User talk:Fentener van Vlissingen

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Fentener van Vlissingen!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文(台灣)‎ | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−

TUSC token 025edd336731e2fe0d9f899af7558a34[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

copyvio?[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Crash Turkish Airlines TK 1951 wreck.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--131.137.245.199 19:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please read into the creative commons licences before assuming that images uploaded from Flickr are copyright violations. See full cc-by-2.0 licence here. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Fentener van Vlissingen!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Gerrit Schotte straalt na de overwinning.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Multichill (talk) 15:39, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Edward_Cheung,_Prime_Minister_Mike_Eman,_Governor_Fredis_Refunjol.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 15:41, 1 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and thanks for your support!
I planned to create those versions of the maps, highlighting the Dutch part of the island, but lacked time to make them. File:Sint_Maarten_location_map.svg is now available and File:Sint_Maarten_relief_location_map.jpg will be soon.
Greetings. Sting (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

NASA images on flickr[edit]

Hello.

I just wanted your opinion on wether it's ok to upload these NASA images from Flickr. The thing is that they are marked as atribution requiered and non-comercial, but there's also a disclaimer below saying "Where the work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license."

So can those images be ploaded to commons and used in wikipedia articles or not? Thanks. --U5K0 (talk) 10:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Paul Klee[edit]

Hi Fentener van Vlissingen; I think that the case of copyright protection of works by Paul Klee in the U.S. is a bit more complicated than you wrote under "Summarizing" at Category:Paul Klee, so I added some more text. Basically, the protection of 95 years from publication applies only if the work in question was published in compliance with U.S. copyright formalities, otherwise {{PD-1996}} applies, wouldn't you say? Gestumblindi (talk) 20:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After some more thought I think I may be mistaken in this, so feel free to correct me if needed :-) Gestumblindi (talk) 20:05, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the same as you earlier today, but after asking a question about it in the Village Pump, it seems that these formalities (registration, renewal) do not matter for foreign works. On 1996-1-1, copyright was restored for all copyrighted works abroad, and now these works get the U.S. copyright term as if copyright had been properly registered and renewed. In the words of User:Clindberg:

Lastly, renewal does not matter for URAA-restored works -- they get the U.S. term as if they had been properly renewed.

This seems logical, as otherwise the restoration of copyright would have been useless for most foreign works, which would fall short of the URAA goal of universally protecting copyrighted works. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! I changed the wording again, basically reverting back to your version, but adding "However, this only applies to works where the country of origin is Germany, not Switzerland" for clarity (it may be redundant, but otherwise the summary wouldn't say anything about the U.S. status of Swiss works by Klee). Gestumblindi (talk) 20:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, I think your addition indeed improves clarity on the issue. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 21:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Universiteit van Franeker.jpg[edit]

Hi,

May I ask where you found this color version of the image? Also, is there a higher quality version available?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Universiteit_van_Franeker.jpg

David

Your account will be renamed[edit]

20:49, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

As Kobina Sekyi was born in 1892 I doubt that the photo was made in XIX c. I think, dating it to around 1910 is more reliable. Would you check your source and fix it? Ankry (talk) 16:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you're right indeed. I fixed it. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 04:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

13Weesperpoort, 1850.jpg: versiegeschiedenis[edit]

In 2012 heb jij dit schilderij geladen. in de omschrijving staat 1850, maar het schilderij is rechtsonder gedateerd 1867. Stond 1850 ergens in de titel van het schilderij? Met vriendelijke groet,Ceescamel (talk) 10:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Cees! Ik kan ook niet meer terugvinden waar ik die 1850 vandaan haal. 1867 (of 1861?) lijkt me inderdaad correcter. Fentener van Vlissingen (talk) 13:08, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

File:Abraham de Veer (1767-1838) 2.JPG[edit]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner), if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:34, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lithuania Minor.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goesseln (talk) 21:13, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

?Are you sure about this image[edit]

Good afternoon, I'm an Iranian and was thinking about [Mosselstein.jpg|this image]. Just used google translate to translate what you fellas added in Nederland language about this image. It looks you think this image is taken in Band-e Charak. We think it's taken in kharg island. As it's written in the article:

In 1753 the Dutch Empire established both a trading post and a fort on the island after securing perpetual ownership of the island from Mir Nasáir, the Arab ruler of Bandar Rig, in return for a present of 2000 rupees.[2] In 1766 the Dutch fort was captured by Mir Mahanna, the governor of Bandar Rig.[3]

In some persian articles, this fort is called "Fort Mosselstein". e.g.

[1]

or

[2]

Even in dutch articles you can see such name. e.g.

[3]

How about to change the discription? I'm not familiar with Nederland language then could you change the discriptions? Rohalamin (talk) 09:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rohalamin: nobody knows where image was taken. It could be Kharg, or Band-e Charak, but also five other different places. I added explanation in all speculative photos, and categorized them under Dutch colonial architecture in Iran. --Orijentolog (talk) 23:53, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Orijentolog Ok, Thank you. Rohalamin (talk) 04:40, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]