User talk:फ़िलप्रो

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, फ़िलप्रो!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:01, 18 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Aryan language classification[edit]

Hello, you appear to disagree with the colour pattern used in File:Indoarische Sprachen Gruppen.png to represent subgroups and removed it repeatedly. While the classification of Indo-Aryan language is certainly no straightforward matter, the pattern has a source in Ethnologue, which warrants its representation to represent their point of view. The bleached map you created is useful as well to remain non commital about classification, therefore I moved it into a separate file File:Major Indo-Aryan languages.png per Commons:Overwriting existing files. You are welcome to create new maps to represente alternative classification schemes. The point is to let various points of view coexist to be used separately as needed. Thank you. Aucassin (talk) 21:15, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Thanks! Filpro (talk) 23:26, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:British empire in east.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Torsch (talk) 20:32, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Maneka, Sonia, and Rajiv Gandhi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Maneka, Sonia, and Rajiv Gandhi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Vensatry (Ping me) 16:26, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please help[edit]

Hi, can you please help me remove the background of this image ? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Khasi-language.jpg ? I am trying to make the page Khasi language on Wikipedia more better, since I am a new user i don't know how to remove the background or don't have the software for it. Please help. 31.215.192.164 19:22, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Zonal Councils[edit]

According to Ministry of Home Affairs, there are six zonal councils:-

Northern Zonal Council, comprising the States of Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu & Kashmir, Punjab, Rajasthan, National Capital Territory of Delhi and Union Territory of Chandigarh

Central Zonal Council, comprising the States of Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh;

Eastern Zonal Council, comprising the States of Bihar, Jharkhand, Odisha and West Bengal;

Western Zonal Council, comprising the States of Goa, Gujarat, Maharashtra and the Union Territories of Daman & Diu and Dadra & Nagar Haveli; and

Southern Zonal Council, comprising the States of Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Kerala, Tamil Nadu, Telangana and the Union Territory of Puducherry.

And there is nothing called a North Central Zonal Council.
http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/iscs/genesis/
http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/iscs/wp-content/uploads/2016/08/states_reorganisation_act.pdf
http://www.mapsofindia.com/zonal/

I suggest necessary steps need to be taken to correct it.Fylindfotberserk (talk) 15:52, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed :) Filpro (talk) 01:17, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome dude. Can you do two more thing which I missed completely owing to these not being in the govt website. Andaman and Nicobar Islands are considered special invitees of Southern Zonal Council.
http://interstatecouncil.nic.in/iscs/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/COMPOSITION-OF-SOUTHERN-ZONAL-COUNCIL.pdf
and Sikkim has been put in the North Eastern Zonal Council
http://mha.nic.in/zonal_council Can you fix that?? Fylindfotberserk (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Please feel free to message me for any other requests. Filpro (talk) 06:07, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Awesome, that really helped. Thanks.. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indo-Aryan languages map, inclusion of Maithili[edit]

I am contacting you to let you know that your Indo-Aryan languages map that is used on Indo-Aryan languages and Indo-Aryan peoples is incorrect as it displays Maithili as a dialect of Hindi. The constitutions of both India and Nepal recognise Maithili as a distinct language:

http://mha.nic.in/sites/upload_files/mha/files/EighthSchedule_19052017.pdf

Ethnologue also includes Maithili as a separate language and not a dialect of Hindi as well:

https://www.ethnologue.com/language/mai

Could you please edit the map and include Maithili as a separate language which almost all sources recognise it as. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Axomika (talk • contribs) 21:32, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Filpro: Please address this issue with your map. Thanks

Regarding your Map of Western India[edit]

Is this map [1] made in accordance to Geological Survey of India? If yes, could you kindly write that in the description? I would like to use it in the article. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:31, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Fylindfotberserk: Tiger7253 is technically the creator of that map, which is based off the one I uploaded, which is also based off another map. I think the Geological Survey of India also considers Rajasthan as part their definition of Western India. The map you linked seems identical to the Western Zonal Council. If you want, you can edit the description of that map yourself. Thank you. Filpro (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, yes, my mistake lol. For a moment I thought it would be similar to your North India file which seems to be based on the Geological Survey of India divisions. Thanks for letting me edit the description. I may use it or the "Zonal Councils" one. Thanks again.. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 08:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu and Kashmir map[edit]

Hi, The map you have uploaded for Jammu and Kashmir File:IN-JK.svg is incorrect. First, it includes the part controlled by China in the bottom-right (off en:Demchok and part of en:Aksai Chin) and second it shows the en:Trans-Karakoram tract as part of Pakistan. Please take a look at File:Jammu and Kashmir in India (de-facto).svg for reference and also see the maps on openstreetmap.org and google.com/maps (change location to global).

The Trans-Karakoram tract and Aksai Chin parts should not be included in the map. It would be great if you can fix this map and others in Category:SVG locator maps of states in India (red and dark grey location map scheme) as well. Thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 18:36, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please include surrounding countries in the new locator maps as they help better contextualize the location. Gotitbro (talk) 19:13, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Gotitbro: Sorry for the late reply. The article you linked for Demchok says that it is controlled by India. Demchok is also within the bottom-right region that is claimed by China? Then wouldn't showing the bottom-right region as part of China be incorrect? As for the regions claimed, but not controlled by India... the images used on en:Tibet Autonomous Region, en:Azad Kashmir, en:Gilgit-Baltistan, and every article for Chinese and Pakistani subdivisions clearly show hatched regions for parts controlled by India. I'm not sure why you want apply a double-standard by not showing parts claimed by India on Indian maps and insist on using File:Jammu and Kashmir in India (de-facto).svg as a guideline on the Jammu and Kashmir talk page. The Trans-Karakoram tract and Aksai Chin parts are claimed by India, just like Pakistan-controlled Kashmir. That's enough of a reason to show it as disputed in the maps. Thanks. फ़िलप्रो (talk) 07:09, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@फ़िलप्रो: I am not saying the parts shouldn't be shown but the lines in your maps are incorrect. I was saying that Demchok is in India but beyond that it is controlled by China (see this File:Kashmir region 2004.jpg), Demchok is just on the boundary on the Indian side. And the Karakoram tract is shown as part of Pakistan/upper Kashmir region when it is controlled by China. What the maps need is just a line above Siachen demarcating the tract and the bottom right region needs to be shown in grey. [On the WP talkpage I was referring to that file as it shows the complex Kashmir perfectly and because the file was used before Telangana was created on WP, hope that explains it.] Thanks. Gotitbro (talk) 12:54, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File:New-Map-Francophone World.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Openlydialectic (talk) 08:28, 20 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi![edit]

Hi Filpro! It's been a while since I've seen you on Wikipedia. I recall you being fairly active a couple of years ago before mysteriously disappearing. Hope all's well with you! Best regards, Tiger7253 (talk) 08:43, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nice to see you, Tiger7253! All is indeed good on my end, however, I am unfortunately topic banned on the English Wikipedia because of some edit-warring incident. I am no longer allowed to edit any India-related articles. There currently isn't enough motivation for me to bother appealing as I have realised that en:WP:IN has became a place of a very select few groups. You might see me around only to update some map here on commons. I also occasionaly spend my time in the Hindi and Punjabi Wikipedias. Sorry for the late reply. फ़िलप्रो (talk) 02:24, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Request[edit]

Like other states please update Kashmir & Ladakh map as soon as possible Nahtrav (talk)

File:South Asia (orthographic projection) without national boundaries.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

183.83.46.212 07:49, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh[edit]

I saw your map renderings used in Indian states and Union territories. Can you please do the same kn Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh? Editor8220 (talk) 16:33, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Gujarati 2A02:C7C:E00C:6000:C538:E667:2337:61C9 10:52, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gujarati[edit]

Language 2A02:C7C:E00C:6000:C538:E667:2337:61C9 10:53, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Gujarati tàlk[edit]

વાત કરો 2A02:C7C:E00C:6000:C538:E667:2337:61C9 10:56, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

તમે વાત કરી રહ્યા હતા 2A02:C7C:E00C:6000:C538:E667:2337:61C9 10:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
પધારો 2A02:C7C:E00C:6000:C538:E667:2337:61C9 10:57, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
File:India dark grey.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

203.92.60.82 10:46, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]