User talk:Alceste

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Alceste!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Image:Faculté_de_Philo.jpg[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ lietuvių ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ فارسی ∙ +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 08:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image 2006[edit]

Résultats

  • 1er : 5 =84 (n°254 de la 1ère phase)
  • 2ème : 2 =78 (n°11 de la 1ère phase)
  • 3ème : 7 =70 (n°266 de la 1ère phase)
  • 3ème : 10 =70 (n° 303 de la 1ère phase)
  • 5ème : 9 =67 (n°284 de la 1ère phase)
  • 6ème : 6 =62 (n° 61 de la 1ère phase)
  • 7ème : 8 =53 (n°272 de la 1ère phase)
  • 8ème : 1 =50 (n° 5 de la 1ère phase)
  • 9ème : 4 =46 (n°137 de la 1ère phase)
  • 9ème : 11 =46 (n°265 de la 1ère phase)
  • 11ème : 3 =34 (n°315 de la 1ère phase)

([1])

Votes Valides[edit]

1=50 1. 1 -- 128.2.164.44 03:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 2. 1 - Amazing picture of SFO at night. Brilliant detail. diff Sukh17 01:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 1 - diff Hairchrm 03:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 1 - diff Ybboren.wiki 20:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 1 - Excelent picture! -AMK152 14:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) diff 6. 1 - Love how the lights highlight the building and planes, and I love the layout of the airport. *9diff - 220.244.242.47 07:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) see 220.244.242.47's vote, 24.88.76.172's change pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 1 - Spectacular diff 81.144.177.106 17:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) (that's me Dweller 17:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC)) 8. 1 - The Bay should always win. diff --Onathinwhiteline 06:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 1 – This is not a flower? --Packa 09:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 1 - Tough choice indeed. This one has great technical application and educational use, and I'd be proud to have it in my portfolio. diff Hzoi 10:55, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 1 - Tough decision between the natural phenomenom of the aurora and the man-made greatness of that airport. Being a Humanist I vote for man-made greatness. :) --SECurtisTX 19:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 12. 1 - very difficult to choose the most beautiful... --Rohieb 01:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) diff Please link to a diff on your home wiki -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC) new diff: diff --Rohieb 16:21, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 1 - Very impressive. -Aude (talk | contribs) 06:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 1 - Very pretty. I'm using it as my wallpaper. --AAA! 08:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 15. 1 [1] Jd2718 20:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 1 airport 4 teh WIN! proof. Grue 12:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 1 All of these photographs are awesome. Hard to decide between this one and 9. diff | Dictouray 18:59, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 1 all of these photos are awsome Yarl.pl talk 18:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 1 almost went for 9 but no 1 is brilliant Merlin-UK 00:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 1 At first sight looks like something from space opera diff KonstKaras 19:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 1 Awesome picture! was torn between that one and #10. 70.157.78.62 14:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC) diff 22. 1 Beautiful. diff -SocratesJedi 23:03, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 1 definately best picture of the year! bestes foto des jahres! diff --213.196.229.85 17:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 1 diff All those pictures are awesome! chtit_draco talk page 20:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 1 diff Dgies 09:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 1 diff --Jcarroll 00:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 1 diff Jugander 01:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 1 diff NYC JD 17:29, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 1 diff PaladinWhite 01:55, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 1 --Diligent 10:10, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 1 fascinating to see how beautiful even something as mundane as an airport can be from the right perspective. diff 70.107.175.226 19:32, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 1 for PoTY as the most striking and powerful picture, although I would probably support 2 for "Societal image of the year" or something similar, reflecting its poignancy. (also on en.wiki [5]; see the links at the bottom of the page.) Flcelloguy 03:14, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 1 Great pictures! 2, 5, and 11 are also awesome. Hometown of SF might have affected it... :) but they are all amazing. --Yarnalgo 01:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 34. 1 --Hu:Totya (talk!) 12:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 35. 1 -I have a duty to pick whichever one has airplanes in it. diff --SeanMD80 22:47, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 1 I think this one has the highest quality in terms of its improvement to an encyclopedia. All are good selections. Cacophony 02:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 1 It's great diff SBT 25 February 2007 38. 1 Looks like some strange space ship landed there --Rotkraut 22:17, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 1 Nichalp 08:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 1 SFO at night. The usual experience with airports such as SFO is full of stress. It's great to take a step back (or above in this case) and look at a beautiful shot showing the elegant functional design. --Chanho 00:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC) (see diff for my en account which has > 100 edits) 41. 1 The most beautiful picture between all. Captainm 11:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 42. 1 --Vaya 14:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 1 Weil ich schon mal dort war und ihn selbst erlebt habe... Monsterxxl 17:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 1, A truly stunning image. --Philip Stevens 18:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 1, although 5 is nice too. NSLE-Chacor 02:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 1, very cool, makes me proud of the evolution of life on this planet. (diff) AtilimGunesBaydin 18:21, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 1. Excelent picture! --Karelj 19:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 1. The choice was hard. But this is surely a sight you don't have every day. --Defrenrokorit 17:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 1. The SFO by night has been my wallpaper for months. Excellent picture. (diff for 7000+ edits) Wim van Dorst 16:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC). 50. 1--Gusme 16:09, 22 February 2007 (UTC)


2=78 1. 2 - A moving picture telling a human story. --CopperKettle 14:06, 22 February 2007 (UTC)diff 2. 2 - A stark and dramatic presentation of the bland. Very striking. --Davidkazuhiro 20:35, 23 February 2007 (UTC) diff 3. 2 - Absolutely beautiful. ^demon 18:34, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 4. 2 - amazing colour... --Wj32 07:40, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 2 - Amazing detail. diff --Reaper X 22:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 2 - compelling shot, composition, lighting, everything. --Leif 15:12, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 7. 2 - Corrected diff, here is the new one: diff 131.111.8.99 23:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 2 - Cott12 23:46, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 2 - diff - Unbelievably realistic. Cedlaod 05:25, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 2 - --Ggonnell 17:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 2 - Great photos tell a story, which this one does diff MrWeeble 23:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 2 -- I wish I knew more about him. diff Jeremy Tobacman 01:18, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 2 - I've always liked this pic - diff Roadmr 16:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 2 — Laura Scudder | Talk 19:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 2 - more fun than watching flies fuck ˉanetode╦╩ 20:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 2 - My apologies to number 5, but this is a really moving photo. (diff) --70.231.138.93 00:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 2 - My favourite already in the first round. I agree with MrWeeble. But numbers four and six are great illustrations as well. Miaow Miaow 01:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 2 - No contest. yes it's black and white, but the subject is really good. Verdy p 05:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 2 -- Not even close. Rklawton 01:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 2 - Not only a fantastic photograph, but it conveys something more than the rest. Cielomobile 07:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 21. 2 — Probably the most informative, and certainly one of the best-composed pictures on the Commons. — coeLacan — 07:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 2 - Rmhermen 23:26, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 2 -- Saravask 00:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 2 – Sarge Baldy 03:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 2 - These are all well done informational images, but this is the only photo here that has something to say beyond that. – flamurai 20:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 2 - This one truly hits a nerve for me. --67.135.143.106 23:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) diff 27. 2 - --The Photographer 22:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 2 [9] --Muchness 16:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 2 --Alaiche 11:18, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 30. 2 Beautiful picture. The light, tone and grainy quality compliment the subject matter perfectly. --Cactus.man 14:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 2 Beautiful. Scribblingwoman 00:08, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 32. 2 because it's probably the best scene. gren 07:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 2 Birds and different views all are verry nice, but pic 2 tells not only about the depicted person, but also about the condition of a western society. It needs courage and knowledge al well making such a portrait.--Decius 17:24, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 2 Brilliant and intelligent -- DianeAnna 00:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 2 Brilliant. diff JohnnoShadbolt 05:14, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 2 but it's really hard to choose! --Cruccone 20:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 2 carries information, not only effects (diff) 790 11:42, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 2 Chick Bowen 03:43, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff. 39. 2 diff Difficult choice, but I like this one. KeepOnTruckin 23:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 2 diff --ZimZalaBim 20:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 2 diff--Ganchelkas 17:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 42. 2 --Donarreiskoffer 08:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 2 Easy to overlook in the thumbnails, but it is a portrait not just a "snapshot." Patrick Edwin Moran 03:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 2 first, 9 second. Barcex 12:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 2 Forrester 21:52, 22 February 2007 (UTC) diff 46. 2 Great pic, perfect colours and lots of personality! Bertilvidet 22:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 2 Great picture --Jodo 17:12, 26 February 2007 (UTC) (Diff on German Wikipedia) 48. 2 Gugganij 13:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 2 Herr Kriss 18:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 2 I confess that I was disposed reflexively to support 5, which surely more explicitly than 2 serves an illustrative encyclopedic purpose and is plainly preferred to 2 by a measure of value (as against, by a measure of artistic merit or technical quality), but I think the concerns regarding color raised at its FP candidacy are not insignificant; I break tie between the two, perhaps inappropriately, in favor, as Ragesoss, of the image created by a Wikimedian. diff Jahiegel 07:49, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 2 I like great colors, but the subject matter of this one has my vote. GChriss 23:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC) (My identity diff: [1]) 52. 2 I wonder how he would feel about this photograph… diff Atchius 18:53, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 53. 2 It says so much. I just hope someone renames the picture. Cary "Bastiq▼e" Bass demandez 03:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 54. 2 It took guts to compose this so carefully. Brutally beautiful. Kafziel 16:32, 26 February 2007 (UTC) [2] 55. 2 It's stark beauty, and inherent poetical nature make it stand out among the other works. The muted colors add to the overall effect producing an image of instant emotional and critical response. diff Zidel333 07:39, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 2 Itub 09:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 2 Jtico 22:00, 17 February 2007 (UTC) dif 58. 2 Mikm 17:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 59. 2 --Nono365 12:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 60. 2 Other pictures, except 9 and 11, are actually nothing special. --Derbeth talk 09:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 61. 2 Pour l'amour de l'humanité... --Jod-let 15:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 62. 2 real life Aleichem 12:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC)< 100 commons edits, Please add a valid diff --Herby talk thyme 12:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC) diff Aleichem 14:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 63. 2 Stack 04:02, 25 February 2007 (UTC) diff 64. 2 Tatoute 09:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 65. 2 that's not a picture, that's a whole story Irmgard 19:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 66. 2 -The biggest richness; joy of living, even in the poverty diff-Burakhuseyin 00:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 67. 2 The shot is composed beautifully and the lighting is superb. Lauren (diff) 68. 2 This isn't the most beautiful picture, but it is the most important. —Psychonaut 18:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 69. 2 This picture is creepy... Yuval Y § Chat § 17:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 70. 2 wonder if he's seen it.. diff Sbandrews 21:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 71. 2 : Oxam Hartog 23:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 72. 2, amazing composition.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 13:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 73. 2, they're all brilliant and beautiful, but this one is very powerful. diff Seraphimblade 08:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 74. 2. Captivating. diff -- Schnee 23:16, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 75. 2. diff --sony-youthtalk 21:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 76. 2. diff Wodup 04:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 77. 2. Incredible. diff. AmiDaniel 08:40, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 78. 2--Jacopo86 09:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


3=36 1. 3 - de:Benutzer:Syrcro (diff) 2. 3 - diff Adambro 12:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 3 - encyclopaedic, user made, very illustrative mfx Q&A 12:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 3 - Gr8, that's it...--StaraBlazkova 10:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 3 - Great original work. Other images are excellent as well. - diff Utcursch 11:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 3 -- Groovycathers 11:09, 28 February 2007 Congratulations to all the finalists - really difficult to choose a winner! en:diff 7. 3 - Important that this doesn't become just another photo contest. Shyamal 11:18, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 3 – Kaihsu Tai 17:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 3 - Marcus Cyron 09:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 3 -- Pseudomoi (to chat on WP) 10:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 3 A great animation. diff Reywas92 21:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 3 A really good animation, IMo the picture of the year. Manecke 00:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff. < 100 Commons edits, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 3 clever composition, illustrates one of the basics of mechanics. Régis Lachaume 18:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 3 diff --80.176.145.157 16:52, 21 February 2007 (UTC) - corrected diff (hopefully) --80.176.145.157 01:21, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 3 diff JPG-GR 07:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 3 Genial Diff --Leonudio 01:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 3 Go Newton! 192.200.128.45 02:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC)diff 18. 3 --Herrick 13:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 3 I am a big fan of animation, and this is something very special. This is the diff you require. Refsworldlee(chew-fat) 01:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 3 my favourite, great composition. --Ulz cup of coffee? 23:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (to less, I know: diff) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Here's a new diff.--Ulz cup of coffee? 09:40, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 3 notafish }<';> 21:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 3 --Schwalbe 12:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (de-contribs) in memorium of the far too early death of the author DDL. 23. 3 ShadowHalo 19:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 3 -Susanlesch 20:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 3 --T.h. 15:14, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 3 The animation enhances this already great image. diff — xaosflux Talk 18:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 3 Truly original. The shadows on the book are incredible. (diff)—Emote 06:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 3, but there's a lot of images (especially 10) close second. (My home wiki is the English Wikipedia diff) MacGyverMagic 11:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 3. I've always loved those things...but this was a hard decision because they're all so good! Diff SailorAlphaCentauri 20:03, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 3. Jkelly 00:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 3. Please do not discard my vote this time. I have over 10,000 edits on en.wikipedia. Here, once again, is the diff [4]. — CharlotteWebb 01:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 3. Titoxd(?!?) 04:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid vote. Please sign with Commons username or IP address (check instructions first) - Alvesgaspar 11:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 3--Warburg 21:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 3--Wuselig 01:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC)nicht nur technisch schön, sondern ästhetisch präsentiert - toll!!!


4=46 1. 4 - (diff) Hurlbrink 08:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 2. 4 - A spectacular image, among a selection of other spectacular images. I chose this one because I think that it is the most educational of the bunch, as fitting for an encyclopedia.diff --Elonka 07:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 4 - All images are extremely good, however this one shows a lot of imagination. Lcarsdata 09:19, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 4 - diff Jnestorius 00:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 4 — For its encyclopedic value and clarity, though picture 9 had me astonished by its beauty and all other pictures were great. diff — The Saint 19:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 4 - Great astronomy animation, congratulations! Besides, self-made, not taken from another website, like e.g. number 5. Cmapm 14:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 4 - Hard to pick just one, they're all wonderful. -- Avenue 09:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 4 - Impressive animation Modest Genius diff 86.21.14.113 14:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff. Please refer to the IP address under which you voted - Alvesgaspar 15:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC) fixed 86.21.14.113 16:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 4 - Makes a difficult concept clear.--agr 20:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 4 - Motion picture! I've always wanted to see the moon in this aspect. diff diff (looks like it changed on me) 71.213.102.221 10:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 4 - Ruhrfisch 04:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 4 -- taking a bunch of PD images and making an informative PD animation out of it is truly inspiring. --SB_Johnny|talk|books 02:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 4 - Talented creator, smooth animation, incredibly beautiful and fascinating --Iamunknown 05:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 4 - The phases of the moon. This series shows what a computer can display. Larry R. Holmgren 208.127.99.126 06:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please -user does not exist--Herby talk thyme 11:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC)) 15. 4 - Very informative. --59.182.32.135 08:39, 22 February 2007 (UTC) diff Invalid diff, please check instructions Alvesgaspar 08:50, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Heres the diff. --202.71.137.18 06:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC) (I'm using a different computer for this one; the diff notes that as well) 16. 4 - Very tough decision, kudos to all. diff AdelaMae 10:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 4 - Who could not like the moo-oon? diff Wwwwolf 22:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 4 - wonderful picture! Peter1968 08:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC) diff 19. 4 - Zaui 22:12, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 4 A marvelous illustration of an otherwise difficult to visualize phenomenon. Otherwise, 10 or 7 would get my support. Wsiegmund 21:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 4 a very hard choice... all would be worthy winners. but the animation sold me. ++Lar: t/c 23:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 4- All of the pictures are outstanding, but in the Wiki spirit I have to vote for number 4 because I've actually shown it to a family member to explain the concept. My Wikipedia Information Anynobody 09:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 4 All well-deserving, but this is also the most useful, imho, for leading to knowledge of a concept. diff --Canuckguy 00:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 4 As the most interesting. --ajvol 12:46, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 4 Beautiful, informative, illuminating. It represents the values of wikipedia perfectly diff 86.129.53.151 19:01, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 4 because of its beauty, uniqueness and importance as an illustration. Otherwise, I'd have to choose among 10, 8 and 7. Wsiegmund 21:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 4 diff --196.202.91.131 08:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 4 diff educational and a large amount of preparation work. But all the others are great! Graeme Bartlett 01:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 4 diff Jade Knight 11:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 4 diff --M1ss1ontomars2k4 20:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 4 --Error 22:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 4 great work Alessio Damato 20:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 4 Hard choice over 9 though. Goodnightmush 22:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 34. 4 here is a diff because i have fewer (not less) than 100 edits. --M1ss1ontomars2k4 00:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 4 I heart moon diff Stop The Lies 02:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 4 I like that it teaches you and is pretty too! diff WilliamKF 20:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 4 It is rare for a single picture to convey so much in so simple a fashion diff Adzz 23:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 4 It was a hard choice but I like number 4 the best, that must have been a real challenge not just skill (and i bet it took a lot) but luck on on the weather also. Diff Jeepday 01:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 4 Just great. --Gloumouth1 10:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 4 Kersti 16:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 4 Lunar libration Shenme 08:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC) diff 42. 4 PAR 05:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 4 Softeis 22:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 4, but 9 is a close runner-up. Jon Harald Søby 11:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 4, but so close to pick 2,5 or 6.. my diff Murgh 16:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 4diff Besselfunctions


5=84 1. 5 – dontworry 11:02, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2. 5 – Netnet @ 09:11, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 5 - absolutely beautiful pic, I hope to see it myself some day. diff --JerryOrr 12:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 5 - after great consideration. 11 would be my second, but in order to see the beauty of it you have to study it in detail - 5 is amazing even at first glance. 9 is my third, but I've always thought it looked, well, drawn. Unreal. No, 5 is my final vote. It is striking at both low and high resolution, and the image detail is awesome. It makes me want to go north even though I've had enough of the damned snow already. diff Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 01:37, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 5 - Alexj2002 23:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 5 - Beautiful shot (diff) - Fmmarianicolon 04:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 5 - diff Rbj 08:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 5 - Earth, our only home, an inconvenient truth. diff Xiner 22:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 5 - excellent picture. JROBBO 03:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 5 - Fantastic! Love the earth.--diff Chax2 12:12, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 5 - Far above the rest. Beyond compare. Royalbroil T : C 03:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 5 - hard decision, they're all really, really great! diff 86.59.60.209 00:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 5 — Kalan 08:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 14. 5 - --Max666 19:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 15. 5 -- MURO DE AGUAS ( Write me) 17:15, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 5 - Natural beauty at its greatist - ChrisDHDR 16:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 17. 5 - Number ten is also great but five is just extraordinary Marmoulak 06:12, 25 February 2007 (UTC) - diff 18. 5 - Rodge 08:05, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 5 - SlimVirgin 14:00, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 20. 5 - Stunning. -BjorneOfDanmark 00:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC) diff 21. 5 - Stunning. Humus sapiens 05:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 5 - tough call - diff Flex 16:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 5 - Tough choice, especially since non of my nominations made it to the final. :/ --LasseG 02:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 5 - Truly amazing, awesome colours, makes me want to move to the Arctic! diff M0RHI 22:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 5 - Very rare. Gives people a distant and mysterious feeling. Excellent. [diff] --Raphaelmak 05:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 5 -- Wars 12:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 5 - What an amazing photo. Dbslikacheung, active in the Chinese (Zhongwen) Wikipedia (My User Page, My Contributes, diff) 10:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 5 - What fantastic colors ! diff 62.129.166.218 13:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff link - Alvesgaspar 13:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 5 A fantastic image of the aurora 74.114.91.237 01:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 30. 5 A picture like this is not easy to take! Vmenkov 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 5 after long hesitation. Traumrune 22:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 5 Amazing. --Johnny 12:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 5 beautiful and valuable TomAlt 14:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 5 Beautiful composition and unusually good photo of aurora [3] diff] Betsythedevine 23:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 5 But it was a tough choice! diff --Grant M 13:28, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 5 Crazy. Wish I could vote for them all. diff --Fbv65edel 02:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 5 Definitely caught my attention. Loved it. diff Century0 02:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 5 diff great shot, very impressive --StéfanLD 00:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 5 diff Pruthvi.Vallabh 02:26, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 5 diff --StéfanLD 20:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 5 diff Susan Davis 00:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 42. 5 diff. Manuel Menal 20:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 5 diff24.59.107.139 22:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 5 --Eduardoferreira 12:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 5 has to get my vote, since Wikinews used it here. Here's the diff for my account on Wikinews, I believe you'll find I've made enough edits. Any problem with my vote, please notify me on my Wikinews talk page. --Brianmc 12:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 5' Helios89 20:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 5 Husky 09:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 5 I really like the colours reflecting back in the snow diff --RedHillian 01:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 5 If I had to pic one thing I'd like to see, I'd go with that. Stunning.--Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:59, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 5 is interesting for me, diff --Ali1986 19:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 5 I've been on that very road, and for some reason it always produces the best lights. diff -206.174.71.231 52. 5 --I've seen this from the cockpit window of a 747 over Hudson's Bay--spectacular!Lmcelhiney 04:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff 53. 5 JMCC1 10:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 54. 5' Kaganer 18:35, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 55. 5 --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 17:03, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 5 Love it, very deserving. diff Mullibok 00:42, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 5 Love the colors. diff --Ideogram 09:02, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 58. 5 Platonides 21:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 59. 5 Pure nature. diff -GlamdringCookies 11:01, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 60. 5 --schlendrian •λ• 16:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 61. 5 Simply stunning Tompw (talk) (en) 17:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 62. 5 simply stunning... (I see I have less than 100 edits... ok, see my English talkpage.) --Tone 16:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 63. 5 --Stavenn 05:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 64. 5 Stunning. Corrected diff. 67.85.35.9 19:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 65. 5 Tbc 20:14, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 66. 5 the nature --β16 - (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 67. 5 This is a really nice picture. I've always been fond of the Northern Lights. diff--Dycedarg 22:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 68. 5 This really is the best diff --24.164.94.90 06:36, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 69. 5 Tizio 18:33, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 70. 5 --Ultratomio 10:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 71. 5 Very beautiful picture of the Northern Lights (I wish it was this visible in MN) diff :: ZJH (T C E) 02:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 72. 5 --Willtron 16:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 73. 5 wOw (Capital "O") diff --68.231.38.229 08:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 74. 5 WOW, absolutly breathtaking. diff Ferdiaob 20:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 75. 5, a beautiful picture. Olessi 15:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 76. 5. ais523 (w:en:) 13:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC) (I have 100 edits on :w:en:) 77. 5. Difficult choice diff --74.38.90.174 17:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 78. 5. --Fang Aili talk 15:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 79. 5. pjahr ۞ 20:43, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 80. 5. Real, but unreal. Audacity 03:29, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Wikipedia 81. 5. Stunning. --Jpgordon 18:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC)diff 82. 5. This is such a great shot! diff -- Ezratrumpet 23:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 83. 5. VT hawkeye 05:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC) (en:diff]) 84. 5--WikiMeGa**** @@@-fr Accueil fr:Accueil 10:08, 23 February 2007 (UTC)


6=62 1. 6 - 3, 6, 7 and 8 all look good in low resolution which is important since Wikipedia articles only use small images. Of these, 6 wins since it's an unrepeatable shot documenting an encyclopedic event. Angela 14:01, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 2. 6 - A haunting photo, looks like a raised Titanic! Rapotter 3. 6 - A stunning comment on the relationship of our technological society with the rest of the planet. EnEdC 23:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 6 - diff - Trevor MacInnis 15:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 6 -- diff Marshall 23:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 6 - diff --MKay 16:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 6 - diff —RP88 04:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 6 - Half a ship due to simply the force of nature. diff --Bamsefar75 02:41, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 6 -- Lerdsuwa 13:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 6 - SACUD [talk]► 18:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 6 - Simply a great shot enriching commons. -- 2000 19:52, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 6 -- Sozi 09:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 6 - That was a really choice, but I prefer it ever so slightly to 5, if only because it was taken by a Wikimedian. I really like it a lot, this is an amazing picture. (diff) --Dylan Lake 04:08, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 6 - that's about it--Dannycas 05:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 6 - Very nice picture. Plus bonus points for geotagging! diff Mike1024 (t/c) 10:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 6 — Wow. diff — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] ツ 23:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 6 ~ trialsanderrors 06:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 6 203.87.65.3 09:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff. 19. 6 24.128.26.96 04:20, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Amazing pic of the ship, I must say. diff 20. 6 90.9.51.224 No anonymous votes, please - Alvesgaspar 20:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 6 --Angelo.romano 12:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 22. 6 --Calton 23:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 6 China Crisis 17:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 6 --Closedmouth 12:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 25. 6 --Dani 7C3 (talk) 17:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 6 diff -- Steel en:Steel 13:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 6 -diff- alexscho 10:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 6 diff IronGargoyle 00:27, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 6 diff --Orioane 09:48, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 6 diff Rkitko 01:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 6 diff. Wonderful narrative image. --195.166.150.161 06:39, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 6 Dpenguinman@wikipedia Dpenguinmandiff 33. 6 --Eleassar (t/p) 15:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 6 EyOne 12:53, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 6 High enough resolution, suberb composition, fascinating--Simonizer 09:21, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 6 --I really like six.Yaanch [6] 37. 6 It is technically maybe not the most perfect. But it has a great atmosphere... --AngMoKio 19:14, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 6 --JeremyA 04:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 6 --Luigi Chiesa 22:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 6 Mieciu K2 21:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC) diff 20:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 6 --NeuCeu 08:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 42. 6' Poppy 23:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 6' Radomil talk 18:38, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 6 really difficult to choose, they're all excellent. diff 90.240.184.207 10:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 6 Really nice detail and color. diff Patrickneil 21:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 6 --S. Kasten 14:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 6 Sfu 18:57, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 6 So many good pics to have to decide from! --evrik 19:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 6 Sparkit 23:07, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 6 Terence Ong 09:24, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 6 --Trounce 21:56, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 52. 6 What a hard choice between 1, 5, 6, 9, and 11. I finally decided that I liked 1 & 6 the best and thought the award should go to a photo taken by a Wikimedian. diff Hgebel 01:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 53. 6 What a shame that i've only one vote but this is my favorite considering encyclopedic use and "loveliness"--Wiggum 10:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 54. 6 Yakudza 21:20, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 55. 6. -- [diff] Gjp23 18:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 6. -- Mbdortmund 20:37, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 6. BrianSmithson 06:34, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 58. 6. Great photo diff Springnuts 16:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 59. 6. This looks so unreal; pale colors (I use the same camera, so I know almost all pics are pale as this one :)) add to this feel, and it's as if the ship has come to its grave. The big, old, heavy, unnatural, rusty ship and the unforgiving sea. Beautifully symbolic. :) diff --Matija 22:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 60. 6. Very beautiful image. --Carioca 05:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 61. 6: You don't see something like that every day. Egs 09:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 62. 6-diff 150.131.80.16 02:01, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


7=70 1. 7 - A very difficult decision!! However, I love the clarity and color of this shot and what really clinched it for me was the bit of snow on the beak! diff Merteuil 17:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 2. 7 - Alekjds&diff 05:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) valid diff 3. 7 - awesome. I feel that 7 and 8 may split a lot of votes since they are both birds in similar scenery. Oh well. -Bluedog423 03:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 7 - Barasoaindarra 23:09, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 7 - Beautiful colours make great contrast with snow 192.246.231.98 00:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC) diff 6. 7 - Beautiful, inspiring, perfect Fg2 10:28, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 7 - Beautiful. --Conti|✉ 19:19, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 7 - Bird's good picture Smat 19:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 7 - Combines all that the POTY should represent. Surprised 5 is getting so many votes - lots of ccd dark noise when viewed at full res. - not good at all. SFC9394 11:13, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 7 - diff -77.107.200.160 20:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 7 - diff Wonderful colours outstanding the snow font. --Aukawasi 05:09, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 7 - exceptionnel !!! : très esthétique (magnifique oiseau dans ce décors de neige, le givre sur le bout du bec...), pédagogique : on voit avec précision l'organisation extérieur du plumage, des couleurs, la texture du bec, la concitution des pattes, on voit la rétine de l'oeil... ; elle témoigne de la spécificité de la force contributive de l'art photographique à la connaissance : impossible pour la plupart d'entre nous d'approcher d'aussi près et de façon statique un oiseau et pouvoir observer ainsi dans les détails son aspect extérieur ! Cette photo est une richesse exptionnelle pour le projet wikipédia ! - diff Alceste 18:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 7 - Fruggo 18:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 7 - GAD talk ð contributions 13:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Simple and beautiful... 15. 7 - Great picture. --NEUROtiker 00:30, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 7 - I just like that picture - diff --Benmento 09:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 7 - informative and simple. feydey (talk) 13:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 7 -- LadyofHats 18:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 7 - Lapplaender 11:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 7 - Love that picture! -- High Contrast 16:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 7 - My favorite, using it as wallpaper. --Falcorian (talk) 01:39, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 7 - no visible artifacts and crystal clear! diff --WikiSlasher 09:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 7 - Olegivvit 12:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 7 - Perfect composition, wonderful subject and amazing photographic quality, well beyond most pictures in this final. And a work of a Wikipedian, of course. - Alvesgaspar 22:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 7 — Sergey kudryavtsev 08:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 7 - Simple, sweet, and oh so clear. diff Rivertorch 06:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 7 - That's the one. Alaexis 10:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC); diff 28. 7 - the little bit of ice on the beak is just the icing on the cake! --pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 7 - Very hard to make up one's mind, but I like the natural theme of this one. diff --Yvesnimmo 22:53, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 7 - Zimbres 04:07, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 7 Andrew Levine -- same reasons as Alceste above: So much precise detail in the plumage, the bit of frost on the beak, and the feet. Andrew Levine 21:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 7 because it's so hard to catch them. fantastic. --Nina 21:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 7 Cool! --Pokrajac 17:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 7 diff 24.90.165.192 02:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 7 diff -Alekjds 02:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 7 diff --Artefacto 14:22, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 7 Diff Carlosguitar 14:36, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 7 diff Khardan 18:46, 19 February 2007 (UTC). 39. 7 --Digon3 18:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 7 Extraordinarily beautiful. It was so hard to chose between 7 and 8! --Pharaoh Hound 12:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 7 for the bluejay diff — MrDolomite | Talk 10:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 42. 7 great pic - diff Measly pawn 17:03, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 7 Hashekemist 21:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 7 --Herby talk thyme 11:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 7 I love the detail in the feathers and ice on its beak, but they're all really good.--HereToHelp (talk) 23:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) note this edit was made by user:HereToHelp - [4] - although their sig only points to ENwp. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Which has more than 100 edits here. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 7 it's amazing. diff ChP94 18:47, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 7 Love the colors. /Daniel78 21:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 7 --MiPe 14:09, 17 February 2007 (UTC) diff 49. 7 My favorite in commons. --Nerval 06:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 50. 7 My favorite since i've seen it first time. --GeorgHH 21:06, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 7 Mysid 21:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 52. 7 Nihonjoe 23:12, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 53. 7 --Nolanus 18:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 54. 7 Roarjo 22:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 55. 7 The clarity even at the highest zoom level is just astonishing. Blahedo 07:25, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 7 The snow on the Jay's beak seals the deal for me. --Starwiz 01:27, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 7 This was a really tough decision ... all fine pics, and 2 others really close - but has to be this one for me. Beauty and superb technique too. diff --81.179.66.146 18:54, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 58. 7 --Überraschungsbilder 15:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 59. 7 Unbelievable clarity...love the snow on the tip of the beak! diff —BrOnXbOmBr21 22:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 60. 7 un'immagine bellissima. diff. --pin84 22:07, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 61. 7 very difficult to choose... I'll give my vote to the bird, but I have a special thought for number 9 (will be my screen for a while) and the very powerful 2 (which I just decided to use in m6 - Apocalypse now... Great shot, strongly evocative! El Comandante Hasta ∞ 03:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 62. 7 WOW diff --The.Q | Talk 15:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 63. 7 yep, the lovely birdie! go on.--Mohamed Magdy 06:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 64. 7-- 如詩如畫。 --Hillgentleman[3] 65. 7, excellent, exceptional, brilliant. Shyam (T/C) 18:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 66. 7. Diff showing my confirmation that User:Simetrical == w:User:Simetrical. —Simetrical (talk • contribs) 04:58, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 67. 7. Finest Image of the lot. Photographer has quite a portfolio of excellent quallity images. Most all of the other images are "be at the right place at the right time" images, or "take enough pictures till you get it" images, whereas his are works of art. On a side note, the "newton's cradle" animation is well done., except the motions of the balls are unrealistically calculated. There is a certain timing and formula they should follow, and, having used these a tone of times, this is not quite it. Also, the "homeless man" would have been my vote, but the "photoshopping" effects mar the uncut beauty(figurative, not literal) of any image.The level of detail in 7 is unmatched, not even by 8...I've never seen a wildlife picture so clear...diff--Vox Rationis 05:48, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 68. 7. It's subtle. 69.115.254.212 04:52, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 69. 7. This is a tough one--they are all extraordinary.diff--70.79.19.180 22:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff link. Please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 22:56, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 70. 7diff They're all breath-taking, so I take n° 7, it's just too cute! --Escondites 18:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC)


8=53 1. 8 - AuburnPilot 05:22, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (en.Wiki) 2. 8 - Awesome shot of a magnificent animal. Ken Thomas 20:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 8 - Clear nature. diff. --Anton Rakitskiy 08:25, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 8 - diff - Jwillbur 04:57, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 8 - diff. ---Bryson109 22:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 8 - Difficult to decide, these are all fantastic images. Jnpet 04:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 8 - great Bird, perfectly sharp - not number 5 for the same reasons it didn't reach the excellent state on de:WP:KEB... diff --Muellercrtp 23:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 8 - I really love the quietness of this photograph. diff --Huygens 20:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 8 - Or 7... Can I do half votes? If I can I would have half to 7 and half to 8, but I do like 8 a bit more than 7. --Antilived 04:28, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 8 - Seemed like a toughíssimo choice at 1st (5, 6 & 7 are all super) but I had to go this way - it's just a perfect photograph of a wondrous subject. Who doesn't love owls?! Ok, mice don't, I'll give U that.. --Lumijaguaari (моє обговорення) 05:20, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 8 - So beautiful. --Wildfeuer 01:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 8 - That Barred Owl is basically amazing. diff. 63.175.167.126 05:33, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 8 - The owl for knowledge. --Malene Thyssen 10:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 8 - the still frosty atmosphere...and I've always loved owls! diff--80.177.7.14 22:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 8' ~ Arjun 18:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 16. 8 A great business card for all Wikimedia projects. Freedom to share 17:38, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 8 a little better than 7 --diff Revolus 14:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 8 --Aconcagua 09:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 8 An amazing high resolution picture of an rarely seen owl. diff Alan.ca 04:52, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 8 --Awiseman 17:45, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 21. 8 Basik07 14:33, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 8 Beautiful picture toke by a wikimedian and showing a camouflage example diff M LA 14:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 8 --che 15:29, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 8 --Conrado 17:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 8 diff - Great photo. --MichaelBillington 12:10, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 8 Excellent --NicolasGrandjean 17:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 8 Ganz, ganz knapp vor 7. Beide unspektakulär, aber präzise fotografiert mit wunderbar zurückhaltenden, natürlichen Farben, hoher enzyklopädischer Relevanz, Schärfeverlauf perfekt. -- smial 02:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 8 Goldfritha 01:29, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 8 --Hans Koberger 10:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 8 I Love the Barred owl its a fantastic animal and a fantastic picture. diff Darkest Hour 21:06, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 8 Incredible shot. My wallpaper for a while. (diff) --64.93.150.122 21:21, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 8 It's the one I would most likely use as wallpaper.. diffWwwhatsup 16:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 8 --Jovanvb 11:03, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 8 Like this bird. --Yuriybrisk 18:54, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 8 Lourdes 17:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 8 --Nick1915 20:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 8 Owls are such lovely birds. I find this photo very soothing. Arria Belli | parlami 01:54, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 8 Paulo Juntas 17:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Very nice picture 39. 8 Quadell (talk) 20:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 8 --Rémih 13:43, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 8 --Romary 10:04, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 42. 8 --Schlesinger 19:40, 21 February 2007 (UTC) diff. It's simply a good photo. 43. 8 Snowwayout 21:47, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 8 --Spangineeren ws (háblame) 16:57, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 8 --startaq 02:54, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 8 --user:Qviri 01:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 8 Very striking (though 6 came close, and I love 3 too!) diff Quackdave 16:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 8 was the only image that i couldnt find a negative factor, Gnangarra 12:35, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 8, and my next choices would be 10 and 9. 5 has serious aesthetic issues in addition to not being by a Wikimedian--Ragesoss 02:47, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 8, Beautiful Wikimedian's picture with good composition, quality and wikipedian interest - Ceridwen 18:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 8. A magnificient animal in a natural kinglike position. You can even see the (invisible) foreground mirrored in its eyes. My compliments to the photographer! diff Sijo Ripa 15:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 52. 8.diff Great picture and one of the best I've ever seen. Eacz12 21:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 53. 8: Beautiful picture. —Celestianpower háblame 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)


9=67 1. 9 - A great pic ;-) SMP (talk page) 00:12, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 2. 9 - Amazing colours - a unique scene. DJR 22:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 3. 9 - Amazing! Kprateek88 16:16, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 9 - Brilliant display of colors. diff Huntscorpio 00:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 9 - Dantadd✉ 20:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 9 - diff -- Paddu 04:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 9 - diff - Zepheus 17:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 9 - diff $pooky 10:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 9 - Difficult to capture! --Shibo77 03:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 9 - great picture. -- diff Warfieldian 01:16, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 9 - i love the contrast between the man civilization and such a beautiful nature --Zertrin on the French Wiki diff 12. 9 - Just too damn pretty to be real. 134.198.64.84 18:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 9 - Love it, NoSeptember 23:41, 26 February 2007 (UTC) diff 14. 9 - one of the few pictures that has the right to win - Jeroenvrp 15:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 9 - Parce que j'aime les photos de nuit, les panoramas, et que les qualités techniques et esthétiques de cette photo sont irréprochables. Diff --Grook Da Oger 03:20, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 9 — pd_THOR | =/\= | 18:17, 17 February 2007 (UTC) (diff) 17. 9 - That's a great pic... you get a great sense of "foreboding" in that shot... that could be an opening scene for 24! diff --Jhortman 22:06, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 9 - this is the best one! diff JP06035 18:20, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 9 -- You made 1 pale in comparison. diff -- Kerowren 20:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 9 [10] Doug Bell 17:51, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 9 ~~helix84 21:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 9 A great image with great colors. ← Körnerbrötchen - @ 08:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 9 A hard choice, congratulations to all photographers. diff Ashibaka 05:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 9 A nice blend of the natural (moon, clouds and lake) and the constructed (cityscape) Rmkf1982 diff 25. 9 A wonderful skyline with beautiful colors. diff --Joebengo 16:09, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 9 --Brallan 20:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 9 --Broadbeer 23:12, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 9 Chris93 12:38, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 12:42, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 9 Colors and mood --wL <speak•creatively> 02:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 9 diff - documents the city beautifully. 137.131.164.201 23:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 9 diff -Ike9898 02:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 32. 9 diff No-Bullet 01:55, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 9 diff Regenspaziergang 23:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 9 diffPeaceNT 16:10, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 9 Doesn't even lok like a picture it is so good -YK Times diff 02:29, 2 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 9 --Dual Freq 05:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 9 Er Komandante (messages) 19:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 9 Excellent photo of my childhood city, wonderful. Diff- [5]--Kungfuadam 13:39, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 9 great picture. diff MichaelWheeley 01:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 9 Great shot. --tomf688 (talk - email) 20:19, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 9 is just about the most wonderful night photography picture I have seen on the Commons, and I have seen a lot. Also, to the user above, had you read the beginning of this page, you would know that we're voting for the best featured picture promoted in 2006, as well as how to vote. - 24.167.165.20 00:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 42. 9 Krzysiu Jarzyna ☎ 19:24, 20 February 2007 (UTC) -- the most natural. 43. 9 --Merlinme 13:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 44. 9 Nice landscape and sky. diff YooChung 15:59, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 9 number 6 is a very close second.--69.225.87.189 03:58, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff 46. 9 original--Parisette 21:42, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 9 Outstanding. diff, 216.110.127.248 22:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 9 perfect in every way, quality, resolution, composition are amazing, encyclopedic value is not that great but that's why it's on commons after all -- Gorgo 21:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 9 Pretty cool image --Emx 01:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 9 Rasbak 08:50, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 51. 9 Really like this one. diff --Romanski 11:15, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 52. 9 RobbieG (diff) I love it. Although all the photos are very dramatic. RobbieG 22:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 53. 9 Same as above, just forgot to diff. diff You know they should make these things easier. There's a wonderful innovation called a radio button! 54. 9 Surreal RickO5 diff 55. 9 They are all very well done. RichN (talk) 00:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 9 très belles couleurs diffmy edit count is | there Ofol 12:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 9 --Urban 05:58, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 58. 9 Very ominous...I love the character of the picture. diff Ophion 3:48, 23 February 2007 (UTV) 59. 9 Wonderful Image diff Wilsbadkarma 09:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 60. 9. Amazing colors. 68.253.218.233 20:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) diff 61. 9. Beautiful diff 84.68.226.123 18:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 62. 9. Extremely atmospheric photograph. diff DWaterson 23:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 63. 9. Great pic of San Diego, my hometown! diff Eric Bekins 23:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff limk. Please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 23:19, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 64. 9. I love San Diego! --Giac! - (Tiago is here) 17:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 65. 9. I've always liked cityscapes and the moon shining through the clouds makes so much cooler. diff clpo13 18:15, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 66. 9. Now there's a jim-dandy picture. Dar-Ape 03:34, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 67. 9. --Wst question 17:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC)


10=70 1. 10 - All of these images are lovely, so I can be exremely picky: 1 is a very good shot, but the composition could be improved (the lights in the corners are particularly distracting). 2's composition is perfect, but the image uploaded is very low resolution, and has a currently hip ultrasharpened HDRish look to it that will look very 2000s in a decade or two. 3 is a great animation, but I suspect it will also not age well, and there's something uncomfortably discontinuous about the motion. 4 is an apropos and unintrusive use of animation, but the image quality is actually not that good (low resolution, aliased font, aliasing at edges of moon); I think it also misleadingly suggests that it is actual photographs of the moon. The long exposure of 5 makes it appear blurry at large sizes. The composition of 6 is awesome but the image quality and contrast are only "good". 7 is a perfectly great wildlife photo, but is sort of obvious. Similarly with 8, except that foreground branches are additionally a bit distracting. 9 is wonderful in every way, and would win my favorite photo of the group, but its usefulness in an encyclopedia is limited. 11 is a great encyclopedic capture of a difficult to photograph event; really nothing to criticize about it at all except that the subject is a little mundane. 10 is high quality, and outstanding in its capture of something encyclopedic that would otherwise be basically impossible to see, so it is my pick. Thumbs up all around! en User:Brighterorange 2. 10 - amazing capture, and encyclopaedic - MPF 00:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 10 - Astonishing picture, encyclopaedic value. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 10 -- Atluxity 17:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 10 - Cap-in-hand artist diff Nepomuk 15:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 10 -- diff -- SatyrTN 01:43, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 10 – diff --Ligulem 23:49, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 10 - Difficult choice, but I go for this one (very original). --JLCA 22:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 10 - Elapied 10:41, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 10 - enochlau (talk) 22:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 10 - Excellent detail, and fascinating subject! Tough choice though. (Here's a diff to my talk page on Wikiversity). Cormaggio 13:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 12. 10 - Excellent, difficult shot. diff R. S. Shaw 06:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 10 - Incredible shot of fleeting subjects, excellent focus and detail Peter Campbell 11:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 14. 10 - It is a very amazing picture --Archenzo 21:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 10 - lightning in a bottle. diff. Lpangelrob 20:00, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 10 - Looks like a very difficult shot. diff24.55.132.198 05:34, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 10 - Nemo5576 07:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 10 - Quite a unique picture! diff Robomojo 06:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 19. 10 - Ratarsed 21:35, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 10 - the wub "?!" 18:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 10 - uhm Przykuta 06:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 22. 10 - wau 01:46, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 10 – Tintazul talk 15:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 24. 10 (but 7 & 8 are outstanding too) // tsca [re] 01:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 10 Absolutely wonderful. Fir0002 has done it again. An extremely difficult subject, great encyclopedic value and all in all a tremendous picture. diff Oghmoir 16:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 10 Amazing clarity for such a fast-moving subject. --Lee Daniel Crocker 17:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 27. 10 amazing. Fabienkhan 16:16, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 10 --Amrum 18:12, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 10 An amazing, beautiful, and encyclopedic shot. diff --Aranae 02:36, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 10 Astonishing technical picture, and by a Wikimedian too. --MichaelMaggs 22:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 10 Beautiful... Paris75000 09:26, 26 February 2007 (UTC) I've got about 7.000 edits on Wiki.fr and diff 32. 10 Caracas1830 10:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 33. 10 Chabacano 17:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 10 Changed my mind. diff -- Tivedshambo 17:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 10 diff --DieBuche 18:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 10 diff Katt 23:56, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 10 Encyclopedic. Diff. -- Jeandré, 2007-02-17t17:19z 38. 10 Excellent. diff Kellen 23:42, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 10 Fir0002, you're a great photographer. I like what you do. Beautiful picture. DeansFA 09:41, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 10 -Gadfium 22:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 10 gosh, this was a tough choice. Dominus 17:37, 24 February 2007 (UTC) diff 42. 10 Great! --ALE! ¿…? 13:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 10 has highest use value, plus technical difficulty diff since I lack 100 edits here. GRBerry 18:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 10 Has to be this one. Lycaon 09:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 10 --howcheng {chat} 03:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 10 I'd've been thrilled to vote for 11 or 7 too. w:en ×Meegs 15:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 47. 10 Its encyclopedic value is great, and it's a well-taken picture. diff 69.27.5.106 23:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 48. 10 it's my desktop picture now. diff (again) László 11:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 49. 10 Just a beautiful picture. --Joelmills 23:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 50. 10 ONUnicorn 21:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 51. 10 probably the most difficult to shoot and it has excellent quality. --Dschwen 21:18, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 52. 10 --qvvx 00:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diffs: ruwiki → metawiki metawiki → commonswiki) 53. 10 Sex sells, especially if it's captured in a photograph like this. Diff Theroachman 18:51, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 54. 10 Spectacular photo. --Rbraunwa 19:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 55. 10 The most skillful IMHO --Ayacop 10:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 56. 10 These are all spectacular; my next choices would be 11 and 9; I love 1 and 5 but would prefer to use a wikiuser's image. diff Bikeable 18:02, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 57. 10 This is absolutely amazing. Two thumbs up for the photographer's skills! However, the other images are great too!--Pumbaa 13:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 58. 10 --Tschaensky 11:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 59. 10 Unique, encyclopedic, and of wonderful quality. diff Basar 19:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 60. 10 very amazing capture, but I also like 11 (similar) and 2 for the subject --Nux (talk••dyskusja) 23:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 61. 10 Visually stunning. Fredhsu 19:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 62. 10, tough choice. Duja 18:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 63. 10. Dori | Talk 04:48, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 64. 10. I can well believe that it took Fir0002 three days to capture that image. - BanyanTree 03:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 65. 10. I envy Fir for taking such incredible pictures - this is art! PER9000 16:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 66. 10. It's incredible that someone managed such a shot! --Stephan Schulz 15:55, 28 February 2007 (UTC) diff 67. 10. Some good competition, but this was my instinctive choice, and I don't want to change it. diff JPD 17:24, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 68. 10. Unbelievable shot! [2] User:Dante Alighieri 19:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 69. 10--Absar 13:51, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 70. 10--Prazak 12:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

11=46 1. 11 -- 66.71.42.128 15:40, 28 February 2007 (UTC) But also Suto on Wikipedia English, 須藤 on Wikipedia Japanese, and also Suto on Wikiversity. Can I vote? diff 2. 11 - amazing shot, very difficult to obtain, timeless. diff (see the edit summary, thanks) tiZom(2¢) 03:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 3. 11 - and not 9 because he has no user page :-) diff. Hessam 21:05, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 4. 11 - Beautiful capture, extraordinarily clear. --diffNarfil Palùrfalas 01:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 5. 11 - can't even begin to think how this was done - Jack • talk • 04:10, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 6. 11 - captured energy. --Born2flie 03:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 7. 11 - Close to home. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 11:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 8. 11 - Detailed and very difficult to take. Also something we can't usually see as its too fast and bright. Ksbrowntalk 11:14, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 9. 11 -- Erina 11:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 10. 11 - I wish it was in landscape - [1] Darkson - BANG! 20:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 11. 11 - It was hard to decide. 3, and 4, were way cool, but didn't quite have the quality that 11 has. 3 had weird animation frames, w:en:Uncanney Valley? The Libration one was way cool, but the quality was lacking in that the moon didn't stay in one position. 11 was a high quality image, that looks awesome. Mckaysalisbury 06:13, 27 February 2007 (UTC) (certification diff) 12. 11 - I've loved fires ever since I became a Boy Scout. [1] Scoutersig 15:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC) 13. 11 — my vote goes to this picture, but all listed here are really great. /odder 18:19, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 14. 11 - Stunning detail on the beautifully fluid smoke. diff -- Avraham 17:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 15. 11 - There are several excellent choices, to be sure, but this one is the only one that is nearly flawless. An extraordinary photo. diff Jersyko 04:34, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 16. 11 - This is a great example of an everyday object turned extraordinary. --Tewy 00:48, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 17. 11 - This looks awesome and a hard pic to take. diff cheers Beaver 09:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 18. 11 -- TimVickers 01:36, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff 19. 11 - Very hard to choose between 11 and 8 --Arad 00:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 20. 11 "Match" - Beautiful colors, difficult to obtain, encyclopedic value is great. diff Asiir 216.15.52.83 12:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 21. 11 (diff) Noclip 17:38, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 11 /Lokal_Profil 15:54, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Mmmm.. fire... And great resoulution to 22. 11 5 and 9 isn't that good as I thought, and the quality isn't good in largest size. So it's between the 11th and 10th picture. //moralist 14:26, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 23. 11 A striking image(hehe). Difficult to take, technically excellent, informative and interesting. HighInBC 20:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC)diff 24. 11 Clear, beautiful pic. V60 VCTalk • VContribs 02:42, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 25. 11 diff IanManka 14:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 26. 11 diff Yono 00:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 27. 11 Entten tentten teelikamentten... Lähes kaikki kuvat ovat niin loistavia että mahdoton valita. Tämä näyttää pikkukuvana parhaalta Tuohirulla 23:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 28. 11 --EugeneZelenko 15:55, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 29. 11 --Filip (§) 13:58, 23 February 2007 (UTC) 30. 11 I just like that one :-) (diff) --80.62.90.39 14:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) 31. 11 I voted for this one in its original Featured Picture nomination and I still think it is one of the best pictures I have ever seen. Valley2city 07:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff 32. 11 Incredible! Esrever 17:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff 33. 11 --Kintup 17:36, 17 February 2007 (UTC) less than 100 commons edits. please re-read the instructions. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) diff --kintup 14:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC) 34. 11 Miguel303xm 06:45, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 35. 11 Nice, clean, sharp. [8] Abeg92 13:48, 19 February 2007 (UTC) 36. 11 Roger McLassus 11:44, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 37. 11 Rudi pl 13:06, 24 February 2007 (UTC) 38. 11 --Sir Gawain 11:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 39. 11 These are all great pictures, no 11 would be my favourite. --Matt314 20:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC) 40. 11 Was a tough choice between this & 8, but this edged out. diff SkierRMH 23:34, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 41. 11 --Winterheart 06:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC) (diff Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) 42. '11 --Zantastik 18:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC) 43. 11 --Zefram 00:35, 25 February 2007 (UTC) 44. 11, would vote for the flies for information but the match is just a bit more aesthetically pleasing. :) diff Voretus 16:30, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 45. 11. That's an amazing shot! diff 128.62.106.94 23:12, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 46. 11-diff Freepopcornonfridays

Votes Invalides[edit]

• y next presentation). Congrats to all ! user:anthere • You need 100 edits, please create a diff.71.131.40.234 04:44, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • • -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. {{{2}}}

  • 2 - A common sight on the commons site.diff 212.140.254.74 09:48, 22 February 2007 (UTC) diff doesn't assert user correctly. Reywas92 00:17, 23 February 2007 (UTC) diff

• *-- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. {{{2}}} • *1 - Bright lights, Big city. no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - Brilliant aerial shot of one of my favorite airports. Pic diff --Skyring 09:51, 20 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 edits on that wiki, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 20:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - diff "Lafayette Iraq War Memorial" You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - diff for EEMeltonIV Please sign your post and refer to your IP address or Commons username in your diff. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - Great pic, especially at night. By Spartacvs. please sign your vote --Herby talk thyme 12:33, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) • *1 - I can't believe an airport could be that nice. – OCNative 09:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - Quite a fascinating picture. diff invalid diff, no signature here pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 -- Really cool! Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *1 - Sad it's not by a wikipedian, but I am voting for it anyway. Morgan Leigh 23:17, 18 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - Surreal... me like. - Arch_NME 22:19, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Please insert a diff link, according to instructions - Alvesgaspar 22:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 - They are all great. (Donovan You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. Geocachernemesis • *1 - They are all great. 124.197.47.23 05:34, 27 February 2007 (UTC) I voted again while logged in below • *1 -- this is the only image unique to 2006...the lunar one is cool, but is from 2005.User:Barefootpanda no user by this name pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 awesome diff 68.95.225.184 03:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 Awesome picture. 5 is also pretty good. diff Chris01720 11:59, 26 February 2007 (UTC) <100 edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 diff (voting again, previous vote got deleted somehow) NYC JD 22:54, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Found your lost vote. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *1 diff 09:58, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Please sign your vote Alvesgaspar 10:49, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 diff Lovely photo of the airport. Not sure if my diff is correct, though. --220.253.116.85 12:06, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 12:51, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 fascinating to see how beautiful even something as mundane as an airport can be from the right perspective. diff 70.107.175.226 19:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 19:29, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 hope this diff is enough, if not - PLS let me know! THNXX. ummm... the airport is fantastic, it makes you think about the world community and how great our Earth is. - Zac allan 11:37, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff (also, we don't read Russian, I'm sorry) - Alvesgaspar 11:52, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *1 Shame its not from a wikipedian but I am still voting for it. diffMorgan Leigh 04:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry, voting in restricted to wikipedians with more than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 12:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) This Wikipedian has over 100 edits, but the diff is invalid -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *1. Technically demanding, executed with great skill, with a result that is both informative and visually striking. 217.44.254.21 21:33, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *1. Very nice. Gajamukhu 19:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *2 - Belle photo !!! Super couleurs. User:alex668391 < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 08:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 - Great composition and most powerful expression of all the candidates --71.232.93.40 00:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes, please - Alvesgaspar 00:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 -- Ouicoude --82.123.101.58 14:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC) diff Sorry, invalid diff. Please take the other diffs as example. -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 - So hard to choose, but this one is absolutely great. Retouching is close to perfect. diff 131.111.8.99 23:15, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 23:17, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 - Unflinching. 74.106.157.152 06:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC) diff invalid diff, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 - Zodiiak diff : I don't think people realize how powerful this picture is...there's just so much going on here, look at it for 1 minute and you'll just open up in so many ways invalid diff, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 - Zodiiak diff : This pictures delivers a powerful story with no words...it's captivated me in so many ways Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 -74.130.49.99 04:13, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Martinman11 04:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 I almost chose 9. --ArtifexCrastinus 01:59, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *2 Jybet 15:04, 23 February 2007 (UTC)< 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 15:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC) I can vote : please read my wp page ( 1190 edits) thanks Jybet 23:38, 26 February 2007 (UTC) But you still need a diff to confirm that you and that user are the same. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) ok, sorry ;) diff Jybet 22:59, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *2 --Kaosrimo 08:05, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 Simply stunning. --62.25.109.195 13:37, 26 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 14:13, 26 February 2007 (UTC)) • *2 So damn hard to choose! But at least we can change votes throughout the voting period. --L337 kybldmstr 22:12, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 23:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 Some amazing pictures here, but 2 captures emotion amazingly. VegaDark 02:31, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Diff Please add a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 13:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 The most technic and artistic one. Remi Mathis 21:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *2 User:Kidnimbus 21:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no user by this name here...pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *2. þħɥʂıɕıʄʈʝɘɖı 21:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *2They're all great, but this one is about people.[6] invalid diff and sign, please reread instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 - Animating a woodcut-- that's cool. en:User:Skal You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 - But 4 was pretty close. Robinson weijman 11:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)< 100 commons edits, Please add a valid diff --Herby talk thyme 11:21, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 - Fantastic animation. I love 1 too, but my vote is for 3 as it is a superb work, considering the fact that it's original. --Nmadhubala 12:57, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ([2] on en.wikipedia) we need a valid diff from your other account where you assert to be the same as this Commons user, not the other way around. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:46, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 - great! Afonin 13:15, 22 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 --130.203.247.83 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux Talk 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *3 160.39.192.192 Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *3 68.248.159.134 15:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:27, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 -Didie07 06:34, 24 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous users, please - Alvesgaspar 10:36, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 very clever --213.48.74.29 12:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC) ([1] on Wikipedia.en) not a valid diff, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *3 Very good picture ([7]) --62.158.117.213 12:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *3. asb63 05:48, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *3. Good work and funny., Arcy You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *3. Simply hypnotizing. jec_3us 12:15, 27 Febrary 2007 (PST) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *3shot picture, interesting http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AA9l8e7n&diff=110207622&oldid=109753666 diff]--71.138.90.208 01:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 edits on that wiki, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 08:39, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 - beautiful - just a little slower please User:pglasziou < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 08:28, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 - Beautifully designed explanation of article content. 76.173.102.126 02:54, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 - educational, excellent addition on wikipedia 67.168.202.5 05:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) diff You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 - The moon and it's importance is far too often taken for granted. I vote moon :) - 192.31.106.34 21:22, 19 February 2007 (UTC) No anons please -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 - The moon and it's importance is far too often taken for granted. I vote moon :) - Eisenmond 21:37, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Eisenmond in Wikipedia Please add a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 129.2.151.216 22:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 --81.145.242.106 14:15, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no valid diff, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 88.108.32.186 21:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Great pic, animations should be encourgaed. no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 A picture that combines art and science. Wonderful! 24.30.251.242 23:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 All are beautiful, but I feel that this one really imparts knowledge all by itself. 199.64.0.252 17:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)) • *4 Beautiful picture, great educational value. Must have taken lots of time & patience to create. -- 84.24.161.82 07:41, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 Big fan of the animated moon. Remember 15:04, 18 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:13, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 Explanatory power is worth 10,000 words . -- Lumos3 13:45, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 I like it. 68.34.24.67 21:28, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry no anonymous votes — xaosflux Talk 21:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 I used this along with #3 in my intro physics course. Very instructive image series. --Skoch3 06:08, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 13:31, 26 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 It emphasises our belonging in an awesome universe. diff 80.6.20.172 18:35, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff. Please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 18:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 Love it - just love it. It's a ball--Smkolins 05:22, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 valuable and difficult to create diff 72.224.115.254 17:09, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please refer to IP address - Alvesgaspar 17:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *4 Wow, what a gorgeous and demonstrative photo. --diff 198.37.25.220 03:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a valid diff --Herby talk thyme 09:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *4, All good pictures, but this is my fav.Clerks]] 16:16, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *4. --Daniel73480 16:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 16:06, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4. Very interesting and informative. Bubba73 03:33, 28 February 2007 (UTC) wikipedia.en Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *4--brilliant; in this case, a picture is worth a million words! diff 69.136.195.244 18:30, 18 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *4diff 72.224.115.254 17:50, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff - Alvesgaspar 18:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - a beautiful pic of a beautiful natural phenomenon -- fdewaele, 21:31, 19 February 2007 Please add a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - A beautiful picture of nature at its best. Purae You have to register an account, not just create a userpage. go to Special:Userlogin. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - A perfect shot of a hard to catch subject. Definitely #5 71.234.110.209 02:18, 21 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 08:08, 21 February 2007 (UTC)) • *5 - Beatifull picture -Nanahuatzin 08:49, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 12:59, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - beautiful picture. diff John Carter 16:13, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions again - Alvesgaspar 16:48, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - Better that a picture of an sweaty tramp with a shopping trolley 203.49.185.184 10:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 -- Between 5 and 11 5 would have to be my favourite by just a small amount. Harry Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:22, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - fantastic pic! 172.141.124.212 11:25, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 12:00, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - Ilonamay 10:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - l'aurore boréal est vraiment la plus belle. Alecs.y (disc. - contr.) 09:13, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *5 - Nice! 168.224.1.14 16:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 16:54, 20 February 2007 (UTC)) • *5 - Pretty pic. --24.16.255.168 04:34, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - Simply Amazing no anonymous votes pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - Stunning diff Tafkam 15:01, 23 February 2007 (UTC)You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 - Superb Aurora image 84.190.217.241 12:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no valid diff, please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 14:44, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 24.20.123.231 23:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) no anonymous votes please - Huntscorpio 00:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Absolutely beautiful, looks like a National Geographic best quality image. Canticle You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Amazing picture. It really lights up the sky for me. Calgacus 13:53, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Amazing... Ajor933 16:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:04, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 but I'll probably pick 9 for concensus. Those other animated pics are horrible. 204.89.48.253 15:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 15:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC)) • *5 --Dan-Philipp 13:57, 20 February 2007 (UTC) diff You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 difficult choice diff--74.38.90.174 02:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff - Alvesgaspar 11:59, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Dunning 05:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 --Göran Smith 18:20, 26 February 2007 (UTC) ( diff ) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Great colors. Great picture. Smoove Z 06:51, 23 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 08:37, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Its really nice picture. Nature at its best. 203.199.242.193 07:05, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Looks beautiful 62.3.249.32 23:44, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a diff --Herby talk thyme 00:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)) • *5 --Mike bzh 16:25, 17 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 Commons edits; read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:37, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Natural and colorful sight - not to forget "rare". - Qasamaan You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 sometimes it's not enough to just be there - nice low light shot Eco ant 15:42, 20 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 15:47, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Stunning diff 67.85.35.9 18:55, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff link, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 19:05, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 The only thing better is to see them in person. They are truly awe inspiring! 131.17.129.22 17:49, 20 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes, please - Alvesgaspar 18:14, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 Tough call! An embarrassment of riches, as the saying goes. 6, 7, 8, 9 also are wonderful. 75.162.27.112 01:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *5 very impressive shot --StéfanLD 14:37, 20 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *5. --219.73.49.52 10:23, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry that was me. Juntung 10:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, Please add a valid diff --Herby talk thyme 12:02, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *5. 81.77.219.210 20:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC). Sorry forgot to log-in first - Legis 20:53, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *5. All really awesome images. diff - UtherSRG 04:34, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 12:49, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *5. Excellent 86.148.134.123 17:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 17:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC)) • *5--Drozdp 15:57, 22 February 2007 (UTC) Please sign your vote - Alvesgaspar 17:18, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *5--Miuet 15:02, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 14:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 - An amazing photo but number 3 came close - User:Highfields on Wikipedia Please provide a valid diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:37, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 - fantastic. diff 81.79.231.132 11:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 12:43, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 - fantastic. diff please sign your vote, thanks --Herby talk thyme 13:35, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) • *6 - just perfect. SalomonCeb 15:14, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 15:33, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 --89.102.143.110 17:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 20:44, 26 February 2007 (UTC)) • *6 America Star is the best! --Sergiodf 10:58, 20 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 Awesome. --24.25.242.51 07:31, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 Chairman Sharif 16:26, 20 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons votes, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 16:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 cool pic diff You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 10:31, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 diff -- Tivedshambo 17:56, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 diffplease sign your vote --Herby talk thyme 08:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) • *6 Great shot. Almost speaks to you.--Dmol 23:26, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux Talk 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *6 Nice colors and I love the contrast between machine and nature. --Brownings 12:20, 23 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 12:45, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 Nice to see a news photo in the bunch. Jmdustin 23:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux Talk 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *6 sent chills down my spine 140.180.24.127 19:52, 18 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *6 wow! --146.191.228.11 15:04, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *6. Great photo It's a winner! diff Springnuts 16:57, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff - Alvesgaspar 18:16, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *6. With apologies to 1, which is a close second. Freshacconci 15:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits --Herby talk thyme 16:05, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *6129.215.196.17 13:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)yadevol no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 13:50, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *7 --24.24.177.129 07:27, 19 February 2007 (UTC)no anonymous votes pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *7 Fantastic ! 82.125.88.155 14:51, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a diff to your vote to confirm your identity -- Bryan (talk to me) 15:10, 17 February 2007 (UTC) • *7 See a glimpse of the world reflected in the eye and ask yourself how this bird experiences the snowy branch. (Perhaps for next year Wikimedia could offer a custom web form for voting.) SvGeloven 17:56, 26 February 2007 (CET) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *7 Very nice Picture 194.208.154.21 17:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC) (de:nintendere) Please include a valid diff link - Alvesgaspar 18:19, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *7: Just a guess. (diff) --Slgrandson 03:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *8 - Amazing!--82.201.178.229 15:27, 25 February 2007 (UTC)No anon voting please --Herby talk thyme 15:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC)) • *8 -- diff I am not sure whether I got diff right, but I am certainly positive about #8! -- Fehlerteufel 15:12, 20 February 2007 (CET) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:00, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *8 very nice picture Yukawa < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 14:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *8, in composition and phototechnically the most acomplished image 87.203.50.195 17:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes, please Alvesgaspar 17:47, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *8. That's something you don't get to see that much in Germany. Lectonar 15:55, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *8. þħɥʂıɕıʄʈʝɘɖı 23:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC) diff Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *9 - Just an amazingly beautiful photo --86.144.219.209 17:22, 28 February 2007 (UTC) You need to be a registered user with +100 edits, please create a diff. • *9 - Makes manmade objects look like a natural phenomena --Eezie 03:04, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits - Alvesgaspar 13:01, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 -- MGlosenger 02:53, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *9 - Really cool photo. Great Colors User:Benfu < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 08:01, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 - RideABicycle | Talk | 04:51, 22 February 2007 (UTC) non existent user --Herby talk thyme 08:27, 22 February 2007 (UTC)) • *9 - The energy of the city calmed by the stillness of the water and the black of night --Strider52 23:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 --[diff] Tempest115 19:30, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Sorry, less than 100 edits in both wikis together - Alvesgaspar 20:08, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Absolutely stunning 220.233.89.72 21:51, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 All so good --71.108.126.121 06:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) Please provide a diff -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:32, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 As hard as it is to choose, 9 takes it. If only I could vote more than once (But then again, 11 votes wouldn't really affect the results, now would it?) --72.12.30.253 21:43, 22 February 2007 (UTC) No anonymous votes, please - Alvesgaspar 22:53, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Awesome! --Versageek 09:25, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits. Please check the instructions again - Alvesgaspar 10:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 diff 155.245.43.155 11:49, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 12:40, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Evocatice. 89.138.37.240 23:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)no anon votes, please re-read instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 It is a beautiful nature shot. Watersoftheoasis 20:23, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 20:43, 26 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Kerowyn 17:52, 17 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits; please re-read the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:48, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Messedrocker 04:07, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 Nice. 71.252.19.214 22:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) • *9 WoW just WoW if you look up close in that picture you see two tiny UFOs LAWL in the sky. Very emotional/moody shot... very champagne-ish. San Diego represent!Getonyourfeet 14:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 15:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 - All are great; this one fulfills every criterion I can think of, both in terms of technique (perfect lighting, composition, shutter, sharpness, while capturing a flitting subject) and expression (semantics, mood, style). Halfway between still-life and action picture, it achieves an exquisite blend of tension and repose. It is both a superb scientific illustration, a powerful metaphor for the cycles of life and a cultural statement, and thus extremely rich in information and meaning. Francisco de Almeida, 01:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC)Nonexistant user. — xaosflux Talk 02:38, 27 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 - Amazingly skillful to be able to capture such a sharp image of this subject. 81.152.197.14 09:53, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, reread the instructions pfctdayelise (说什么?) 09:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 - An incredible picture, great detail, and I bet it was hard to take. By far the best picture here in my opinion. Vertigo2008 18:54, 17 February 2007 (UTC) Too few edits -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:38, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 - Not merely beautiful and affecting, but encyclopedically informative. -- 131.204.217.64 03:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC) Alarob 03:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:42, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 10 and 11 were close, love the timing on both. (I live here :))AndonicO 12:15, 20 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:31, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 216.163.254.1 20:14, 28 February 2007 (UTC) You need 100 edits, please create a diff. Platonides 21:32, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 217.45.192.99 11:50, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 Capturing it, the composition, the detai. Great shot. ---Bigbean No unsigned voting please --Herby talk thyme 13:30, 26 February 2007 (UTC)) • *10 --Green Bonsai 10:31, 25 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 16:00, 27 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 I was sure I had voted here already... Anyways, hurrah for Fir! diff AndonicO 21:57, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 Naturenet 19:31, 21 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:55, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 Those flies are on my desktop now. diff László 16:27, 23 February 2007 (UTC) Invalid diff link, please check the instructions - Alvesgaspar 17:53, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *10 Toughest shot to take. CodeCarpenter 21:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux Talk 02:05, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *10' Wonderful. Gslibardi 20:32, 20 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 20:36, 20 February 2007 (UTC) • *10. --141.113.85.21 07:23, 28 February 2007 (UTC)Sorry I was not logged in --Rise0011 07:30, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *10. Brilliant image; tack-sharp focus and beautiful colors. Drama!Birdbrainscan 03:49, 26 February 2007 (UTC) Does not meet sufferage requirements. — xaosflux Talk 04:05, 26 February 2007 (UTC) • *10. --Rise0011 07:25, 28 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *10. These are all amazing. tough choice. diff Iggynelix 03:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC) <100 -- Bryan (talk to me) 19:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *10--toffauvet 13:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, Please add a valid diff --Herby talk thyme 12:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 - amazing shot, very difficult to obtain, timeless. diff tiZom(2¢) 18:11, 17 February 2007 (UTC) the diff needs to be from the account where you have 100 edits, not commons! pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:51, 18 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 - it's really hard, they're all so wonderfull, but 11 has something surrealism I like. -- Ra'ike Diskussion 11:09, 27 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 - Really nice closeup that captures not only the flame, but also the smoke. [2] 207.161.27.152 03:11, 20 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. • *11 -- Really quite awesome. The quality is amazing. I'm new, sorry I don't have 100 edits yet.70.20.213.202 15:07, 24 February 2007 (UTC) Don't worry, it is the intention that counts... Alvesgaspar 15:21, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 - wow, i forgot to zoom in on this before. the detail is unbelievable! JoeSmack 21:56, 25 February 2007 (UTC) Less than 100 edits in Commons, sorry! - Alvesgaspar 22:45, 25 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 --137.198.61.65 18:17, 19 February 2007 (UTC) no anon votes, please reread the instructions --Herby talk thyme 18:29, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 62.85.3.2 22:31, 19 February 2007 (UTC) Please add a diff --MichaelMaggs 22:40, 19 February 2007 (UTC)) 21:59, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 63.224.229.188 00:16, 24 February 2007 (UTC) no anonymous votes please - 68.155.245.134 07:20, 24 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 Ianthegecko 16:12, 23 February 2007 (UTC) < 100 commons edits, please re-read instructions --Herby talk thyme 16:28, 23 February 2007 (UTC) • *11 Nice composition and clarity. <3 bunny 00:00, 1 March 2007 (UTC)Does not meet sufferage requirement, also posted past cut-off. — xaosflux Talk 02:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC) • *11 That's just a cool picture! 146.235.130.52 22:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC) Declared invalid after voting closed; see talk page • *11 Would love to see this in landscape style, to use as a desktop User:Darkson:Darkson no valid account?? pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:09, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *11, but I was torn. 5, 7, and 11, props for superb technicality in completely different ways. The editing on the Aurora Borealis was excellent, I looked at it and thought I could see the green sky moving. The focus on the Blue Jay (and not of the branches) was superb, I stared at the feathers and the claws, and the dusting of snow for far too long. The photo of that match, that little perfect swirl of blue fire under the yellow burst is entrancing. I also really liked 1 and 2 (especially the upturned shoe). diff, Wikipedia Miss Mondegreen 00:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC) invalid diff pfctdayelise (说什么?) 07:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *11. wonderful detail, i love it 24.125.208.164 23:01, 26 February 2007 (UTC) You currently have less than 100 edits on Commons. Please provide a valid diff to confirm your identity. -- Bryan (talk to me) 21:05, 28 February 2007 (UTC) • *12 Excellent use of negative space. 75.164.129.30 09:45, 22 February 2007 (UTC)No anon votes please --MichaelMaggs 09:58, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]


• *i can't vote :( but I think the best picture should be not based solely beauty but on value added to the wiki, so 5 -- no anon votes pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC) • *none', these are decent images, but how do any of them pertain to the year 2006 in any sense? 65.29.137.10 00:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC) They were recognised as FPs during 2006. pfctdayelise (说什么?) 06:56, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Alceste!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:26, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Alceste. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Alceste~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

19:44, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alceste&oldid=153504828"