User talk:Antoinetav

Image Tagging Image:Ionesco.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ionesco.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. High on a tree 10:54, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

The page still doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is still unclear. --|EPO| 22:18, 18 January 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Epuration biologique.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Epuration biologique.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 17:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:MâleGTmain.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MâleGTmain.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 17:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Kleber au lycée kleber.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Kleber au lycée kleber.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. 91.65.124.74 17:21, 13 August 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:MaleGT.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:MaleGT.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. OsamaK 04:03, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Reg_alim.gif

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Reg_alim.gif. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. OsamaK 04:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:CycleGT.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CycleGT.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. OsamaK 04:05, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

File:Tashilhunpo2.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Demande de suppression d'image

Bonjour, pourrai tu supprimer l'image ici que j'ai importé il y a quelque temps. Je ne préfère pas expliquer cette demande de suppression de façon public ici tend que l'image n'est pas supprimé (une fois la surpression faite je pourrai t'expliquer). Merci d'avance Antoinetav (talk) 23:05, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

 Done "Uploader request" suffit comme motif ;) Bonne continuation.--Bapti ✉ 09:20, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Ah, je vois que Bapti est toujours aussi réactif :-) -- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 09:44, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monk in Tashilhunpo3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like this one. An interesting scene, no tilt, saturation very strong but acceptable. --Iotatau 23:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landscape evereste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good. Yann 05:31, 3 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kumbum Gyantse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Decline

You mention, "Decline Sky and the church overexposed". Could you please explain this position? There is a photo of a white chirch, that cannot become 18% gray on the resulting photograph. Thanks.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:11, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hello, yes it is true the church is not overexposed and I am sorry to have write that. But the background is really over exposed and a with church on a background with it is...not enough clear for my eye. The contrast is not clear and the church would suit better with a blue sky. I am sorry but I think that it is not a QI. Antoinetav (talk) 22:45, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

So the problem is that I made my try with a wrong light conditions. Thank you for the answer and the advice, maybe someday I'll do the picture with a blue sky.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 12:16, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Image: Papilio rumanzovia5.jpg

Your image Papilio rumanzovia5.jpg is misidentified. I believe it is a en:Pachliopta kotzebuea. Dger (talk) 02:50, 12 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sugiton5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sharp and beautiful --Croucrou 18:18, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Antoinetav!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Grand Canyon 11.jpg was uncategorized on 26 June 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:40, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Cat in Petra

Bonjour Antoine,
while updating todays "selected anniversaries" for the homepage of de.wikipedia, I found your image of the cat in Petra - love it :)
It is now part of todays de:Wikipedia:Hauptseite/Jahrestage/August/22.
Bien cordialement, Tsui (talk)

Regarding the file http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wadi_Rum.jpg

I have been in Jordan two weeks ago, and this photo shows the area of Petra and not Wadi rum, which is over 50km south of it. It has been made from the Kings Highway and in the background you see the Jordan Valley. The approximate location from where the photo was made is 30°10'37.21"N and 35°25'40.53"E, looking northwest.

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

---

Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 08:45, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Replicas of Academy Award statuette 2.jpg

And also:

• File:Replicas of Academy Award statuette 3.jpg
• File:Replicas of Academy Award statuette.jpg

Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 19:55, 26 July 2013 (UTC)

Your photo on the main page Oct 16

Hello Antoinetav; Just to let you know, your magnificent photo "File:Drigung monastery10.jpg" will be on the main page of the English Wikipedia on October 16, 2014, as it accompanies my Featured Article w:Tintin in Tibet, scheduled here: w:Wikipedia:Today's featured article/October 16, 2014. I really love your photo; such awe-inspiring beauty of Tibet. Cheers. Prhartcom (talk) 20:02, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for that ! Antoinetav (talk) 19:45, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

It is up there today... Prhartcom (talk) 01:45, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Great ! Thanks again ! Antoinetav (talk) 19:50, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:NewYork hotel Vegas.jpg

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Interior of Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls 16.jpg

And also:

• File:Interior of Basilica of Saint Paul Outside the Walls 17.jpg

Yours sincerely, BrightRaven (talk) 12:27, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Sun god UCSD.jpg

File:Sun god UCSD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Worldbruce (talk) 22:50, 18 September 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MasoodHA (talk) 12:27, 5 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Antoinetav,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kleber au lycée kleber.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 26 July 2023 (UTC)