User talk:Alexander Shatulin

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Alexander Shatulin!

Were the "problems" real problems, or were they just because the thumbnails hadn't yet caught up with the dimensions of the new file version? In the latter case, the problem usually fixes itself after a few days (and may not appear to all people browsing the article); if this seems to be taking too long, you can help it along by "purging" and/or refreshing your local caches... AnonMoos (talk) 01:42, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1) When it have been cropped the images used in templates became too large in some language versions (example). 2) After the first reverting aspect ratio of some thumbnails haven't been reverted. Cash cleanup had no effect. Alexander Shatulin (talk) 10:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do you not believe, we should let it in the upper category: Bearskin hats, because (from English Wikipedia): "In many languages, the raccoon is named for its characteristic dousing behavior in conjunction with that language's term for bear, for example Waschbär in German, orsetto lavatore in Italian, mosómedve in Hungarian and araiguma in Japanese". In German the family "Procyonidae" is called Kleinbären (little bears)? Regards from there --Kürschner (talk) 22:29, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taking into consideration zoological systematics, raccoons are not bears. Vernacular names in some languages may be misleading. Also Wikimedia Commons is international project, not German, Italian, Japanese etc. Finally bearskin cap and coonskin cap are different sorts of headgear, usually not associated one with other (see English Wikipedia articles). Alexander Shatulin (talk) 22:39, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Armed Forces of the Russian Federation has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


2A02:810D:4ABF:DC60:30C8:C5FE:252B:5950 14:12, 4 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]