User talk:Михајло Анђелковић/1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to the Commons, Михајло Анђелковић/1!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)


Please give images good descriptions[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ suomi ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

I noticed you've uploaded one or more images and I thought I should turn your attention to a common error.
Please give some thought to writing a good description of uploaded images. This ensures that they can be used in more than one way. It also helps those that review and improve categories do a better job, which also ensures that images will get used in novel and interesting ways. Thanks, and happy editing! Siebrand 08:07, 19 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

About Image:LocationKosovo.svg[edit]

Why you edit the map Image:LocationKosovo.svg , evidencing the Serbia? The map is for the location of Kosovo in the World, not Serbia. Regards. --Eagleal 17:30, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand yet why you want to highlight Serbia. I told you: The map is for the position/location of Kosovo in the World, not Kosovo and Serbia. --Eagleal 19:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Yes but, you have highlighted too much Serbia. As you had done, it seems that Kosovo is Serbia. In the first version, Serbia was yes highlighted and separated from other countries, but Kosovo have more contrast, to evidence the location of that region in Europe. And the border between Kosovo and Serbia you can dash it, if you want. The map was OK before, except the border. --Eagleal 20:10, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
However, I had never contributed to the article, except for the image. I created it (from an old version), because there were some controversies between some Serbs and Kosovians. In order to clear any doubt, I'm from Albania. Regards. --Eagleal 20:55, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:M-84HV.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:M-84HV.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. High Contrast (talk) 06:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC[edit]

Test. 巡 Mihajlo [ talk ] 12:24, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Михајло Анђелковић!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:41, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kh-15 free drawing.png[edit]

File:Kh-15 free drawing.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

AVRS (talk) 15:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgrade - Old Sava bridge, 08.10.2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Kuli 10:19, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novi Beograd - Sunrise 02.11.2010.jpg[edit]

I added now some image notes to explain what I mean. Better now? --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 20:40, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Novi Beograd - West Gate 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. Strange "continuing" shadow of the tower (right) in the sky.--Jebulon 13:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your statue in QIC, your message[edit]

Hello Mikhajlo Angelkovitch.
First, I'm sorry for my bad english, I hope we will understand us together.
Then, I would like to say that I like your photos, and especially the last one, discussed here.
I understand that the pedestal of the statue (maybe a bit dark...) is not a cuboïd.
IMO, the problem concerns the church in background, really distorted. The walls are leaning a lot, even if the church is not a cube. Can you have a grid on your photo or monitor ? You may see what I mean. It is very visible at the door. Have a look to the street lamp left too: I hope than in Serbia street furnitures are more straight ! In a lot of cases, you will see that perspective correction is a requirement in QIC.
It is easily correctible with a software. I use GIMP, a free software, easily downloadable. Perspective corrections, tilts, color enhancements are easy. I'll download your photo, and try something for you to show you if you want and agree. One can make a lot of other improvements with this software, but I am a relative newbie, and I don't know all about it ! (But one may find several very interesting video tutorials on "Youtube".)
Thanks for your kind message, and for the latin alphabet transcription too. A transcription is good, but a translation should be better !! Who is this holy and venerable priest ?
Best regards from Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 22:23, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not sure my english is so good: you misunderstood what I wrote, or I was not clear enough, sorry. And I don't know now how to explain my opinion...--Jebulon (talk) 22:54, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
OK my friend. I wait for your call. Thanks.--Jebulon (talk) 23:06, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belgrade - Branko's Bridge construction underneath.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good! --Kuli 13:12, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Temple of Saint Sava - Monument, 11.11.2010.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice, but could you please transcript the inscription in latin alphabet, and correct the perspective ? --Jebulon 16:29, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 CommentThe first is a good suggestion. About the second, I'm not sure what I am suppsoed to do, not to mention how. Would you be so kind to give suggestions about what is wrong on the image talk, for I may be taking this picture soon under better weather conditions? It is very possible that we're not talking about bad perspective but about a feature of this monument (but lets start talk). Thanks. --Михајло Анђелковић 16:43, 11 November 2010 (UTC) Much better now, thank you.--Jebulon 21:49, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Hi Михајло Анђелковић,
did all 3 people visible in File:Wikimedian Meetup Belgrade 28.11.2010 - 1.jpg (and your other uploads from that event) agree to be identified in the image description? --Túrelio (talk) 11:16, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please, define 'identified' more clearly. I used their Wiki nicknames that are also used here. They are all well recognized members of Wikimedia Serbia. Is there any reason why you ask for this particular image and not for dozens of otheres I've uploaded? 巡 Mihajlo [ talk ]

You associate a persons face to his/her username. With that information, people who know them in the real world, can easily associate the real person to a Wikimedia user account. This should only be done after prior consent by the depicted. In case these people haven't themselves disclosed their account's identity by putting their own face or their real name on their userpage, this may even violate the privacy policy of the WMF. As an admin I'm active in checking recent uploads/edits and the above mentioned image was the first that caught my eyes. But this problem concerns all similar images, of course. --Túrelio (talk) 11:29, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am not on this particular image, but I am on other images from the same category. In general, when meetings are photographed, they participants know that these photographs will appear on the Internet. There is sr:Википедија:Уживо page that documents the meetups, the images are published there, and it is fairly well visited. In particular, I agree that I am identified in all the images in this category. Nikola (talk) 11:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

From photographers at Wikimedia-meetings in Germany I've heard that 1) they ask in advance (in general, at the start of the meeting) whether someone objects to be photographed, and 2) they promise to remove any image to which a depicted objects. In addition, they usually don't identify the depicted in the description, except Jimbo, speakers and other notable/well-known people, of course. But that's only how they do it; that's not a policy, as to my knowledge. --Túrelio (talk) 11:52, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to be identified in images uploaded on Commons. -- Obradovic Goran (talk) 11:58, 1 December 2010 (UTC) (Обрадовић Горан)[reply]
This is insane, and this is not the first time that people have had problems with our wiki meetups photos. Give it a rest, will you? And, for the record, I am in most of the photos that Mihajlo takes and I certainly agree to be identified. --Filip (§) 12:06, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for being called insane for protecting other users privacy. --Túrelio (talk) 13:19, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I did not call you insane. I don't think you're insane. I think that this tirade is useless and that you could put your efforts in some more useful stuff. Also, I don't think it's in your remit to protect users' privacies. ;) --Filip (§) 15:45, 1 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Fourth_Regional_Conference_of_Wikimedia_Serbia[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Fourth_Regional_Conference_of_Wikimedia_Serbia has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

62.194.19.121 11:55, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Postage_stamp_honoring_Jackie_Cochran.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Postage_stamp_honoring_Jackie_Cochran.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ww2censor (talk) 03:06, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know about en:File:EX25G2.jpg. I have tagged it for deletion too. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 15:38, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Михајло_Анђелковић/1&oldid=51908205"