User:D-Kuru/archiv/fp/2008

This page is an archive! You aren't allowed to edit this page. If you want to talk to me use my dicussion page.

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Spilomyia-sayi-001.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Spilomyia-sayi-001.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 21:06, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dresden-Wiener-Platz-night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perfect --Lmbuga 02:23, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 20070430-Garten-hornisse2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The picture itself is good, but it need English description and scientific name of this bee. MathKnight 21:19, 8 November 2008 (UTC) English description + scientific name added --D-Kuru 10:59, 9 November 2008 (UTC) Thanks. MathKnight 17:47, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Plasma lamps.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Looks ok to me. I don't think geotag is necessary here. --Eusebius (talk) 13:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Satisfies all criteria. And you should nominate it for Featured Pictures. --Mr. Mario (talk) 16:31, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

The images brother is a fp --D-Kuru (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Support --Twdragon (talk) 14:19, 12 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 3 Support, 0 Oppose =>

Promoted --Mr. Mario (talk) 00:16, 14 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lever tumbler lock animation.gif, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments good work --Mbdortmund 16:22, 11 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Calliptamus italicus03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Details are good, but did you try to make a bit brighter? It is very good already, but the thumb doesn't show it--Mbdortmund 14:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alpstein Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A bit of vignetting (before stitching) in the right part of the sky --Pom² 16:15, 11 November 2008 (UTC) An excellent image! I like the tremendous dynamic range and the intense fall colours. I encurage you to cut the construction site on the left and to improve stitching quality (see the white lines on the street) and nominate for FP. --Ikiwaner 12:12, 15 November 2008 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KlausenpassPano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Marpissa muscosa 4 Luc Viatour.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Marpissa muscosa 4 Luc Viatour.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Benh (talk) 22:29, 18 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Picea Pungens Young Cones.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plasma-lamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! AskøyBridge panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

FP promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Elephas_Maximus_Eye_Closeup_cropped.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Elephas_Maximus_Eye_Closeup_cropped.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bitschweil Pano.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice, but downsampled a bit too much. --Dschwen 19:54, 25 November 2008 (UTC) Maybe downsampled, but after all of very good quality. --LC-de 19:49, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Firing tank.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Oppose Fails the geocoding requirement (as this is obviously a tank in action and not a studio/promotional photo, a set of coordinates is required). Lycaon (talk) 20:31, 25 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment There are many tank pictures here on Commons, and apparently no category for firing tanks. Maybe it would be a good idea. At least it would help for reviewing this candidate.  Question Is it the shell that is visible on the left on the picture? --Eusebius (talk) 08:23, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I've created Category:Firing tanks and added the category to the image. If there are enough images I will create subcategories and seperate them. Right now it isn't necessary. @ question: Yes this is the shell. It's one reason why I have chosen this image. In some other images you only see a big fireball. --D-Kuru (talk) 12:02, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Comment I think the scope should simply be "Firing tank", since (to the best of my knowledge) the firing depicted here is not really specific to this tank model. I think the tank is best seen in this picture, but the presence of the shell makes the nominated candidate more valuable. I will support nomination as soon as 1) we agree on a scope, 2) a consensus is reached about the geotag (I'm not sure it is necessary here) and 3) I'm convinced that all Commons pictures of firing tanks are in the corresponding category (and provided I find no better picture, of course). --Eusebius (talk) 13:22, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

   Done Category:tanks checked for firing tanks. --Eusebius (talk) 13:53, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

The scope is the firing/shooting tank. I just added the brackets and the information so that the information is included which tank this image shows. I rebuilt the scope a bit. I asked Lycaon why this image requires a geocode. I also don't think that it's necessary, because the scope is the firing tank and not the location around it. Of course a picture of the opera in Sydney should be geocoded. --D-Kuru (talk) 17:04, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

What is the distinction between shooting and firing, and which one is represented here? Scope is ambiguous as it is now. Plus, I really think you should drop the additional information in the scope. The scope is not about the picture, it is about what the picture is representative of. The description of the picture goes on the image page. --Eusebius (talk) 17:30, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

shooting and additional description removed. Firing describes the same action as shooting does. I would prefer firing, because 1) Category is named "firing tanks" 2) "to go shooting" means that you go hunting. (Even it's not an important reason) --D-Kuru (talk) 18:49, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

•  Support I would have preferred simply "Firing tank", but scope is ok for me. Please read "Changes in scope during the review period" at the end of this page, on what to do when you change a scope. I think the geographic info we have on the image page is enough and that geotag is not really needed here if we can't have it. --Eusebius (talk) 21:13, 27 November 2008 (UTC)

I don't care about the scope's name, because "Firing tank" tells exactly the same as "A Firing tank". It's just nicer --D-Kuru (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

---

Scope changed from A shooting (Challenger 2) tank to Firing tank --D-Kuru (talk) 12:52, 28 November 2008 (UTC)

• Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".

---

•  Support Support maintained --Eusebius (talk) 12:54, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral I still maintain that the picture should be somehow geocoded (e.g. with a given radius), so I won't support. Yet I cancel my opposition so that a draw is avoided. Lycaon (talk) 23:18, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>

promoted. -- Eusebius (talk) 11:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)