User talk:ArildV/Archive 2012

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter)b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --V-wolf 16:02, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götiska tornet September 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 15:46, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten December 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 14:38, 13 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarbybacken january 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments yes, its so gray in snow! --Ralf Roletschek 16:52, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby Sjöstad january 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, perfect exposure. Mr.choppers 04:06, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Filmhuset January 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Curious lighting, but good. --Mattbuck 18:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Folksamhuset January 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Love the trails. --Mattbuck 18:00, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallsta Paper Mill January 2012h.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's good, but imo it will be even better with a bit more contrast. --Iifar 20:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstaviks kyrka January 2011d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ianare 23:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallsta Paper Mill January 2012e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallstaviks kyrka January 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:01, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Zvezdny-gorodok-shop-4888.jpg

It is a HDR with downstep for the signboard, normal expo for inner part of the shop and upstep for outside. I tried to remove colour noises, yet it's not an easy task. Shooting with longer exposition gains lack of inside view. The main mistake is, I make this photo in too dark time of the evening. It's not easy to visit Star City, that's why I do not bother about small amount of remaining noise.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 09:46, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallsta Paper Mill January 2012n.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The sky looks overexposed. --Iifar 17:57, 29 January 2012 (UTC) It was a very pale sky with mist, water vapor (also from the paper mill next to), clouds, and frost haze. In my opinion is the color of the sky natural.--ArildV 18:09, 29 January 2012 (UTC). Color of the sky looks natural, but uppermost branches of the trees are like half burned out. Maybe less exposure will help to make them more visible? --Iifar 18:30, 29 January 2012 (UTC) I understand your point. I uploaded a new version. Thank you for your careful review.--ArildV 19:15, 29 January 2012 (UTC). Support Looks ok to me now. --Iifar 20:12, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! European Herring Gull.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (once remark the sky is really dull but it's the weather ...) --PierreSelim 13:22, 30 January 2012 (UTC)  Comment Wrong id. The bird is Larus canus. Makele-90 14:23, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KA Almgrens sidenväveri november 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --PierreSelim 10:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Raichberg 100731.jpg

Hello Arild,

thank you for your cropping edit. I have uploaded a new version including perspective correction. You may review this image again.

Thanks and best regards. --R-bitzer (talk) 23:18, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallsta Paper Mill January 2012g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not sure about this. The stone in the foreground is quite disturbing IMHO. --LC-de 13:04, 25 January 2012 (UTC) The stone is part of the architecture, and marks the entrance.--ArildV 08:48, 27 January 2012 (UTC) I say give it the benefit. Mattbuck 06:18, 1 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norrtäljeån January 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Is WB ok? Image looks a bit bluish to me and it has very narrow white line in top and right side. --Iifar 18:37, 29 January 2012 (UTC) I not sure I understand "very narrow white line" here, maybe you can add a images note?--ArildV 19:36, 29 January 2012 (UTC) Somehow I cant see my upper note, but the line goes along uppermost side of the image. Probably you won't see it, if your browser background is white. --Iifar 20:01, 29 January 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded.--ArildV 10:27, 2 February 2012 (UTC)  Support Much better. --Iifar 10:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maria Abrahamsson Göteborg Book Fair 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good, thats live. --Ralf Roletschek 17:09, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Älv-Snabben 5 september 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 17:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Magnus Ljunggren

This exposure is much better, thank you. Visible colour noise, especially top left corner and in the shadow under the head. Good sharpness (try to keep it while removing the noise), perfect DOF. Maybe you should check the white balance and to remove the yellow hue, if the head microphone was white, this helps to check.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:00, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Also, Jan Ainali image is good with noise and lightness, but has minor trouble with yellow hue (white balance) and, alas, hardly suits for the QI because of sharpness. Sorry, motion blur is a harsh thing... But serial shooting usually helps to avoid this blur, one of the 6 shots usually appears sharp enough.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 20:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your comments. I'll try again with Magnus Ljunggren tomorrow. I still have the RAW file. Best regards, --ArildV (talk) 20:11, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby sjö December 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Aleks G 23:43, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Template:Wmse-teknikpool

I added a french translation to the template => Template:Wmse-teknikpool/fr. I hope it's ok. PierreSelim (talk) 19:24, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

It was very kind of you to add a frence translation. Merci!--ArildV (talk) 21:48, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lifebuoy in Södra Hammarbyhamnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me and nice. --Moonik 14:09, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby vs GAIS 2012-02-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question What's the red spot (see annotation)? --Dr.Haus 21:52, 11 February 2012 (UTC) A bandy ball! --ArildV 21:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC) Ok, the QI for me. --Dr.Haus 23:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Emelie February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 11:05, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emil Paulin Ström 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Looks ok, but imo with more contrast it will be better. --Iifar 19:53, 13 February 2012 (UTC) I uploaded a new version with more contrast.--ArildV 20:24, 13 February 2012 (UTC).  Support Better now. --Iifar 06:34, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Imo a bit more contrast will make it even better. --Iifar 19:43, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Waldermarsudde Panorama February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good, I like it --Carschten 21:25, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariella in Stockholm 2012-02-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 10:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen 2012-02-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Iifar 10:53, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Emil Paulin Ström 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Intersting composition --PierreSelim 08:15, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia takes..

Did you get all the info you need for the event? Kaldari (talk) 22:35, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Hey,

I think we have all the information we need at the moment. Thank you very much for your help!--ArildV (talk) 19:09, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby vs GAIS 2012-02-11 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of noise, but QI to me--Lmbuga 18:53, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viking Line terminal Stockholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:31, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobias Andersson 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:24, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen February 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 22:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen February 2012d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok. Makele-90 16:08, 14 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Mariella February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 13:29, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Håkan Juholt Göteborg Book Fair 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version, WB and colour.--ArildV 13:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC) An unfortunate expression, but good. Mattbuck 15:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Malmö February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me, good quality--Lmbuga 23:34, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Waldermarsudde Panorama February 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Waldermarsudde Panorama February 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:09, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Waldemarsudde.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:03, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Goalkeeper (Bandy).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Please link to a relevant category or gallery. Thanks, cmadler (talk) 19:55, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

   Question Is Category:Bandy goalkeepers an appropriate category?--ArildV (talk) 21:56, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

  I think it could be ok. PierreSelim (talk) 11:05, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

   Done--ArildV (talk) 11:22, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support best in scope and useful for the encyclopædiæ of sports. --PierreSelim (talk) 13:06, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Robert Rimgård 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me--Lmbuga 19:15, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Digital television camera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments This one is nice and sharp. The red rail is quite distracting though. --99of9 05:16, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zinkensdamms IP February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:37, 20 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympia Ice resurfacerb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 02:35, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Barnängen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vassil 20:57, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rocking horse in Södra Hammarbyhamnen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think those are actually ducks though. --Mattbuck 20:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Grand Hôtel, Stockholm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Tough decision but finally I support this one. There are 3 more competitors but either the quality or the light is not so good. Anyway, I would like to see a bit more of the neighbour buildings.--MrPanyGoff 15:36, 22 February 2012 (UTC)  Comment Thank you. The images is cropped, so I can upload a new version with more space--ArildV (talk) 15:54, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support (ec) I agree with MrPanyGoff. I wavered about this for a while, particularly looking at File:Grand Hotel, Stockholm.jpg, which does show the neighboring buildings nicely. But in the end I will say that we have no photo better than this one; if I were to pick just one photo to illustrate an article about this building, I would pick this one. cmadler (talk) 15:59, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 16:11, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Dag Hammarskjold-2.jpg

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dag Hammarskjöld.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment Very good photo. This one is also interesting and serious competitor. Can you find out if these images are taken in his United Nations office or elsewhere?--MrPanyGoff 16:30, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Oppose Certainly best in scope, but needs to be geocoded (and ideally also a written description of the location). This should also probably be added to the gallery, Dag Hammarskjöld, which needs some work. I will support it once it is geocoded. cmadler (talk) 16:38, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
•  Comment I found some picture from UN 1, 2 with location "United Nations, New York". --ArildV (talk) 17:07, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

  Geocode and gallery  Done.--ArildV (talk) 17:19, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

 Support Good. --MrPanyGoff 18:18, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

•  Support My concerns have been addressed. Best in scope, meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 19:32, 22 February 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 16:36, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued image promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bow visors.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria; best in scope. cmadler (talk) 13:23, 15 February 2012 (UTC)

Scores:

1. MS Mariella Bow visor February 2012.jpg: +1
3. Malta BW 2011-10-08 08-54-23.JPG: +0 
=>
File:MS Mariella Bow visor February 2012.jpg: Promoted.
File:Malta BW 2011-10-08 08-54-23.JPG: Declined.

--MrPanyGoff 10:15, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

-- MrPanyGoff 11:00, 1 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manillaskolan February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Seems OK to me. --Mattbuck 23:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Olympia Ice resurfacer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Does he dream of driving it all over Saskatchewan? --Mattbuck 23:24, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lars Almström 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Vassil 10:36, 29 February 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Drottningholm Palace Church.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:34, 4 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:30, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandvik February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Maybe slightly too much blue?) --NorbertNagel 18:21, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Magnus Muhrén.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Meets the criteria, imo.--MrPanyGoff 19:35, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Dr.Haus (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby vs GAIS 2012-02-11 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magnus Muhrén 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:12, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oljekvarnen February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done--ArildV 22:55, 15 March 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 23:08, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the promotion! It wouldn't surprise me if it was indeed the oldest camera in active use around here. :) Lewis Collard! (lol, internet) 19:23, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Personalvillan Waldemarsudde February 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality but a little bit tilted. --Moonik 11:46, 18 March 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version.ArildV 12:07, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sicklauddsbron november 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality for me. --Jkadavoor 05:53, 21 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Väddö Augusti 2011b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Something wrong with the light (probably underexposed). + annotated dust spot. Take care of the pixellisation of the sky ! All seems correctible--Jebulon 09:26, 22 March 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version.ArildV 12:35, 23 March 2012 (UTC)Yes ! Good to me now, thank you for new upload.--Jebulon 16:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Abbe and Madicken outside Djurgården 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 20:00, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hians mot forsen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Tack! Innebär det alla WLM-bilderna för 2011?

Catasa, 2 april 2012 kl. 21.10 (CEST)

Hej!

Jag är inte säker på att jag förstår frågan rätt. Det är bara enstaka bilder som har nominerats av olika användare. Du kan även nominera dina egna bilder om du vill. Vänligen --ArildV (talk) 08:26, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Tack! Jag tror jag förstår bättre nu! Catasa, 3 april 2012 kl. 22.30 (CEST)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Härjedalen 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 08:43, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Malmö February 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --S nova 17:44, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Villa Jägarhyddan november 2011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 18:40, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Crop idea

From my point of view, your suggested crop will make the image too tight. I think the unsharp foreground works as a semantic crop. Moreover, we see a person who works mostly with and for people — among those people. I have already cropped more faces from right and left. What if I blur the hair on the left side, will it be enough?--PereslavlFoto (talk) 10:38, 17 April 2012 (UTC)

Maybe it will improve, but I prefer to crop here. It's just my opinion, I could be wrong. If you like it the way it is, keep it. Maybe some one else will promote. Regards, --ArildV (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kungshamra 2011c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 23:38, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra Hammarbyhamnen 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI, considering the light situation. --NorbertNagel 19:17, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort lighthouse 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's good, but it will be even better, if you add some exposure. --Iifar 09:10, 29 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you, i uploaded a new version.--ArildV 09:22, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good for me--Lmbuga 01:06, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012e.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but the horizon is a bit tilted--Lmbuga 00:56, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good, light, sharpness and composition.--Jebulon 23:49, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 01:03, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012i.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 18:31, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012r.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Just missing geocode. --Selbymay 12:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I will add geocode to all my photos from Landsort.--ArildV 14:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012n.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The tower is leaning to the left. --Iifar 17:29, 1 May 2012 (UTC) Correct. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 17:58, 1 May 2012 (UTC).  Support Fine with me now. --Iifar 18:14, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012o.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:38, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Arizona, Glen Canyon Bridge, highway 89.jpg

Thanks for notyfying me aobout this "Subcarpathian Voivodeship" problem. I'll fix the "Wikiekspedycja 2012 USA" template in a moment, it was copied from "Wikiekspedycja 2011", that took place in "Subcarpathian Voivodeship". ;) -- Cheers, CLI (talk) 08:39, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendals slott panorama May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 15:35, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012q.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Done. I also re-crop the image (7:6) to get more space around the ship, and to avoid a tight upper cropArildV 11:41, 3 May 2012 (UTC)  Support QI with good compositon for me. --R-bitzer 0:42, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus ridibundus 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:18, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hökarängens centrum 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 16:30, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rosendals slott (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope rectified with (Exterior). --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:09, 2 May 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Ezarateesteban 18:26, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 20:02, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skogskyrkogården April 2012f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:26, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monumenthallen 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice --Carschten 21:28, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sjöskumspipan 4 2012g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:50, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen April 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice! --kallerna 14:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen April 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Ok IMO. --kallerna 14:44, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skogskyrkogården April 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skogskyrkogården April 2012g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:33, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Landsort lighthouse 2012b.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Landsort lighthouse 2012b.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen 2012k.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:28, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Nämdö 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The background building mnerges with the ship, but QI nevertheless to me --Cayambe 13:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Södertörn 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:17, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kvarnholmen 2012 BW.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion is intentional here I guess. QI to me. --Cayambe 07:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebherr LTM 1055b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Liebherr LTM 1055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 19:58, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manillaskola (Exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support This is better quality, imo. The description should be more informative, please.--MrPanyGoff 09:50, 7 May 2012 (UTC) {

 Done.ArildV (talk) 11:26, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 18:52, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholmsarenan May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Great photo, but it needs a perspective correction. Can you apply (e.g. with hugin or Lightroon)? --NorbertNagel 20:45, 7 May 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version (using GIMP). --ArildV 09:36, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hökarängens centrum 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, although I would reduce the highlights a bit. - A.Savin 23:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handelsvägen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent lighting. --Cayambe 14:30, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Trijnstel_talk 22:22, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Discuss

[1] Because i could not promote or decline with QIHelper. Sorry, this page is hard to understand for me. I prefer Wikipédia to Commons...You can revocate. --Orikrin1998 10:05, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

You don't have to do anything. The images was was already promoted. Otherwise it would have been "nomination" and not "promotion" Regards--ArildV (talk) 10:17, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

See also here.--ArildV (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Merci ! --Orikrin1998 10:51, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lilla Sickla 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 09:56, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holmentornet 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Fine with me. --Iifar 14:31, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WTNkpng1 ArildV Matteus kyrka 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 09:38, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WTNkpng1 ArildV Norra Promenaden 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good enough IMHO --V-wolf 10:52, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statoil 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 12:07, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice light--Lmbuga 18:16, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luma tram stop 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 11:26, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda 2012f.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments a bit shady, but great composition --Carschten 13:34, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max Hammarby sjöstad 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:46, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacka 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:30, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WTNkpng1 ArildV Norrköping stadsbibliotek 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't want to comment on the image quality, but am I the only person who sees a major problem with putting a fountain in a place full of paper? Mattbuck 19:44, 15 May 2012 (UTC) The fountain and water is behind the stair here. Perhaps the architect was trying to avoid a wall, and chose water instead. The library was controversial (especially the exterior, and that it replaced an older building) but IMO a good example of brutalism architecture and a nice library.--ArildV 06:08, 16 May 2012 (UTC)  Support I have chosen my book :) QI to me. --Myrabella 22:33, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WTNkpng1 ArildV Drags kraftstation 2012.jpeg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 16:09, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Allébron maj 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments ! --Carschten 15:43, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wiki Takes Norrköping 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:19, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Värmekyrkan 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Specify the source, you don't take the photo in 1927 --Ezarate 16:34, 19 May 2012 (UTC) Please read the information again. Taken by me 12 May 2012. --ArildV 12:17, 20 May 2012 (UTC) Why was it taken black and white? Ezarate 00:53, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Why not? I like to shoot black and white sometimes (mostly in real raw format) and I thought it worked well here (and highlights the building's structure).--ArildV 18:23, 21 May 2012 (UTC) Needs to be tilted a bit anticlockwise I think. Mattbuck 16:08, 24 May 2012 (UTC) Thanks. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 17:34, 24 May 2012 (UTC) OK. Mattbuck 20:47, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dannemora.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 14:21, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österbybruk 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 08:20, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vattholma 2012d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice bokeh with the f/2.8. I find it natural that the letters are hard to read due to the age of the milestone. Good annotations. --Slaunger 19:59, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobo 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 09:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Österbybruk 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Please remove a tiny dustspot in the sky at left (or might it be a bird?) --Cayambe 19:46, 29 May 2012 (UTC) Done Thank you.--ArildV 20:43, 27 May 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altomta 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadsgården 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 13:21, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hammarby sjöstad 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me.--JLPC 08:35, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tobo 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 21:38, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mannagrynskvarnen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:42, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chroicocephalus ridibundus 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Makele-90 17:59, 5 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Örbyhus 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:50, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finnboda 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:20, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Djurgården 11 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --JLPC 08:23, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tierp 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 19:08, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Askungen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 11:48, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charketuristen 7 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:26, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Ballong Hammarby sjöstad 2012.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 09:43, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charkuteristen 5 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like it. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunna gruvor 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK imo. - A.Savin 11:51, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brunna gruvor 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Bit borderline, but ok. --Mattbuck 13:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luma GP 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:57, 11 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Monasterio de Andechs, Alemania 2012-05-01, DD 33.JPG

Hello ArildV, thsnks for your comments, hints and for your offer to work the RAW file. I have the file and can upload it somewhere where you have access, but before that, I just tried it once more, please, let me know what you think, all the best, Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Hello,

To show you what I meant, I uploaded a new version. Feel free to replace it with your own version from the RAW file. All I did to improve the color was to adjust the "colour temperature". I also adjusted the exposure (+one step) and also adjusted highlights and shadows. Regards--ArildV (talk) 08:49, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinstaden 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kallerna 09:16, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vattholma 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 19:02, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tierp järnvägsstation 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --Florstein 19:42, 14 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012l.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perhaps bad white balance? --Berthold Werner 08:23, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you. You are absolutly right. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 19:09, 14 June 2012 (UTC) Good now. --Berthold Werner 06:31, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballong Hammarby sjöstad 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Though a bit dark in the lower part... QI to me. --Cayambe 06:29, 15 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdals reningsverk 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:09, 16 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012z.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012y.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:49, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallwylska museet 2012 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I think it needs a slight tilt ccw, otherwise I like it! V-wolf 06:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you. New version uploaded.--ArildV 07:33, 19 June 2012 (UTC) I think it's straight now, so I promote. V-wolf 08:19, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Familjebostäder 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färila 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks good to me. --Iifar 15:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fjärila 2012d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Imo here is needed little crop on the left. --Iifar 16:05, 21 June 2012 (UTC) Thank you for your review. I uploaded a new version (crop, and also WB, less blue).--ArildV 16:33, 21 June 2012 (UTC).  Support Good quality. --Iifar 18:04, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hallwylska Palatset 2012-kitchen 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäckevallen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:08, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bro över Kesuån 2012d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice picture! -- MJJR 21:42, 22 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bro över Kesuån 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 09:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reindeer in Ljungdalen 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent. --Florstein 20:53, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reindeer Torkilstöten 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Selbymay 16:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reindeer in Ljungdalen 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:38, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postvallen 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Postvallen 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:45, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färila 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI, imho.--V-wolf 13:56, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Färila kyrka 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments New version with better WB.--ArildV 14:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högvålen 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me... though for my taste there is a bit too much of macadam at the bottom. :-) --Cayambe 15:58, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högvålen 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 12:46, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högvålens kapell 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:07, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lean-to Torkilstöten 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:14, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tännäs church (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment This view appears to be the best possible. I suggest to add (exterior)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:44, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

•  Info Done.--ArildV (talk) 18:54, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
•  Support VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. MrPanyGoff 21:10, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chroicocephalus ridibundus 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Excellent! --Florstein 17:33, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bro över Kesuån 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 12:57, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reindeer Torkilstöten 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good! --Iifar 15:30, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högvålens kapell 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacka strand 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 20:56, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! House in Mälen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharpness not perfect (right part of the house), but sufficient for QI IMO.--Jebulon 16:35, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Torkilstöten June 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:28, 1 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tännäs kyrka 2012c.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Well chosen camera position. You have made the best of the poor lighting conditions. QI to me. --Cayambe 07:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vargstjärnsstöten 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice scenery, qi to me. --Cayambe 08:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --AzaToth 20:45, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and useful --Poco a poco 19:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Globen sedd från slakthusområdet 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:51, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ryssebergen 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks to me like there is too much blue. --NorbertNagel 16:00, 8 July 2012 (UTC) I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 19:37, 8 July 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 08:23, 9 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Louis de Geer konsert & kongress 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks ok to me. --Iifar 10:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:42, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Larus fuscus Finnboda 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:55, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholms roddförening 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Danrok 18:58, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet May 2012 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. -- JLPC 18:08, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cairn Torkilstöten 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality! One tiny spot on the sky (perhaps a bird). --Iifar 15:08, 19 July 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I removed the bird/spot--ArildV 18:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012å.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landsort 2012g.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 14:22, 20 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tugboat Tug July 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinderella II Nacka Strand 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:13, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marinstaden July 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:32, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tug July 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cinderella II Nacka Strand 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Funäsdalens kyrka 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice and good quality! --Iifar 17:59, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stockholmsarenan August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:54, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 15:58, 24 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ekerö centrum 2012 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 08:05, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charkuteristen 5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:22, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Charkuteristen 1 August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 13:13, 26 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hjälpslaktaren 2 August 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:21, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vemdalens kyrka 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:13, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hemmet August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very "clean" !--Jebulon 14:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm palace August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good for me. Good quality--Lmbuga 23:23, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholm slottspark August 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 21:22, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drottningholms slottskyrka August 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, please remove one dust spot. --Iifar 12:09, 1 September 2012 (UTC) Done, thank you.--ArildV 12:38, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Slakthusområdet August 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good --Carschten 14:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solna station August 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:19, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Apollo kitharoides Drottningholm.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 06:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götiska tornet August 2012a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:56, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trädgårdsmästarebostaden Svartsjö slott 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Trädgårdsmästarebostaden Svartsjö slott 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:01, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svartsjö slott August 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 18:51, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skå kyrka 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 18:04, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Götiska tornet August 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for your review. I uploaded a new version. --ArildV 19:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svartsjö slott August 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skå kyrkskola 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 10:12, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! X60 Riddarholmen September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments very good --Ralf Roletschek 16:29, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svartsjö slott August 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's good, but it will be better if you add a bit more exposure and contrast. --Iifar 18:49, 6 September 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review and suggestions. I'll see what I can do. But I'm not quite sure the exposure. --ArildV 22:50, 6 September 2012 (UTC)Where is the good exposure (and therefore the right color) ? here, or here ? --Jebulon 09:58, 7 September 2012 (UTC) My mistake. I read wrong, I thought lifar wanted less exposure. Sorry. I'll try to upload a new version tonight.--ArildV 16:18, 7 September 2012 (UTC) I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 16:34, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Drottningholm palace August 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholm palace August 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka september 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High quality photo -- George Chernilevsky 20:48, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka september 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 20:56, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka september 2012 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 19:13, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Dannemora.jpg

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Dannemora.jpg|base=Image license}} Jarekt (talk) 16:35, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing this --Jarekt (talk) 17:22, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing it out. Regards--ArildV (talk) 17:39, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Johannisberg September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dramaten September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö Rävstaviken September 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 06:27, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö september 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality image for me. --Frank Schulenburg 04:09, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö Edesnäs September 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good--Jebulon 15:25, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö kyrka september 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:00, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö gruvor Nyköpingsgruvan September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 42 September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sofia kyrka September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:38, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Sky of File:Rocher El Torcal 1.jpg

Hello ArildV

First, I want to thank you about you always useful reviews of my pictures (and your frequent lenient supports !), and congratulate you for the quality of yours.

Some additional infos about the sky in the picture mentionned above, in the QIC page:

I really don't know how to add a "fake" sky behind a picture. If I knew how, I surely would have add some clouds, because highly blue skys like this one are a bit boring, IMO. But I guess a fake sky is always visible , and the digital manipulation is probably very difficult.

Maybe I misused the polarizing filter (picture was taken in "high" mountain), because at the end, I had some very ugly artifacts (pixellization etc...), so I tried to correct it by "softening" a more uniform existing color. In some places, I used a "brush" near the stone, and I see now a small issue with the very little "bush" at right.

By the way, did you notice the (annotated) plane ? It is absolutely true, not fake ! ;)

Do you think the image can "pass" at it is ? If not, please let me know, and I'll try to rework it.

Since two weeks, I'm discovering "Lightroom 4" (I mainly used GIMP previously) as software and I'm trying to use it as best as possible, but I'm really a newbie ! Now, I've just learned how to make "blue" a "grey" sky !

Anyway, thank you very much again for comments.

Se dig snart,--Jebulon (talk) 16:26, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the kind words and the great images you upload to Commons. I guess one can use en:Photomontage to add a "fake sky".Thanks for your explanation. The image is certainly good enough for QI, I was just curious.

Thanks for your comment here by the way. I do not know if something is wrong (or if I can change something). I was not exactly in front of the church, but slightly to the right (to avoid the tree on the left). Perhaps it confuses the eye? Best regards, --ArildV (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Nyckelviken September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. --Iifar 07:23, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Direktörsvillan Svartsjö slott 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 07:21, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Y1 train at Fågelsjö Station 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 10:49, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumper GD 600 S 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:34, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strandvägen 7AB September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 08:26, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum and Skeppsholmsbron September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:44, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Street in Södra Hammarbyhamnen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 18:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Photo review

Hi Arild!
Yes, crop from my own garden. And this too. Thanks for review.
With best regards, George -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:09, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stora Nyckelviken September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice.Here his family house near Paris.--Jebulon 14:06, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeppsbron 24 September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, needs geoloc though. --Coyau 06:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Thank you. Geoloc added to both images.--ArildV 06:22, 20 September 2012 (UTC) Great. --Coyau 06:27, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeppsbron 26 September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, needs geoloc though. --Coyau 06:15, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skeppsbron 18 September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 18:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hornsgatan 32 September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:02, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Svartsjö palace, exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Meets all criteria. cmadler (talk) 13:24, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:24, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Riddarholmen May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good--Jebulon 10:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tram Norrköping May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 15:02, 22 September 2012 (UTC) -- Nice picture, but can you do something about the overexposed sky? --DKrieger 16:57, 22 September 2012 (UTC) Thank you (both for the review and comments), I uploaded a new version. There was poor lighting conditions and a pale sky, but I hope that the new version is better.--ArildV 19:37, 22 September 2012 (UTC) - Now the pic seems perfect to me! I am sorry that I can not promote it again ;) --DKrieger 21:22, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 10:06, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kajkrogen 1 September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 12:44, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danvikshem 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:51, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dumper GD 601 S 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:28, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nordanvind April 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please crop out the "halfperson" at left, and correct the slight magenta CA left and right (windows of the buildings) ? The background is a bit disturbing, but the main subject is sharp, nice and interesting. I'll promote when done, thanks in advance.--Jebulon 10:18, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Thank you. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 10:33, 23 September 2012 (UTC) Good now.--Jebulon 18:09, 25 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skå kyrka 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årsta bäckravin 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good and nice -- Lothar Spurzem 14:49, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Årstabron September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 14:03, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Danviksklippan May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:19, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Manu Sareen at Göteborg Book Fair 2012 (crop).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Philo Ikonya at Göteborg Book Fair 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:05, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Västra Frölunda kyrka september 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you for your review. I uploaded a new version.--ArildV 20:44, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rivö September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:15, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Manu Sareen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support The geocoding in this case does not seem to me essential. VI for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:26, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Myrabella (talk) 22:22, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bastionplatsen September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. --Iifar 19:37, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mariakyrkan September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Skanskaskrapan september 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 10:28, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vrångö September 2012 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:34, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --Mattbuck 11:21, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 07:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality of a nice place. --Cayambe 11:33, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments for a photo almost unbearably beautiful --Ralf Roletschek 07:31, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good to me.--Jebulon 15:23, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:54, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sara Bergmark Elfgren at Göteborg Book Fair 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:33, 1 October 2012 (UTC) Comment The shadow in the face is disturbing. -- Lothar Spurzem 10:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kent Werne at Göteborg Book Fair 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 12:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sara Bergmark Elfgren.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment It would be interresting to say who is the person; the caption of the image does not say either. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:30, 1 October 2012 (UTC)  Done Swedish writer. She has written Cirkeln together with Mats Strandberg.--ArildV (talk) 08:37, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 12:03, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:06, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Diana September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 08:04, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mölndals kvarnby September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:35, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carin Wirsén at Göteborg Book Fair 2012b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:03, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mölndals Kvarnby September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:15, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bjørn Kalsø.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:50, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 11:41, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gunnebo slott September 2012 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for QI --NorbertNagel 20:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mölndals Kvarnby September 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 20:13, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vrångö September 2012 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Iifar 11:12, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dag Sebastian Ahlander at Göteborg Book Fair 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good portrait. --Selbymay 08:10, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kontoristföreningens hus September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:37, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit more contrast near the roof wouldn't have hurt, but the picture is definitely QI to me. Very good composition! --DKrieger 19:39, 6 October 2012 (UTC) Thank you very mutch for your review. I uploaded a new version with a little bit more contrast and highlights.--ArildV 20:07, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Näsets kyrka September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, though the image would benefit from removing the foliage at the upper left. Regards, --Cayambe 14:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC) Thanks for the review. I dont think I can manage to do it, the background with clouds and the sky is too complicated. If someone else wants to do it, I'm grateful Regards.--ArildV 14:25, 5 October 2012 (UTC)  Done If you do not like it, please revert it. Regards, --Cayambe 23:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! SJ Rc6 1351 Uppsala October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 09:29, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mats Strandberg at Swecon 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Solnedgång Beckholmen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uppsala slott sett från Botaniska trädgården oktober 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Botaniska trädgården oktober 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 19:59, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uppsala Castle October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. - A.Savin 09:25, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Rivö at Vrångö Island September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 16:09, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Styrsö kyrka September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:17, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Mats Strandberg.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Joe Abercrombie.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:42, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 13:31, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vershuset October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:54, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Upplands museum October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and good. --Selbymay 12:02, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Valö September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 12:09, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Uppsala central station October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:23, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Valö September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Thank you.  Done. --ArildV 12:20, 12 October 2012 (UTC) Good quality. --NorbertNagel 07:07, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pumphuset Uppsala October 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good.--Jebulon 13:37, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Upplandsmuseet September 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Utö Rävstaviken September 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 15:42, 15 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ballonger Norra Hammarbyhamnen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 02:06, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear ArildV, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 20:07, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BELL B25D MK VI.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 21:47, 25 October 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Andreasegde

Hi,

I am discussing with a user who is now uploading lower quality versions of photos over older ones. I was trying to convince him to stop or change his method, but he refuses to accept the fact that his uploads are of lower quality than originals. Could you write a few words confirming that new versions are poorer. Beside of course, the tilt, wich this person corrects, but other factors get worse. disussion. --sfu (talk) 19:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Done. I agree about the quality.--ArildV (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen September 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:06, 3 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosendals palace May 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Rzuwig 21:26, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rosendals palace May 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rosendals palace May 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:11, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Styrsö September 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:18, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vrångö missionskyrka September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 21:03, 15 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tug July 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 20:44, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Direktörsvillan Trädgårdsföreningen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 16:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Styrsö kyrka September 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:25, 24 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vesta Styresö 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. - A.Savin 13:21, 27 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Styrsö kyrka September 2012 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting composition and good quality. --Selbymay 10:22, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jungle gym Hammarbyterrassen 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 22:12, 29 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Playground Södra Hammarbyhamnen December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:39, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sickla Udde December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 12:09, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsmora December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 09:30, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:20, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja kyrka December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:58, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja kyrka December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lucasbosch 20:22, 2 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Södra Stavsudda December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 07:35, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice.--Jebulon 15:57, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Some (short) branches could be cropped on the left, but QI anyway. --JLPC 18:47, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MS Lisen December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Background houses seem overexposed, if you have RAW please reduce exposure. -- A.Savin 11:29, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Sorry, my misstake. New version uploaded. Thank you for your review. --ArildV 15:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)  Support --A.Savin 16:48, 3 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsmora brygga 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Iifar 11:47, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 15:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:29, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sicklauddsbron December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Coyau 16:13, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Möja December 2012 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments nice. QI --Rjcastillo 15:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Viberö Långvik December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:42, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsmora December 2012 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 14:07, 5 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Berg December 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berg December 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:02, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:20, 6 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Berg December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moonik 17:59, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Granholmen brygga december 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI imo --Rjcastillo 14:07, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

File:RQ-170 Sentinel in Iran.jpg

Thanks for your vigilance, but I've explained everything below^[2] and he also put explanation in Flickr^[3]. I hope everything is fine now, only problem would be if Lockheed Martin sue us. :) Personally I don't think it's something artistically remarkably, but I nominated it because it's rare. --Orijentolog (talk) 16:31, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the explanation and for uploading the image to Commons.--ArildV (talk) 23:28, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Henriksdalshamnen December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 14:13, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ramsmora December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted anticlockwise, and also pretty. Mattbuck 09:41, 3 December 2012 (UTC) New version uploaded, tilt corrected--ArildV 10:02, 3 December 2012 (UTC) Would you mind reviewing again?--ArildV 09:16, 11 December 2012 (UTC)QI for me. Nice composition and good exposure under difficult light condition. --Isiwal 12:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Fd Biograf Puck december 2012 02.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 16:45, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Norrström December 2012.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Norrström December 2012.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:16, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högalids församlingshus December 2012 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK to me --A.Savin 10:06, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adolf Fredriks kyrka december 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:05, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Drakenbergsområdet December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 19:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carl XIV John statue at Slussen December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:22, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nationalmuseum December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 05:59, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedvig Eleonora kyrka December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI - I know that problem and do not like extreme perspective correction (in that case the church would look like a turtle) --Isiwal 22:57, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högalids församlingshus December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:53, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karl XII Kungsträdgården December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good Quality --Rjcastillo 13:28, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Isiwal 14:41, 18 December 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Simon's 1888 Gothenburg map.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Simon's 1888 Gothenburg map.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:31, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas

Wish you a Merry Christmas and a very very happy new year. -- Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

2013!

		* * * 2013 !!! * * *
		Hi Arild! Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:44, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Norrström December 2012 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 18:44, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sankt Johannes kyrka December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sankt Johannes kyrka, Stockholm (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Mostly unobstructed, geocoded, criteria satisfied. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 21:26, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hedvig Eleonora kyrka (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support All criteria met --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Yann (talk) 12:17, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kornhamnstorg 61 December 2012.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting and good quality, I guess there is nothing straight here --Poco a poco 18:34, 25 December 2012 (UTC)