User talk:Alexandr frolov

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alexandr frolov!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 01:51, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

File:345634534534.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Alexandr frolov!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Map tyd1.png was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Tydtujaryk.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Map tyd1.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:MayAgach 502.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Sunset in the desert.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Jazator Jul 046.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Jazator Jul 006.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Jazator Jul 135.jpg was uncategorized on 5 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Свастика.jpg was uncategorized on 7 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Samaha.jpg was uncategorized on 7 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Вбаре.jpg was uncategorized on 7 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Вбарре.jpg was uncategorized on 7 April 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:C110.jpg was uncategorized on 22 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:C109.jpg was uncategorized on 22 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:C107.jpg was uncategorized on 22 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:Turnir.jpg was uncategorized on 22 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:С118.jpg was uncategorized on 22 May 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Маленький Ленин.jpg[edit]

File:Маленький Ленин.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eleassar ^(t/p) 10:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Верблюд в Чуйской степи.jpg[edit]

File:Верблюд в Чуйской степи.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

/St1995 00:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Тыдтуярык радуга.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Тыдтуярык радуга.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Тыдтуярык радуга.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sealle (talk) 07:52, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akkol6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:14, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akkol1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carlos yo 20:24, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karakul.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jal6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 07:42, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Quality_images_candidates[edit]

Hi Alexandr. Thank you for nominating your images at COM:QIC. Did you have a time to check the reviews? Some of your images need some (often easy) fixing to get promoted. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:58, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have a few thousand photos, of course I will post something on Wikipedia, but I have difficulty with English and with Wikipedia interface :)), but I will find a way out --Alexandr frolov (talk) 08:50, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazah Jurt3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:44, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kazah Jurt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:02, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mongolian Sh.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. FPC subject to me --Podzemnik 06:18, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarlyk Yak.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:41, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altai Ail - traditional dwelling.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 05:57, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list[edit]

Hi Alexandr. If you want to send me a message, you don't have to write it so many times. Once is enough. Also, I nominated only 5 images today. Also, you wrote the same message to other users' nominations. Can you please remove it? Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi .. I carefully watched, did you have more than 10 nominations today? .. I have very little time now, if it's not difficult for you, could you correct my mistake?

Živjo :).. Skrbno sem gledal, ali si imel danes več kot 10 nominacij? Zdaj imam zelo malo časa, če ti ni težko, bi mi popravil napako? --Alexandr frolov (talk) 09:31, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated 5 images as only 5 nominations a day are allowed. I don't have much time neither. I'd recommend you to get to know a wiki editing and the project itself a bit better before you nominate more pictures for Quality images. Especially please pay attention to your file names and put your images into better categories so people can actually find them. Your images are amazing though, some of them are close to Featured Pictures. Greetings, --Podzemnik (talk) 09:48, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I will definitely learn the rules of Wikipedia, unfortunately I live in Altai, in the mountains, that is not just with the Internet .. :). But I saw more than 10 of your files today. I believe that the rules must be followed by all. If I made a mistake, then sorry. --Alexandr frolov (talk) 09:52, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I nominated only 5 images, as I do every day and as I said before and as other users wrote you. If I nominated 6, it's a good habit here to point just one image out, not to decline all of them. We're here on the same boat. If you'll need any help with the interface, let me know. Regards, --Podzemnik (talk) 13:47, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RedMount.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 07:00, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarlyk Yak2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 07:04, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akkol2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality, no aberrations, nice SkywalkerPL 17:08, 24 February 2019 (UTC) @SkywalkerPL: Please change "Nomination" into "Promotion" yourself if you want to promote an image next time. --Milseburg 08:40, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RedRock1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:08, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarlyk4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:56, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ss20150423 1912 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:38, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarlyk5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:03, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akkol3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --C messier 12:12, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Категории[edit]

Здравствуйте! спасибо за интересные фотографии. Но постарайтесь, пожалуйста, категоризовать их так, чтобы у каждого был шанс их найти. Без этого система категорий на Викискладе никакого смысла не имеет. Во-первых, ни в коем случае не надо создавать пустые категории без единой вышестоящей категории. Category:Farm kill я вынужден удалить, в таком виде она ничего не даёт, к тому же мне ничего неизвестно о таком словосочетании в английском языке -- возможно, вы имели в виду Category:Slaughtering? Среди тех категорий, что вы создади, только Category:Animals in the Altai Mountains осмысленна в принципе -- но так как категории создаются по логической иерархии, там должно быть не "Animals", а Category:Animals of Russia, так как Алтайские горы всё-таки находятся в России. Если нужна помощь -- обращайтесь --A.Savin 22:33, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйте, я вообще не понимаю что такое категории в данном случае и как их присваивать к фотографиям. Я гружу фото для иллюстрирования статей которые сам пишу по географии алтая, как прописывать названия категорий по английчски, я не понимаю. Алтайские горы кстати находятся не только в России, а большей частью в Монголии и в Китае.

--Alexandr frolov (talk) 02:47, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ну, если вы не знаете, что такое категории и с чем их едят -- тогда и не создавайте их, пожалуйста, а в изображения, которые загружаете, проставляйте {{subst:unc}} вместо категорий. Тогда хоть их рано или поздно найдут и добавят нужные категории --A.Savin 02:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо за совет и участие. Думаю как-нибудь устаканится. ;). в русской википедии я их активно правлю, в этом разделе кто-то тоже за мной "подбирает"--Alexandr frolov (talk) 03:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Я вас только что просил не создавать пустые категории, а вы продолжаете в том же духе (Category:Oboo), пожалуйста перестаньте это делать. --A.Savin 03:12, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

уважаемый, давайте меньше ненужных движений, Вы узнаейте что такое обо(ово), куда мне эту фотографию тогда вставлять если это обо ?.. и я хотел включить эту категорию в категорю крантс или как там она..--Alexandr frolov (talk) 03:20, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

У меня есть ещё куча фотографий, которые не входят в существующие категории, и как мнге быть ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandr frolov (talk • contribs)

Я уже писал выше, что делать. Добавляйте {{subst:unc}} в описание ваших файлов --A.Savin 03:29, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ну это Ваша точка зрения. Почему я не могу создать новую категорию ? для тех вещей которых еще нет в Википедии ?--Alexandr frolov (talk) 03:31, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Потому. Потому что создавать категории нужно в соответствии с правилами, с соблюдением логической иерархии и с осмысленным названием на английском. Вы только что сказали, что ничего это не можете. От предложенной помощи также фактически отказались. Круг замкнулся, дискутировать более не о чем --A.Savin 03:36, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

я вас поблагодарил за помощь, спасибо еще раз. Лично я вижу логику: лошади алтая/лошади что здесь не так ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandr frolov (talk • contribs)

Horses of Altai = Horses of Russia by region + Animals in the Altai Mountains. А вот "Animals..." в фото добавлять не надо, если там уже есть "Horses...", да. --A.Savin 03:48, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

вот на примере, тут что не так ?. Спасибо --Alexandr frolov (talk) 03:55, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Horses of Altai" -- OK. Безусловно, нужна ещё локация поточнее, но не требовать же всё сразу --A.Savin 04:01, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

В смысле локация точнее ?.. Указывать вплоть до места ?

но вот тут я вообще ничего не пойму..

Я тоже не пойму, что тут понимать. Есть Республика Алтай и есть Алтайский край. Лично я на глаз не могу определить, что где снято. Это может сказать только фотограф. Есть ещё районы и внутри оных самые разные населённые пункты. Для File:Altai horses 02.jpg достаточно две категории -- "Horses of Altai" и, условно говоря, "какой-то там район" --A.Savin 04:28, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо, с этим я разобрался. Т.е. если нет какой то категории, то ее можно создать в составе имеющейся. А что быть со вторым файлом. В какую его категорию. Это Обо в алтайских горах.--Alexandr frolov (talk) 04:37, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Несмотря на многократные просьбы не делать этого, вы продолжаете создавать пустые категории. Увижу ещё раз -- будет блокировка. --A.Savin 14:10, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Александр, спасибо за помощь, не могли бы Вы помочь с вот категоризацией вот этого файла.

Я планирую серию статей о геопарке на алтае. Геоморфологи подключатся позже, тогда и терминология более точная будет. какие категории тут можно поставить ?.--Alexandr frolov (talk) 09:30, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вам же лучше знать, где это снято, но судя по описанию файла, Category:Chaganuzun River? --A.Savin 09:57, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

это само собой, но нужны ли категории о геоморфологии или хватит только вышеупомянутой ? одной ?--Alexandr frolov (talk) 10:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Так как я не знаю, что именно за формация, не могу подсказать. Для более точного местонахождения, ещё Category:Kosh-Agachsky District, если координаты верные --A.Savin 10:07, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Александр, надеюсь не задолбал еще вопросами ..))) Дело в том что я живу в этом дистрикте..;) И вижу что, не все категории там представлены. Что лучше , добавлять фотографии в Category:Kosh-Agachsky District или делать новые : "Цветы в Кош-Агачском районе" например, и у нас там сотня рек и озер, на каждый объект категорию прописывать ? , очень хотелось бы разобраться.--Alexandr frolov (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

В идеале да, но не делайте это пока, пожалуйста --A.Savin 10:55, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

И вот это не надо: ибо через Chuya Steppe оно уже там --A.Savin 11:18, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Прошу уделить еще немного времени, что бы окончательно разобраться. Снова берем файл

. Там есть категория и Чаган-узун река и Кош-Агачский район. Но ведь перывая входит во вторую... --Alexandr frolov (talk) 11:26, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. Так как Akkol River (Chagan tributary) <- Rivers of the Altai Republic <- Streams in the Altay Mountains <- Altay Mountains. Удаляем последнюю, и всё нормально. Тоже сделано --A.Savin 11:34, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Александр, а как вот эту фоту атрибутировать по категориям, Спасибо ! А то что то тоже не понравилось кому то категории.. Могли бы отрецензировать её ?. Это долина реки Юстыт, реликтовая лиственница. единственная на десятки километров — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alexandr frolov (talk • contribs)

Добавьте Category:Larix in Russia. Подписывайте, пожалуйста, ваши комменты на странице обсуждения. --A.Savin 15:11, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

м (Moving from Category:Larix in Russia. to Category:Larix in Russia) Спасибо, вот хоть убей не пойму что это за изменения ? --Alexandr frolov (talk) 16:19, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Дык вы же сами зачем-то точку поставили после Раши )) --A.Savin 16:24, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Упс..))) --Alexandr frolov (talk) 16:33, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Александр, добрый вечер.

Вот потребовалось для статьи загрузить фото. Я правильно атрибутировал категории ? Спасибо--Alexandr frolov (talk) 14:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Вот здесь вы опять оставляете лишнюю категорию: Horse riding непосредственно следует из Horses, поэтому Horses нужно добавлять в категорию Horse riding, а не в файл, который уже в этой категории --A.Savin 14:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Вот как нужно: [1] [2] --A.Savin 14:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Спасибо понял, счас как раз гружу лошадок, но уже с кумысной фермы. А что скажите про шаманские шкуры ? пример чуть выше ? --Alexandr frolov (talk) 14:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Сделано. --A.Savin 14:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A.Savin,С добрым утром. Что то я в тупик встал со своим английским, не поможите. вот два файла про гляциологию на Алтае. Долина реки Чаган/Аккол

--Alexandr frolov (talk) 09:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yak102.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:47, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red desert4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 18:21, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse Altai 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Minor CAs at the black hair, categories fixed. --XRay 06:22, 7 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Animal on a farm in the Altai Mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Podzemnik 06:50, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse Altai 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 08:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junior geologist in the Altai Mountains.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, and the categories look good to me, too. -- Ikan Kekek 06:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camels in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 06:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop[edit]

Вы опять в массовом порядке создаёте пустые, неверно озаглавленные, и/или дублирующие категории. Я уже просил вас это не делать. Если не знаете, как работать с категориями (хотя я вам и пытался втолковать) -- просто оставьте их в покое. Это последнее предупреждение. В следующий раз будет блокировка --A.Savin 11:54, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Александер, зачем вы так нервничаете, у меня просто времени не хватило, корова начала телиться.. счас разберусь с ней и с категориями --Alexandr frolov (talk) 13:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)*[reply]
A.Savin я усвоил чтон ужно делать, но ботанические категории так просто не даются. Впереди археология, там вообще завал. Вынужден был отъехать по делам, не успел доделать, не принимайте так лично. --Alexandr frolov (talk) 14:27, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Если вам нужна какая-то категория, вы всегда можете посмотреть в статью Википедии об интересующей теме, какая категория на Викискладе там проставлена. Следите, как я оформляю ваши категории и какие категории ставлю в ваши файлы, и делайте так же. Вы можете обратиться ко мне за помощью (надеюсь, это не будет продолжаться вечно). Не нужно заниматься самодеятельностью, пока вас просят этого не делать --A.Savin 14:50, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse cart mongolia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice!--Famberhorst 07:00, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Death cult of the horse 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality despite some not so relevant CA that could be avoided with smaller lens aperture --Moroder 15:32, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Dear Alexandr frolov,

You are receiving this message because we noticed that you voted in R1 of the 2018 Picture of the Year contest, but not yet in the second round. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2018) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked.

In the final (and current) round, you may vote for a maximum of three images. The image with the most votes will become the Picture of the Year 2018.

Round 2 will end 17 March 2019, 23:59:59.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 18:03, 16 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurai Range, Yantrek Top 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Congratulations, that's really good. Some wonderful colors and textures in this photo. -- Ikan Kekek 06:52, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larch in the valley of the river yustid 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dryas octopetala seeds 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:57, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Death cult of the horse 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments IMO a disgusting photo, but quality is for me high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:46, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Larch in the valley of the river yustid 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments You need to add the category for the larch. -- Ikan Kekek 06:10, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Category added. Good photo. -- Ikan Kekek 07:41, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Культ.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Культ.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ronhjones ^(Talk) 20:02, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altai horses 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but you should crop the left to hide the cut animal -- Basile Morin 10:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC) --Basile Morin 10:48, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 15:54, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurai Range, Yantrek Top 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:56, 17 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taldurinsky deer monument 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:06, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheepback 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good. -- Ikan Kekek 08:14, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road in Mongolia aimak Bayan Ulgiy 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taldurinsky deer monument 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:06, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Primula rosea in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Please add some categories related to the location --Podzemnik 07:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

QI Candidate Insects on Geranium pratense flowers[edit]

The fly is a apecies of Culicidae , probably Anopheles Notafly (talk) 17:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

- спасибо, ничего в этом не понимаю. если хотите сами поставить категорию

/ Thanks, I do not understand anything. if you want to put a category
--Alexandr frolov (talk) 18:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Farm in Mongolia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Peulle 13:15, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyphs in the Tura-Alty 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 16:14, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leontopodium ochroleucum, эдельвейс в Горах Алтая 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:54, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red desert in Altai 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lamb in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Bit of noise, but still ok --Poco a poco 10:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentiana decumbens в Кош-Агачском районе республика алтай 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:59, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour-Alty, a monument of architecture of the Altai Republic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Granada 11:55, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ilias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:31, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camelus bactrianus in western Mongolia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - The camel on the right isn't as sharp as the one on the left, but good quality, overall, and a very nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 09:13, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upupa epops in Central Mongolia 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:00, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camelus bactrianus in western Mongolia 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:58, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Insects on Geranium pratense flowers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Quality is good but the insect should be identified --Poco a poco 10:29, 24 March 2019 (UTC) Identified and category fixed Notafly 22:02, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok --Poco a poco 20:43, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Тектонический обвал на Курайском хребте.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The photo is perhaps a bit over-processed. But good enough for me.--Famberhorst 16:57, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camelus bactrianus in western Mongolia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support - Large photo, sharp enough, cute composition. -- Ikan Kekek 11:37, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Camel Farm in Mongolia 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 18:13, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Upupa epops in Central Mongolia 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Eatcha 13:54, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Red desert in Altai 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The main object (red desert) is in focus, I have no problem with the mountains. --Eatcha 14:09, 28 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Petroglyphs in the Tura-Alty 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --СССР 17:27, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pigs in the Altai Mountains. Village Ortolyk.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add some categories related to pigs... --Podzemnik 07:31, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Image quality is good, but it needs better categorization. --MB-one 07:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Categorized now; good quality. --СССР 17:32, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour-Alty, a monument of architecture of the Altai Republic 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
What is "a monument of architecture"? --Podzemnik 10:02, 21 March 2019 (UTC) Archaeology site.Likely Bronze Age Notafly 22:10, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. --СССР 17:31, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A little white camel 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Camelus bactrianus in western Mongolia 06.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Camelus bactrianus in western Mongolia 06.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 9 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мааш.jpg[edit]

File:Мааш.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyright note in bottom left corner

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

—SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) ^{ping me plz} 18:41, 23 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Semi-desert landscape in the mountains of Russian Altai.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Carschten 12:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spring pasture 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 04:58, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Киндыктыкуль.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:40, 6 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tibetan Mastiff Тибетский Мастиф 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Unfortunate cutting line through the dog green area vs. brown area. Nonetheless QI imho. --Tuxyso 13:33, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I respect your judgment about the quality of the photo, but don't we need geographic coordinates, or at least a more specific location than "Altai Mountains"? -- Ikan Kekek 13:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment yes, a more specific location would be nice, but imho the description in good enough. Feel free to change to Discuss. --Tuxyso 13:47, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Doesn't it matter whether the dog is in the Altai mountains, on the Kurfürstendamm in Berlin, In New York or in Rome? -- Spurzem 15:20, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I believe it matters. -- Ikan Kekek 21:18, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeolian erosion Эоловая эрозия 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 13:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Horse licks salt in the Altai Mountains 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 10:11, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - I added Category:Salt licks. Be aware of that category and use it when relevant in the future. -- Ikan Kekek 05:00, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nomad's house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
It needs more specific categories --Poco a poco 12:20, 4 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --Zcebeci 09:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spring pasture 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:32, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Khyaras-Nuur Хяргас Нуур 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 04:12, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kokkul or Blue Lake 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:27, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shaazgai Lake Шаазгай Нуур 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:43, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Papaver pseudocanescens - polar poppy in the Altai Mountains 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:32, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kokkul or Blue Lake 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shaazgai Lake Шаазгай Нуур 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --MB-one 08:40, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shaazgai Lake Шаазгай Нуур 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 11:52, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeolian erosion Эоловая эрозия 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support A bit grainy but still ok --MB-one 11:05, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frost on the window 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akkol river 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Wish I were there nowadays --Zcebeci 08:16, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kurai Range, Yantrek Top 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:46, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aeolian erosion Эоловая эрозия 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 01:20, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road number 257 or Chuysky Tract.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:42, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Four ok, everything is fine.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lenin Ленин 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Funny and good quality. Added some more relevant categories. --MB-one 10:37, 19 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Road in Mongolia aimak Bayan Ulgiy 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Sarlyk Yak2.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sarlyk Yak2.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sarlyk Yak3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments A bit grainy at full size but a great shot. -- Ikan Kekek 13:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good quality. --UnpetitproleX 23:11, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Alexandr frolov

File:345634534534.jpg[edit]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

File:Маленький Ленин.jpg[edit]

File:Верблюд в Чуйской степи.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Тыдтуярык радуга.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Commons:Quality_images_candidates[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Категории[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Please stop[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2018 is open![edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Культ.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

QI Candidate Insects on Geranium pratense flowers[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

File:Мааш.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Navigation menu

Search