User talk:Angela

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello Angela! Nice to meet you. I am Pybalo from the Spanish Wikipedia & Wiktionary. I observed the un-sincronized photo caption in Portada, and your work in Template:Picture of the day/Temp. If we wish translate to many languages the caption of the Picture of the day, we will need a time-window between the appearing of the picture and its "publishing". I will try to make a scheduling list of future pictures of the day, with theirs multilple language captions. It's will be similar to [1].

Sorry for my horrible English, (please correct my writting if it is so bad! ;)) Bye bye Pybalo 07:58, 23 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Yes that's true. I was trying to think of a way that it could all be done in one template via parameters rather than having separate templates for each language. It might be possible, but I'm not sure how. :) Angela 07:21, 24 Oct 2004 (UTC)

I have a few days ago created a Template:CopyrightByWikimedia, and added it to the Wiki logos (see Wikipedia). Currently this is provisionally, and some of the logos have a double license, i.e. GFDL and CopyrightByWikimedia. Comments & changes welcome. -- Chris 73 12:36, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

I'm not really sure GFDL makes any sense for something which is a trademark. Trademark law applies then, not copyright law, so it isn't really logical to state it is GFDL. I've said at Image talk:Tsca wiktionary logo2.png that I don't think the tag should be added to logos which are only proposed not official. Angela 13:34, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
I have removed the GFDL tags from the logos on Wikimedia, and added the CopyrightedByWikimedia logo to what i think are the official logos. I also listed the logo proposal in a different subsection. -- Chris 73 21:57, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
Got an info from Eloquence, and guess i was wrong. Currently, only the commons logo is copyrighted. -- Chris 73 22:19, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)
It's kind of up in the air at the moment, but it's probably best to leave the message off until we know for sure. Currently some of them are trademarks of the Foundation but without the copyright held by the Foundation. Angela 23:36, 15 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Hello Angela! From your creation of Commons:Categories I got the impression that you are very anxious about this thing. I just created the Category:CommonsRoot where - so my intention - category tree should start. My goal is, that there are no categories floating around - having no parent category - and from that every category is some how connected to every other. What do you think about that? --Addicted 11:27, 19 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Hello Angela, I was voted in you. :-) How are you? I have a question. Thank you for attention. --FML hi 18:20, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again! Thank you very much for the answer, but that (about wikipedia logo) was not my question. :-) That image isn't mine and my English is not so good, I cannot to go verify. But, now, go on to my question: do you believe that I forget my question? :-). Oh God, for now I forget, but when I remember, I ask to you, ok? Bye! --FML hi 03:14, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, just let me know if you ever remember it. You might get a faster response if you ask me at en instead of here. Angela 23:48, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion request[edit]

{{idw|[[:Category:Mount Rainier]]}}

Actually, this a proposal to delete a category, not an image (but I followed the procedure at Commons:Deletion requests). I think the Mount Rainier images may be better handled in articles, Mount Rainier and Mount Rainier National Park, rather than categories. See User talk:Wsiegmund for more. Wsiegmund 05:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for telling me, but you could have told me rather than using a {{Template}}. :) I'll comment at Commons:Deletion requests. Angela 12:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I fear that I take written procedures too literally sometime. I read your comment at Commons:Deletion requests. Thank you for taking the time to respond in such a thoughtful manner. Wsiegmund 23:31, 29 September 2005 (UTC)[reply]
No problem :) Angela
I've withdrawn my deletion request and reverted my changes to pages that included Category:Mount Rainier. Thank you for your patience. Wsiegmund 18:22, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, thanks for letting me know. Angela
I've tried to clarify Commons:First steps. You might want to see if I've succeeded. Wsiegmund 18:25, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good. I think it's an improvement. :) Angela 21:16, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for taking a look at it. Best wishes. Wsiegmund 01:00, 2 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation[edit]

Hi Angela,

I'd like to invite you to Commons:WikiProject Tree of Life

TeunSpaans 20:18, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the invite. Have you thought of collaborating with Wikispecies in some way on this? Angela 01:57, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course. Wikispecies is designed to build a taxonomy tree of all living species. We will need that foundation. This project is aimed to document all living species with all appropriate kind of media. The projects are complementary. Media on wikispecies can not be used on the different local encyclopedia, so we will have the media here. Also, for wikispecies it is necessary to describe all tribes, subfamilies, families, superfamilies and such, while this project is concenctrating in the lowest levels, species. (While occasinally going deeper to subspecies and cultivars).
TeunSpaans 18:12, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Press photos[edit]

I was sorting out the press photos and noticed this. A sole GFDL tag on your press photo is a bit complicated to make any use of it. Any possibility of putting it under an easier license? Thanx notafish }<';> 16:51, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanx :-) notafish }<';> 10:42, 26 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WIkipedia logo modified[edit]

posso modificare un logo di wikipedia? nell'immagine che ho creato, c'è il logo di wikipedia con a fianco un lucchetto (wikipedia lock) fammi sapere ciao

Generally logos that are trademarked should not be modified without the permission of the Foundation. Angela 14:20, 11 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr images not found cat - FYI[edit]

Hi Angela, your input here could be helpful. rootology (T) 15:07, 19 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Angela Beesley.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Angela Beesley.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Anatoliy (talk) 22:58, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you serious? Angela (talk) 13:02, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Angela!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:37, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Craig-newmark.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Stifle (talk) 09:37, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You do realise most people just won't bother and you'll end up deleting freely licensed content without reason? Anyway, I've forwarded the email. Not that it makes any difference - I could as easily fake that as I could lie when uploading the image. Angela (talk) 12:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:DebbieGarside.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:DebbieGarside.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   19:51, 29 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image was sent to me by the subject. I've forwarded the email to OTRS which says the image was GFDL (this was before the license change). Angela (talk) 01:13, 30 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:FAQ has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

FAM1885 (talk) 20:23, 5 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Icon admin[edit]

I would want to be able to copy the image, put things on it and then, upload it to wikipedia and make top icons with it. May I?

Ebe123 (talk) 20:01, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It depends on which image you mean. I suggest that you ask on the Help desk. Angela (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:HeatherFord.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HeatherFord.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:HeatherFord.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

GeorgHHtalk   15:09, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I asked the subject about this the first time the image was tagged as unsourced and she suggested using the one on the English Wikipedia instead. Presumably this one. Angela (talk) 22:01, 22 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Cosima.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.61.186.88 13:39, 11 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vanesa sanches (talk) 19:30, 28 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Artandimage (talk) 03:17, 14 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:44, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year[reply]

Commons:FAQ has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Desdelabanda (talk) 18:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Roland.h.bueb (talk) 18:52, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Karl432 (talk) 17:29, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for this. I wanted a specific file to be deleted and clicked "Nomination for deletion" for help on this, not to nominate the help page itself for deletion. -- Karl432 (talk) 17:35, 31 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Commons:FAQ has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Antavious87 (talk) 18:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


190.192.169.93 23:36, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, INeverCry 18:08, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

   FDMS  4    15:31, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Weiler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ego Hunter (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Candidates for speedy deletion has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Roboindia (talk) 10:35, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Beercollection.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

. HombreDHojalata.talk 23:33, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:19, 18 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jackie RGarcia (talk) 20:59, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Contents has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this help page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Franz.zilvah (talk) 01:44, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]


File:WikiNoëlAnglais1.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: When the image was on Wikipedia, it said above the summary of the image "This Wikipedia-specific image or media file should not be copied to Wikimedia Commons." Thus, it should be deleted immediately)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : The helper5667.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 22:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:FAQ has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

משפחת בונן (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]