User talk:Ardfern/Archive 11

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 9

Re: File:Switch House, Tate Modern, London, October 2016 (12).JPG

Hi, Ardfern. Louise Bourgeois only died in 2010. Isn't her work copyrighted pretty much everywhere? --Rrburke (talk) 14:04, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Briggate,_Leeds

Briggate, Leeds has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

BMacZero (talk) 16:56, 20 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Istanbul Airlines/Best Air (Turkey)

Hi I have reverted your edits. These are supposed to be in both defunct airline categories, so that there is (eventually) both a complete list of all defunct airlines and also one by each country Ardfern (talk) 01:39, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Where was this decided, when, by whom? It is against our categorization practice. If you cannot show me a consensus reached somewhere we will mutually revert each other. --E4024 (talk) 01:42, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No idea when, by whom etc, its been common and accepted practice in the aviation area for many years. Main example is Aircraft by registration and then Aircraft by country of registration, allowing the ability to see a complete list of all aircraft registered, as well as those by country. I understood there was discussion on this ages ago and this was the accepted way forward. Submit for discussion if you can't accept it. Ardfern (talk) 01:54, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of year of manufacture

Recently you started to remove the year of manufacture from many files, like here or here.

What is the reason for removing these informations, which had been added throughout the years with a lot of work by both you, me and others? --Uli Elch (talk) 08:34, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not from many files, largely from Boeing 747-400 freighter conversions (-400BCF and -400BDSF). This is because the freighter conversions were not actually built in the original year and only became BCF/BDSF when converted at a later date. If this is causing confusion I am happy to revert the changes made. Apart from that I am trying to add as many years of manufacture as I can. Ardfern (talk) 08:44, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your quick reply. Hitherto, it has been consensus to insert the year the airframe was actually built, not the conversion date (which is obscure in many cases anyway). Using the "new" method it might well happen that a Basler BT-67 conversion of a venerable 1940s DC-3 might get the label "manufactured in 2014" which in my opinion is grossly misleading for 98% of users. --Uli Elch (talk) 09:16, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I will revert all to airframe manufacture date. Ardfern (talk) 10:27, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please use sub-categories

When categorising files, please avoid placing them into several categories that are directly linked within the same tree (e.g. a parent category and a child category – like Category:United Kingdom and Category:London), to prevent over-categorization of files and over-population of categories. Usually, only the most specific category should be used. See Commons:Categories for more details. Thank you.

––Apalsola ^{t • c} 12:36, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks for this advice! and also the reversion re Blue1 - I thought we were in the middle of discussion on this, or has some sort of decision been taken Ardfern (talk) 16:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ardfern/Archive 11,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:17, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ardfern/Archive 11,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Ardfern/Archive 11,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:07, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

C-130 category changes

Hi Ardfern, just wondering why you are creating a split category tree for the C-30s? This is resulting in Category:C-130J Hercules existing at the same time as, and being a subcategory of, Category:Lockheed C-130J Hercules, same with Category:C-130J Hercules (United States Air Force) and Category:Lockheed C-130J Hercules of the United States Air Force. This is massively confusing and unnecessarily tedious for end users to navigate, much less comprehend. Please, pick a naming scheme for the whole family and apply evenly. — Huntster (t @ c) 17:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Split category only temporary, still working on the changes, only one pair of hands Ardfern (talk) 20:08, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, just seemed very random. Thanks for the note. — Huntster (t @ c) 20:45, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, you can expand the {{Usaf serial}} template to incorporate all but one of the categories you have been adding (and I'm trying to get that incorporated too). Might save you some time, and the template makes it backward and forward compatible and fairly future-proof. See my edit to see what I mean. — Huntster (t @ c) 06:01, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Good job on the template. Thanks Ardfern (talk) 08:27, 14 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin, October 2010 (02).JPG

File:National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin, October 2010 (02).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:04, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boeing_747-200BSF

Boeing 747-200BSF has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Estopedist1 (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2010_in_Maldives

Category:2010_in_Maldives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Robby (talk) 23:01, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2011_in_Maldives

Category:2011_in_Maldives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Robby (talk) 23:03, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2007_in_Maldives

Category:2007_in_Maldives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Robby (talk) 09:59, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:2009_in_Maldives

Category:2009_in_Maldives has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Robby (talk) 10:03, 1 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Airports by IATA code and Category:Airports by ICAO code

What is the purpose of these categories? ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 13:25, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I would have thought that was pretty self evident. I have been doing a lot of work recently on trying to fully categorise Cessna files. The 'by location' categorisation is sometimes difficult as airport codes are often hard to find and/or search by. This was an attempt to remedy this by providing easier access to IATA and ICAO coding. Happy for it to go to discussion if you disagree. Ardfern (talk) 17:08, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I do disagree. I nominated the both categories for discussion. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 21:00, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Airports_by_IATA_code

Airports by IATA code has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Apalsola ^{t • c} 20:46, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request granted

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request.

Request reason: "This has nothing to do with me and it is not my IP address. Ardfern (talk) 18:32, 17 December 2019 (UTC)"[reply]

Unblock reason: "I made you IP block exempt. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 18 December 2019 (UTC)"[reply]

This template should be archived normally.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ português ∙ suomi ∙ हिन्दी ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ 中文（臺灣） ∙ +/−

Incorrect claims of own work

Hi. I just stumbled across File:Alfred Hopkinson.jpg, which you uploaded and licensed as your own work despite it being published 127 years ago. While you can claim some derivative effort for scanning the file, we need to have the original copyright holder's licence as well. In this case the author is apparently unknown, so I have used {{Unknown|author}}{{PD-Scan|1=PD-old-assumed}}{{PD-US-expired}} as the image was published over 120 years ago. Taking a quick look at some of your other recent uploads I notice that you have made the same claim of authorship for files created before your lifetime. Would you mind going back to your previous uploads and setting the correct author and licence? Thanks. From Hill To Shore (talk) 20:12, 3 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wasn't trying to claim as my own work, hence the addition of the source, just wasn't aware of all the licensing stuff you have supplied above. Have never seen it before on such files, but will implement, may take some time to go back over the numerous such files I have added. Ardfern (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for agreeing to review your uploads. As a general tip, the standard creative commons licences insert the words, "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license." You also left your name in the "author" field. If you didn't create the image and are not claiming copyright, you need to double check which licence tag should be added. See Commons:Licensing for a general guide but if you are unsure then you can ask for advice on specific files at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:22, 4 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again. I was just wondering about how you are getting on. Do you need any assistance or advice with converting your old uploads? From Hill To Shore (talk) 00:09, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Can you please respond to say if you are making progress? From Hill To Shore (talk) 22:44, 31 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. It has been a third of a year since you agreed to fix this but since then you have ignored my requests for an update. Can you please advise on what action you are taking to resolve this?

If you are not willing to talk to me, I'll have to bring this up at the user problems board and ask another editor to get involved. From Hill To Shore (talk) 14:40, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Its not that I am not willing to talk to you, but I have a lot of other Wikimedia work on which currently takes precedence. I have amended some files as requested and will get on to the others when time allows. 25 amended recently. Ardfern (talk) 22:51, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the update. An acknowledgement that you were actually doing something was all that I was after. While you may have other things you are working on that you consider important, the correct licensing of files is a cornerstone of the project, so it is vital that these are fixed. If you are continuing to make progress with corrections, then that is fine. The problem with the licenses not being fixed is that the images may be reused outside of Wikimedia (such as in a book) and you are credited as the creator, leading to confusion of the licensing for years to come. From Hill To Shore (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Got it. Thanks for the lesson. I understand Ardfern (talk) 13:51, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Ardfern/Archive 11

Contents

Re: File:Switch House, Tate Modern, London, October 2016 (12).JPG

Category:Briggate,_Leeds

Istanbul Airlines/Best Air (Turkey)

Unexplained removal of year of manufacture

Please use sub-categories

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Important message for file movers

C-130 category changes

File:National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin, October 2010 (02).JPG

Category:Boeing_747-200BSF

Category:2010_in_Maldives

Category:2011_in_Maldives

Category:2007_in_Maldives

Category:2009_in_Maldives

Category:Airports by IATA code and Category:Airports by ICAO code

Category:Airports_by_IATA_code

Incorrect claims of own work

Navigation menu

User talk:Ardfern/Archive 11

Re: File:Switch House, Tate Modern, London, October 2016 (12).JPG

Istanbul Airlines/Best Air (Turkey)

Unexplained removal of year of manufacture

Please use sub-categories

Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Important message for file movers

C-130 category changes

Category:Airports by IATA code and Category:Airports by ICAO code

Incorrect claims of own work

Navigation menu

Search