User talk:Afrogindahood

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Afrogindahood!

Copyright status: File:Willem van Waning (1897-1968).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Willem van Waning (1897-1968).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 10:36, 28 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Willem van Waning (1897-1968).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 01:16, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 15:25, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ingin bertanya, kenapa warna merahnya harus kurang terang daripada File:Flag of Indonesia.svg dan apakah ini ada di dalam UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2009? Terima kasih. Hddty (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Warna merah dalam bendera versi fisik ini kurang terang dikarenakan warna ini merupakan warna merah paling terang dengan kadar 0-100-100-0 yang dapat diproduksi menurut model warna CMYK yang digunakan dalam percetakan berwarna. UU Nomor 24 Tahun 2009 menjabarkan warna merah yang digunakan dalam bendera Indonesia adalah warna merah dengan kadar warna RGB 255-0-0. Kadar warna tersebut tidak bisa dikonversi ke model warna CMYK dikarenakan rentang gamut model warna CMYK lebih terbatas dibanding dengan model warna MHB/RGB, seperti terlihat di gambar File:CIE1931xy gamut comparison.svg. Oleh karenanya warna merah dalam bendera fisik apabila dibandingkan dengan warna merah bendera di televisi atau layar komputer akan selalu nampak lebih gelap karena adanya perbedaan model warna yang digunakan antara tampilan perangkat elektronik dan percetakan, terima kasih (Afrogindahood (talk) 11:23, 28 August 2020 (UTC))[reply]
File:Arabian Peninsula (orthographic projection).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abu aamir (talk) 08:18, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesia[edit]

By changing the file sizes you have destroyed three imagemap templates in three Wikipedias. Please correct this. NNW 13:28, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, I'm looking into this matter and correcting the templates Afrogindahood (talk) 08:13, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
It would be easier and faster to bring the files back to their old size. NNW 11:46, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I have updated the three imagemap templates with new poly coordinates. I also updated the File:Indonesia, administrative divisions - de - colored.svg map to conform with the new imagemap poly coordinates (Afrogindahood (talk) 21:43, 15 August 2021 (UTC))[reply]
File:Arabian Peninsula (orthographic projection).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abu aamir (talk) 13:58, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lambang daerah provinsi dan kabupaten di Jawa Barat[edit]

Mungkin ini rasanya agak sensitif, tetapi ini penting.

Semenjak saya mencoba mengkroscek gambar-gambar lambang daerah ada di proyek Wikimedia, perda-perda, dan di Internet, saya menemukan banyak sekali kesalahan dari cara menggambar lambang daerah. Sebagai contoh, lambang Jawa Barat. Tahun 2019 kemarin Anda sempat mengganti lambang dengan yang ini. Begitu saya kroscek dengan deskripsi tekstual yang ada di sini dan juga Perda No. 11/PD/DPRD-GR/1961, saya menemukan beberapa kejanggalan:

  • Padinya berjumlah 20, padahal yang diminta hanya 17 biji.
  • Kapasnya berjumlah 11, padahal yang diminta 8 kuntum dan 3 daun.
  • Dalam blazon yang disintesis di hubert-herald, kotak-kotak pada lambang harusnya berjumlah 6 × 5, bukan 5 × 5 (saya belum memahami mengapa demikian).
  • Untuk elemen lainnya sudah OK.

Yang saya sayangkan, lambang-lambang yang lebih baru biasanya dilampirkan dalam Perda dan dimuat dalam JDIH, dan masih sedikit pemerintahan daerah yang memuat Perda lambang daerah yang berasal dari era 1950—1990-an. Mengingat dahulunya Perda-Perda ini direproduksi dalam mesin tik di atas kertas buram (komputer baru dimulai sekitar tahun 70-an akhir hingga 80-an), maka Perda-Perda era abad ke-20 masih sedikit yang sudah didigitalisasi atau dicetak ulang, sehingga masyarakat kurang mengenal makna yang sesungguhnya dari lambang-lambang tersebut karena desainnya banyak yang salah dan referensi yang masih kurang. Terima kasih. RaFaDa20631 (talk) 00:09, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hai RaFaDa20631, terima kasih untuk kritiknya, saya awalnya membuat lambang Jawa Barat vektor ini sesuai dengan lambang yang terdapat di situs resmi provinsi Jabar. Beri saya waktu untuk memodifikasi lagi lambang ini terkait dengan 3 poin kejanggalan yang diuraikan di atas. Afrogindahood (talk) 12:48, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
File:Arabian Peninsula (orthographic projection).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Abu aamir (talk) 14:07, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Indonesia map[edit]

Hello, could you please update the File:Indonesia, administrative divisions - de - colored.svg with the new provinces? Thank you. --Potapt (talk) 22:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing!
Indonesia, administrative divisions - de - colored
Afrogindahood (talk) 14:14, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Afrogindahood, can you also update this following maps Geographical units of Indonesia.svg, Indonesia provinces outline map.svg, Developmental zones of Indonesia.svg and TimezonesID.svg? -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 06:03, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done, all above maps are updated Afrogindahood (talk) 21:39, 12 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but apparently you are missing our most recent Indonesian province, Southwest Papua (Papua Barat Daya) -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 16:16, 14 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Apologize, i think i might not update the maps you requested yet until the misnomer issue regarding the most recent province is discussed and solved by the Indonesian government (Afrogindahood (talk) 11:42, 12 February 2023 (UTC))[reply]
Kira-kira untuk saat ini apakah sudah saatnya untuk menambahkan provinsi Papua Barat Daya pada peta yang Anda buat? -Ibrahim Muizzuddin (talk) 14:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:Sundanese language distribution map.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2001:448A:11A0:1994:95A2:6414:66CD:1B03 11:55, 4 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]