User talk:7partparadigm

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Open request[edit]

Hello, passer-by. Do you know of any free portraits of current British Members of Parliament? There are very few *good* open-source pictures of the current MP's out there, and many of their wiki pages are empty of photos of who this Parliament is and what they look like. If you know of one or more, please copy and past a URL below, and if it checks out, I will post it on their their main wiki page right away. Thanks! --7partparadigm

Congressional maps[edit]

Hello! I really admire and appreciate your work on the historic congressional maps. I was wondering if you were going to make the new maps for Florida, North Carolina, and Virginia for the 2016 general election. -Americus55 (talk) 17:16, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I need to finish the historic ones. The really big ones like Cali keep on making my GIS software crash! They need to go up, though. And they will before the election. I have noticed some misinformation out there about the current state of North Carolina's congressional districts. There have been no official changes there (it seems), and the new changes made to Florida's federal congressional districts under special Florida legislature bill Senate Joint Resolution 2C (H110S9079) is under appeal. The data for the new Florida maps would be from this website (or one of its daughters) (http://www.floridaredistricting.org/), because the official source (http://nationalmap.gov/small_scale/#chpbound) is non-functional at the moment. See, once the data has been loaded from the USGS it will not render. This may be trouble with my own software, but I don't think it is. So, even if the new maps are officially ratified by the state legislatures, the Dept. of the Interior may be failing us with thier current data. The states you mentioned, if the changes are real, should have their own official .shp files somewhere in their own registers, so even if USGS is not working, official boundaries should still be obtainable.
It looks like there have been some major improvements to the shapes in Florida! If they are final. Thank you for bringing this to my attention. I will try to resource the maps, if I can find their data. In reality, no official changes may have been made in one or more of the states you mentioned. Check in a week or so and there will be something there. --7partparadigm (talk) 08:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ohio map[edit]

The Ohio 8th district map has an error. In the southeast corner of the district near Westchester, the map shows the city of Upper Arlington. The only Upper Arlington in Ohio is a city just west of Columbus in central Ohio.

Hi, I checked the map. It looks like it has Upper Arlington right were you said it should be - west outside Columbus. --7partparadigm (talk) 08:25, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

California US Congressional District 46 (since 2013)map has an error[edit]

The label "Yorba Linda" is right on top of where the city of is located. Yorba Linda is located immediately to the east of Placentia, straddling both sides of Highway 90 on the map. https://www.google.com/maps/place/Placentia,+CA/@33.8917679,-117.8665989,13z/data=!4m5!3m4!1s0x80dcd41ec5fb4199:0xdd4ab2b148d1758!8m2!3d33.8722371!4d-117.8703363 DarthRad (talk)

Hello, yeah I see that issue on CA district 33 as well. It looks like what happened is that Placentia does not appear on the maps at the GIS zoom-level at which those maps were made. On ArcGIS, Yorba Linda appears to be dominant in nomenclature for that area, and does, actually, cross both sides of Highway 90. I am sorry your community name got left out on some of the maps, but it does appear to be present on others. --7partparadigm (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove warnings[edit]

català  Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  polski  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  suomi  македонски  русский  українська  日本語  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−


Hello. This is a reminder for you that it is important to address the identified issues instead of simply removing legitimate warnings and notices from your talk page. Removing messages does not remove them from the talk page's history. You are encouraged instead to archive past discussions according to our community guidelines. You can have this done automatically for you -- simply place {{subst:User:Jeff G./usertalksetup}} or {{subst:autoarchive resolved section/usertalksetup}} at the top of your user talk page and then old messages will be archived after 1 month (see User:MiszaBot/usertalksetup for more details). If you have received warnings for copyright issues, please familiarize yourself with our policy on licensing. You can also ask for help at the village pump or the help desk if you need assistance.

Yann (talk) 09:09, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello 7partparadigm.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yann (talk) 09:37, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan 1980 Presidential Election Map[edit]

Hi! I saw your work on the United States Presidential Election in Michigan, 1984 page. The map with all the county voting patterns is great, I was wondering you would be able to replicate that map for 1980? Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 128.119.202.132 (talk) 18:42, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nevada CD1 Map inaccurate[edit]

Starting in the left below corner clockwise:

  • west side at Summerlin Parkway: Boundery needs to follow Durango drive
  • nothern boarder follows Lake Mead Bvd
  • northern board follow interstate 15
  • right upper corner form
  • form of eastern boarder at flamengo rd
  • southern border follow Brussel road except one block missing

You can see this details even in your redistricting timeline map. --62.46.205.199 12:38, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Michigan Maps[edit]

Do you think in the 93 Michigan map, the orange 6 can be fixed? And in all the maps, it says "Detriot" instead of Detroit.

This has the 63 Michigan map. https://books.google.com/books?id=U9DnAAAAMAAJ&pg=PP3&lpg=PP3&dq=michigan+1963+congressional+districts+map&source=bl&ots=indgE7V56s&sig=wOnAE98TopPQUBuobfo_SjD-i3g&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiujfL_67zWAhXhh1QKHbshAcY4ChDoAQgnMAA#v=onepage&q=michigan%201963%20congressional%20districts%20map&f=false

NASAPeepo (talk) 02:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Afrikaans | azərbaycanca | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | français | galego | hrvatski | magyar | italiano | Nederlands | norsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | sicilianu | Simple English | suomi | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | Ελληνικά | български | македонски | русский | српски / srpski | українська | հայերեն | मराठी | हिन्दी | বাংলা | മലയാളം | ไทย | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 粵語 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | עברית |العربية | فارسی | +/−


Hello 7partparadigm.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

I personal support and admire your efforts to include these maps, but you have erroneously tagged them as public domain when they are clearly copyrighted by their respective entities, or based on other copyrighted data, making them ineligible for inclusion in Commons as currelty constructed. I have started a conversation with [[1]] since that person has already warned you once about this violation. I believe we need to find a better way, one that complies with the relevant license requirements for Commons Images, to include these images. I look forward to hearing from you so a solution can be reached.Dcmacnut (talk) 20:56, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Curt Clawson 2014 Congressional Photo.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Louisiana US Congressional District 1 (since 2013).tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.114.104.228 02:55, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK1988(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 23:56, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MisterElection2001 (talk) 03:59, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NE1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 06:38, 18 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 06:09, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dewey Defeats Truman.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kavyansh.Singh.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:AR1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:01, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MD1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 03:01, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TylerKutschbach (talk) 02:59, 5 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZ2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:40, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZ2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZ1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZ1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:41, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AZ1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:42, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AR1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AR1992.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TheHaloVeteran2 (talk) 20:43, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK1988.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B043:7967:8CA7:DABF:ECC0:EA5F 23:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B043:7967:8CA7:DABF:ECC0:EA5F 23:16, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:AK2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B043:7967:8CA7:DABF:ECC0:EA5F 23:20, 13 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:MD1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B023:D423:445A:EB72:66D3:6CF1 03:31, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:NM1996(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:28, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:NM1988(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2603:6010:F006:964B:6566:90F2:A8BF:6A67 22:53, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:SD1996.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B06C:30DC:AC0E:50C0:723A:7E94 06:04, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:OR1984.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PA1996(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B061:DF52:7590:FC48:39AF:BD3C 03:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TX2004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:TX2000.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:PA1996(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

2600:1009:B05F:E5D6:3CD4:9736:DE24:4928 02:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]