User talk:Adrar

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Adrar!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Adrar!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello[edit]

Hello, Adrar, concerning your remark to me personnally about "not justifie": that's out of the scope of the discussuion and therefore I answer you here. Maybe it made the impression of "justifying" to you. But sorry, I am not an administrator, I do not judge that user, I do not contribute to an edit war. Let us wait for the end of the discussion. Kind greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 18:50, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again, I answered at my talk page. Kind greeting--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Making category descriptions[edit]

Hello Adrar, have a look at the collapsed multi-langauge descrition at Category:Northern Basque Country. Such descriptions are being made by internationalisation, but have to be prepared. You could do a great job by making one-line descriptions in basque and in english for the cats in the category tree Category:Basque Country. Best is to resume the introduction textes from english and basque wikipedia; if you wish, you can add a third description in french, but en and eu will do. E.g. for Labourd this could be:

  • introduction from en:Labourd shortened ==> Labourd or Lapurdi, in the french Pyrénées Atlantiques département (64), is a former province of France and one of the seven provinces of the Basque Country.
  • shortened introduction (my guess, don't smile, just correct it) from eu:Lapurdi ==> Lapurdi Euskal Herriko zazpi lurraldeetako bat da. Administratiboki Frantziako Akitania eskualdeko Pirinio Atlantikoak departamenduko (64).

Make a few to begin with and let me have a look at them. --Havang(nl) (talk) 22:05, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It looks perfect. You are going fast. I created also the category tree Category:Geography of the Northern Basque Country, see also catscan http://toolserver.org/~daniel/WikiSense/CategoryIntersect.php?wikifam=commons.wikimedia.org&basecat=Geography_of_the_Northern_Basque_Country&basedeep=3&mode=iul&go=Scan&format=html&userlang=nl. Greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 17:36, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Interwiki's Soule[edit]

Hello again, you soon come to Soule. That's the first Northern Basque province I looked over, and for Soule cities I did not yet add all interwiki links. Maybe you can add the interwiki's when treating those cat's. Thanks. --Havang(nl) (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well done. Greetings--Havang(nl) (talk) 17:46, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

slash / to be avoided in titles[edit]

Hello, Adrar, I saw you making titles like Category:Ernest Fourneau in Ascain / Azkaine. I inform you that the use of / in titles is greatly disencouraged, because it stands for subpages, (in general computer use for documentpaths), and also because bots may overlook such pages. Try to use in the future alternatives like ..in Ascain - Azkaine or ..in Ascain (Azkaine). No need to change what already has been named. Greetings. --Havang(nl) (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't blank pages[edit]

Hi Adrar,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you blanked Cordobilla (Navarre) on Commons. I asume you meant for the page to be deleted, but blanking the page is not the right way to do this. I'd like to strongly recommend to use {{speedy| type reason here }} and add it on top of the page you would like to have deleted; This way it will be placed on a special list that administrators check regulary for deletion. Without this it might take a long time before it's noticed. Thanks again. 20:43, 24 May 2010 (UTC)–Krinkletalk

Aupa Krinkle, thanks for the advice. I'm not an expert; I created the page and I didn't want to delete it but to redirect this reference to "Category:Cordobilla (Galar)". Now I have done a category redirect so I hope it will be OK if now I write in this empty page the name of the category which would be redirected. My will is that people can find the different forms of the name of this village. Same for "Cordovilla". Thanks, eskerrik asko.--Adrar (talk) 21:50, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Milesker ![edit]

Félicitations pour vos photos des gares de la ligne de Bayonne à Saint-Jean-Pied de Port ! Merci beaucoup, Kvardek du (talk) 06:57, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Les listes me paraissent justes. Il me semble avoir lu quelque part un nom en basque entre Villefranque et Bayonne. Hélas, je ne connais pas bien les anciennes gares d'Urt, puisque je n'ai que 15 ans... mais j'en ai eu des échos grâce à mon grand-père cheminot. Pour les gares après Urt de la ligne Bayonne - Toulouse, il me semble qu'il y avait Sames - Guiche, Orthevielle, Peyrehorade, Église de Peyrehorade, Cauneille, Labatut et Puyoô.
Cordialement, Kvardek du (talk) 10:39, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ce site confirme sauf pour église de Peyrehorade qui apparait pourtant sur la carte qu'il donne. Kvardek du (talk) 10:47, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Je connais la gare de Sames-Guiche de nom (et grâce à l'aticle Wikipédia :) mais je n'y suis jamais allé, malgré sa proximité... Et bien que mon lycée soit juste à côté du quartier du même nom, je ne sais pas où se trouve l'ancienne gare de Marracq. Si je la trouve, je pourrais aller prendre des photos. Cordialement, Kvardek du (talk) 11:48, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Gare de Marracq trouvée... sur Wikipédia ! Mais d'après ce que je connais de l'endroit (à côté du Forum), il n'y a plus que trois voies peu utilisées. Kvardek du (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Adrar, I answered at my talk page. But a question: is this picture correctly located: File:Eglise-Larcevau.jpg. Greetings, --Havang(nl) (talk) 11:46, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion notification Category:STAB has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  македонски  русский  українська  ತುಳು  ಕನ್ನಡ  ไทย  עברית  日本語  中文  +/−

Kvardek du (talk) 09:43, 16 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token a39f639d29ba97297e7f8abe0fcd9dbb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Édouard Caillauren omenezko eskultura Biarritzen II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 01:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Édouard Caillauren omenezko eskultura Biarritzen.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bob247 (talk) 01:50, 5 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]