good for me.--Grondin 16:03, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophie Österberg Mars 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. I wouldn't disagree if you retouch the reflexes on the glasses --Moroder 16:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karaköy Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:44, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ahi Çelebi Camii Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, probably you can make a slight perspective correction at the right side of the building, but it's only marginal. Nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 21:12, 7 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I uploaded a new version, with stronger perspective correction and a small tilt.--ArildV 07:06, 8 March 2013 (UTC) It's better now. --Tuxyso 07:25, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Üsküdar February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Cant say not QI but pretty boring...and sad --Moroder 16:51, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sultan Ahmet Mosque February 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sultan Ahmet Mosque February 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:11, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Golden Horn Metro Bridge Mars 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Golden Horn Metro Bridge Mars 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:03, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dolmabahçe Mosque (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 19:07, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 23:48, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomb of Sultan Murad III Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 03:11, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kız Kulesi Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good - Arcalino 20:24, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nuruosmaniye Mosque Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. --A.Savin 13:41, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tomteboda February 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice perspective, several interesting details, good quality. --Tuxyso 14:57, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Süleymaniye Mosque February 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:23, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:03, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brevik February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:54, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dome of the Süleymaniye Mosque.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 18:32, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 22:22, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nuruosmaniye Mosque (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : best in scope. --JLPC (talk) 21:39, 11 March 2013 (UTC)

• I'd prefer a location specifier in the scope. --Ikar.us (talk) 00:12, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Godot13 (talk) 13:08, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Color noise reduction of my coin photo

Thanks for uploading a new version. I also tried color noise reduction and did not really see a difference. If I compare your version with mine I cannot figure out a visibly difference. Can you mark an area where your editing is visible (just for my understanding)? Thanks. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:02, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey,

Sorry, I uploaded the old version by mistake. I had uploaded a new version now.Regards, --ArildV (talk) 14:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Now it is visible - Thanks! I denoised the other side of the coin myself: File:5-Cent-Belgium-1856-Back.jpg. Do you think this is also better now? --Tuxyso (talk) 17:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Better imo. Your color noise reduction is less radical than mine, but as you pointed out its a old coin.--ArildV (talk) 18:38, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Råsunda February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beşiktaş Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice compo. A pity the birds on the foreground are a bit blurred but main subject OK. --Myrabella 15:48, 13 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Råsunda Stadium (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Good choice, and nice image.--Jebulon (talk) 22:25, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the help!

Thanks for the help!

I just wanted to say thanks for the new version on this. If it gets FP status it will be because of your readjusting. I had a hard time with that picture, I think because of the brightness of th skier's suit. Hope to work with you again. Have a nice day, Letartean (talk) 01:16, 18 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Korsö February 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --Poco a poco 16:34, 15 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Korsö Kroksö Sandön February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Klara kyrka february 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 16:33, 17 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! André Costa Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good portrait -- George Chernilevsky 18:29, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bostancı Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umeå konsthögskola February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fantasy Land February 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good mood & quality. --Selbymay 19:57, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fantasy Land February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hagia Sophia February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:26, 21 March 2013 (UTC) Very good image, but dust spot and undefined white object in the upper part on the right side in the sky. Could be fixed. Arcalino 11:33, 21 March 2013 (UTC)} Thank you. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 13:16, 21 March 2013 (UTC)OK for me now Arcalino 14:19, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina Bazaar February 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 08:01, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fagerdala February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted anticlockwise. Mattbuck 11:24, 17 March 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded.--ArildV 12:03, 20 March 2013 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 13:23, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordiska Museet Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good --Rjcastillo 13:45, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Randersgatan Kista Mars 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 12:17, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Gustav Vasa Nordiska museet 02.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gustav Vasa Nordiska museet 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --PierreSelim 09:15, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lighting soso but good overall --Poco a poco 11:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Randersgatan Kista Mars 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:27, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 Mars 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.  QuestionI guess that the building is that white in real?? If not I would slightly reduce highlights and increase black and clarity. Nonetheless already QI in this version. --Tuxyso 13:42, 24 March 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review and comment. I think the picture reflects reality. The building has a glass facade, with white elements inside. The facade looks different depending on the sun, shadows and clouds.--ArildV 09:30, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 Mars 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:55, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Randersgatan Kista Mars 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I love this picture, however, the image is tilted, I have used as a reference point swing ropes and post. thanks --The Photographer 12:36, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  Done Thank you.--ArildV 07:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC) Info Ok now, well done --The Photographer 12:31, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnstocken 2 Mars 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality - please remove marked dust spot. --NorbertNagel 18:02, 25 March 2013 (UTC)  DoneThank you.--ArildV 07:38, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Commuter trains at Haydarpasa Station Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality is good, but the photo is slightly distorted (look at the rain drain at the very right) --Tuxyso 22:46, 17 March 2013 (UTC) I dont understand the disortion here, the drainpipe seem to lean outwards, but there is no tilt otherwise. Perhaps the walls of the old station building is not straight?--ArildV 12:02, 20 March 2013 (UTC) Background isn't brilliant, but ok. Mattbuck 11:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Klara kyrka (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Very good reason for a aerial view --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:37, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Nordiska museet (interior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:40, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora Tingshus Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 19:49, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inlandsbanan Röjan Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:43, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inlandsbanan Sveg station Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:45, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inlandsbanan Mora station Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:15, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnstocken 2 Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 09:31, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:39, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nordiska Museet Mars 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nordiska Museet Mars 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora kyrka Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 20:11, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Panorama Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:13, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mora kyrka Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well presented atmosphere.--MrPanyGoff 09:44, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängbro Ljungan 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängbro Ljungan 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gammelgården Ljungdalen Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 16:41, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zorngården Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:47, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Korsnäsgården Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:12, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Korsnäsgården Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:45, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sveg station Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:51, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungan Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 14:37, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängbro Ljungan 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:04, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:59, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Geotag is missing. Have you tried a different crop? IMHO the power line is disturbing (see my crop suggestion). --Tuxyso 06:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Donex2. Thanks for suggestion. --ArildV 21:59, 2 April 2013 (UTC) Better and QI now. --Tuxyso 00:07, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice composition. --Tuxyso 06:53, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 06:46, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:10, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hängbro Ljungan 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:58, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:00, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helags Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Though somewhat oversharpened --Smial 08:59, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tophane-i Amire Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 10:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bill Clinton Boulevard February 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, QI to me--Lmbuga 11:34, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pristina Bazaar February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit of noise but just ok --Poco a poco 09:28, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golden Horn Metro Bridge Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good q.--Lmbuga 11:07, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:25, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  CommentColor balance is incorrect, the snow is pink. --Nino Verde 10:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks. New version uploaded.--ArildV 19:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Gammelgården Ljungdalen Mars 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gammelgården Ljungdalen Mars 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunsjöfjället Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The composition is not exceptional, but overall quality is OK. --Tuxyso 19:00, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haliç Tersaneleri Mars 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:54, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karaköy Mars 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Sharped noise on water and dark windows. Need to be fixed. --Nino Verde 10:02, 6 April 2013 (UTC) Please remove also the senser dust spots on the sky. Also you can crop some part of the sky: 10-20% --Alchemist-hp 10:05, 6 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks!  Donex3 and corrected.--ArildV 19:34, 6 April 2013 (UTC)  CommentOk for me. No problems i mentioned before. --Nino Verde 09:48, 8 April 2013 (UTC) QI for me. --Kadellar 14:25, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, the car on the left is a little bit disturbing Arcalino 11:45, 11 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review, I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 12:09, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:42, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen Mars 2013 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 17:03, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten Mars 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:30, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastugrundet January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality for me. --Christian Ferrer 07:20, 13 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. I wish those two people weren't before the banner! --Kadellar 18:15, 14 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby IF - IFK Värnamo April 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:00, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby IF - IFK Värnamo April 2013 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Selbymay 09:36, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monday James Hammarby April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, but what if you crop the part of the grass that lies in shadow at the bottom? It would look much better. If you keep the ratio, maybe you can also remove the security guy. --Kadellar 14:25, 15 April 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks.--ArildV 14:52, 15 April 2013 (UTC) Thanks! --Kadellar 19:35, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöstadskapellet April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:09, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kulturama April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:46, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:48, 17 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Helags Mars 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumphuset April 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:58, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumphuset April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 21:24, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finn Malmgrens väg 27-29 April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:49, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markuskyrkan April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:00, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrkvillan Enskede April 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 10:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrkvillan Enskede April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --A.Savin 10:21, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markuskyrkan April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 16:23, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markuskyrkan April 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:40, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Björkhagen April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:17, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholmsarenan April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:24, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tullhuset Uppsala April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 09:16, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uppsala domkyrka April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A nice photo, but too dark. The only correctly exposed part is the very small window. The interior is compared to the window underexposed. Have you got an exposure series to create an HDR or margin to increase shadow areas? --Tuxyso 06:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC) It's a exposure fusion from 3 exposure. I uploaded a new version, but the church are not very bright inside.--ArildV 07:11, 19 April 2013 (UTC) I think it is better this way. --Tuxyso 07:55, 19 April 2013 (UTC) I agree. Thank you for you review and comment.--ArildV 12:45, 19 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromma prästgård April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 21:16, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bromma kyrka april 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:10, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finn Malmgrens väg 27-29 April 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.Nice! --Moroder 10:01, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Familjebostäder April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments More perspective correction? I'm not sure it would look natural with absolute straight walls here, given the angle and the extreme perspective correction which has already been done.--ArildV 15:37, 17 April 2013 (UTC) This is what I was trying to say, straight walls here look to distorted, I would reduce the correction to make it look more natural --Poco a poco 08:52, 20 April 2013 (UTC) OK, I understand! New version uploaded (perspective correction changed from -36 to -15 in Lightroom).--ArildV 13:50, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken April 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 11:04, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken April 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 15:52, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Markuskyrkan April 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:04, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholmsarenan April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 09:29, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby IF - IFK Värnamo April 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:23, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The vertical lines of the left side of the picture are tilted (CW). I think that it needs a little rotation and a little perspective correction--Lmbuga 15:46, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Thank you! I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 20:01, 22 April 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 08:18, 27 April 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Israel-2013-Aerial 21-Masada.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Israel-2013-Aerial 21-Masada.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgården 8 May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:08, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zornmuseet Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it Kruczy89 20:30, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

---

Wiki Loves Public Art about to take off! Dear ArildV, During May we are running Wiki Loves Public Art, a photo contest focused on getting photographs of artworks and sculptures uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Have a look at the lists of objects included, and of participating GLAMs in your country, and upload as many images as you can. Kind regards, the organizers of Wiki Loves Public Art

Message delivered by odderBot on 13:23, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uppståndelsekapellet April 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:07, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Uppsala domkyrka April 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Uppsala domkyrka April 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bullerön May 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 18:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bullerön May 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 18:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 14:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annedal April 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 14:34, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Supportermarschen 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 16:40, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bullerön May 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Its a new version uploaded.--ArildV 11:23, 27 May 2013 (UTC) *  Support Good now in my opinion --Smial 22:49, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Annedal April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etnografiska museet May 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Grey stripe at the bottom, needs crop --A.Savin 10:50, 30 May 2013 (UTC)  Done. Thanks.--ArildV 14:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --A.Savin 17:28, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Observatorium Mays 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 08:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Marathon 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good quality image, but where's the runners? --SuperJew 09:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isabella Andersson Stockholm Marathon 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 09:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Birka June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice but dust spots and some white areas almost overexposed (easy to fix imo). --JLPC 17:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I add some exposure, adjust the highlights (and also the WB, less blue). I hope I removed all dustspots. --ArildV 21:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)  Support : really good now ! --JLPC 22:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Daniel Woldu Stockholm Marathon 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 15:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 9207 May 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Nino Verde 07:30, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Etnografiska museet May 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mysing June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Mysing June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen May 2013 BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 15:44, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen May 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Police motorcycle Stockholm Marathon 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 12:53, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen May 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen May 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please remove marked dust spot. --NorbertNagel 18:17, 6 June 2013 (UTC)  Done Thanks! .--ArildV 19:44, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Observatorium Mays 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Observatorium Mays 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:09, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda May 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 12:33, 7 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:9207 May 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:9207 May 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sickla kaj June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --Villy Fink Isaksen 21:53, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm city hall June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 10:03, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Strong magenta cast --Kreuzschnabel 10:29, 14 June 2013 (UTC) New version uploaded.--ArildV 10:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Much better now. --Kreuzschnabel 10:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 19:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Galleri Korn Vernissage May 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:22, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:22, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballad June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 01:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 01:36, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Less brigthness in some clouds would improve it but still ok --Poco a poco 08:52, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Thank you, I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 22:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Bateau pirate, Yasmina Tunisie, juin 2013.jpg

In deed, I did a strong noise reduction with the original image. I don't know if the new one is OK for QI now! Anyway, thanks for your comment Regards --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 21:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, I think the new version is much better. Regards --ArildV (talk) 05:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk Juni 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice. Everyone should have a look in full resolution. --NorbertNagel 20:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 13:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Trace 05:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good --Moroder 11:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hostel Laxön June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, btw what lense did you use? --Moroder 09:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks. Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8.--ArildV 09:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks its for the irrelevant CA on the tree. I have the same lens and same problems ;-)--Moroder 11:38, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Moroder 10:06, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective problems (the note). I would try th reduce highlights at the bottom front if the building. --Tuxyso 12:16, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks for note, I uploaded a new version (I also i also slightly reducedhighlights and exposure).--ArildV 22:04, 16 June 2013 (UTC) Much better and QI now. But in the new version the shadow side also became a bit darker. I would slightly increase the shadows. --Tuxyso 06:35, 18 June 2013 (UTC)  Done, thanks.--ArildV 08:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Korsö Kroksö Sandön February 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Korsö Kroksö Sandön February 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:25, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västlands kyrka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 09:53, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen May 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective issues on the left. Mattbuck 17:40, 13 June 2013 (UTC) I dont see the problem. Alreday very strong perspective correction (wide-angle, close-up), more correction will not improve the picture, just make the picture look weird and unrealistic.--ArildV 09:44, 14 June 2013 (UTC) Perspective is adequate for me. --Ikar.us 19:05, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi ArildV

talkback. Penyulap ☏ 11:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk Juni 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk Juni 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The left wing is leaning clockwise --A.Savin 08:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)Thanks for your review. I uploaded a new version, with small tilt and perspective correction.--ArildV 16:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)  Support clearly better, QI to me --A.Savin 20:28, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Saltsjökvarn June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:41, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks, new verison uploaded.--ArildV 07:56, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 16:13, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 22.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The irons of the foreground are perhaps disturbing, but the quality is very good---Lmbuga 16:24, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment It's tilted on left, look at the bulding at left --Christian Ferrer 11:31, 21 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 16:55, 21 June 2013 (UTC)  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 17:12, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Älvkarleby Hydroelectric Power Station.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:36, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sickla kaj June 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sickla kaj June 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:23, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Grattis! V-wolf (talk) 13:38, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Tack!--ArildV (talk) 15:37, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Great minds...

Tja! Upptäckte just att din nytagna bild och Jorchrs bild från ifjol är ganska lika. Sånt är kul för framtida bruk och jämförelser. Great minds think alike :) V-wolf (talk) 13:35, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 21.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perhaps a bit tilted CCW, either way, good quality--Lmbuga 10:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 11:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:34, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk Juni 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lmbuga 09:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsberg bruk June 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 09:04, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slussen June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well exposed, good quality. --Tuxyso 07:20, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 07:16, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Interview for Wikimedia Blog

Hi Arild,

My name is Michael Guss and I'm a communications volunteer with the Wikimedia Foundation in San Francisco. We have a feature on the Wikimedia blog [1] to profile the photographers behind the beautiful photos that become Picture of the Day (POTD) on Wikimedia Commons. You can see some of our past POTD posts here: https://blog.wikimedia.org/c/communications/picture-of-the-day/ Given that one of your photos, Upplandsmuseet September 2012, is scheduled for 14 July 2013 , we'd love to do a short interview with you by email to discuss your photography and your POTD. Please let me know if you would be interested! You can email me mgusswikimedia.org or respond on my talk page.

Thanks,

MGuss (WMF) (talk) 18:10, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

oops! Just saw that you already participated last year. Would it be worth an updated interview? We would be happy to profile some more of your photos; but just let me know if you want to do another interview. MGuss (WMF) (talk) 18:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hercules fontain June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:41, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hercules fontain June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality. --Iifar 09:08, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:36, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me, but the image can be cropped (too much sky and...)--Lmbuga 18:18, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Thank you, new version uploaded. --ArildV 19:34, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kina slott June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Gävle fire station (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support : all criteria met. --JLPC (talk) 16:54, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kyrkpaviljongen June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Good quality. --Iifar 14:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:23, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013 03.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Bergslagssafari-kategori

Tack för att du fyllde i kategorin på Karlholmsbilderna! Det föll bort i min allmänna virrighet :) Jag blir förresten inte klok på den orten. På vägskyltarna står det Karlholm, bruket heter i äldre litteratur Karlholms bruk, men orten heter enligt Lantmäteriet Karlholmsbruk, och enligt en del kartor heter bruket Karlholmsbruk bruk. V-wolf (talk) 20:27, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Råkade att se att bilden du nominerade inte hade kategorin. SCB skriver Karlholmsbruk också, kommunen Karlholm vilket även stå på Eniros karta. Hmm. Kan man lagt till bruk för att särskilja postorten från någon annan och det blivit namnet även på småorten, och sedan har det gamla namnet levt kvar? I mina semestertrakter förvirrar postorten "Storsjö kapell" utsocknes, "kapell" lades till då byn blev postort trots att byn heter Storsjö och hyser Storsjö kyrka. --ArildV (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk June 2013 27.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 20:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 10:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 07:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk June 2013 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk June 2013 25.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 07:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The photo is clearly QI, but tilted CCW and perhaps with a little (very little) perspective distortion--Lmbuga 17:32, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks for your review. I uploaded a new version with tilt corrected, did you think it need more perspective correction?--ArildV 20:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks. Good quality--Lmbuga 11:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västlands kyrka 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 20:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gävle brandstation June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 10:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 10:42, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk June 2013 23.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:31, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlholmsbruk June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me: It's a good picture--Lmbuga 17:50, 27 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rindö June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 14:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rindö June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:03, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:54, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:03, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good but please remove the dust spot. --Moonik 13:57, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Done. Thanks.--ArildV 14:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Teaterplan June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 12:28, 28 June 2013 (UTC) QI for me if... perspective correction (see notes)--Lmbuga 02:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks for the notes. I uploaded a new version.but please note, some of the objects in the background are not straight (see notes). --ArildV 06:51, 29 June 2013 (UTC). Much better IMO. Thanks--Lmbuga 19:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Zorngården (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Best in Scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:34, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpö June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:55, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpö June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 16:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rindö June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but some additional cats could help to find more use to this picture --Poco a poco 19:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC) Thanks, done--ArildV 19:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC).

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UIM F2 World Powerboat Championship Stockholm 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 20:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Would be better without the frame work an container, but IMHO it's sufficient for QI --Martin Kraft 08:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok --Martin Kraft 08:24, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västan June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment You can't see the entire hair, It's cut (problem with composition). A bit unsharp: Nothing major in the picture (hands, guitar...) is sharp enough to allow a hair too unsharp because movement. But I'm not sure because I like the picture. I think that it is easy to convince me that the photo is QI--Lmbuga 21:53, 2 July 2013 (UTC). To me perhaps not QI, but I can understand, sorry: The picture is good--Lmbuga 21:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeppsbron june 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice. --Kadellar 00:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC) As Kadellar, very nice--Lmbuga 00:58, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Why not FP? --Moonik 14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC) Thank your for your comments and support, I nominated it for FP --ArildV 06:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Line terminal June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excelent perspective. Original and good. Good composition IMO--Lmbuga 01:23, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norra Djurgårdsstaden June 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice but do you have space left at the top? The crane at the left in unfortunately cropped. --Tuxyso 08:02, 30 June 2013 (UTC) Sorry i dont have more space,maybe I can do the opposite (see note).--ArildV 19:59, 30 June 2013 (UTC) IMHO nonetheless QI. --Tuxyso 22:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Skeppsbron june 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Skeppsbron june 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gävle June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you, new version uploaded.--ArildV 11:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 18:05, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gävle June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Minor cw tilt. --Iifar 10:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)Thank you, new version uploaded.--ArildV 11:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma Läger June 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 09:21, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 08:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma Läger June 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 08:50, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marma läger June 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 11:45, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlholmsbruk June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Volvo S60 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 07:06, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strömsbergs bruk June 2013 29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Somewhat underexposed, but still good quality. --Smial 11:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 11:02, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nina June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:45, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nina June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nina June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 19:10, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! UIM F2 World Powerboat Championship in Stockholm June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hercules fontain June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Maybe you can adjust the lateral crop. --Moroder 06:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm June 2013 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Nice. --Moroder 06:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Public Art 2013! Dear ArildV, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Public Art 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 9,000 pictures of works of art from five countries. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images, and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you would like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. Your feedback will help us improve future contests! To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Public Art 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Public Art team

Dagens bild 14 juli

Grattis till dagens bild i dag. Riktigt snygg. /Dcastor (talk) 20:41, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Tack så mycket!--ArildV (talk) 21:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bünsowska huset February 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 11:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bünsowska huset (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support – best in scope. --Bob Collowân (talk) 16:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danviksbron June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 08:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 22:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:20, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biologiska museet January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imho. --V-wolf 09:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very nice --A.Savin 09:28, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very Good. --D4m1en 10:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karlholms kyrka June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and good quality but IMO would be better with little less saturation --Christian Ferrer 16:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Thank you, I think you are right. I uploaded a new version with less saturation. --ArildV 16:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC) OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 20:14, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bünsowska huset February 2013 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bünsowska huset February 2013 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dalénum June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 00:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älvkarleby June 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 22:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västlands bruk June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 19:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpö June 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:54, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholm June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but would be better with entire car  Support --Christian Ferrer 19:20, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpö June 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:14, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunsjön July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 21:14, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flatruetvägen July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very pretty --A.Savin 12:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungris July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 11:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungris July 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me, but slight dust spot (see note, please) --Lmbuga 22:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC) Thank you, done. --ArildV 12:04, 25 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungris July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:05, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skarpö June 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good,  Support --Bob Collowân 09:52, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support. Do you think you can add location coordinates? --Bob Collowân 10:34, 26 July 2013 (UTC) Done.--ArildV 19:59, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Flatruetvägen July 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flatruetvägen July 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungris July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Just slight chromatic aberrations on the left side but a good QI anyway. --Ximonic 09:03, 29 July 2013 (UTC) Thanks for note and review. I uploaded a new version, i had forgot to remove CA.--ArildV 23:45, 28 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --A.Savin 16:35, 29 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very too much green IMO --Christian Ferrer 20:27, 26 July 2013 (UTC) I dont think so here, the green colour lock natural to me and the histogram is fine.--ArildV 20:50, 26 July 2013 (UTC) I've tried on my PC and I prefear less green tint, anyway it's QI  Support --Christian Ferrer 12:57, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --A.Savin 11:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:16, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäckevallen July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Bob Collowân 10:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postvallen July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very good --A.Savin 10:33, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good --A.Savin 10:30, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postvallen July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. To be perfect IMO, it needs a bit less of perspective correction, but it is almost imperceptible--Lmbuga 12:13, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Thank you, I reduced the perspective correction from -6 to -3 in Lightroom.--ArildV 12:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC) Much better, thanks--Lmbuga 14:06, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Nice and good, but slight dust spot (see note, please)--Lmbuga 17:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Done, thanks for note!--ArildV 17:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC) Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 18:24, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunsjöfjället July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me. --Sputniktilt 07:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten Panorama Jule 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:01, 1 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good IMO--Lmbuga 15:32, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 12:05, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice --Christian Ferrer 11:18, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungdalen July 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:34, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dunsjöfjället July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 19:29, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ljungan July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Three soft dust spots in the sky. Apart from that QI. --NorbertNagel 10:37, 3 August 2013 (UTC) Thank you, done. --ArildV 15:12, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, but geocode should be corrected --A.Savin 15:24, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Sorry (mistake), QI for me also, but I hope what Savin says--Lmbuga 15:41, 2 August 2013 (UTC) Done by RillkeBot, UploadWizard uploads had some problem a few days ago and added 0,0 geocodes.--ArildV 08:58, 3 August 2013 (UTC)  Support QI and nice--Lmbuga 22:54, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Birka June 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Birka June 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Torkilstöten Panorama Jule 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Torkilstöten Panorama Jule 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Tuna kyrka July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK  Support --Rjcastillo 15:28, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Tuna July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:22, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Tuna kyrka July 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 16:25, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedemora järnvägsstation juli 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 21:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flatruetvägen July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:56, 8 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Röjan station Mars 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though right side could use sharpening. --Mattbuck 09:21, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Tuna kyrka July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 18:31, 11 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Önnered September 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:28, 18 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten July 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 21:17, 21 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Önnered September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ok, whatever, QI --Poco a poco 18:21, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken April 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:51, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Signalfabriken April 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionplatsen September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:26, 21 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment Noticeable CA on the left could be fixed. --Julian Herzog 16:57, 24 August 2013 (UTC) Done, thank you.--ArildV 04:20, 26 August 2013 (UTC) Nice, thank you. Julian Herzog 05:53, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isafjord 1 Mars 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grisblänkan August 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:31, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Grisblänkan August 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Grisblänkan August 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen April 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Light is unfortunate (most of the building is in shadows). For me nonetheless good quality because a lot of fine details are still visible in the shadow parts. Have you tried to reduce highlights at the right side of the building? IMHO there are some overexposed areass. --Tuxyso 11:13, 28 August 2013 (UTC) Thank your for your careful review. I have uploaded a new version created with LR/Enfuse.--ArildV 00:45, 1 January 2001 (UTC) OK for me now. I am again and again impressed of the detail quality of the D600. Which lens did you use? --Tuxyso 14:28, 28 August 2013 (UTC) 24-70mm 2.8 (from Wikimedia Sverige's pool of technology).--ArildV 08:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sickla Udde January 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, but I would suggest to use other_version instead of an image note which is imho confusing here. --Tuxyso 11:18, 28 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 13:40, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you, I only had a 50mm lens with me.--ArildV 18:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice --Poco a poco 09:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholms slott December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Very good, probably FP, good luck in the WLM 2013 --Iifar 08:37, 1 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks! Good luck to you too!--ArildV 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC) I nominated it for FP.--ArildV 18:58, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 22:14, 31 August 2013 (UTC)

Retouched your picture

Hi, if you like it you can use it . Regards --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Hey,

Thank you, great work! Regards --ArildV (talk) 22:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 16:19, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka augusti 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 15:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Minor noise in darker areas, but ok --Poco a poco 19:47, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:29, 3 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm Panorama August 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent quality! -- Felix Koenig 12:08, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 18:05, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:17, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:20, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice -- MJJR 08:02, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Einstein2 13:59, 2 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Heuschrecke 08:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse Mars 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 11:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm Panorama June 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Outstanding quality. Heuschrecke 08:45, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Katarina kyrka January 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice, it's a pity for the signs. Can't you retouch them? --Moroder 07:41, 3 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you. I don't have the skills to retouch them in a good way.--ArildV 07:15, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort Lighthouse August 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. -- Felix Koenig 20:45, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:53, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Riksdagen December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 12:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendal September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 12:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendals stall September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendals stall September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:31, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendals stall September 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 08:32, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok --Poco a poco 22:03, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:00, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lövholmen May 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 20:43, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:04, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Nyckelviken September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:03, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Nyckelviken September 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendal September 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 14:46, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dramaten May 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 22:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 21:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra teatern January 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Snow in September :-) --Colin 19:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sahlgrenska huset.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Colin 19:25, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:12, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendal September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit oversatured in my tastes but good quality. 4 dustspots to remove (see notes) --Christian Ferrer 06:24, 7 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I uploaded a new version with less saturation but also less exposure and removed dust spots.--ArildV 07:10, 7 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Much better, good. --Christian Ferrer 07:27, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --Christian Ferrer 06:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --Christian Ferrer 10:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013.jpg

Hallå Arild, I've compared the first and the third versions and it's true that the left is always leaning but the right is better now IMO, you're certainly right, old house are not necessarily straight. Anyway a very good picture, I've supported it before your message. If I find the time, I will tried myself with LR to see if it's possible to do better. Vänligt, --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

• I've tried too and have not be successful, You have done a good job, thanks to have tried to correct --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Thank you.--ArildV (talk) 21:13, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stockholms slott December 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockholms slott December 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Utö kyrka January 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Utö kyrka January 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:24, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Onam greetings!

Have a nice Onam tomorrow! JKadavoor Jee 17:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

OnaSadya

Thank you! Have a nice Onam you too!--ArildV (talk) 21:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:39, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice and very good --Lmbuga 11:16, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:19, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. It could be tilted CCW and need perspective correction: See the tombstones of the right--Lmbuga 11:27, 13 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you, i made a new version. When I look at the newer buildings (assumed to be straight) in the background everything looks straight now.--ArildV 17:14, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:06, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:02, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna September 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support very nice (there is a smidge tilt at both sides, nonetheless QI to me) --A.Savin 18:23, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:26, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 12:22, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendal September 2013 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:30, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmsbron September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:20, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholms kastell September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. There is a DS on top in the middle --Moroder 10:28, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version. --ArildV 22:11, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholms kyrka September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilla Höggarnsbank september 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --A.Savin 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Pers kyrkoruin september 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment They are ruins, and it's posible that the foundation may have moved, but the vertical lines of the right (included the door and the building of the bottom left corner) are tilted CCW. What do you think?--Lmbuga 11:19, 14 September 2013 (UTC) Thanks, I think you are right. I uploaded a new version with tilt correction and also stronger perspective correction.--ArildV 09:33, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Good quality--Lmbuga 22:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Pers kyrkoruin september 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment See note, please: Slight dust spot--Lmbuga 10:48, 14 September 2013 (UTC)  Done, thanks for note!-ArildV 10:54, 14 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 11:10, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 10:43, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vaxholms kyrka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 09:27, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granholmens fyr september 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna September 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 09:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lövholmen May 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:39, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:33, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality!!--Lmbuga 13:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholms slottsteater augusti 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:35, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Capella September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beckholmen September 2013 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:39, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan September 2013 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upplandsmuseet April 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:19, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Swartlings ridskola September 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:32, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Lars kyrkoruin September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -Kadellar 12:58, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support ok --A.Savin 16:59, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtunastiftelsen September 2013 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Difficult lighting well controlled. --Smial 14:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtunastiftelsen September 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:56, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtunastiftelsen September 2013 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:47, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja kyrka December 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK --A.Savin 14:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Exercishallen September 2013..jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:18, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan September 2013 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja kyrka December 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support nice --Rjcastillo 14:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgårdsvarvet September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Rjcastillo 14:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja kyrka December 2012 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI-Good quality. --Isiwal 13:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Björken 18 September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Very good IMO, I love it, but see notes--Lmbuga 13:29, 16 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you! I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 19:26, 16 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Very good--Lmbuga 12:54, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Martin Falbisoner 19:14, 17 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Olofs kyrkoruin september 2013 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. In the other picture of St Olof, isn't perspective overcorrected? --Kadellar 22:54, 15 September 2013 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I dont know, the buildings in the background are straight and some part of the ruin leans outwards.--ArildV 20:49, 16 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rommehed July 2013 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Foreground disturbing, I preffer the cut (See notes), and some noise aceptable over there --The Photographer 17:34, 12 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Foreground supports the composition. --Smial 10:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stockholm Central Station September 2013.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:24, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sigtuna September 2013 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI for me--Lmbuga 16:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Pers kyrkoruin september 2013 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI --Rjcastillo 23:31, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Biologiska museet September 2013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:14, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Just a word on QIC

I like your photography very much, because it can be seen you always try to show the subject both informative and nice. And without unnecessary gimmicks, or cheap effects. -- Smial (talk) 13:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your appreciation and kind words!--ArildV (talk) 13:39, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tobermory Main Street 2012-08-09.jpg

Thank-you for reviewing and supporting this picture. Following FP comments, I've reworked the image to restore detail in the trees. You may wish to review the image to ensure you are still happy with it. -- Colin (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Thank you. I think the new version is an improvement. Regards--ArildV (talk) 22:02, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

File:SM Kępno Ratusz (9) ID 651409.jpg

Please have one more look at the image. (very strong CA removal). --217.159.164.255 13:07, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid I can't do more. If you believe that any of the previous versions were better, please revert.--ArildV (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP promotion

Template:FPpromotion Template:FPpromotion/JKadavoor Jee 06:18, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Template:Autotranslate

{{|Autotranslate|1=File:Nobelpriset i fysik 2010.tif|base=Image permission}} Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Hey,

Excuse me, but in my opinion it is a waste of time. The image has information on both the author, source, and have a valid license. Further more, if you look at the image use you will find (in English) a description about the donation and upload of the image. In other words, there's no reason to doubt the information I have given.--ArildV (talk) 12:14, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

Per COM:OTRS, any permission must be confirmed through our OTRS system. Please send the permission for this image to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thank you. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:52, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Nobelpriset i fysik 2010.tif

Template:Autotranslate Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:54, 31 October 2013 (UTC)

"Happy Diwali!"

While Template:W is popularly known as the "festival of lights", the most significant spiritual meaning behind it is "the awareness of the inner light". It is the belief that there is something beyond the physical body and mind which is pure, infinite, and eternal, called the Atman. The celebration of Diwali as the "victory of good over evil” refers to the light of higher knowledge dispelling all ignorance, the ignorance that masks one's true nature, not as the body, but as the unchanging, infinite, immanent and transcendent reality. With this awakening come compassion and the awareness of the oneness of all things (higher knowledge). This brings Template:W (joy or peace). Just as we celebrate the birth of our physical being, Diwali is the celebration of this Inner Light. While the story behind Diwali and the manner of celebration varies from region to, the essence is the same – to rejoice in the Inner Light! And this year Template:W and All Souls' Day come together to fully defeat the Evil! "Happy Diwali!" – JKadavoor Jee 06:17, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Happy Diwali

I also wish you a very very happy and prosperous diwali. --Joydeep _Talk 06:26, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

FP promotion

Template:FPpromotion/JKadavoor Jee 08:37, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP promotion

Template:FPpromotion

Template:WLM 2013 thank you

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP promotion

Template:FPpromotion/JKadavoor Jee 08:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Category:Valued images by user

Hi Arild,
I've modified your entry in the above Category in order to show the number of VIs.
Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 21:16, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! Regards--ArildV (talk) 09:02, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Template:VICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 14 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted

2014 !

	* * * 2014! * * *
	Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:02, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New year

I wish you and your family a very happy Christmas and a wonderful new year. --Joydeep _Talk 11:04, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Dear Arild, I wish and you and your family a Merry Christmas and lots of health and, of course, nice pictures for the coming year! Your Poco² 14:04, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia in the European Parliament

Since 2009 Wikipedians are visiting German and Austrian State Parliaments to take pictures of their members. They have been made available under a free license on Wikimedia Commons. They can be used in Wikipedia and other Wikimedia projects but also outside of Wikipedia - in compliance with the license conditions - for example by the Members of Parliament themselves. Besides the creation of free pictures of politicians, the project offers the deputies the opportunity to ask questions about Wikipedia and to discuss „their“ Wikipedia article (eg. to indicate possible problems with personal rights). For Wikipedians this offers the chance to explain their idea of „Free Knowledge“ and the work of the Wikimedia projects. In addition these contacts give Wikipedia photographers access to places that are not accessible to the public in order to produce free images. We now have the opportunity to visit the European Parliament in Strasbourg in February and perform a photography and editing project for the 764 MEPs there. In particular as the next elections for the European Parliament are upcoming in May, these new articles and photos are under a strong focus of the public. Volunteers should sign up on our Google form - note the section on the Commons project page about selection. I would be happy to have a supporting voice from you for the Grant request on Meta: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants_talk:PEG/Olaf_Kosinsky/Wikipedians_in_European_Parliament --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 19:55, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

FP Promotion

Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 22:05, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted

Quality Image Promotion

Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted Template:QICpromoted