User:Romanceor/QI
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
|
• Wikipédia-fr |
• My pictures |
• Wikimedia Commons |
| Nominations aux images de qualité de Romanceor — Romanceor quality images nominations |
|
Dernière mise à jour par — Last update by :Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC) |
N.B. : Seules les images acceptées sont encore mises à jour ici. 19:56, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Acceptées[edit]
-
- Nomination Long exposition on waterfalls in Plitvika lakes (Croatia), by Romanceor 16:39, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion A little bit of sharpening and curves and this would have a chance at FP. ~~~~
-
- Nomination Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris seen from Saint-Michel bridge, by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion The image is tilted, should be fixed first --Richard Bartz 12:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC) Tilted corrected. Romanceor 00:13, 27 February 2008 (UTC)-
Supporti like the deepness of this picture- LadyofHats how can i know the UTC? (It is in the middle of the page, above where the images start --fred) 4 march 2008 LadyofHats 12:31, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Viola ×wittrockiana (Pensée) (april 2008 - Parc de Bercy, Paris), by --Romanceor 09:53, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I like the composition, colours are OK, hi res --Mbdortmund 22:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Vendeuse d'arachides à Ouagadougou --Romanceor 11:17, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I love the delicacy of the scene.--B.navez 15:58, 27 April 2008 (UTC) Certainly a QI. However, it is simply so good, that it should also be a Featured Picture. Wherefore it is now nominated as such --Thermos 15:30, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Sacha Guitry incarnated by Denis Podalydès at the Cinémathèque française in Paris --Romanceor 08:23, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion good theater image insite of the difficult light --Mbdortmund 23:11, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Gothic vault (Saint-Séverin church, Paris) --Romanceor 07:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice perspective. --Stefan Vladuck 23:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Organs (Saint-Séverin church, Paris) --Romanceor 07:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Maybe a bit soft due to the very small aperture, but alltogether I find it's a good photograph. --Stefan Vladuck 23:07, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Ray Lema at the Cinémathèque française in Paris (02.2008) --Romanceor 20:00, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I like the atmosphere, technique is OK --Mbdortmund 22:33, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Ecailles d'Araucaria araucana --Romanceor 02:14, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice image showing thin DOF. --Lerdsuwa 13:13, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Isolated metro wagon in Place d'Italie, Paris --Romanceor 01:57, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion The odd composition serves a purpose by giving an overview of the surroundings. --Dilaudid 19:33, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Préparation de brochettes en vue de l'arrivée d'une manifestation (Paris, 10-June-2008) --Romanceor 01:24, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion I don't like the man with the stripped shirts behind. --Lerdsuwa 13:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC), technical quality is very good, and the guy in the bg is fine. --Dschwen 19:20, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Détail des tours surplombant la rue de Tolbiac --Romanceor 11:53, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Very nice! The slightly slanting vertical lines remind of three-dimensionality in this graphic shot. –Dilaudid 12:40, 30 July 2008 (UTC), Yes, nicely seen. Great shot. --Dschwen 18:44, 30 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Police forces at the end of a demonstration in Paris --Romanceor 12:34, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Great framing, the picture tells the story. TimVickers 16:38, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Rope games in the show Les Fils qui nous lient, Paris --Romanceor 20:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion good, sorry for the license problems with the other pictures --Mbdortmund 20:15, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Parisian demonstration on last january 29th. --Romanceor 15:43, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion a better description would be nice --Mbdortmund 16:21, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Free billboard in rue de l'Arbalète, Paris --Romanceor 03:21, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice shot of graffiti. --George Chernilevsky 18:54, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Fisrt facade door of San Mark Basilika of Venice --Romanceor 00:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
Request minor editing. Exist horizontal stitching line through mosaic. Overall very nice --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I really don't understand where that came from... even the photoshop file had it ! --Romanceor 08:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm sorry... It is my download error. I re-downloaded this image now, all OK. Support it is good for FP --George Chernilevsky 08:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Trucks wait in Chungara–Tambo Quemado mountain pass between Chile and Bolivia. --Romanceor 10:48, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion Good. --Berthold Werner 14:23, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Seen of Valparaiso --Romanceor 16:04, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion impressive view, structures could be a bit finer --Mbdortmund 13:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Baulé "zébus" mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:55, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African bird mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:50, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baule mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:45, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bird mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- George Chernilevsky 05:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Night bird or sun mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:42, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Bouc" mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Two faces African mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 05:36, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Baule mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- George Chernilevsky 05:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination "Antilope" mask. --Romanceor 19:03, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI -- George Chernilevsky 05:29, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African dog mask --Romanceor 12:25, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion QI & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus 12:44, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African mask --Romanceor 14:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 14:00, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Bambara mask --Romanceor 14:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion good --Mbdortmund 09:28, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
-
- Nomination African mask --Romanceor 14:38, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Promotion Good -- George Chernilevsky 10:36, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Sea water under the rain --Romanceor 00:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Promotion great atmosphere --Mbdortmund 00:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Church of Santo Domingo in Oaxaca, Mexico --Romanceor 00:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Promotion Good quality. --Mbdortmund 00:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
_-_2.jpg)
-Romanceor.jpg)
Ecluse du bord de Marne arround Dormans[edit]
- Nomination Ecluse du bord de Marne arround Dormans, Aisne, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good timing, QI -- Ianaré 22:56, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp and CCW tilt. Lycaon 08:52, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
Done Sharped and tilt corrected. Romanceor 12:35, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support now is ok - Pudelek 10:50, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
Result orginal: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose -> promote -- carol 16:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Lestat 10:55, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- this last vote doesn't count since it wasn't a draw but nothing changes with or without it. -- carol 16:54, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Hôtel des abbés de Cluny[edit]
- Nomination Musée national du Moyen Âge (Hôtel des abbés de Cluny) in Paris, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion
Comment Very nice composition, but it could be lightened, there are 2 spots in the sky (clone out), and it's a little blurry (try shrinking ?) --ianaré 13:20, 10 March 2008 EDT
- Comment Blurriness is probably due to small aperture (f/29), but there is still a high level of detail that would be destroyed by downsampling. --Stefan Vladuck 17:45, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Wow, you made me discover it ! That's crazy... i'll use less my 29 for now on. Romanceor 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I think you have blown some highlights in your lightened version. How did you do the lightening? Maybe try using curves to lighten only the dark parts a little bit... --Stefan Vladuck 23:33, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Info That's right ; I had done it with a photoshop brush. I just corrected that (better lightened) and distortion. Romanceor 13:30, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support Looks nice, not very good detail but high resolution. --Beyond silence 17:57, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose -> promoted to QI --Aqwis 00:15, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
Nuit de fête Place Flagey[edit]
- Nomination Nocturn activity in Place Eugène Flagey in Brussels --Romanceor 01:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Promotion Nice, but needs CCW rotation. --Dilaudid 10:55, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Judging from the electric poles I think it's already level. --Lerdsuwa 13:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Which are more likely to be completely vertical, poles or buildings? :) --Dilaudid 19:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Info I rotated 0.9° left ; I think it's all right now. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 12:29, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
- Judging from the electric poles I think it's already level. --Lerdsuwa 13:19, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support still has my support. --Lerdsuwa 16:26, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? carol (talk) 03:34, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support Thanks! –Dilaudid 10:11, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
File:Cobblestone reparing.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cobblestone repairing in Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support Good. Yann 20:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
QuestionWhat about this new version ? --Romanceor 21:30, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support Ok, meets the criteria. --High Contrast 13:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support I think after those two corrections, it is fine now. Maedin 17:29, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promote? Maedin 16:48, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Ernesto Cardenal read his poems in Santiago of Chile. --Romanceor 20:42, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
- Promotion
- Support good portrait --Mbdortmund 02:39, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO it's too noisy. --kallerna 10:53, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Ok now. --kallerna 10:04, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment Romanceor's picture show sometimes little technical weaknesses, but they tell a story and are very good concerning atmosphere and composition, I think the noise is acceptable here because of the other qualities. It's an available light picture and a flash would have reduced the noise but destroyed the atmosphere. --Mbdortmund 14:39, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Atmosphere well captured, available light snap shots cannot always be technically perfect. -- Smial 21:11, 5 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose All this needs is proper editing, it's a great shot. The problem is that it's not only got noise (and color noise), it's got jpeg artifacts in the noise. If you want to upload the original, I can fix it for you. Then I'd even support it as FP. --Calibas 01:15, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support --Marcok 23:37, 7 August 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree that the noise issue could easily be addressed, I'll support it if that has been properly done. -- H005 21:25, 9 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support Issue sucessfully resolved. -- H005 16:20, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Comment I denoised it a little bit, please have a look --Mbdortmund 14:06, 10 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support QI for me --George Chernilevsky 13:36, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support The new denoised version is nice. Jonathunder 14:43, 13 August 2009 (UTC)
- Support --High Contrast 20:52, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 7 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote? George Chernilevsky 06:00, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Refusées[edit]
-
-
-
-
-
-
![* Nomination The Eiffel tower is 300 meters high]], by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC) * Decline Composition: the tower is somewhat castrated by this crop. guillom 10:20, 26 February 2008 (GMT)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/La_Tour_Eiffel_surplombant_Paris.jpg/120px-La_Tour_Eiffel_surplombant_Paris.jpg)
-
- Nomination Pantheon de Paris (distortion checked), by Romanceor, 00:03, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Opposetoo dark and blury- LadyofHats 4 march 2008
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Demonstration in Paris on november 2007, 20th.
- Decline nice idea but too noisy. --Stulli 20:31, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Composition florale de muscari et narcisses dans "Les Parterres" (Parc de Bercy, Paris 12), by --Romanceor 07:39, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Depth of field issues: the focus is on the hyacinth leaves, leaving none of the flowers in good focus. Adam Cuerden 01:11, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Fried plantains' sellers in Ouagadougou --Romanceor 12:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Bad light. Faces are in a too harsh shadow. --Ikiwaner 08:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Street name on the left side of the Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Poor framing, the subject is uncertain -- Alvesgaspar 11:24, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Bas-relief on the left side of Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Weird lighting and poor framing -- Alvesgaspar 11:27, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Panorama in Trogir, Croatia, --Romanceor 16:07, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Well made panorama but the artefacts (e.g. white rim around flag on harbour tower) from February are still there despite the resampling. There are also some dust spots from the sensor visible. Lycaon 17:31, 23 May 2008 (UTC).
-
-
- Nomination Panorama of the valley of San Pedro de Atacama, --Romanceor 15:53, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I am not so qualified to review this, if you want to discuss it, perhaps more qualified will look at it. I think I saw a seam in the sky, I also think I saw a cloud formation which was time lapsed from another cloud formation. Not as technically easy to produce this as an acceptable 'graph of a pile of beer cans huh? -- carol 06:01, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Perspective in the Sacra Conversatione by Giovanni Bellini in San Zaccaria of Venice, --Romanceor 13:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline The mixed light makes this a difficult shot, but the colour balance of the painting seems way off (comparison). --Stefan Vladuck 14:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC) Question What about this version ? --Romanceor 16:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC) Very nice subject. But the right pillar is overexposure, there is slightly artifacts of whole may from poor lighting, and composition is disordered by peoples heads and was cropped. _Fukutaro 14:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination William Klein, yesterday at the Cinémathèque française --Romanceor 03:04, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed. --Dschwen 14:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I know the black area on left bring the subject on the right "third line", but i think a little crop suit better for article illustration. And I also agree that a little more exposure could help. Else, nice shot. --Pom² 19:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Mused a bit with levels and sharpness, hope it helps. --Rama 08:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Helps, but this is no QI to me due to high noise levels. --Dschwen 12:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Alain Tanner awnsering André S. Labarthe, yesterday at the Cinémathèque française --Romanceor 03:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Underexposed. --Dschwen 14:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Mused a bit with levels and sharpness, hope it helps. --Rama 08:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Helps, but this is no QI to me due to high noise levels. --Dschwen 12:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination The Cinémathèque française recieving sheet music from Antoine Duhamel --Romanceor 05:10, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Decline I like this one the most but noise is quite high. --Lerdsuwa 05:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
Mused a bit with levels and sharpness, hope it helps. --Rama 08:09, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Helps, but this is no QI to me due to high noise levels. --Dschwen 12:16, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Enseigne de mercerie-bonneterie à Bruxelles --Romanceor 18:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Unacceptable sub-standard stitching. I recommend hugin/enblend, it's free. --Dschwen 00:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC) Info It has been done with The Panorama Factory v4.5. I'll try again with the v5.1 and hugin. --Romanceor 10:47, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
-
-
-
-
-
- Nomination Homeless guy in Campo Formio, Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
Neutral Good composition and lighting, but heavy CA. --Afrank99 16:51, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
In deed ! I didn't see that... Could it be corrected anyhow ? --Romanceor 17:31, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
I've never tried it, but I think DXO Optics Pro and PTLens can do it. --Afrank99 20:12, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Declining: if you sort out the CA, you can renom. Maedin 12:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
- Decline Odd crop, rather poor composition. Juliancolton 13:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
-
-
-
- Nomination Waste in Ouagadougou --Romanceor 12:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
- Decline Too tight crop and something distracting on the right side. --Berthold Werner 18:29, 14 March 2010 (UTC) -- il faut faire attention au droit à l'image, également. Cette personne est identifiable. ----Jebulon 19:57, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
![* Nomination The Eiffel tower is 300 meters high]], by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC) * Decline Composition: the tower is somewhat castrated by this crop. guillom 10:20, 26 February 2008 (GMT)](/wiki/File:La_Tour_Eiffel_surplombant_Paris.jpg)
.JPG)
La Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris vue du pont d'Arcole[edit]
- Nomination Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris seen from Arcole bridge, by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Comment The image is tilted, should be fixed first -- Richard Bartz 12:26, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Tilted corrected. Romanceor 00:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I feel circular lens flare, slightly detail, lens distortion of right building. And could you add location? _Fukutaro 11:27, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- CommentLens flare and lens distortion corrected -- Romanceor 14:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- OpposePersonally i dislike the "ghost" that is standing in the midle of the image -user:LadyofHats 10:31, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose as per LadyofHats -- ianaré 12:52, 10 March 2008 EDT
Result: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> not promoted to QI -- Lycaon 06:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Grand Trianon[edit]
- Nomination Grand Trianon, dans le parc du château de Versailles, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Did you correct color or contrast? I think this is artificialy color. And tilt. _Fukutaro 16:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's the original picture, the colors are real. Romanceor 17:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Not retouched: If so, did you use proper white-balance when time you shoot this? I seem still that slightly too amber (and tilt) Fukutaro 10:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- The photo has been taked arround 19h. Could it be the sunset that gives you this impression ? Romanceor 12:19, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- Not retouched: If so, did you use proper white-balance when time you shoot this? I seem still that slightly too amber (and tilt) Fukutaro 10:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's the original picture, the colors are real. Romanceor 17:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support- I think it is on the edge of being acepted, i wouldnt try to fix the color. it may end seeming even more artificial -- LadyofHats
- Neutral Good composition and color, support if slight tilt is corrected -- ianaré 16:51 5 March 2008 EDT
- Comment - hmmm... a little dark - Pudelek 11:57, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose bad perspective, bad crop, too dark. --Lestat 10:54, March 7, 2008 (UTC)
- Info bright and tilt corrected. --Romanceor 15:40, March 9, 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose the very tight crop bothers me. --Rampensau 13:41, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose -> not promoted to QI -- Lycaon 06:42, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Conciergerie in Paris[edit]
- Nomination Conciergerie in Paris, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support A really good and pleasant illustration of nocturn long time exposure B.navez 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice typical image that is the slow shutter shot at the night time. But I think that at the left buildings are not good sharpness. And it need to add some [[Category:]] and some location. _Fukutaro 14:01, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Location et categorization done. Are you sure sharpness of the walls of the building is what makes quality or not of thess kinds of long exposure pictures with moving objects ? --B.navez 18:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yes. I meant historic building's sharpness for QI. The road at the lower right in focused. _Fukutaro 11:06, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
- Location et categorization done. Are you sure sharpness of the walls of the building is what makes quality or not of thess kinds of long exposure pictures with moving objects ? --B.navez 18:57, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose I think it's too dark and too soft (coincidence btw : I shot a panorama of this from the same location, but threw it because one of my pics was blurred... ;) ) -- Benh 21:33, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
- Comment It dearly needs a better filename --Bossi (talk • gallery • contrib) 02:53, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Result orginal: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> decline -- carol 16:55, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Sommet de la tour de Beurre de la cathédrale de Rouen[edit]
- Nomination Sommet de la tour de Beurre de la Cathédrale, Rouen, France, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose A vertical composition would be more appropriate --ianaré 13:02, 10 March 2008 EDT
- Comment Well, in fact the subject of the photo is the top of the tower and not the tower herself... Romanceor 20:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I think for an encyclopedia there is greater value in showing more of the tower. --ianaré 01:34, 11 March 2008 EDT
- Comment I agree with the fact that it is important to have the whole tower, but I don't think it has to be the only photo : it is possible that a part of the article about the Cathédrale de Rouen is specific about the top of this famous tower, which has a very rare structure : an octogonal crown instead of the top initialy planed. Romanceor 11:55, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with ianare. _Fukutaro 14:17, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support nice, good detail. --Beyond silence
17:58, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Result: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> (decline?) -- carol 17:08, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Not enough space in the top of the image. The very top of the tower seems to be cut off. sfu 10:28, 17 March 2008
Ouagadougou fishery[edit]
- Nomination Fishers and their fishing net in Ouagadougou --Romanceor 12:33, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support A good composition and nice colours. --Ikiwaner 08:12, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Really! This is too noisy to pass QI's technical requirements. Lycaon 22:32, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Couldn't you do something about it ? Have I to reduce the size ? Romanceor 18:17, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- It's difficult. I removed some of the noise, but more would compromise the details of the image! Sorry. Lycaon 07:32, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Beyond silence 20:30, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy, not qualifiable for a day light picture. --B.navez 17:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose washed out, low detail --Simonizer 07:41, 29 May 2008 (UTC)
Result: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose -> not promoted -- carol 14:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose ac Simonizer, Lycaon and B.navez. --Lestath 10:40, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Nothing wrong with voting after the allotted time! --carol 14:15, 31 May 2008 (UTC)
Carapils[edit]
- Nomination Carapils bier cans, --Romanceor 13:56, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support The photograph is good and the events that cause these photographs are often good as well. What I don't support, however, is under-age consumption of alcohol and in the blurry parts of this image, such questions arise. Heh. It is very good to have a foundation of fun without external assistence first. -- carol 05:51, 1 June 2008 (UTC)
- Info Uhuh... there is no underaged consumer in this picture, and neither arround the cans. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 16:36, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose it seems jpg artifacts on the red part. And somehow, very complicated. _Fukutaro 14:21, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
- Question I just don't understand what's complicated ; is that the composition that disturbs you ? --Romanceor 16:21, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Unneeded noise in the out-of-focus parts. Lycaon 05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- Info I tried to reduce the noise by JPEG compression by 5%, but I'm not sure what means "Unneeded noise" : how is it possible to have a needed noise ? --Romanceor [parlons-en] 10:36, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
- Unneeded or unnecessary or could/should have been avoided. Lycaon 12:02, 13 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Lycaon 05:51, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
Clochard parisien à Bercy[edit]
- Nomination Clochard à Bercy, Paris --Romanceor 18:53, 11 June 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support I like this picture more for its composition rather than its technical qualities. The lighting conditions were tough, and there is considerable clipping in the highlights, as well as alight noise overall. I'm supporting it, it still is a good pic. --Dschwen 00:28, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It has problem so that, I think it needs discuss and some opinion. _Fukutaro 15:01, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Support good --Beyond silence 21:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Compositional not bad but technically insufficient for QI (clipping and noise). Lycaon 11:31, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Lycaon --Simonizer 22:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? carol (talk) 03:28, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
Tour NE de la bibliothèque François Mitterand[edit]
- Nomination Tower of the French national library. --Romanceor 03:42, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Low noise, good sharpness, exposure, not tilted... Looks fine to me Benh 08:33, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- OpposeStill no Freedom of Panorama in France - Building is under the copyright of the architect. esby
- Comment You shouldn't correct distortion in Photoshop because it just corrects the angles but not the shortening. Use Hugin instead. --Ikiwaner 15:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)
Image:Préparation de grenouille.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Frog preparation --Romanceor 13:10, 3 September 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose Even with the description "frog preparation" I can't work out what the subject of the image actually is. TimVickers 18:09, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lucky you ;-(. Lycaon 06:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Ha! Probably very true. I'll hold on to the idea that it is some kind of root vegetable! :) TimVickers 15:01, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Lucky you ;-(. Lycaon 06:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support I actually like it. Wouldn't try eating this though! Adamantios 18:39, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
- Support I like it. --Kosiarz-PL 05:53, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Too noisy. Lycaon 06:13, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose It is not clear to me what to look at exactly in the picture. Besides, I like them fried, but I don't want to know about the whole process! :-P --Eusebius 09:11, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Gnangarra 15:21, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
File:Cycliste à place d'Italie-Paris.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Cyclist in Place d'Italie, Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- Oppose too noisy --Ianare 06:51, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- QuestionWhat about it now ? --Romanceor 12:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Unfortunately denoising removed too much detail. --Ianare 16:22, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support I like the colors. Yann 22:25, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Ianaré, the de-noising has removed detail and texture. I really like the picture, otherwise, is it possible to re-process from raw . . . maybe try a little less de-noising with some downsampling? Maedin 17:23, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Reprocessing, yep, but please do not advocate downsampling: that's akin to throwing away part of your image. Lycaon 21:11, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline? Maedin 16:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)
Parisian dog walker.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Parisian dog walker. --Romanceor 15:35, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Decline
- CommentI like colours and atmosphere but perspektive should be corrected --Mbdortmund 16:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Question I don't understand what I should do to correct the perspective ? Is it tilt you mean ? --Romanceor 17:18, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
the vertical lines on the walls are tilt to the left, and this tilt seems to be stronger on the left part of the picture, that's why I think the perspective should be corrected --Mbdortmund 23:46, 30 May 2009 (UTC)- CommentI think this is optical illusion due to angle of shot because photoshop's 'repères' doesn't indicate any tilt on any vertical line. --Romanceor 12:42, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Comment just to show what I mean, I'll delete the copy tomorrow, red lines are vertical File:Parisian dog walker copy.jpg --Mbdortmund 15:52, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oooops. I was looking my file and not the one online... it's obiously tilted, I corrected.--Romanceor 16:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Support good --Mbdortmund 17:39, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oooops. I was looking my file and not the one online... it's obiously tilted, I corrected.--Romanceor 16:36, 31 May 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose There is still a significant noise issue. Lycaon 17:44, 2 June 2009 (UTC)
- What about this version ? --Romanceor [parlons-en] 07:57, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Support Good. Yann 14:34, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not sure what to call it technically, but some of the edges have been degraded. Look, for example, at where the lady's scarf meets her coat. Was this caused by excessive noise reduction? Maedin 19:26, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good view, like impressionistic painting... by technically is not perfect. --George Chernilevsky 07:50, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline? Maedin 13:27, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
Retirées des nominations[edit]
Serge Toubiana à la Cinémathèque française[edit]
- Nomination Serge Toubiana animating the yesterday's discussion about "Was May 68 filmed ?" at the Cinémathèque française --Romanceor 03:52, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Withdrawn
- Oppose Significant motion blur on the hand and microphone. --Lerdsuwa 05:16, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- Comment Microphone and hand are not the subject of the photo, and their blurness contribute to the effect of dynamisn of the picture, which name is Serge Toubiana "animating". --Romanceor 05:39, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
- You gotta clean your sensor, dude. --Dschwen 00:17, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Question Yes I know ; it's a catastrophy... But I've been told that's VERY expensive. May I ask where do you see it in this picture ? --Romanceor 10:53, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not expensive. You need lint-free paper tissue and Methanol. I've done it twice before (and I'm overdue too :-) ). Spots are all over the bg.--Dschwen 12:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you were speaking of lenses that's not the problem : it really is the dust arrived on the sensor in Ouagadougou (a very dust&dirty city, true horror for SLRs, overall when you need objective changes). But in fact I'm just discovering the "Dust correction" tool in Capture NX which will permit me to wait until I have the 25€ asked by Nikon to clean the sensor... 'cause yes, I prefer to let doing it by professionals : to risky. Thanks anyhow. --Romanceor 12:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Of course I'm talking about the sensor! First time is always the scariest. But then again, I had a nicely equiped lab to do my cleaning in. --Dschwen 12:58, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- Well if you were speaking of lenses that's not the problem : it really is the dust arrived on the sensor in Ouagadougou (a very dust&dirty city, true horror for SLRs, overall when you need objective changes). But in fact I'm just discovering the "Dust correction" tool in Capture NX which will permit me to wait until I have the 25€ asked by Nikon to clean the sensor... 'cause yes, I prefer to let doing it by professionals : to risky. Thanks anyhow. --Romanceor 12:41, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
- It's not expensive. You need lint-free paper tissue and Methanol. I've done it twice before (and I'm overdue too :-) ). Spots are all over the bg.--Dschwen 12:14, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Serge Toubiana is too much blury, even if he has a very expressive face on the picture. --Romanceor [parlons-en] 17:16, 17 June 2008 (UTC)
Anciennes versions de fichiers —- candidature actualisée[edit]
-
-
- Nomination Grand Trianon, dans le parc du château de Versailles, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Did you correct color or contrast? I think this is artificialy color. And tilt. _Fukutaro 16:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC) · No, it's the original picture, the colors are real. Romanceor 17:53, 26 February 2008 (UTC)
-
-
- Nomination Park of Bercy during winter 2007-2008 in Paris, by Romanceor 16:56, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Nice composition and place. But I don`t like this element in bottom left corner - it`s out of focus and it`s breaking the composition. Image seems to be tilted to the left (the bridge is tilted. sfu 17:46, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris seen from Arcole bridge, by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC) The image is tilted, should be fixed first --~~~~
- Decline {{{2}}}
-
-
-
- Nomination: Musée national du Moyen Âge (Hôtel des abbés de Cluny) in Paris, by Romanceor 17:00, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Sacra Conversatione de Giovanni Bellini in San Zaccaria of Venice, --Romanceor 20:16, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination Panorama in Trogir, Croatia, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline Compression artifacts (e.g. white rim around flag on harbor tower). Otherwise nice panorama. - Till.niermann 15:42, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
-
.jpg)
Oiseau hein[edit]
- Nomination Juvenile gulls (Brijuni archipelago, Croatia), possibly yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis), by Romanceor 16:23, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Decline
- Support Composition is nice, sharpness seems to be good enough. sfu 18:27, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose very noisy, and id not sufficient. Lycaon 20:18, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose very noisy, sorry --Beyond silence 17:53, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
- Question I don't understand that noise ; isn't it just water vapor ? Romanceor 12:12, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> not promoted to QI --Fukutaro 11:08, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Non révisées[edit]
-
- Nomination: Brijuni National Park in Croatia, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Ponton sur un bord de Marne, Aisne, France, by Romanceor 12:20, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Very short exposition on animal's legs in Brijuni National Park (Croatia), by Romanceor 16:42, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Electrophone, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Jardins au dessus de la gare de Lyon-Perrache, France, by Romanceor 15:27, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cleaning of the Parc de Bercy (Paris), by Romanceor 12:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Review Comment Seems dark to me. Could you lighten the picture a bit ? -- Stephanemartin 14:33, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Comment Something like that ? --Romanceor 21:54, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Comment You have blown the highlights in the edited version (look at the man's shoulder). --Stefan Vladuck 22:01, 15 April 2008 (UTC) Comment What about this version then ? --Romanceor 12:48, 16 April 2008 (UTC) NeutralI think it it better than the two previous ones. The cleaning man seems focused. Some noise though. -- Stephanemartin 10:19, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Gargoyle on the right side of Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gargoyles on the top of the cloister of Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Gospel singers in Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Cloister of the Saint-Séverin church in Paris --Romanceor 21:24, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Wi-Fi hotspot in the parc de Bercy, Paris, --Romanceor 16:37, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Police force in front of a Parisian demonstration (10-June-2008) --Romanceor 01:16, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
- Review needed
-
- Nomination: Homeless guy in Bercy, Paris. --Romanceor 17:16, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review Again good colours and compo, but noise keeps on bothering me. This is a bit weird and unexpected for 400 ISO on a D200! Lycaon 21:18, 2 June 2009 (UTC) CommentYes. I don't understand neither. But here is a new version. What about it ? --Romanceor 14:03, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
It is an improvement. Lycaon 20:59, 3 June 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Cour carrée (detail) of the Louvre Museum, Paris --Romanceor 20:08, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
- Review Comment Quite good, but there is some disturbing light above the left window. Yann 22:19, 23 May 2009 (UTC) Comment and a little tilt IMHO --Mbdortmund 19:05, 28 May 2009 (UTC) CommentI tried the best I could ; it isn't obvious... If someone wants to try it again, the RAW's here. --Romanceor 17:57, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
-
- Nomination: Ernesto Cardenal read his poems in Santiago of Chile (other version). --Romanceor 07:27, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
- Review Comment would be better without the vignettation on the top --Mbdortmund 16:52, 2 August 2009 (UTC) Comment This is natural vignetation : it wasn't added at post-prod. So I'm not sure to want (or be able) to delete it. --Romanceor 18:51, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Oiseau hein[edit]
- Nomination: Juvenile yellow-legged gull (Larus michahellis) (Brijuni archipelago, Croatia), by Romanceor 11:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Review
- Support Colours are superb, but the picture seems noisy (look at the water). I think the upper part should be cropped, as it adds nothing to the picture. Update: edited picture is fine for me -- Stephanemartin 07:09, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
- Support --Alessandro Zangrilli 11:52, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Info I have uploaded an edited version (cropped and noise filtered). --Stefan Vladuck 21:46, 15 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Both images are colorful waterdrops. --Fukutaro 14:46, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Comment I believe that this is a natural phenomenon due to dispersion of the sunlight in the water drops, and not a technical flaw of the photograph. --Stefan Vladuck 15:32, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose Image is oversharpened. Lycaon 15:50, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Question I'm not sure ; what does it mean ? And what can I do about it ? --Romanceor 16:58, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- CommentOT: I would have nominated some of your other pictures, e.g. Flore de Bercy 11.JPG, if you would provide a description. --Mbdortmund 17:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- CommentOT: I'll nominate these flower pictures too but I'm still expecting identifications on w:fr:Projet:Botanique/Quelle est cette plante ?#Identifications florales --Romanceor 21:21, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
- Question Stefan Vladuck, don't you support the new version of the picture ? Romanceor 12:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- I certainly do (otherwise I wouldn't have submitted it), but as far as I know as a co-author I cannot be counted... --Stefan Vladuck 14:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- What if I do the crop ? huhu... third time the picture has been declined. --Romanceor 12:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)
- I certainly do (otherwise I wouldn't have submitted it), but as far as I know as a co-author I cannot be counted... --Stefan Vladuck 14:26, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
- Interesting how editing only disqualifies you as a voter -- at least it is to me. -- carol 13:42, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose -> (a draw) -- carol 20:23, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
Image:Paulownia_tomentosa_à_Place_d'Italie.jpg[edit]
- Nomination Paulownia tomentosa on Place d'Italie, in Paris --Romanceor 17:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Discussion Misidentified. This one seems to be Paulownia tomentosa. Change name please. --B.navez 18:12, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- Info Done. Thanks. --Romanceor 21:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → More votes? --Eusebius (talk) 17:35, 2 December 2008 (UTC)