User talk:Acroterion

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


FP Promotion[edit]

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Catoctin Mountain and farm MD1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Catoctin Mountain and farm MD1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 11 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bank of America Building Baltimore MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please check your image. It's leaning out at the left. --XRay 04:40, 18 November 2023 (UTC) Adjusted, thanks. Acroterion 16:48, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 09:58, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lookout Lighthouse MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 03:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Point Lookout coal sheds MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blue Ridge Parkway clouds VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lorton Auto Train VA2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Please improve the categorization. Geo location would be nice. Otherwise good. --XRay 04:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Train Lorton VA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:31, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illuminated boat display Frederick MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Illuminated boat display Frederick MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:45, 20 December 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting posts[edit]

While I appreciate that you have the best intentions in mind, I would appreciate it if you did not delete posts from my talk page. There are two reasons for this.

First, transparency suggests that everything posted should be in the archives -- not just the messages that are useful.

Second, since the system tells me about the deletion, inevitably I look back to see what was deleted. This takes much more time than simply reading the offending post.

Thanks, .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:37, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Certainly - different editors have different policies concerning that sort of thing. I'll keep your preference in mind. Acroterion (talk) 21:20, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Majestic Theater Gettysburg PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:38, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leonardo AW-169 N691HS FDK MD6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:45, 22 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leonardo AW-169 N691HS FDK MD7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impressive view, but too noisy. Is it fixable? Alexander Novikov 11:52, 22 February 2024 (UTC) Probably, I'll try a different workflow. Acroterion 13:33, 22 February 2024 (UTC) Adjusted. Acroterion 00:43, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 09:33, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 12:16, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beechcraft B300 Super King Air N828UP FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 10:30, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bombardier Global 6500 N650SS FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
a bit noisy --Nikride 13:08, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Thanks, I will work on that. Acroterion 15:35, 19 March 2024 (UTC) Noise reduced. Acroterion 01:40, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nikride 14:12, 20 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! American Blimp A-170G N157LG FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salt Lake Temple UT1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salt Lake Temple UT2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:02, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! South Temple visitor center Salt Lake City UT1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:44, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North American B-25J Mitchell Tondelayo DMW MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North American B-25J Mitchell Tondelayo DMW MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:32, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old Cumberland County Courthouse Carlisle PA1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sikorsky VH-3D 159357 HMX-1 FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169611 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:23, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169611 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169611 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nanchang CJ-6 N22591 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169611 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --The Cosmonaut 02:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169611 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 06:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell UH-1Y 169283 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell UH-1Y 169283 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:45, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell AH-1Z 169826 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Plozessor 04:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bell UH-1Y 169283 of USMC HMLA-773 FDK MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:24, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyctanassa violacea MD5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyctanassa violacea MD4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyctanassa violacea MD1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 01:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyctanassa violacea MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ✓ Done Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyctanassa violacea preening MD2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]