User:A.Savin/Archive/2016/4

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Old Fair Cathedral 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:54, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:55, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Volga from Fedorovskogo Embankment 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:21, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN tram OktyabrskayaStreet 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 14:29, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Volga Terminal 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 12:10, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A tick dark, but anyhow QI --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Kirovskaya station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:17, 29 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Markina Square balcony 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 02:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Cathedral Mosque 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 04:22, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:53, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Вики любит памятники 2016

noframe

Здравствуйте! Спасибо за участие в российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016! Сообщаем, что Ваши фотографии:

• File:Church in Vvedenskaya Sloboda 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Apanayev Mosque 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Kazan Baumana Street StNicholas Cathedral 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Burnay Mosque 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Federal University building 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Kazan Isanbayev House 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kekin Building 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlevskaya Street Alexandrovsky Passage 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlevskaya Street Town Hall 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlin Annunciation Cathedral 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlin Nicholas Church 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlin Presidential Palace 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlin Soyembika Tower 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Kazan Kremlin exterior view 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Kazan Marjani Mosque 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Kazan Ostrovskogo15 house 08-2016.jpg
• File:Kazan Railway station 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Kazan Zakabannaya Mosque 08-2016.jpg
• File:MariEl Volzhsk 08-2016 photo12 Local museum.jpg
• File:MosOblast Staraya Kashira Znamenskaya Church 08-2016.jpg
• File:MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img5.jpg
• File:Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img3.jpg
• File:Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img4.jpg
• File:Moscow Chistye Prudy vestibule 04-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Church in Stoleshnikov Lane 03-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Gorky Park main portal 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Moscow Gorky Park main portal 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Moscow Kolomenskoe Ascension Church interior 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Moscow Kolomenskoe Ascension Church interior 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Moscow Kuznetsky Most 7 building 03-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Moscow LeninskyPr 2nd Hospital 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow LeninskyPr Alexandrinsky palace front side 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow LeninskyPr Summer House 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow ParkKulturyR vestibule 04-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Perervinsky Monastery remote view 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo2.jpg
• File:Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo3.jpg
• File:Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo5.jpg
• File:Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo7.jpg
• File:Moscow Teatralnaya Square fountain 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow TverskoyBvd Ermolova House 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Vozdvizhenka Morozov House 08-2016.jpg
• File:Moscow Vozdvizhenka18 manor 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN AlexanderNevsky Cathedral 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img4.jpg
• File:NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg
• File:NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img4.jpg
• File:NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg
• File:NN Chkalov Stairs 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:NN Chkalov Stairs 08-2016 img3.jpg
• File:NN Emperor's Pavilion on Moscow Station 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN House of the Communication 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN John the Baptist Nativity Church 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:NN John the Baptist Nativity Church 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:NN Kremlin 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:NN Kremlin 08-2016 img3.jpg
• File:NN Kremlin 08-2016 img6.jpg
• File:NN Kremlin 08-2016 img9.jpg
• File:NN Lykovaya Damba Street 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN Old Fair Cathedral 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img3.jpg
• File:NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg
• File:NN Spit from Kanavinsky Bridge 08-2016.jpg
• File:NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img4.jpg
• File:NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img5.jpg
• File:NN Trade Fair 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:NN Trade Fair 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:NN Trade Fair 08-2016 img3.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk ANevsky Cathedral 07-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk Glavny Station 07-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk KrasnyPr Opera Theatre 07-2016.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk KrasnyPr Trade House 07-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk KrasnyPr Zapsibzoloto 07-2016.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk LeninaSt DK Revolyutsii 07-2016.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk LeninaSt Post Office 07-2016.jpg
• File:Novosibirsk LeninaSt wooden house 07-2016.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Annunciation Church site 08-2016.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk History Museum 08-2016.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Horseyard 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Ioanno-Predtechensky Convent 08-2016 img1.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Ioanno-Predtechensky Convent 08-2016 img3.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Ioanno-Predtechensky Convent 08-2016 img4.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Rozhdestvenskaya Square buildings 08-2016 img2.jpg
• File:Sviyazhsk Rozhdestvenskaya Street and pier 08-2016 img1.jpg

оказались среди 653 из 22580 загруженных в ходе конкурса изображений и вошли в лонг-лист. В ближайшие дни жюри определит победителей, а пока вы можете сделать так, чтобы Ваши фотографии увидели читатели Википедии. Найдите подходящую статью об объекте культурного наследия, городе или регионе и добавьте туда свои фотографии. Вы также можете проиллюстрировать путеводители Викигида. Ещё раз спасибо за интерес к конкурсу и культурному наследию!

Организаторы российской части конкурса Вики любит памятники 2016

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Strelka Street 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:38, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN John the Baptist Nativity Church 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:06, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:57, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kustovaya railway station underpass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vengolis 03:18, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sovetskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:36, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Andragonia photos

Hi Savin!
I recently created a page on hr.wikipedia.org, named Andragonia, the page for band only exists on Português wikipedia and Croatian wikipedia. Only thing missing is of course a photo of the band in the infobox. So what is it about, I contacted bands vocalist, Thiago Larenttes through the e-mail, he answered and gave me a permission to use Andragonia photos on wikipedia. Should I e-mail you his message, or should I just paste the message here? Dvanaesti Igrač (talk) 22:14, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

@Dvanaesti Igrač: Please contact Commons:OTRS to have the permission documented: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. --A.Savin 22:17, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Chkalov Stairs 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Oktyabrskaya Hotel 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:02, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:45, 1 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Novosibirsk Zapadny railway station 07-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:39, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 05:58, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Strelka Stadium construction 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good idea and very well executed. Just a touch of noise, but fine for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 06:41, 2 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Pechersky Monastery 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sechenova Street 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What a document! Very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:56, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sergius Church 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:49, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Volga from Fedorovskogo Embankment 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:13, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Komsomolskaya station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good quality. --Haeferl 01:33, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Moskovsky Railway Station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Spit from Kanavinsky Bridge 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:29, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 13:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:31, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:33, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Фото костёла св. Иосифа в Кракове

Здравствуйте, Александр, не совсем понял в чём проблема в фото краковского костёла св. Иосифа моего авторства в номинации на качественное изображение. Категории под фото проставлены.
C уважением
Skelanard (talk) 12:14, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Теперь, кажется, понял — дело было в излишних категориях. Можете ли убрать в номинации свой голос против или обозначить что проблема решена?
C уважением
Skelanard (talk) 13:10, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 13:45, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Спасибо. Я хотел бы у Вас ещё спросить, как у опытного участника (у самого пока опыта на Викискладе маловато), когда изображение может уже считаться качественным — после рассмотрения в Consensual review? Если да, то нужно ли переносить файл туда самостоятельно или нет? --Skelanard (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Если речь о фото костёла, то я зачеркнул свою претензию после того, как вы исправили категории, так что бот должен по истечении трёх дней пометить его как QI, если никто не оспорит. Если изображение кто-то поддержал, а ещё кто-то это оспорил — бот перемещает его в CR, и помечает его как качественное только если оно в течение нескольких дней получило больше голосов «за», чем голосов «против». --A.Savin 22:43, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

А, то есть, если в течение 3 суток больше голосов за чем против (в этом случае получается остаются ещё одни сутки), то оно автоматически признаётся качественным, правильно я понял? --Skelanard (talk) 22:56, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Скажем так — изображение признаётся качественным, если а) оно в регулярной номинации поддержано одним участником и не оспорено в течение трёх суток другим, или б) оно провисело в CR максимум девять суток и при этом получило больше голосов «за», чем «против», причём в последнем случае бот помечает его как качественное, если последний голос по номинации был отдан не менее чем два дня назад. Надеюсь, теперь достаточно понятно объяснил. --A.Savin 23:18, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Bor from NN 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! View of Bor from NN 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:42, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BorNN House of Culture 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 13:31, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality--ArildV 13:37, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 13:45, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:NN Spit from Kanavinsky Bridge 08-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NN Spit from Kanavinsky Bridge 08-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:26, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Pochainskaya Street 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:50, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Dobrolyubova 6 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:33, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Galushka MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handball Darya Dmitrieva MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LDPR Vladimir Zhirinovsky MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pyotr Shepotinnik MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:20, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Spit from Fedorovskogo Embankment 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square bus 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 17:48, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 17:44, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Gorkovskaya station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 17:50, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:58, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sergievskaya 13a house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Building seems to be something askew (look at the windows) but for me good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:46, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN tram OktyabrskayaStreet 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:04, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Chkalovskaya entrance 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 05:15, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:37, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square trolley 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:12, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sovetskaya Street 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:42, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 10:21, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya view towards the Kremlin 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Trade Fair 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 05:09, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Ilyinka footbridge 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:32, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:45, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Surprising colors `n` very good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:47, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Our Lady Joy of All Who Sorrow Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazingly well preserved churches in Russia! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Dvigatel Revolyutsii station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments What an architecture! Well taken and good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:53, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN AlexanderNevsky Cathedral 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question It is real color of the sky? WOW! --SKas 17:21, 12 November 2016 (UTC)Good quality. --Ermell 20:13, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Myrrhbearers Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:15, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:48, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 19:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Parthenon

About the categories "Parthenon in (date)" you have removed "Restoration of the Parthenon". Why did you remove it ? It really showed the different steps of the restorations. At least this category must have a link, whatsoever, with the Parthenon and not only Greece. It could be ""The Parthenon per year" or something like that. What do you think ?--Io Herodotus (talk) 08:46, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Io Herodotus: Sorting categories by year into restoration is wrong. Restoration is when you see scaffolds, machines, and/or workers on the picture. This is not the case on all pictures by year. So, category "Parthenon in 2009" is logically to sort into "2009 in Athens". There could be also a category "Partehon by year", as sub of "Athens by year", but currently there is none. The category "Restoration of the Parthenon" is to add independently to each picture that shows restoration. --A.Savin 13:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

OK I agree, a restoration doesn't last so long, it's wasn't the right word. "Athens by year" could be a sub of "Athens by year", but also a sub of "Parthenon". I insist on that point. Someone looking for images of the Partenon wouldn't necessarily look for "Athens by year".--Io Herodotus (talk) 16:06, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

@Io Herodotus: Yes. Category:Parthenon by year and for parental categories: Category:Parthenon + Category:Athens by year. --A.Savin 16:09, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Since each category, like "cat. The Parthenon in 2009" has a sub, here "cat. Athens in 2009". Do you think it's necessary for "cat. Partenon by year" to have a sub "cat. Athens by year", it looks like a duplicate to me. --Io Herodotus (talk) 17:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Why do you think it is a duplicate? Parthenon in 2009 as subcat of 2009 in Athens is just logical. --A.Savin 01:11, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:19, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kustovaya railway station platform 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice symmetries! Is there a slight purple fringing on the vertical wire at the upper right corner or it's my imagination? --Basotxerri 18:53, 12 November 2016 (UTC) You are right; removed. --A.Savin 03:26, 13 November 2016 (UTC) OK, good quality. --Basotxerri 09:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Chkalov Stairs 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Spit from Fedorovskogo Embankment 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Nizhegorodsky District entry sign 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 10:11, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN tram OktyabrskayaStreet 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:56, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Marjani Mosque 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 02:32, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan River port area 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan tram on Kirovskaya Dike 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:14, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Qolsharif Mosque 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Weak  Support Good quality. Colors, coposition, fine. But IMO a little bit noise in the sky. --XRay 16:32, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin exterior view 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:33, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Lower Qaban Lake 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro Sukonnaya Sloboda 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 23:20, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan view from Riviera Hotel 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:41, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Imperial Novorossiysk University

Уважаемый A.Savin! Императорский Новороссийский университет действовал в Одессе, поэтому добавление категории Category:History of Novorossiysk не совсем правильно. Eraevsky (talk) 11:00, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin former monastery 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro Kremlevskaya 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 03:16, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Petzold Brewery 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit oversaturated. --XRay 07:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Soyembika Tower 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. May be a little bit oversaturated. --XRay 07:47, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Apanayev Mosque 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Qaban Lake evening 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Ilyinskaya Street Ascension Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Perspective is overcorrected and IMHO, sky needs denoising. --C messier 09:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC) C messier,  Done the best I could, pls. check --A.Savin 16:07, 17 November 2016 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 09:33, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:14, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan River port area 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 05:35, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Annunciation Cathedral 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan wooden house next to Apanayev Mosque 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Railway station 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:58, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Qaban Lake evening 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:31, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan view from Riviera Hotel 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 02:28, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LDPR Yaroslav Nilov MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:09, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Rutskoy MoscowRia 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handball Yevgeny Trefilov MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:34, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handball Sergey Shishkarev MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:37, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kazan Kremlin exterior view 08-2016 img3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazan Kremlin exterior view 08-2016 img3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:31, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Using photo without attribution

Hello,

I want to use this image https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWarsaw_07-13_img16_View_from_StAnne_Church_tower.jpg on a website I'm creating but without attribution. Can I buy rights to use it (only on that one page)?

Best regards Jolanta — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lolspopp (talk • contribs) 15:05, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Lolspopp: Replied via e-mail. --A.Savin 15:17, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan River port area 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 02:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Taynitskaya Tower 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:37, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlevskaya Street Town Hall 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Schöne Symmetrie! Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:58, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Tikhvinskaya Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments "Rhapsody in Blue". Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 03:28, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Qaban Lake evening 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful rainbow! Good quality. --Haeferl 03:40, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Presidential Palace 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlevskaya Street Chernoyarovsky Passage 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro TukaySquare 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 08:55, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Category:Members_of_parliaments_of_Germany

Members of parliaments of Germany has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Nurulla Mosque 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:38, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kyrlay Park of Attractions remote view 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan trams at Railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 04:50, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Ostrovskogo15 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:13, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Burnay Mosque 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment. Sharp but the harsh shadow at the left and the bird on the top are disturbing. -- Spurzem 13:14, 23 November 2016 (UTC)  Question @Spurzem: Where are quality issues? --A.Savin 13:46, 23 November 2016 (UTC) I said it. Please read once more. Good quality is not only sharpness and no CAs. -- Spurzem 15:26, 23 November 2016 (UTC) Good quality. Spurzem, your objection in this case is absurd. This is a very good photo, and there's nothing harsh about the shadow nor disturbing about there being a bird at the top of the spire. If you really want to go to CR, change this to "Discuss", but you are going to get reamed there. -- Ikan Kekek 19:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Electric Networks building 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:09, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro Kremlevskaya 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments schöner Himmel, die Frau an der treppe gefällt mir, gut eingefangene Szene --Ralf Roletschek 00:07, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Riviera Hotel 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 13:10, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:48, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I don't like the blurred foreground toward the left, but this is certainly a QI. -- Ikan Kekek 00:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:50, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 00:51, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Bezymyannaya Tower and Cannon Yard 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Federal University building 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:17, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Bulak near Kremlin 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan view from Riviera Hotel 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 13:17, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Russian Theatre 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 12:24, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 14:51, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 14:52, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice DOF -- George Chernilevsky 14:55, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- George Chernilevsky 14:58, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Вопрос по именным поездам Мос. метро

Добрый вечер! Опять хотел с вами посоветоваться, на этот раз насчет категории Named trains of Moscow Metro. Дело в том, что часть этих поездов уже прекратила свое существование. В соответствующей вики-статье информация о них разнесена по разным разделам. Как вы думаете, не стоит ли в указанной категории сделать подкатегорию, скажем, Former named trains of Moscow Metro? Я так понимаю, в подобном выделении нет ничего необычного. --Michgrig (talk) 14:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC) P.S. Ой, что это тут с подписями случилось? --Michgrig (talk) 14:21, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Ну, да, можно и в former перенести. Но тогда её включить и в History of Moscow Metro --A.Savin 14:42, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Ага, так и сделал. Благодарю. --Michgrig (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Kazan River port area 08-2016 img3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kazan River port area 08-2016 img3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Chistye Prudy vestibule 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:59, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow LeninskyPr Alexandrinsky palace garden side 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park colonnades viewpoint 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kazansky Station TVZ doubledecker train 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 01:56, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 07:16, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park Pushkinsky Bridge 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 08:04, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Bogoyavleniye img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:03, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeleny Dol Station and surroundings 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Если снизу еще обрезать, то композиция выиграет, ИМО. А то получается пустой передний план -- George Chernilevsky 15:04, 27 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment Спасибо, Георгий, но здесь фиксированный размер 2:1, который я бы не стал менять. --A.Savin 06:53, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kuznetsky Most 7 building 03-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:06, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kolomenskoe Ascension Church interior 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Much of this doesn't look very sharp. Can you do something about that? -- Ikan Kekek 08:02, 28 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment @Ikan Kekek: I don't know. I looked at the picture again, but the issues do not seem quite dramatic to me. But it was not easy to take: very limited place to capture it entirely; weak light. --A.Savin 20:39, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Well to me, this is not clear enough to be a QI, though others will argue that the file's size makes it good enough. Would you like to try to sharpen it somewhat, or should we take it to CR? -- Ikan Kekek 21:19, 28 November 2016 (UTC) @Ikan Kekek:  Done New version --A.Savin 22:18, 28 November 2016 (UTC) Thanks. I think that's a clear improvement. Good enough for QI now, I believe. -- Ikan Kekek 05:18, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Frunzenskaya Embankment at Pushkinsky Bridge 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 16:41, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kolomenskoe wooden school 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:06, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Bogoyavleniye img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:00, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Chekhov Art Theatre 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:11, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:41, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park main portal 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:23, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 06:00, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Vozdvizhenka Morozov House 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  SupportQuality high enough for a Q1photo, however sky is a bit noisy --Michielverbeek 06:09, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Afimall atrium 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments An excellent composition, but the bottom is dissappointing me (partly blurred and from low quality). I doubt if it is repairable, but like this I don't think it is a Q1photo --Michielverbeek 15:58, 30 November 2016 (UTC)  Comment Michielverbeek, I wonder where exactly do you see blur and low quality? If you mean the area near the fountain / the escalators: of course it is not razor sharp, but still not below our usual standards, AFAICS. --A.Savin 04:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Yes it is near the fountain. You have used a long exposure time 1/10 sec. I have changed my mind and I give a week support --Michielverbeek 06:16, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Good evening Mr. Savin,

Question: what categories you want me to use? The house is on a mountain road in the national park in the town of Cogolo. and that church is in Val di Sole.
Sincerely,
--Famberhorst (talk) 17:49, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

You could for example add Wooden doors in Italy and Barred windows in Italy, and remove Val di Sole. --A.Savin 18:00, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Okay, I'll do and thank you

Sincerely, --Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Botanical Garden, Moscow.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Botanical Garden, Moscow.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A little bit of noise but looks OK. --Peulle 11:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Sakharovo img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:30, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park colonnades viewpoint 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park colonnades viewpoint 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 11:35, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park Pushkinsky Bridge 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:02, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Starling

I could either send you RAW image if that would be better or the unprocessed JPG. It would be great to see what you can do! Thanks, Charles (talk) 18:09, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: Raw file please. But I have to send you my e-mail contact first, which is currently not possible, as you disabled wikimail. --A.Savin 18:57, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

I think Wikimail should be Ok now. Charles (talk) 21:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

@Charlesjsharp: I saw, and replied back yesterday. Would you mind sending me your raw, or is it done for you? Thanks --A.Savin 22:17, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Handball Ekaterina Ilyina MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:21, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svetlana Ter-Minasova in Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:23, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vyacheslav Bocharov in Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:19, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow LeninskyPr Summer House 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support good quality though a bit too satured IMO --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park Pushkinsky Bridge 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kropotkinskaya vestibule 07-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 17:52, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Dubrovka Dominion Tower 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:19, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mikhail Shvydkoi in Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The man looks like he likes a drink every now and now! --Daniel Case 06:43, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jean Michel Jarre B10-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Zarechnaya station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Haeferl 03:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Rozhdestvenskaya Street 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:12, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 18:58, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:12, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I like the DoF in this image. Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Dobrolyubova 20 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:44, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Emperor's Pavilion on Moscow Station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. The colors ... --XRay 05:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Volga from Fedorovskogo Embankment 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Ulyanova Street 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Assumption Church on Hill 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Looks a bit dark like some filter was used, think you could correct that? W.carter 19:20, 5 December 2016 (UTC) @W.carter: Thanks for reviewing, but I don't know. As for me, it's not (much) darker than usually, and no filter was used. --A.Savin 01:33, 6 December 2016 (UTC) Just thought it looked a bit strange, but then old building can look odd.Anyway, it's sharp enough and compo is good enough for QI at least. --W.carter 10:29, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Trade Fair 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Kremlin 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 16:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Pochainskaya Street 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong colors, but ok. Good quality. --W.carter 17:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Lykovaya Damba Street 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Same strong colors, must be the light, and I guess the tree can't be avoided. Good quality. --W.carter 17:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN tram OktyabrskayaStreet 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 17:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kolomenskoe Ascension Church interior 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Chkalov Stairs 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPokrovskaya Street 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Minin and Pozharsky Square view 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 01:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Metro Avtozavodskaya station 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:38, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Old Fair Cathedral 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 05:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN John the Baptist Nativity Church 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lovely. -- Ikan Kekek 05:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN BolPecherskaya Street 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:07, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN House of the Communication 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:55, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sergius Church 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:06, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Krasnogorsk Church of Theotokos of the Sign 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img06 Trinity Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support --Christian Ferrer 18:51, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img09 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 17:35, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Staraya Kashira Znamenskaya Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Schyolkovo District radio telescope 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 19:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Jean Michel Jarre B10-2016.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jean Michel Jarre B10-2016.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

For you. Again, just great portrait! Congratz! -- Slaunger (talk) 08:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

• Вижу, вы понимаете в FP. Должно быть, вот это годится для FP. --PereslavlFoto (talk) 13:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Circus 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Amazing and wow! Looks a bit like an ufo. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Ilyinskaya Street house102 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:54, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:53, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN-Bor Volga Cableway 08-2016 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 17:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Sergievskaya 17 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It will be nice if the wheel of the cart (?) on rightis not cut-off. QI OK. --Jkadavoor 17:07, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! NN Dobrolyubova 4 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 17:02, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Салют на морском порту.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Салют на морском порту.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Nicholas Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:43, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin exterior view 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:57, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Tuqai75 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 05:26, 12 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Qolsharif Mosque 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan tram on Kirovskaya Dike 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Glubokoe Lake 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kekin Building 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:57, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Millennium Bridge 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and very nice to look at. -- Ikan Kekek 13:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Ioanno-Predtechensky Monastery 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. (Sky seems a bit noisy) --Jkadavoor 04:00, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Zakabannaya Mosque 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan River port area 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 23:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro ProspektPobedy 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jkadavoor 03:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlevskaya Street Alexandrovsky Passage 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Street signs

Hi, I am answering here to your question, as it may be too long and out of scope for the QI page.

For each street sign I import to Commons, I create the corresponding street category on Commons (with geolocation) and an entry in Wikidata. Street names are an essential part of toponymy, so it is important to document that. I also intend to import pictures of the streets themselves. Some of these streets deserve an article. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Petzold Brewery 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 20:21, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Soyembika Tower 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI -- Spurzem 20:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Marjani Mosque 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:19, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Railway station 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:25, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img05 confectionery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kazansky Station TVZ doubledecker train 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me Good quality. --Bijay chaurasia 03:21, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Baumana Street StNicholas Cathedral 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Isanbayev House 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Galaktionova5 house 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice and sharp. Shame about the heavy shadow on the right.--Famberhorst 16:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Qaban Lake evening 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments GQ --Palauenc05 15:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan House of Tatarstan Government 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Отмена правки

Добрый день. Почему отменили правку?--Reddle (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

@Reddle: Потому что а) вы создали эту категорию, не посмотрев, что здесь уже есть категория Churches of the Theotokos of Tikhvin in Russia, что одно и то же. По каждой теме может быть строго одна категория. б) В любом случае, добавлять её нужно не в файл, а в категорию одним уровнем ниже, при условии существования таковой; в данном случае она существует и называется Tikhvinskaya church in Kazan. Вам ничего больше делать не надо, я всё уже исправил. --A.Savin 06:21, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Хорошо. Спасибо за ответ. --Reddle (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Putin, Lavrov, Bortnikov, Naryshkin (2016-12-19).jpg

Hello.Do you see that "Andrei Karlov" is not clear enough to add Category:Andrei Karlov?Thank you --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:13, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Category:Andrei Karlov should be there for photos of A.K.. --A.Savin 12:18, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Kremlin Spasskaya Tower 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 16:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Apanayev Mosque 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Likhachev House 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan Metro Sukonnaya Sloboda 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 20:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kazan view from Riviera Hotel 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 19:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Орден графического дизайнера
	За Ваши прекрасные фотографии и за Вашу добросовестную работу в Википедии я награждаю Вас этим орденом, желаю Вам здоровья и дальнейших успехов! Keete 37 (User talk:Keete 37) 19:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kuznetsky Most 7 building 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 06:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow LeninskyPr Alexandrinsky palace front side 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kolomenskoe wooden farmhouse 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Godot13 06:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TverskoyBvd MGorky Art Theatre 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Quality high enough to be a Q1 --Michielverbeek 06:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Bogoyavleniye img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:05, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NN Stroganov Church 08-2016 img4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Church in Stoleshnikov Lane 03-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 19:02, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow ParkKulturyR vestibule 04-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful warm-cold contrast. Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 13:51, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park main portal 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, and good enough for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 14:30, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow North Izmaylovo Tower 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --The Photographer 15:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Merry Christmas!

	Merry Christmas, A.Savin!
	Hi A.Savin, thank you for all your valuable contributions on Commons. This help fulfill the number 1 goal of Commons: To be a free, educational media repository for everyone. I wish you and your family a merry Christmas and a happy new year.    ★ Poké95 01:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 02:45, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img01 Platform 38km.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img04 Palace of Culture.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 00:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tina Hassel Berlin 2015-08-29.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LDPR Alexander Kurdyumov MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 07:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karen Shakhnazarov MoscowTass 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 11:27, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Sakharovo img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sparkling and excellent quality. -- Johann Jaritz 03:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Teatralnaya Square fountain 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 14:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TverskoyBvd Ermolova House 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Afimall atrium 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Nagatinsky Zaton canal locks 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 06:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kolomenskoe Ascension Church interior 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park colonnades viewpoint 08-2016 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Dark cloudss are well done so quality is high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 07:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Akri platform 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Shame about the shadow left over in the top of the house, but good quality.--Famberhorst 16:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino lake near Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Tikhvinskaya Church 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 16:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Svetlana Zakharova in Moscow 06-2015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Comments in QI, FP or Whatever

I have found your criticisms somewhat disrespectful that go beyond the technical aspect. I tried to solve this matter for several years, however, I just wanted to make it clear that from now on I will ignore any criticism or comment that comes from you. --The Photographer 13:35, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

@The Photographer: Your comment here is just as disrespectful, at the very least. Let me be clear: you're perfectly free to ignore my comments on QIC, but when you nominate images that do not completely meet the guidelines (in this case: "Images should (...) be properly categorized"), I'll take the liberty to decline such nominations. Thanks --A.Savin 14:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

(Talk page stalker) The Photographer I just searched through QIC for interaction between you and A.Savin, and I do not really understand what is upsetting you regarding A.Savin's comments there. I do not find them disrespectful, but warranted. I saw one comment where A.Savin was surprised that your categorisation was not OK, and I do understand as you are in no way a newbie there, and know what is expected, including categorization, which is clearly stated in the guideline. I saw another comment, where you added categories, but A.Savin was questioning if you really had no better idea of where a particular photo was taken. Again a relevant question. An image of high technical quality is not worth much if it cannot be found by a repository user via the categories or from a search of the description. I am aware it can be a tedious process. I am right now in the proces of uploading images I took on a canal tour in Amsterdam in September, and I do not recall the route at all, and I have no idea, when I first see a picture where it was actually taken. But then I use online map tools to reconstruct my route from my series of images, such that I can properly geolocate them and add relevant categories and descriptions. It is time consuming, but actually also quite interesting and in the process I learn a lot about the locations. Is it other comments that you have found disrespectful? I generally appreciate A.Savin's reviews at QIC. They are consistent and qualified, they do not favor or target specific users in my experience. A while ago, after a long wikibreak I objected to one of his reviews of a photo of mine, where he dared to decline it. At first I disagreed, but after careful scrutiny I realised A.Savin was right. My photographing skills had simply deterioated during my break to sub-QI level, and this was a wake-up call to shape up! -- Slaunger (talk) 20:26, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

I think he means my comment on this photo. The photo depicts a church somewhere in Brazil, so at the very least Category:Churches in Brazil is missing. Also, Brazil Northeast is not a locality but a region, just like e.g. California is a U.S. state. Surely there are more precise categories. There are several tools out there to identify the landmark you've been to / you had photographed. One of the most helpful ones is WikiMapia. I think the problem is not that he cannot. The problem is, that he is not willing to. This was already the case last year, with his careless mass uploads from Flickr. This is also the reason why I didn't donate anything to him. Unfortunately, I'm afraid, that all this money is not particularly well invested. I'm willing to help to improve the content of the project, but sorry, not to push the pure egoshooting of some users... --A.Savin 21:03, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

@Slaunger: The problem is much more complex and it is the union of many small lack of respect, with no apparent sense. It all started here, however, I think tha community in general is quite positive. --The Photographer 21:25, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the link, I myself was too lazy to search for. In fact, I was very right with this request, and there were several "sequels", one resulting in a 1 week block of you. --A.Savin 21:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

A.Savin, I don't think you, User:The Photographer or me are going to win any awards for diplomacy, but I hope you agree we are all good photographers with a desire to provide high quality free content for Commons. All of us can be clumsy with the way we deal with conflict situations and I see faults on both sides here. Yes The Photographer should not have nominated images for QI without making the effort to categorise them well. This is not acceptable for a long-term user well aware of the rules, and is rude to the reviewers to expect them to catch such mistakes -- we'd all prefer if we knew User:XXX reliably offered QI images that were the best and well-prepared. Your reply about what game he is playing is understandable -- you are annoyed and right to be -- but probably not likely to lead to a constructive result. Similarly your comments about the Flickr mass upload and the crowdfunding campaign and the removal of rollback all indicate you are still in conflict and angry. Comments about ego and that people should reconsider their donations are not acceptable and unkind. I have had big disagreements with The Photographer in the past, and he's said bad things to me and my friends also in the past. I think he's best doing his photography, rather than getting dirty with Commons politics, and I see his photography contributions to Commons are valuable but frustrated by lack of the correct equipment. This is why I encouraged and supported the crowdfunding campaign -- the photography is what links us all three and is the best part of ourselves. In contrast, petty squabbles over QI edits are not worth falling out over. -- Colin (talk) 12:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

So, what should I do in future? a) Ignore all The Photographer's nominations -> but I for myself find categories on Commons very useful and I'd find it unfair when a particular user doesn't care, but nonetheless has most of their stuff promoted, following the "scratch-my-back-I-scratch-yours" scheme. b) Oppose a nomination when there are no sufficient categories, regardless of the technical quality. That's what I actually was about to do, but then he commented it this way. Is it really an acceptable behaviour towards colleagues for someone who is seeking the help from colleagues? Or am I a "second class user" for him, because I didn't donate there (btw, by yesterday I didn't say WHY I didn't donate). I also don't understand the issue with "frustrated by lack of the correct equipment"; because, actually, The Photographer should be currently happy to have collected an amount sufficient to buy a new middle-range camera plus a decent lens. I'm sorry not to have a good feeling about the current crowdfunding, given the situation how he is treating potential donors. There is also an example of another campaign, where all the money was very well invested in the end, and that was Jee's campaign. --A.Savin 14:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I think you should continue reviewing images fairly and consistently as you have done so far independent of who the creator is. If a conflict arises again, such as the above on QIC, step back before you get into an edit war and first try and resolve the issue via discussion on the users talk page, and if that fails maybe another user can step in and mediate or report the issue as you did, but before using admin muscles to get your will, even if warranted. It is also perfectly OK to criticize a user's behavior as reflected in speficic actions, but when you go the step further to speculate about the user's underlying malevolent objectives, or by posting comments to critizise the person instead of actions you are likely to just escalate the conflict to no benefit for anyone. Like your "scratch-my-back-I-scratch-yours" comment above is a generalising comment targeting a wide group of users on QIC. It is a bad faith hypothesis for which you have no evidence, and it is not helpful. -- Slaunger (talk) 15:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

I can't really advise about QI because I find that forum frustrating: the UI is awful and the range of review quality too variable. There were two parts to your comments at QI: one on the image/categories and one on The Photographer's behaviour/motive. It is not acceptable to reject valid criticism of a QI nomination just because of who made it, but on the other hand, it may be wise to ignore the personal opinions of someone who one feels is rudely over-critical of oneself. I think both of you just snapped a bit today. I don't think you are a "second class user" for The Photographer because of donation or not. I'm not sure why you are so focused on that campaign and why it should influence The Photographer's behaviour or the behaviour of anyone who did or didn't donate. For what it is worth, the campaign was specifically about creating 360-degree panoramas, as well as other stitched panoramas, which are hard to achieve (particularly for interiors) without the appropriate tripod head and ultra-wide-angle lens. The proof, on whether that was a worthwhile investment, will be whether next year we see some good images created with that equipment. I'll judge it on the photos alone. Perhaps you should too. -- Colin (talk) 16:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Time to archive?

Hi A.Savin,

It seems there are problems with templates on your talk page. My guess is that it is due to it being too large with too many templates. I propose you archive some of it. Thanks, -- Slaunger (talk) 20:30, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img02 bus station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 13:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img03 Lenina41.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 15:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img07 Trinity Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Strong green colour, quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 11:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img08 government building.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:30, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ozyory 08-2016 img10 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MosOblast Stupino Belopesotsky Convent 08-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice view. The tower looks tilted CW and CCW. IMO it's the building itself. --XRay 06:37, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kuznetsky Most 7 building 03-2016 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:10, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Perervinsky Monastery remote view 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty and good quality. -- Johann Jaritz 15:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Kazansky Station TVZ doubledecker train 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is perhaps a slight CA on the wires on the left but in general terms this is already OK. Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TverskoyBvd Pushkin Drama Theatre 08-2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:16, 27 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow CBRF building 03-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 16:02, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Romen Theatre 03-2016 photo7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow Gorky Park Pushkinsky Bridge 08-2016 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 12:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Moscow TroitskyDistrict 09-2016 Bogoyavleniye img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Bird, insect or dust spot that should be removed from the sky. See the note --Halavar 12:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Halavar, yes, probably a dragonfly. What's wrong with it? Why should I remove it? --A.Savin 14:11, 28 December 2016 (UTC)  Comment Why? To get a promotion. In my opinion (and from what I know about the tradition here in QIC) image promoted should not have this things on the sky. --Halavar 20:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)  Comment No, I don't think that a single one insect spot is worthy a new version; but should you find any other issues like dust spots, I'll of course remove them all and then this insect spot too. But I find it unfair to hinder a promotion just because of that dragonfly. --A.Savin 21:17, 28 December 2016 (UTC)  Support. It does look like an insect, not a dust spot. Don't remove it. -- Ikan Kekek 22:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC) Support--Jacek Halicki 22:53, 28 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 31 December 2016 (UTC)