User talk:Andries Van den Abeele

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Andries Van den Abeele!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Andries Van den Abeele!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:46, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:22, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Beste Andries, kunt u voor uw bestanden aangeven (bv voor File:Alleweireldt Joseph.JPG) van welke publicatie u een foto heeft genomen? Alvast bedankt. -- Deadstar (msg) 14:58, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Deadstar, Foto door mij genomen van een gravure. met hartelijke groeten, Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 16:43, 17 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:De Meulemeester 01.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:De Meulemeester 01.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andries, as André De Meulemeester died only in 1973 his works are still copyrighted. If the painting/drawing in this book cover ist by De Meulemeester, you need to provide his (or his heirs) written permission. --Túrelio (talk) 10:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mik Babylon.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mik Babylon.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andries, who is the photographer of the photo on the cover? --Túrelio (talk) 10:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Victor Llona, portrait by Jean de Bosschère (1935).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Victor Llona, portrait by Jean de Bosschère (1935).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but Jean de Bosschere died only in 1953, whereby his works are still copyirghted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raymond M. Lemaire.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:18, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Empain Edouard-Jean, cover of Empains autobiography.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Empain Edouard-Jean, cover of Empains autobiography.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need to provide a written permission from the photographer who has shot the portrait on the book cover. --Túrelio (talk) 10:22, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Kasteel Empain in Battel - Leest bij Mechelen.jpg[edit]

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kasteel Empain in Battel - Leest bij Mechelen.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Kasteel Empain in Battel - Leest bij Mechelen.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who has created the original drawing? --Túrelio (talk) 10:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andries, died you really shoot the original photography of Mr. Tanghe or died you just reproduce an existing photo by somebody else? When has this photo really been shot (surely not in 2013)? --Túrelio (talk) 10:31, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Muurkranten Jutte.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Muurkranten Jutte.JPG]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Túrelio (talk) 10:58, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but this sculpture is surely a recent work. As you may know, Belgium has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyright. So, you need either to provide a written permission from the sculptor or the image needs to be deleted. --Túrelio (talk) 10:59, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:De Meester Maurice (Storie).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 11:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, in the description you mentioned a "permission granted in writing" by Bruges Artroute. Please forward this permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 11:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The same for File:Andrédemeulemeester2.jpg. Who has shot the original photography and when has it been shot? --Túrelio (talk) 11:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please add the true date, when File:Ronald van Beuge met Jacques Delors 002.jpg has been shot. --Túrelio (talk) 11:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Andries, did you really shoot the original photo or did you scan an existing photography created by somebody else? If it is originally your shot, then please add the correct date, as it surely can't have been shot in 2012. --Túrelio (talk) 11:26, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muurkranten affiche.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 14:44, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What is going on?[edit]

Best Turelio, I have the impression that you are all of a sudden following (mit Deutscher Gründlichkeit") the pictures I have made available, some recently, some quite some time ago. For most of them it is difficult to receive a written approval, for all of them I am confident that they will encounter no opposition at all. I have not much time to go into an elaborate search for licenses. I am on the contrary sure that my additions are appreciated, not in the least by those concerned. The sort of 'harassment' by some on Wikipedia is in my eyes unneccessary and out of proportion. If it comes to deleting the pictures, so be it, but be sure that this will not be for the better of wikipedia. Therefore I am confident that I can read your messages as intended only to 'cover' an hypothetical responsibility of wikimedia, without further action needed. Best greetings, 87.65.117.106 13:20, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In case you are Andries Van den Abeele, sorry, but you are mistaken. As I considered your contributions as valuable, I was rather mellow in my approach.
We may not like copyright — and especially copyright laws in their current form —, but we still have to follow them. Besides, it's not a "responsibility of wikimedia", at first it's your responsibility as the uploader. I and my admin colleagues only take some voluntary responsibility as we want to protect artists/creators as well as re-users. Probably many of the problems with your uploads can be solved, if you cooperate. However, if you don't provide the missing permissions, several of your uploads need to be deleted - whether I and you like it or not. --Túrelio (talk) 13:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted images[edit]

Dear Turelio,

You deleted several of the images I added to WikiCommons. The reasons to do so, as I wrote you already, are flimsy. They are a sort of extreme (fundamentalist) interpretation of the copyright. The deletion of the picture on Muurkranten is one of them. Where are you founding it on that objects to be seen by everybody in the public space, cannot be photographed and published? Do you have any courtjudgment forbidding it? I think you should reconsider your views. By all means you have disgusted me of wikicommons. Best regards, Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 08:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong 1: I did not delete any of your images. Instead, I proposed them for deletion and gave you ample opportunity to either provide the required permissions or to involve yourself in the deletion discussions. You choose not to cooperate, but instead replid using deliberately ad-hominem wording.
Wrong 2: There is nothing flimsy and nothing extreme in our interpretation of copyright. All these images were deleted by other admins who agreed with my initial assessment. Works of art are copyrighted until 70 years after death of the author. By making and distributing a picture of a still copyrighted work of art, you violate the copyright of the artist. While many countries make exception for works of art installed permanently in the public space (aka Freedom of panorama), the copyright law of Belgium has no such exception. If you don't like that, then you should ask the legislatory body of Belgium to change it, instead of attacking volunteers on Commons. --Túrelio (talk) 09:36, 10 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I attack nobody. I just consider that the way rules regarding copyright are applicated by some on WikiCommons is exaggerated. I hope that one day common sense will prevail. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 11:59, 12 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Andries Van den Abeele, graag zou ik deze afbeelding in een category onderbrengen, kan U mij helpen? Dank U. Mocht U tijd en zin hebben, de files die beginnen met The spell of Flanders wachten ook nog geduldig op U Lotje (talk) 08:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dag Lotje, Dit is een straat in Mechelen. Dus kan dit in die categorie. De naam van de straat ontgaat me even, maar de huidige toestand is nog zeer gelijkend aan dit oude beeld. Andries Van den Abeele (talk) 10:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Jerzy Lukazewski, rector of the College of Europe.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Prosfilaes (talk) 07:46, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Wensen[edit]

Happy Holidays[edit]

Merry Christmas Andries Van den Abeele

Hi Andries Van den Abeele, ban harte, een zalig Kerstfeest
en een Gelukkig Nieuwjaar,
Thank you for all your contributions to Wikipedia,
Lotje (talk) 05:47, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]