User:A.Savin/Archive/2014/1

2014

Hello Alexander, best wishes, good health and what of the happiness!! --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks, best wishes for you too!! --A.Savin 12:22, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

eine kleine frage

Милейший Александр. Простите, что беспокою в неурочный день. Есть малая просьба. Лет пять назад, не зная толком правил викимедия, назвал я не совсем верно две категории: Khanon Yuri & Savoiarov Mikhail. Ошибка невелика (всего-то, поменять местами имя и не-имя), всё надеялся: найду как это сделать самостоятельно. Но вот, нашёл только как к Вам обратиться. Миллион Извинений. С поклоном, --—(FinitoR) 16:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 17:00, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

благодарю Вас за скорую и любезную расправу (и прошу прощения, что Вам пришлось переименовывать столько раз одно и то же..., по правде говоря, рассчитывал эту рутину сделать сам, тем более спасибо). И ещё одно малое добавление. Если дойдут руки, прошу Вас, посмотрите на шаблон "Authority control" (на русский язык переводится как "авторитетный контроль". Смешно, но поправимо, не так ли?) Дополнение (на всякий случай, если я был не совсем понятен. Я имел в виду вот этот шаблон авторского контроля: {{Authority control|VIAF= |LCCN=nr/ / }}--—(FinitoR) 09:51, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Я не эксперт в библиотечных терминах, но если ввести "авторитетный контроль" в гугле, там много результатов за пределами вики. Так что предположу, что перевод верный. Других идей на этот счёт у меня нет, сожалею. --A.Savin 10:29, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо за внимание и простите за докучливость... Я тоже не эксперт (в библиотечных)... и потому настаивать не стану. Однако я исходил из словарных значений русского языка... М-м-м. Думаю, разница между автором и авторитетом (нам с Вами) ясна не понаслышке... Россия-мать. --—(FinitoR) 10:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Best wishes for 2014

) Feliz año nuevo --Wilfredo R. Rodríguez H. (talk) 00:25, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good --Christian Ferrer 20:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Просьба о помощи

Уважаемый Александр,

Хотел бы, прежде всего, поздравить Вас с наступившим Новым годом, а также с новым признанием Ваших замечательных работ.

Не могли бы Вы помочь в удалении неудачных снимков, загруженных в Коммонз? Речь о двух первых версиях фотографии малайзийского поэта Заена Кастури ([1]). На первой изображен другой малайзийский поэт - ее автор, участник Victor Pogadaev, залил случайно. А вторая просто некачественная. Виктор Александрович попросил об удалении этих фото на моей СО, полагая, что я смогу это сделать сам. Однако я, конечно же, должен переадресовать эту просьбу более компетентному коллеге:)

С уважением, Bapak Alex (talk) 07:12, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Добрый день,

этот файл загружен локально в русской википедии, где у меня нет возможности удалить его версии.

Обратитесь, пожалуйста, к админам раздела. --A.Savin 11:54, 9 January 2014 (UTББC)

Большое спасибо за совет, сейчас обращусь. Bapak Alex (talk) 13:37, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img01 National Museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img06 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Poco a poco 17:23, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img15 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:36, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:PM08-13 img02 Kloster Lehnin.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PM08-13 img03 Kloster Lehnin.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img03 Polish Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img09 Wroclawska.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:11, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img14 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 20:53, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Meet our photographers

Hello Alexander, I would want to know if I can join the page Meet our photographers, and if yes if there is a model template to be used (where can I find it?), or if I must copy an existing page. For your last nomination, after a second look, I see no tilt, I corrected my comment. And one more time, thank you for your support during my last featured promotion, I appreciate that this image was promoted. --Christian Ferrer 08:03, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Done I've just find it : Template:Wikimedia photographer, however I wait for your confirmation if I can join the page --Christian Ferrer 09:14, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi,

Yes, imo no problem. Anyone with 10 or more own FP may be listed. --A.Savin 10:13, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Done Now, I have my profile page. --Christian Ferrer 11:22, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img07 Philharmony.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good --Christian Ferrer 17:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments f4 was a bad choice here. The bottom part is visibly unsharper than the top part. But with regard to the resolution still OK. --Tuxyso 07:43, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Bonn Altstadt Max-Planck-Institut.jpg

Hallo A.Savin, das Max-Planck-Institut befindet sich tatsächlich im ehemaligen Gebäude des Hauptpostamts. Für das Bild – das einzige dieses Gebäudes – bin ich sehr dankbar. Gruß--Leit (talk) 23:18, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img17 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 10:29, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img13 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:16, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img18 Tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality (and nice to have full LEDs) --DXR 12:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img19 Old Brewery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --DXR 12:47, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img02 Raczynski Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:38, 12 January 2014 (UTC)

Christmas 2010 in Russia

Вы всерьёз думаете, что 7 января 2011 года произошло раньше, чем 31 декабря 2010 года? Но почему в календаре такая промашка? Обычно январь бывает после декабря... --PereslavlFoto (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

А в чем проблема-с? В том, что в России Рождество отмечают на две недели позже, чем в других странах? Так это к РПЦ вопрос, а не ко мне. --A.Savin 15:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

На мой взгляд, в 2011 году произошло Рождество 2011 года. А на ваш взгляд, в 2011 году произошло Рождество 2010 года. Проблема в том, что вы переносите событие 2011 года в 2010 год. (Справочно: Рождество в январе отмечают Россия, Словения, Хорватия, Черногория, Грузия, Абхазия, Албания, Ливан, Азербайджан, Казахстан, Киргизия, Латвия, Турция, Венгрия, Италия, Украина, Белоруссия, Литва, Таджикистан, Туркмения, Египет, Македония, Сирия, Узбекистан, Япония, Израиль, Иордания, Сербия, Босния и Герцеговина, Македония, Индия, США, Словакия, Польша, Ирак, Эфиопия, Эритрея, и ещё несколько стран.) --PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Это не я перенёс, а так в категориях и до меня было. Все категории Christmas xxxx in Russia как в январских, так и в декабрьских. В этом своя логика, так как Рождество празднуют с конца декабря по начало января, и Рождество 7 января - праздник уходящего года, пришедшийся на январь только потому, что так хочет РПЦ. Короче, что-либо менять в устоявшейся системе категорий я не намерен. --A.Savin 17:49, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

РПЦ тут ни при чём. Это древняя традиция многих стран.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 17:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Это, если что, суть не меняет. --A.Savin 17:51, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Патрулирование.

Во время патрулирования одной из статей в русской Википедии вы в числе прочих правок отпатрулировали и вот эту. Скорее всего просто упустили её из виду, но хочу всё же сообщить об этом. Отпатрулированные изменения не так внимательно проверяют и эта весьма ненейтральная формулировка провисела там довольно долго. -- Morrfeux (talk) 17:30, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Вы правы. Прошу извинить. По всей видимости, статья до этого не патрулировалась вообще. --A.Savin 17:41, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 20:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:51, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freyenstein 09-2013 img12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img05 Grand Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img12 Ballet School.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 19:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img16 Old Market.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:28, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img2 Klingelhoeferstr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img3 Potsdamer Platz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:22, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img4 Tiergarten.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support good, I like it --Christian Ferrer 16:42, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img5 Regierungsviertel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 16:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grunewald hill view 10-13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img1 Moltke Statue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 15:50, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

YGM

Hello. Check your email—you've got mail!
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

For User_talk:Zhuyifei1999#Abuse_filter --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 03:15, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poznan 10-2013 img08 University Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very weak pro Good quality, but the top of the building is a little bit unsharp (depending on f/8 and 8mm). IMO it's still QI. --XRay 13:39, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement

Removing my photos from Featured picture candidates

Hi! I saw you removed my photos from the list of Featured picture candidates. I have red the guidelines, and I cannot see why you removed them. I want to nominate them one by one. -abbedabb^disk 12:55, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

See COM:FPC#General rules, number 11. --A.Savin 16:35, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault 04.jpg

Hello Alexander, I need a little of help. I do not think that I or my photos let us deserve of such comment and I feel me assaulting. Which procedure then to make against this character? He would need to understand that a little of restraint is necessary. The page is not an overflow to let off steam. Please help me or indicates me whom to turn me. --Christian 18:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Strange discussion, indeed. I don't know Latvian language, GoogleTranslate provides something like "Can't recognize if this is a photo". I tend to think (and I hope) this isn't a personal offense anyway, but maybe Kikos is so kind to explain us what exactly they meant with "Pilnīgi nesapratu, kas te ir nofotografēts". Of course, any personally motivated comments on FPC are unwanted, only the candidating picture and not the photographer as a whole should be judged. --A.Savin 19:43, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Now, he try to revert these comments --Christian 19:50, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

This was their own comment. I'd say they're free to withdraw it. --A.Savin 19:57, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I think that even by speaking about the photo, it has a limit there not to be exceeded, I know something about it one time I was not very kind with one of your photos, you have certainly more detachment than me. Say that it does not look like a photo is a little bit offensive and I am thinking to open a discussion to this page. --Christian 20:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

COM:ANU would be the right place for it. As I said, I'd bide a statement by Kikos and then decide. In general, if someone says "doesn't look like a photo", it also could mean "looks like a painting" which is in most cases a rather flattering evaluation. But if you state the same and mean it negative way, then it needs further explanation imho, because it is not obvious to me what a photo shall look like if it doesn't *even* look like a photo. )) --A.Savin 20:30, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

The way which leads to the wisdom is sometimes complicated. I think that I found a solution : the kindness. Thank you for having listened to me my friend. --Christian 06:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi! "Google Translate" ia a very interesting mechanism :) "Pilnīgi nesapratu, kas te ir nofotografēts" means "Completely can't understand what [a object/composition] is there photographied". Yes, I've writen a assaulting comment. And later removed. Let I explain "why". I'm no a youngster in wiki and not a ocasional contributor. Lot a dogs eaten and can read between strokes. Wikipedia is a interesting place where people do diferent things. Some people write articles, some draw maps, some create photographies, but some hurry about good functionality and good look of it all. One of my jobs is "Commons:Picture of the day" section in lv-wiki. And when I have to place in my frontpage weak image - it is really disturbing. It means - some people in commons are not in their duty. Collegue Christian is a wery productive photographer. And when I more detailed perused their portfolio - not so bad photographer as he told :) (and I've removed my angry comment) But - it is necessery to promote every picture taken? Even if this picture is "so-so"? We all have lot of friends there who can vote for

Support. But - is it the best way? We are collegues there and I think - collegues can tell each other about their mistakes or even speak aloud. If it is really necessery. And You can do that in my discussion pages - I've many :) Please - be not so resentful and think more globally. (writen with assistance of "GoogleTranslate") --Kikos (talk) 07:53, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

So, we know now you meant that it isn't obvious to you what the subject of this photograph is. It is nothing personal for the photographer, so we can close it. But Commons is an international project and it is in most cases way more effective to say something in a bad English, than in your native language to let other people use even worse results by GoogleTranslate and similar tools. And yes, of course COM:FP should contain the real best stuff of Commons and no one should support or oppose just because of the photographer. --A.Savin 11:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes now there is not problem anymore, Kikos wants simply the best for wikimedia, and I would be satisfied if he again comes to make me share his interesting opinion on my photos. --Christian 11:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Of more the comments which we make are also of full contents and deserve too to be of quality. For somebody who wants the best it will not thus be difficult to understand that a minimum of effort is necessary for the general smooth running. --Christian 12:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Субурган Чой Василин-2.JPG

Hello Alexander, You nominated this file to QI, and it have been promoted, but without english description, it is not easy to make the Categorization of recently promoted quality images, is it a religious building (church or maybe an other religion building)? --Christian 16:53, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, you're right. Yes, it is a stupa, which is a religious building. --A.Savin 17:13, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img4 Tiergarten.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Siegessaeule Aussicht 10-13 img4 Tiergarten.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:04, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Bild-verwendung

Hallo A.Savin,

Das Bild vom Sahra Wagenknecht habe ich bei Hurraki verwendet.

Sahra Wagenknecht

Danke & Gruß Manzal

Help requested

Hello Aleksandr, could you please have a look here? I need help from someone who speaks Russian. Thanks! -- SERGIO ^{(aka the Blackcat)} 08:59, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg

Hallo, deine überarbeitete Version ist auch sehr gut und mit Sicherheit besser als das Original (ist halt auch Geschmackssache). Vielleicht solltest Du eine erneute FP Kandidatur erwägen. Würde ich unterstützen. Gruß Norbert -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 10:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Обледенелая береза.jpg

Спасибо. --Aleks G (talk) 19:50, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Курочкин, Владимир Михайлович учёный.jpg

Добрый день, Александр! Подскажите, пожалуйста, как переместить указанное фото в русский раздел Вики (чтобы статья не осталась без фотографии)? Заранее благодарен! Dmitru (talk) 06:29, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Загружайте через локальный формуляр загрузки русской Википедии и используйте шаблон "несвободное изображение", который там в правой половине. --A.Savin 09:58, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Перезагрузил и сделал из статьи ссылку на новый файл с КДИ. Спасибо! Dmitru (talk) 16:32, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks!

Спасибо за категории. Lesless (talk) 08:44, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Metro and FoP

I put question for metro photo on discussion site of featuered. [2] --Mile (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Vic-la-Gardiole, Hérault 08.jpg

Hello Alexander, I was not sure for the tilt but I uploaded a reworked version (size, tilt, colors), can you take a look please? Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:12, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Attica 06-13 Athens 50 View from Philopappos - Acropolis Hill.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kreta - Iraklion - Agios Minas Kathedrale6.jpg

Hi,

das Bild ist übrigens freihand, also ohne Stativ entstanden. Allerdings habe ich dann die RAW-Datei mit unterschiedlichen Belichtungen abgespeichert und dann eine Bildfusion ausgeführt. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 12:59, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

Удалений фотографий

Здравствуйте, потому что часто нарушают авторские права моих фотографий я хочу удалить из Википедии или добавлять другие методы защиты фотографии. Как это возможно? https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5e/Cetatea_Sorocii.JPG https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Cetatea_Soroca.JPG https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b4/Cetatea_Soroca.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Cetatea_Sorocii.jpg

Заранее спасибо! С уважением, Вадим Штербате

Ваша фотография уже используется в статьях википедии, поэтому удалить её нельзя. Если вас не устраивает лицензионная политика Викисклада - просто уходите и ничего больше сюда не заливайте. Но изменить лицензию уже загруженного материала вы не можете. Не надо накладывать на фотку водяные знаки, здесь это не разрешается. --A.Savin 14:48, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Foto Veremej

Sehr geehrter Herr Savin, ich weiß nicht, wie das von Ihnen geschossene Foto in dem Wikipedia-Artikel zu meinem Namen erschien; ich möchte gerne, dass Sie es wieder runternehmen. Danke, Nellja Veremej

COM:OTRS. --A.Savin 09:31, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Kolo_pro_kolovou-2.jpg

Hi. Could you fix this file description? Sorry for being unable to read Russian. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 08:09, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Done See here: File:Kolo pro kolovou.jpg --A.Savin 09:03, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Cirque de Mourèze, Hérault 29.jpg

Hello Alexander, I said that I shall return to this place and I did it this morning (raise at 5:00 am), I am a little disappointed because many images are blurries and I don't understand why however I am going to be able to exploit some like this one, I think the light is not too bad. I think I shall still return to to this nice place. --Christian 14:48, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Klosterkirche St. Peter - Deckenfresko1.jpg

Hallo Alexander,

kannst du mir erklären, wieso das Bild eines deutlich über 100 Jahren alten Deckenfreskos gelöscht wurde? Die Begründung der IP ist für mich unverständlich, den löschenden Admin habe ich als löschfreudig erlebt und deswegen frage ich erstmal hier, bevor ich anderweitig vorgehe. Ich gehe von einer falschen Löschung aus. Sollte sie fälschlich sein, kannst du es wiederherstellen oder wie läuft Löschprüfung hier auf Commons? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 15:09, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi, die einzig sinvolle Begründung wäre, dass die FoP-Deutschland keine Innenfotos einschließt. Wann wurde denn die Kirche erbaut? Fastily benutzt (ob's einem gefällt oder nicht) ein Skript und arbeitet unangefochtene DR's ab, ohne reinzugucken. Ich hätte einfach {{Vk}} geantwortet, das verhindert automatische Löschung. Wiederherstellung ist natürlich kein Problem. --A.Savin 15:28, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

FoP ist nicht anwendbar, das ist richtig. Aber da kein Fotografieverbot existiert gibt es auch kein wirkliches Verbot, was das Ablichten eines an sich öffentlich zur Verfügung stehenden Innenraums verbietet. Die Fresken in der Klosterkirche sind aus dem 18. Jahrhundert. Siehe de:Kloster St. Peter auf dem Schwarzwald. Halte das für eine krasse Fehlentscheidung. Denn damit könnte man ALLE Innenraumaufnahmen von Kirchen löschen und derer gibt es hier ja zigtausende. --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:58, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Selbst wenn es ein striktes Fotoverbot gibt, sind die Fotos zu behalten, wie meine verwackelten Bilder vom Erfurter Goldschatz. Man verstößt gegen hausrecht, das Urheberrecht ist davon aber nicht betroffen. --Ralf Roleček 17:12, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Ich habe die Datei widerhergestellt. Die automatischen Löschungen halte ich auch für sehr problematisch, da es anonymem Vandalismus Tür und Tor öffnet. Nicht jeder ist ja täglich online und überprüft regelmäßig seine Beobachtungsliste, und schon gar nicht auf Commons. Aber hier ist man der Ansicht, dass man nur so die Löschdiskussionen zeitig abarbeiten kann. Eine Beschwerde gegen Fastily wird insofern nichts nützen. --A.Savin 18:20, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Vielen Dank für´s Wiederherstellen. Ich würde damals übrigens nicht informiert. Sonst hätte ich hier bereits zum Zeitpunkt der Löschantragstellung widersprochen. Eine spezifisch persönlich motivierte Aktion der niederländischen IP vermute ich hier zwar nicht. Aber es ist dennoch komisch, dass sie scheinbar genau gewusst hat, wo dass der Antrag noch auf dieser Seite einzutragen ist [3] damit die Admins in abarbeiten können aber eine Info an den Fotografen unterlassen hat. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Bei mir wäre das trotzdem nicht durchgegangen, da ich meine Fotos beobachte. --A.Savin 20:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Files category

Hey there, I actually want to know how can I create my own files category exactly like [4]. I've uploaded good number of files here on Commons and want them to place together so that anyone can see or use it. Do help. Thanks --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 14:26, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Click on Category:Photographs by 25 Cents FC, insert {{User category|25 Cents FC}} there, and save the page. --A.Savin 17:56, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I've respond --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 20:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

On my talk page you mentioned "low resolution images without camera EXIF". Were you talking about [5] metadata ?

Yes --A.Savin 20:17, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Okay, done. Next time onward I would upload files through that way only. Thanks --25 CENTS VICTORIOUS ^☣ 14:17, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

⧼Wikibase-terms/1⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

rename request

Please change my name from gundu to gunduu because this name is already exists on wikipedia. So i registered wikipedia as gunduu please merge or rename as gunduu--Gundu (talk) 09:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

I haven't bureaucrat rights, please go to Commons:Changing username --A.Savin 10:03, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

	Hello, A.Savin/Archive/2014. You have new messages at Blurred Lines's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

If you saw the first statement, I rephrased it so you could understand me more. —Blurred Lines 16:20, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Loko-stadium.jpg

File:Loko-stadium.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Flickrworker (talk) 17:19, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Просьба о помощи

Уважаемый, Александр! Прошу Вас подсказать, как правильно оценивать работы на
Редактирование: Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list (раздел).

Заранее благодарю, с уважением --Жанетта Багаджиян (talk) 15:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Здравствуйте,

Есть небольшое пособие на английском Commons:Image guidelines, там минимальные технические требования.

Обычно это мало кто от корки до корки читает (я тоже грешен), но некоторое чутьё на требуемый уровень развивается в процессе участия путем номинации собственных работ.

К сожалению, адекватных русскоязычных пособий на эту тему нет. В русской Википедии, равно как и в НП Викимедиа-Россия, проблематика качественного энциклопедического фотографирования мало кого волнует и приоритет имеет посему крайне низкий. --A.Savin 22:17, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Здравствуйте, Александр! Спасибо, что нашли время ответить мне и отдельное спасибо за полезную ссылку. Но, я, скорее всего, не совсем верно сформулировала свой вопрос. Меня волнует техническая процедура продвижения понравившейся работы. Мой отзыв появляется в окне кандидата, но без оценки и слова Promotion или вообще идет сбой.Мне, конечно, очень неловко, что я заставляю Вас тратить время на подобные вопросы.С уважением--Жанетта Багаджиян (talk) 08:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Но чтобы верно оценивать чужие изображения без ущерба для QI, нужно знать технические требования. Пропускать просто потому что "понравилось" - нельзя. Нужно быть уверенным, что это качественное. Чтобы рамка стала зелёной, нужно там заменить Nomination на Promotion. Проще, однако, использовать гаджет QIVoter-Helper. Когда находишься на Commons:Quality images candidates/candidate list в режиме редактирования, там появляется такая красная полоса, где написано Click here to activate QIVoterHelper, на которую нажать надо. --A.Savin 10:04, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо большое, Александр! Следуя Вашему совету, обязательно внимательно прочту Commons:Image guidelines. Оценить просто понравившиеся мне работы, я и не рискнула бы, так как не считаю себя достаточно компетентной для этого. В моем случае, я хотела добавить свой отзыв к другим положительным оценкам номинированного изображения. С уважением, --Жанетта Багаджиян (talk) 14:53, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 12:52, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zoo Palast frontal 02-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 13:48, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herder-Gymnasium B-Westend 02-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:39, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zehlendorf Muehle 02-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

FPC Nom.

If my own nomination received 10 support votes, do I close my own nomination to promotion? —Blurred Lines 16:29, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) No. Wait for the bot. It operates at 6 UTC, 14 UTC and 22UTC everyday. Even so, I think it's better to let a non-nominator close the nomination. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Anyway waiting for the bot will save yourself all the post-nomination trouble. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:31, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Are you talking about this? It needs to be there for 5 full days even if there is no opposes. J e e 16:57, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Max Ryazanov 12:09, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Saarow kleine Kirche 02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:26, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bellevue Palace Berlin 02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 14:51, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auguste-Viktoria-Klinikum B-Schoeneberg 02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice quality --Nino Verde 13:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Nino Verde 13:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moabit RathenowerStr Evelin Brandt 02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:27, 11 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebermann-Villa B-Wannsee 02-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienkirche B-Mitte 03-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 13:47, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sperenberg Gutshaus 03-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 15:29, 12 March 2014 (UTC)

Catagories

At QI, why poor? Its a new forest pony and it is in the new forest pony category? Saffron Blaze (talk) 22:50, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Because COM:OVERCAT (if sth. is in the category red cars, it's nonsense to categorize it as cars as well, because a red car is already a car), and because looking at the categories I still don't know where it was taken. --A.Savin 00:08, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Removed the cat "ponies". The ponies are called New Forest ponies (cat used) because they are found in the New Forest (parent cat). I also have the geo location included. Are you suggesting something else? Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:01, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img02 Bad Liebenwerda Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 15:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img03 Bad Liebenwerda Kurpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Nice and good quality--Lmbuga 13:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img09 Bad Liebenwerda Klinik.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 13:14, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Volkspark 02-14 Greenhouse.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:05, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nicolaistrasse B-Lankwitz 03-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:07, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img08 Bad Liebenwerda Burgplatz Amtsgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Vertical lines of the left seems tilted CCW, but it's a good picture (see notes)--Lmbuga 13:19, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
@ Lmbuga: done. --A.Savin 19:26, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
Good quality--Lmbuga 10:12, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fredmund Malik B 2014-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:02, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Map of Ukraine

This edit seems not to fall into the scope of what Wikipedia is about. It is about facts attributable to a reliable, published source; if they do not agree with your idea of what is a fact then we can not use that "fact".... Right now English sources still threat Crimea as an integral part of Ukraine. Let's wait how reliable, published sources claim the status of Crimea is in a couple of months. To start changing maps now looks very CRYSTALBALL to me. Besides you did not wiat for the end of the discussion on: w:Talk:Ukraine#Time_to_redo_the_maps— Yulia Romero • Talk to me! 23:00, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

What do you propose? To unprotect the page again, so that Russian nationalists overwrite the map with Crimea as part of Russia, and Ukrainian nationalists revert them again and again, several times a day? --A.Savin 07:14, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

I agree with Yulia. You should have restored the version from before 18th of March. It's not a version of "Ukrainian nationalists", but a version recognised by sources worldwide. And as a rule of thumb - if there's a chance someone would see your decision as biased, it's best to leave it to someone else. Yarek (talk) 09:48, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 13:27, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img10 Elsterwerda-Biehla Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment See note --Rjcastillo 14:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
Hi Rjcastillo, frankly I don't understand why should I remove this piece of wire. --A.Savin 14:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Comment Que es eso ? --Rjcastillo 14:24, 17 March 2014 (UTC) Comment Sorry. I thought that they were remnants of wire. OK for me --Rjcastillo 14:35, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img11 Elsterwerda-Biehla Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 17:25, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img12 Elsterwerda-Biehla Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img13 Elsterwerda Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:11, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdam Alexandrowka 02-14 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillertheater Berlin 02-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:58, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Bahnhof Klasdorf 03-14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Мне нужна ваша помощь.

Это фото http://trainpix.org/photo/84811/ автор разрешил выложить. Вот теперь я выложил https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:%D0%A4%D0%B8%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%BD%D1%8B%D0%B9_%D0%BF%D0%BE%D0%B5%D0%B7%D0%B4_%22%D0%A8%D0%B5%D0%BA%D1%81%D0%BD%D0%B0%22.jpg

Я не понимаю, что дальше? Автор или я должен прислать на адрес permissions-ru? Спасибо. Александр Коновалов (talk) 13:58, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Нужно, чтобы автор послал разрешение на permissions-ru. Иначе не понятно, что значит "разрешил выложить". Если автор имеет в виду только википедию, то этот файл здесь оставлять нельзя. --A.Savin 17:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Fasnachtsveranstaltungen problematisch?

Hi Alexander,

wie siehst du das Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Hauinger Buurefasnacht 2014? Nach meiner Auffassung sind Karnevals/Fastnachtsmasken keine Kunstwerke im juristischen Sinn, maximal im handwerklichen Sinn. Denn erstens müssten dann konsequenter Weise zig tausende von Bildern von Masken auf Commons gelöscht werden und zweitens müsste man mit dem selben Argument auch Bilder von bekleideten Menschen löschen, da Kleidung generell ja auch urheberrechtlich geschützt ist ... --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:00, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Oops, weiß nicht (ianal)... Ich hatte mir allerdings vor paar Jahren schon mal die Frage gestellt, ob die ganzen Fotos von z.B. dem Kölner Rosenmontagszug mit den Festwagen wie hier [6] auf Commons haltbar sind, aber die werden Jahr für Jahr ruhig hochgeladen und ich hatte noch nie einen Löschantrag deswegen gesehen. Muss das heißen, dass man es tatsächlich darf? Würde ich ehrlich gesagt selber gerne wissen. --A.Savin 20:28, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Die Argumentation des LA-Stellers wirkt auf mich nicht sonderlich an der Sache orientiert. Die wesentlichen Punkte konnte er nicht widerlegen sondern verweist auf eine fragwürdige Commons-Beschreibungsseite. Diese Hobby-Juristerei einiger Benutzer hier geht mir gehörig auf den Zeiger. --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:27, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 16:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 16:17, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:25, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img05 Bad Liebenwerda Kurpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img07 Bad Liebenwerda Alte Schmiede.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:32, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Prenzlberg SchoenhauserAllee U2 ramp.jpg

Hi Alexander, I want to nominate this image at FPC, is it a problem for you? --Christian Ferrer 12:00, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Christian

No it isn't a problem )) Wow enough? Well, if u mean so, give it a try. --A.Savin 04:48, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:55, 22 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img04 Bad Liebenwerda Kurpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 09:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img01 Falkenberg Bahnhof.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 10:05, 23 March 2014 (UTC)

	Hello, A.Savin/Archive/2014. You have new messages at Blurred Lines's talk page. You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ हिन्दी ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Türkçe ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

—Blurred Lines 18:37, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

Dear A.Savin/Archive/2014,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EE 03-14 Img06 Bad Liebenwerda Burgplatz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Category:Georgian areas occupated by Russia

Hallo! Sorry, but it is not clear for me why you deleted th category. I did not find too many votes for deletion on the page Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Georgian areas occupated by Russia. Another two deleted categories were not nominated for deletion. --Yuriy Kvach (talk) 06:49, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

As I said, speedily deleted because of NPOV and non-constructive "voting" by accounts with just a couple of edits each. Btw, deletion requests aren't polls. --A.Savin 06:56, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

The category had a link to the Georgian Law. To delete the category is not a neutral point of view, this is just your opinion! And why do you think the "voting" (OK, discussion!) is not constructive? All the participants of discussion have a lot of edits made, except the anonimous id 81.198.155.62.--Yuriy Kvach (talk) 10:09, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Wrong, I see two more accounts participated in edit wars on Ukrainian topics; one single-purpose account has already been indef'ed. As for the categories, you may request undeletion, but I actually don't think that a political protection does necessarily mean occupation and pls. don't forget that 1) Abkhazia and South Ossetia do not belong to the Russian state, 2) the Crimean people wanted to belong to it; so there is a significant difference to Hitler's occupation of Poland in 1939, just as an example. --A.Savin 13:52, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Создали вновь. Надо блокировать сих активистов и дело с концом.--Soul Train (talk) 16:29, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Я видел, но в том же древе, оказывается, есть еще и Category:Territories under occupation by Israel, которую тогда тоже надо удалять. Вопрос не простой и массовыми блокировками не решить. Желательно мнение не замешанного в тему админа. Хотя статус Абхазии и Осетии, кажется, только сама Грузия именует оккупацией. --A.Savin 16:47, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

User:Namikilisu

Собственно сабж. БOльшая часть вклада - копивио и загрузка изображений-мистификаций для последующей вандализацией страниц ру-вики (в том числе и с виртуалов)[7]. Надо ещё по оставшимся загрузкам ревизию сделать. Наверное нужно предпринимать какие-то санкции в отношении данного участника. С уважением, /St1995 17:35, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 17:56, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TF Wildpark Johannismuehle 03-14 img06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:23, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

wirklich frei?

Kannst du bitte mal prüfen, ob die wirklich so frei sind wie vom Uploader angegeben. Danke. --Túrelio (talk) 06:38, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img01 Bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:59, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img04 museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:32, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img07 Epiphany Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:22, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uzunovo station (MosOblast) 03-2014 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:20, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img03 Bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 21:32, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img3 - Khupta River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges

Hi Alexander, in first, I'm sorry that your nice file is not promoted.
I was looking at the featured galleries and I think that it could be a good idea for this gallery and also for others to be made on the model of this one, that is to create sections by country like that was made for the families of birds. It would have more look. I think I can try to make it by inspiring me of the code of the Birds gallery. If you are afraid that I make an error, I can make a draft at first and show it to you or show it to somebody else who would be competent. What do you think about that? --Christian Ferrer 12:03, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Be bold and try. I wouldn't do it for myself, because this structure needs maintenance by hand, which is rare on FP galleries. --A.Savin 20:04, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Ok I will try at least for one gallery, and when it will be made, I shall do my best to assure the maintenance. Thanks. --Christian Ferrer 05:48, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

The bot only add images to "Unsorted" gallery and you/other volunteers need to periodically move them to proper galleries. A good idea though. J e e 05:55, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Yes J e e, I had understood the mechanism of the "Unsorted" gallery. --Christian Ferrer 06:36, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Done The new gallery is made. There is maybe some retouches to make at the level of the descriptions and links but the pricipal is maked. --Christian Ferrer 09:11, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

I forgot to precise, there is in the new gallery 3 images in more becauses these 3 images are in 2 different countries at the same time (France and Germany) --Christian Ferrer 09:32, 6 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img09 Virgin Mary Protection Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img10 cinema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img14 train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 18:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uzunovo station (MosOblast) 03-2014 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img12 train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 21:33, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img04 Trinity Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:16, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img03 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:03, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img2 - Aleshnya River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 15:20, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RA2 in Ozherelye (MosOblast) 03-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:41, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img07 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:32, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img15 StNicholas Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:11, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img01-railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 18:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img7 - Christ Nativity Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img14 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 21:07, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img06 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 22:01, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img08 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img02 Assumption Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:11, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uzunovo station (MosOblast) 03-2014 img02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img11 StJohn the Baptist Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:45, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img09 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 20:06, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img1 - train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 18:57, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img12 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:28, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img05 Trinity Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:32, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazan LiAZ-5280 trolley 03-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img02-antenna mast.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:13, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Korablino (Ryazan Oblast) train station 03-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:15, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img11 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:13, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uzunovo station (MosOblast) 03-2014 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:58, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img05-Church of the Sign.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:13, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img08 Red square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 10:16, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Категории "Quality images of"

Во-первых, поздравляю с новыми фотографиями, признанными качественными! Во-вторых, у меня есть небольшое пожелание не по ним, а по категориям типа Category:Quality images of Tambov Oblast, в которые эти фотографии входят. Для порядка я бы сделал всё-таки более узкие категории, скажем, Category:Quality images of Morshansk. А уже для этой категории надкатегорию сделал бы Category:Quality images of Tambov Oblast. Вдруг кто-то сделает качественные снимки по Тамбовской области, но не Моршанску. Конечно Россия — не Франция по количеству достопримечательностей (где в каждом 10-тысячном городе есть столько же сооружений, сколько в России в 100-тысячном); но из категорий субъектов я бы всё-таки выделял крупные города, скажем, с населением в 100-200 тысяч человек и более. Как пример — вчера сделал отдельную категорию качественных фотографий по Подольску: Category:Quality images of Podolsk. --Brateevsky (talk) 07:43, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

У меня такая мысль была. Не стал делать, так как города маленькие и общее количество фоток в городской категории незначительно. Но препятствовать вам, конечно, не буду. Если вы беретесь поддерживать эти категории, я - только за. --A.Savin 20:21, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img01 train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:33, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img10 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img13 IntStreet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:25, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Morshansk (Tambov Oblast) 03-2014 img16 StNicholas Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice colours and good quality though the right side is leaning a tiny little bit out. --Cccefalon 17:50, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img4 - Khupta River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:48, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img5 - old school.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 10:14, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img6 - wooden house.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 10:16, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ryazhsk (Ryazan Oblast) 03-2014 img8 - Assumption Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 09:13, 16 April 2014 (UTC)

Request

hi, files Rezapishgam Copyright infringement --Kasir (talk) 19:26, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img06 Epiphany Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img13 train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:49, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Kruzenshtern (ship, 1926), Sète, Hérault 01.jpg

Hi Alexander, a "little" piece of Russia came until me, other images are to come of this ship and also of the Sedov, good day. --Christian Ferrer 20:07, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, it's a nice photo. --A.Savin 20:18, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img04-school.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 14:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img07-Osyotr River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Aathavan jaffna 14:45, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serebryanye Prudy (MosOblast) 03-2014 img03-houses.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dustspot (see note) --Christian Ferrer 14:56, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
Done. --A.Savin 18:36, 19 April 2014 (UTC) Support --Christian Ferrer 06:48, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img01 city garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC) Comment There should be a mistake: of course Simferopol is not in Russia, but in Ukraine...--Jebulon 17:54, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
Comment That's right! It is sad, that we see it also here...I think the word Crimea might be enough, while respecting the principle of political neutrality here on Commons....--Halavar 18:11, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img02 city garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img18 K-Marx-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img21 Botanical Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 16:01, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

FP

Hi Alexander, Colin wrote a comment after your support vote for my picture, it's not a comment on the picture but on your vote, do you think it's possible to delete it, because for me it's a more a personnal attack and a disruption of the current nomination, he did not respect your vote and I'm not happy with that, but I don't want to talk to him because it will be again a war of comments. Do you think there is a solution to stop the disruptions of this user. I go to job, see you later... --Christian Ferrer 05:50, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I've answered. But this is something I can take easy. Public allegations of revenge votes etc., as recently by J., are way worse. --A.Savin 08:18, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

You answered in a good way but honestly if you have the possibility of erasing this discussion, I cannot hide I will be very happy because it harm the project, and his purpose is IMO clearly to scare off the other voters. However to let this individual spit his poison allows the others to get an idea of this user and on the values of its comments. I invented a proverb: more we are surrounded with morons more it is easy to look smart. It is positive attitude. Which sad show for uninitiated who visit this page. If you can, please delete all, you will maybe be made of him an enemy but it will be better for the project. You are much more experimented than me in the project and of course you know what to do and in more my purpose is here to discuss for to improve the functioning and to let him make...I am not on that he is capable of stopping alone. --Christian Ferrer 11:59, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

I am under an obligation to you, my friend, and if you have an idea of something I can do for you or for Wikimedia, just ask me. I really think that the rules of the FPC page should be stricter as regards comments but in the facts things seem very hard to move, it's a reason furthermore to make all which can be made when it is possible. I shall like finding a way to improve things, it's a page to find the finest on commons?!? We go to see what we can make for that! --Christian Ferrer 18:58, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img08 K-Marx-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:00, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img14 Kebir-Jami Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 18:17, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img10 Gaspra Swallows Nest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 09:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img07 train station square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:49, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img15 Trinity Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 18:06, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img05 museum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 09:36, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img02 Massandra Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Overall good quality. There is a little bit magenta fringe in the treetops left side and in the roof fence, but too small to be a real issue. --Cccefalon 10:28, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img11 Salgir River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --JLPC 17:04, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Venyov (Tula Oblast) 03-2014 img02 Bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 09:21, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img09 K-Marx-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:04, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img10 city garden wheel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:55, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img24 Botanical Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img06 Yalta cableway upper station cat.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:57, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img01 Simferopol-Yalta trolley.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:41, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Золотой фонтан

Я по поводу этой правки. Я бы не отнёс это к интерьеру. Это, скорее, веранда. Кстати, и фонтан слёз тоже --Butko (talk) 08:22, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img03 city garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img01 skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 17:38, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img15 Palace Grand Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:11, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img16 train station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok --Cccefalon 10:40, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img10 Palace Golden Fountain.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:38, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img27 train station square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:13, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img04 Pachaji House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:07, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img08 Palace from the street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 16:41, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img06 University.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img26 Botanical Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 15:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img22 Botanical Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:21, 28 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img04 R-L-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:44, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img17 K-Marx-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:09, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img05 Yalta view from the cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 14:57, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img12 Dintser House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Christian Ferrer 11:01, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img08 Derekoy River in Yalta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:56, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img03 Fyodorovskaya StMary Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Wunderbar. --Cccefalon 16:59, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Greater Flamingos, Lido de Thau, Sète 14.jpg

Hi Alexander, how are you?
Again I turn to you because again one of my nominations has sudden an attack, I just want to take you as witness and adviser. Without any comment on the nomination (I saw it because I open the file page not on purpose), user:Kikos has add a note on the file: Greater Flamingos there!. The word there and the sign ! are clearly a sarcasm, especially when we know the history since several of my nominations, and because even at thumbnail we can clearly see the birds. IMO it's not only a kind of vandalism but now also clearly a harassment. I deleted the note put a message on his talk page but as usual as he sees that he annoys me I think it encourages him to continue. Do you think that I well done? And now, have I to wait or complain in a more official way? Whom is that your experience tells you in the measure or any dialogue will lead only only to a strengthening of the positions? It is very hard to stand idly by when somebody adds inconstructives notes on our files. I attract them....it is one of my quality...
I know that there are graver things in the world but I don't see in what it is a reason. --Christian Ferrer 18:49, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, but frankly I don't understand what shall I do here. Maybe you feel hounded by Kikos; then COM:AN/U is the right place to complain. --A.Savin 19:51, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

No problem, you have make exactly for what I expected from you. You are there and you answer friendly and honestly, it's of course all what I wanted. And I thank you for that. --Christian Ferrer 20:05, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img13 Peter and Paul Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:02, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img07 Yalta sea embankment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:24, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img06 Orta Juma Jami Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but the magenta in the wires top left needs to be reduced. --Cccefalon 10:03, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Done. --A.Savin 10:16, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Not 100% but QI already. --Cccefalon 10:19, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

Hi A.Savin. I was not wrong in my nomination: I found that in my talk page, I believe it is yours ! Congrats ! (yes, there is a thin white line along the rocks, but the star is deserved !) --Jebulon (talk) 16:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Crimea South Coast 04-14 img10 Gaspra Swallows Nest.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crimea South Coast 04-14 img10 Gaspra Swallows Nest.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Ed koch image

Comment Hi, I didn't notice the constraint of 50 contribution so I voted. It's a mistake but unintentional, sorry for the inconveniences Godhulii 1985 (talk) 21:43, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img16 Chirakhov House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Slight CAs along big wires and around the arrows of the vanes (easy to fix). --JLPC 16:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for review, Done --A.Savin 17:37, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
JLPC 16:02, 3 May 2014 (UTC)OK now. --

Ostentrop Germany Catholic-Church-St-Lucia-04.jpg

Erst mal Danke für die Promotion des Photos. Ich hatte vor meiner Antwort die Blau-Sättigung hoch und die -Luminanz runtergedreht; ein bewährtes Mittel, um Staubflecken zu orten. Was man ganz schwach sieht, ist aber nicht rund, deshalb bin ich der Meinung, dass es eine Färbung des Himmels ist oder was auch immer, jedenfalls kein Staubfleck. Trotzdem werde ich die Stelle weg-clonen; Du hast Dir ja auch sehr viel Mühe mit der Auswertung gegeben und das schätze ich sehr. Danke nochmal und Gruss, --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 18:44, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Deutsche Wikipedia

Ich verstehe etwas bei der deutschen betreffend deines Account nicht:

Warum konntest du am 03.08.2013 noch editieren, obwohl du schon gesperrt warst?
Warum hast du deine Aktivitäten in der deutschen Wikipedia beendet, der Grund ist wohl , aber nach zwei Jahren kann man es wohl wieder einmal versuchen. Ich würde mich freuen, dich wieder in der deutschen Wikipedia einmal zu sehen. Grüße aus der deutschen Wikipedia --Yorlöa (talk) 20:18, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img02 view from Suvorov Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok --Wilfredor 14:34, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img13 PozharovaStreet Old Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img21 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:44, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img30 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK --JLPC 15:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img12 Intercession Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:37, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img08 Tower of the Winds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Taxiarchos228 10:52, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img19 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:26, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img22 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img17 View to Northern Side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 12:09, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img32 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 11:36, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

Geo Daten für Berlin Spring 2012 Tempelhofer Feld.jpg?

Hallo, hast du zu File:Berlin Berlin Spring 2012 Tempelhofer Feld.jpg Geo-Daten (also Kameraposition und -Ausrichtung)? Danke. Wikiinger (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Erledigt. --A.Savin 11:33, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img06 Peter and Paul Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:50, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img26 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:00, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img27 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 17:15, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img01 railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments 1 dustspot not easy to see (see note) --Christian Ferrer 17:05, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Thanks, Done. --A.Savin 17:18, 7 May 2014 (UTC) Support ok --Christian Ferrer 18:26, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img05 Mustafa Jami Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Better. --Mattbuck 16:37, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img03 view from Suvorov Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img11 Aq-Yar Juma Jami Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:25, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img20 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 19:37, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img36 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 18:33, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img10 Pobeda Cinema.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img37 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 13:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img39 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:05, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img42 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo --Lewis Hulbert 13:27, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img45 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Lewis Hulbert 13:29, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sedov (ship, 1921), Sète, Hérault 07.jpg

Hi Alexander, Colin put several image on my nomination page. Question : have he the right to do that? He propose not an alternative but now it's hard for peoples to support after him because visually all these images make very complex the understanding (an attempt of sabotage, no doubt). Is it possible to put some links instead of this lot of images or at least to resize these images in a smaller size. I do not ask for favor and if he has the right, it's very well for me; --Christian Ferrer 05:26, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Zu deinem Hinweis

hier. Ich könnte diesen Staub jederzeit entfernen, allerdings unter Verlust aller exif-Daten. Mein Paintshop-Pro (ein wunderbares, aber altes Programm) kann damit nicht umgehen. Das ist nach meiner Meinung nicht im Sinne der Wikipedia. Oder sollte ich das trotzdem machen? Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 21:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Ich kann nur sagen, wie ich das beim Photoshop umgehe. 1) Kopie bzw. Ausschnitt des Originals als neue Datei öffnen. 2) Diese Kopie bearbeiten. 3) Das Ergebnis kopieren. 4) Einfügen in Originaldatei an Stelle des Originalbildes (ggf. vorher Originalbild entfernen und Dateigröße an die bearbeitete Version anpassen). 5) Speichern. --A.Savin 21:43, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img20 MGorky Crimean Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img05 LeninaStreet manor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:16, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img40 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:12, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img23 Kenesa ruin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 16:35, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img09 Gaspra Swallows Nest.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:37, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img02 skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Malchen53 17:44, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img16 Shipyard Bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:38, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img12 Yalta Alexander Nevsky Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --Cccefalon 10:50, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img13 Palace yard.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some magenta CA at the roofs ridge. --Cccefalon 13:03, 10 May 2014 (UTC) Done --A.Savin 19:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
QI for me --Cccefalon 07:05, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img03 E-Kurort station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:50, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img10 StElijah Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:57, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Your QIC decline of File:Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant cooling towers from the north.JPG

Hopefully you will reconsider your QIC decline of File:Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant cooling towers from the north.JPG. As I said, I used a point-and-shoot camera (and a fairly old one at that) which means that perfect pictures are pretty much impossible. Also, I was under the impression that QI status was for decent images, not perfect ones (which I guess would be Featured Pictures). Now, I can fix the noise and sharpen the image with GIMP, but I've heard that it's very unusual for anyone to be concerned with chromatic aberration (which is also apparently impossible to eliminate completely), so perhaps you'll relax your stance on that issue. Thanks, --Jakob (talk) 00:12, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

I typically don't comment on other people's talk pages unless invited to do so. However I will make an exception here. First is appears you made absolutely no effort to address the deficiencies in the image through re-processing or editing. I have looked at your image and I agree with the decline. The fact that you used an old point and shoot is directly related to the decline not an excuse for the image. Older cameras tended to take crappy images. Regardless, the QI guidelines are there to ensure the image is evaluated against a standard not some sliding scale based on camera or difficulty of getting the shot. The guidelines speak directly to the technical quality of the image only. The standard is not low either. The QI bar is often higher than that which we apply to FP nominations. I will say that CA is often a factor in declines at QI and FP so some people take it seriously. In this image it is severe but could be ameliorated. However, as an experienced photo editor I would suggest that it is unlikely this image could be reprocessed to a degree that would allow it to pass QI. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:41, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Saffron Blaze: I did try to process that image, but whatever I was doing wasn't really working, so I didn't bother uploading the improved version. Perhaps I will try to get a better camera one of these days.

Given that the QI bar is actually higher than the FP bar, perhaps there should be a "Good Image" status (which would be like a Good Article, but for a picture). --Jakob (talk) 01:49, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Sorry if I wasn't clear. QI is not a higher standard than FP. They just focus on different things. Sometimes an image will make FP even if it might not normally pass QI. As an aside, what is the original file size and type (JPEG, RAW, etc)? What you may be able to achieve in corrections will depend on it. Saffron Blaze (talk) 04:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

@Saffron Blaze: It was originally a JPG file with a size of 2448*3264 pixels. --Jakob (talk) 14:08, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img07 Lunacharskogo.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:14, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img09 Vladimir Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:38, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img23 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Malchen53 14:02, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img02 StMartin Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 07:05, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Ул. Обручева

Александр, здравствуйте! А зачем это было сделано? Улица есть в кадре (и даже её название)). Lesless (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Это фотография не улицы в целом, а здания Russian Space Research Institute. Та категория в Обручева уже включена. --A.Savin 12:53, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

А, понял, спасибо! Lesless (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Translation help please

Hi Alexander- If you have the time I wondered if you could help me with three brief image caption translations for RAC-10 Kopec, RAC-1 Ruble, and RAC-1-Ruble(2). Many thanks in advance.--Godot13 (talk) 03:50, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Many thanks!-Godot13 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bakhchysarai 04-14 img10 Palace Golden Fountain.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bakhchysarai 04-14 img10 Palace Golden Fountain.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img25 Botanical Garden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:16, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img11 Gaspra view to Ayu-Dag.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 16:28, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img14 Palace Grand Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 15:25, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img16 Karaimskaya Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img15 Pavlovsky Cape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:02, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img29 Quarantine Bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. Btw I have added an unrelated note on the image page. It would be good if you can remove the bird (?) that I have boxed in the image. --Graphium 13:17, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img35 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 18:45, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eric Vuillard B 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Ответ на вопрос про разрешение

Просто привычка, раньше был медленный инет и долго грузились полноразмерные фотки, поэтому я при обработке и перегоне из Raw стал изменять размер, а теперь наверное больше по привычке. А при съемке (я в RAW снимаю) там конечно стоит 18 МП, т.к. установить другой размер можно только при съемке в JPEG

Thanks my friend

You have to know that I have make the peace with Colin here. There was several fights. But I assume the full responsibility because it's me who attacked Colin in the first one. If your support towards me, even when I was on a wrong way, exposed you of any way, it is for me the proof of your benevolence towards me as well as the testimony of a very big nobility of soul. I can be there only more grateful, my friend. --Christian Ferrer 11:44, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File:7175m.jpg

File:7175m.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img19 K-Marx-Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:43, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img04 Yalta city cableway.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:25, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img11 Palace Fountain of Tears.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:44, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img31 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Graphium 10:26, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img01 E-Tovarnaya station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 13:33, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img06 sea embankment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Malchen53 12:25, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img12 Juma Jami Mosque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Heuschrecke 13:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img15 Karaimskaya Street.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --Heuschrecke 13:00, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Sigma 8-16mm lens

Hello! I see that you use the Sigma 8-16mm lens. May I ask you to share your experience with me, as I consider to purchase this lens. I hear about good sharpness, but also about flares and lots of quality issues like decentered lenses. Have you experienced any of these problems? Would you recommend this lens? Many thanks in advance! Best regards Uoaei1 (talk)

Hi. First of all, this lens is very helpful for certain photographic situations, and also not as expensive as classical Canon fisheyes, for example. So, despite quality issues, I for my part cannot renounce it. The sharpness and amount of distortion are OK for that range, but optimal only for focal length 10 and more, whereas using 8mm you very likely have something like that one. There is strong leverage effect considering the distortion, so that you have to try to hold your camera VERY strongly vertical, in order not to cause evil perspective distortions. There are also strong chromatic aberrations, which are mostly correctable with Lightroom and similar. All in all: of course yes, for anyone badly active in architectural photography (like myself) I would recommend this toy :) --A.Savin 22:03, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Thanks a lot and best regards! --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:50, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Допоможіть, будь ласка

Доброго дня, можете пояснити як правильно розміщувати інформацію про ліцензування. Постери, що я закинув знаходяться у вільному доступі в інтернеті, тому я не знаю де знайти ліцензію. Можете допомогти новачку. Один раз покажете, а далі я сам буду закидувати.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img04 view from Suvorov Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 11:36, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img24 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:05, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img33 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:09, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img38 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 12:33, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Vitold Muratov

Доброго времени суток, Александр!
Ко мне обратился User:Vitold Muratov с просьбой разблокировать его, поскольку последий удаленный Вами файл является его собственной старой фотоработой, снятой плёночным фотоаппаратом. Здание находится в общественном достоянии. Предлагаю удаленный файл восстановить и просто номинировать на удаление, а пользователя разблокировать, чтобы он мог участвовать в обсуждении. Насколько я вижу, Vitold Muratov не является настолько злостным нарушителем, чтобы его блокировать на месяц.
С уважением, Георгий
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

В описании файла указано даже, откуда фото (Никитенко Г., Соболь В. Дома и люди Васильевского острова. —М.: ЗАО Центрполиграф, 2007 ISBN 978-5-9524-2609-2). Может быть, товарищ Муратов еще будет утверждать, что и Ленина он сам сфотографировал? Нарушения со стороны данного участника очень даже злостные и продолжительные. Налицо и многократная загрузка фотографий скульптур вопреки Несвободы панорамы, и полный хаос с категориями. Между прочим, в русской ВП данный участник уже давно обессрочен. --A.Savin 18:00, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Хорошо, я соглашаюсь с Вашим решением. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img04 E-Kurort station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img07 sea embankment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img09 prosecution.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok to me --Maathavan 14:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img13 StNicholas Cathedral.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ok to me --Maathavan 14:15, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Просьба

Здравствуйте. Хотел бы обратится по поводу неадекватного бана моего аккаунта https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:%D0%AD%D1%80%D0%BC%D0%B0%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80%D0%B8%D1%85 , без предупреждения и без весомых оснований. --5.254.243.165 14:04, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img14 PozharovaStreet Old Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:57, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img43 Cape Fiolent.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Halavar 13:35, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img05 E-Kurort station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img08 sea embankment.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img11 StElijah Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 15:26, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eupatoria 04-14 img14 Old city tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:25, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img18 Mekenzievy Gory station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --VT98Fan 05:08, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

Блокировка Vitold Muratov

Здравствуйте. Участник написал мне письмо о своей блокировке за загрузку изображения File:Peskovskys school.jpg. Фото здания, по его словам, он сделал сам в 1970-х (это вполне вероятно, участник 1933 года рождения), а использованная для коллажа фотография Ленина - это та же фотография, что и File:Lenin CL.jpg. Есть ли какие-то веские причины считать, что имел место подлог? Если нет, мне кажется, следует восстановить фотографию (другой вопрос, что ее использование проблематично, но это уже решается на "медленном" удалении) и разблокировать участника. --Blacklake (talk) 14:55, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

[8]. --A.Savin 17:47, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Ссылка на книгу стоит к биографической справке: "Екатерина Ивановна Песковская, двоюродная сестра Ульянова-Ленина (она была дочерью Анны Александровны, родной сестры Марии Александровны Ульяновой). Владела одной из самых передовых частных гимназий города и преподавала в ней". Из этого не следует, что фотография тоже взята из книги. То, что участник слабо разбирается в вопросах авторского права, я вижу, но вроде бы не было такого, что он выдавал чужие фотографии за свои? --Blacklake (talk) 18:11, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

А то не было. Вот лишь несколько случаев нарушений: [9] [10] [11] [12], Вообще, советую пробежать страницу обсуждения участника, это крайне наглядное свидетельство наплевательского отношения к правилам Викисклада и работе других участников; категории я вообще все годы только и делал что исправлял, просил "коллегу" Муратова быть повнимательнее - ноль реакции. Участник забанен в русской ВП, у Викисклада отношение к троллям отнюдь не более либеральное чем там, и нет оснований терпеть таких нерадивых "коллег" годами. --A.Savin 18:35, 25 May 2014 (UTC)

Спасибо, я посмотрел эти ссылки и некоторое количество удаленных файлов, упомянутых на СО. Но там практически все - это непонимание сути производной работы, т.е. заблуждение, а не какой-то осознанный подлог. Здесь же участник настаивает на том, что он сам сфотографировал этот дом, и я не вижу причины не верить ему. (Еще раз, чтобы не было недопонимания: у меня сейчас вызывает возражения квалификация только по этой отдельно взятой фотографии.) --Blacklake (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Мне вот одно интересно. Сколько же это раз многолетнему участнику нужно "заблудиться", чтобы здесь поняли, что тебя все это время попросту обводят вокруг пальца. --A.Savin 10:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Simferopol 04-14 img28 train station square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:30, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Crimea South Coast 04-14 img03 Massandra Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bakhchysarai 04-14 img07 Pushkin Library.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 17:26, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img25 Brotherhood Cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:17, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

Johannes Schmoelling photo

Hello Alexander, let me introduce myself first. My name is Andreas Hedler, I'm Johannes Schmoelling's webmaster. Johannes asked me to try to get the image from him removed from that wiki-page. He don't like it and means that it does not represents him very well! If you have a better picture, please change. If you don't have one feel free to use one from the official Johannes Schmoelling website!

Kind regards, Andreas Hedler contact@johannesschmoelling.de http://www.johannesschmoelling.de — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kotzkarnikel (talk • contribs)

Hello Mr. Andreas Hedler. Probably you mean this picture being used in the wiki article. Well, thanks for the very flattering assessment of my photographic skill. You may want to know that there are a couple of other photos of Schmoelling on Commons, but alternatively you can mail permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and spend some picture(s) from your website; provided, of course, that either you or Mr. Schmoelling are the copyright owner of the picture (pictures by Stephan Schelle, for example, may only be approved by Stephan Schelle himself). Don't forget, however, that this will mean a permission for anyone to use the photo(s) for any purpose including commercial ones; because this is, like it or not, the essence of a free license. --A.Savin 09:59, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

User:Vitold Muratov

Я разблокировал этого участника. Ленин, несомненно, не его, но фотография здания, вполне может быть сделана самостоятельно. Мы остановились на том, что будет загружена оригинальная фотография. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

@EugeneZelenko: Кажется, в русской ВП есть такое правило, что тот, кто разблокирует многолетнего тролля, обязуется стать его наставником. Вы готовы отслеживать каждую (!) правку разблокированного вами участника Vitold Muratov и всё исправлять в соответствии с правилами Викисклада? Если что, исправлять там надо как минимум процентов 95 всех его правок, а их отнюдь не мало. Если вы это делать не готовы (то есть, по сути, предоставляете выполнять эту работу мне), то ваше действие является ни чем иным, как административным произволом. --A.Savin 19:53, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Я не знаком с предисторией участника в русской Википедии. К сожалению, у меня нет времени и желания на отслеживание всех его правок.

Если Вы считаете нужным его заблокировать, то думаю, лучше будет сделать это через Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems администратор, не вовлечённому в кофликты русской Википедии. Да и след здесь останется.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Aleppo Pines grove, Pinet, Hérault.jpg

Hi Alexander, in the same time you promoted this file, I just uploaded a new version (CAs, more colors vibrance and cloned out a branch at top right) always ok for QI? --Christian Ferrer 11:33, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img02 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 12:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img07 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img26 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK. --JLPC 17:15, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img27 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JDP90 12:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sevastopol 04-14 img34 Chersonesus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:44, 26 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img16 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 11:49, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img24 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 13:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img41 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

An apology

Hi A.Savin,

I have reread what I wrote to you regarding your review of the ferry @QIC, and I would like to apologise for the opening statement I made: "Surely you are joking, A.Savin". I had a strong feeling it was a bad faith review you had made, which was a mistake from my side. --Slaunger (talk) 14:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

OK ))

Strange, I can't remember any dispute with you in the past; but even in cases I had with anyone, I try to review their images as usual (or - more likely - not to review at all); surely nothing in bad faith. --A.Savin 15:54, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

I do not recall any conflicts either, underlining that I was mistaken:) --Slaunger (talk) 16:50, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img10 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo --Isiwal 15:58, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img30 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:59, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img37 Posadskaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img17 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Tilted ccw --Uoaei1 13:52, 27 May 2014 (UTC) No. The tower is straight. The rest has, if any, a very minor tilt. --A.Savin 14:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Ok. --Uoaei1 14:08, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img15 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality.--ArildV 19:39, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img19 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img20 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:06, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img23 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:15, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img01 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:19, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Info

Moin moin! Info fuer Dich: Schau mal hier: User talk:Orgio89. User hat um Entsperrung gebeten und fragt nach dem Grund fuer den Loeschantrag fuer sein Bild. Soll ich das uebernehmen oder willst Du nochmal versuchen?

Oh, ich haette da noch 'ne Frage: Wuerdest Du fuer meine erste richtige Spiegelreflex die Canon Rebel T5 oder besser T5i empfehlen? LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 23:49, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Hedwig in Washington

Den Grund für den Löschantrag habe ich bereits auf der Löschantrags-Seite erläutert und halte ich es nicht für nötig, das zusätzlich zu vertiefen, v.a. auch weil jegliche Belehrungen ggü. dem besagten User bislang auf sehr unfruchtbaren Boden fielen.

Über die Entsperrung soll nicht der sperrende sondern ein anderer Admin entscheiden. Ich empfehle dringend die Beibehaltung der Sperre. Man schaue in seine Beiträge + die gelöschten Beiträge. Es gab Editwars "gegen den Rest der Welt", Erstellung offensichtlicher Unsinnskategorien, wiederholte Einfügung Überkategorien, Entfernung des Löschantrags.

Ich bin Nutzer der 550D. Laut engl. Artikel 550D = Rebel T2i und 700D = Rebel 5i. Da 700D zur gleichen Produktlinie gehört, nehme ich mal an, dass es zumindest nicht schlechter ist als 550D, welche ich für ein sehr gutes Einstiegsmodell halte. Ich selbst warte bis auf Weiteres auf den 7D-Nachfolger. MfG --A.Savin 06:02, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Entsperrung abgelehnt, Kommentar hinterlassen. Haken dran. Ich habe mich nach der T2i umgesehen und kann keine guten Preise fuer eine gebrauchte Kamera finden. Mal schauen ob ich eine T5 oder T5i guenstig ergattern kann. Spaetesten um den 4. July werden wir wohl wieder mit Angeboten ueberschwemmt. Hoffentlich :) Danke fuer Deine Info! LG --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 12:51, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img35 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:46, 30 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img03 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:29, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img36 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Sputniktilt 11:58, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img31 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img33 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Minsk Cinema Oktyabr.jpg

File:Minsk Cinema Oktyabr.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jarash (talk) 06:07, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

My QI nomination

Thank you for your comments on my QI nomination (the one in the Forbidden City). Could you be a bit more specific about a) how exactly the perspective needs to be corrected? and b) the dust? (That trip to China was the first real time I've been able to use a DSLR so I have much better feelings about the resulting images as far as getting to QI or even FP ... at least this one did not seem to have any noise problems, unlike some images I've submitted in the past).

As for the crop, I sort of liked the way the sky (rare to get that level of blue in Beijing) plays against the orange roof. But I'll crop it. Daniel Case (talk) 22:10, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

I've placed a note; but it is just ONE dust spot amongst several. You need to check the whole sky at full size, and to remove the spots using the Photoshop's recovery brush or so (but it makes sense to crop first).

As for the perspective issues, the buildings at the edges are leaning inwards. PS has manual perspective and similar transformation tools. --A.Savin 22:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

OK. Thanks. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Just an addendum: The buildings at the edges may be leaning inward because they actually turn corners at those points (see here) Do you mean they still look to be leaning inward even taking that into account? Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes. I would, at least, try a perspective correction. --A.Savin 17:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img12 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:30, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img09 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img28 bell tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --ArildV 06:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img39 Posadskaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 06:42, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img04 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Dust spot, right side Poco a poco 21:48, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Done Thanks. --A.Savin 22:33, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:01, 2 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Construction of Borisivo metro station

Здравствуйте! Пожалуйста, прошу удалить данное перенаправление на категорию. Создал по ошибке (ошибся в слове Borisovo). --Brateevsky (talk) 18:47, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Большое спасибо! --Brateevsky (talk) 09:07, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img06 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Christian Ferrer 11:25, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img13 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:15, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img14 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img38 Posadskaya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:36, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img05 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good but heavy noise in the sky.--ArildV 06:56, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
@ArildV You are right, new attempt --A.Savin 20:33, 2 June 2014 (UTC) Support--ArildV 12:01, 3 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img18 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 17:36, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img21 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img22 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img25 Staro-Golutvin Monastery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:11, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img08 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise in the sky, otherwise high quality.--ArildV 12:19, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img29 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 10:50, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img32 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 17:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img34 Kremlin.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Fassade the the right is almost burnt, but still OK. --Tuxyso 11:01, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolomna 04-2014 img40 tram.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pleclown 11:32, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 01 Rathenow Amtsgericht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 15:20, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 08 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --Cccefalon 12:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 11 Speicher Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:42, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 14 Speicher Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 12:56, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Charlottenburg Theater des Westens 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:25, 11 June 2014 (UTC)
Support Excellent shot. Minor CA in the bell tower. --Siipikarja 10:40, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte Behrenstr 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:24, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Koepenick Schloss1 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:16, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

to push your fucking political agenda - цитата из хамского обращения Вашего соотечественника (См.: User_talk:Ejensyd#Warning June 2014)

Потому-то я и напомнил ему, кто он есть. Учитывая продемонстрированный им умственный уровень я и не стал с ним разговаривать. Не о чем. Сочувствую нормальным жителям России. Жаль, что их мало.

Относительно категорий: возможно стоит все-таки приводить написание населенных пунктов в соответствие с фонетикой стран их расположения. Ведь в тех же категориях Paris, а не Париж (Parizh), и Roma, а не Рим. --Ejensyd (talk) 21:38, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Что ж, вы были предупреждены, но продолжаете сыпать оскорбления направо и налево. Если что, здесь не Википедия и с троллями мы не церемонимся. Так что месяц для начала. --A.Savin 22:50, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Иного и не ожидал. Для истинно русского "fucking" - абсолютно нормальное слово, даже в отношении его матери. Вы же не заметили этого слова в выражениях вашего соотечественника, и никак не отреагировали на его хамство. Все просто: один русский обратился к другому. Ну как тут не помочь! Великий, бля, русский, fucking в рот, народ!

Ну да, вот именно, как же тут не помочь. Престиж Викисклада мне в разы важнее, чем ваш, с позволения сказать, фотографический вклад. Созидательная работа в этом проекте - явно не ваше призвание. Всего доброго. --A.Savin 21:46, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 02 Rathenow Kulturzentrum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 14:56, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 04 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:48, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 12 Speicher Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 11:33, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 13 Speicher Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:52, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte Bebelplatz1 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 13:51, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte Niederkirchner 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 15:09, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Tempelhof Polizeipraesidium 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --P e z i 15:35, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Geolocation of the POTD monastery

Hi A. Savin,

Regarding the beautiful Russian POTD today uploaded by Yury Saygon, I noticed you had been involved in editing the file page and the image. I think the geocode is inaccurate on the file page, and I have asked the uploader about it on his talk page. However, considering that Yurys contribution list consist of a single day of uploading in September 2013, I think it is unlikely that he will notice, so perhaps you can help improve the geocode? --Slaunger (talk) 14:57, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The problem is, that I don't know the place. Looking at its satellite view and comparing the contours of the buildings with what you see on the photo, I suppose that it was taken from a boat/ship, instead of from the spit. But even if it was sure, I don't know the exact location, and so I have placed the object template instead. --A.Savin 16:16, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

The object location is great, as now I understand the "geographical context" of the photo, which is very helpful for me to "set the scene". --Slaunger (talk) 17:11, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Photosphere Pictures

Hi,

I just saw your deletion request. I just wanted to let you know that the picture may appear to be distorted but actually it can be projected in a Photosphere which is then not distorted at all. I thought it could be useful for someone. But I agree that the picture quality is not best ^^--Shisma (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Étang de Vic, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg

Hi, I uploaded a third version, now there is no sharpening at the half top (=no artefact), and I put noise reduction at the very bottom and I see now no artefact, can you take another look please, and add a note if there is again an issue, thanks -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 18:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 15 Ribbeck Schloss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:02, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 16 Ribbeck Brennerei.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:31, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 17 Ribbeck Storch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:46, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Gatow Dorfkirche 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Charlottenburg Schaubuehne 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 18:20, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte Humboldt-Uni 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 16:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Koepenick Schloss2 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 19:19, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 03 Rathenow Speicher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very tight crop; if possible to recover some pixels, you should do that. Nonetheless, it's QI. --Cccefalon 11:18, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks, less tight crop was not possible (and I was too lazy to change the lens) --A.Savin 14:00, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 06 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments High quality and good composition, but I think the perspective is over-corrected (learning outwards).--ArildV 11:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Thanks Done. Corrected --A.Savin 13:57, 18 June 2014 (UTC) Support--ArildV 15:15, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 07 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 11:14, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 05 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 09 Rathenow Optikpark.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 10:03, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HVL 05-14 img 10 Speicher Aussicht.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 10:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

question QI promoted

Hi, in the classification of the Commons:Quality images/Recently promoted, what is the best classification for images like this one, Architecture/interiors or Architecture/religious/churches.
And for images like this, what is it? My english language is limited and I don't find. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 07:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Architecture/Interior and Objects/Closeups of structures, I would say. --A.Savin 09:17, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte Bebelplatz2 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 14:37, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin-Mitte DomAquaree 05-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 15:50, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Schloss Schoenhausen 06-2014.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Joydeep 14:56, 20 June 2014 (UTC)

Ehrlich gesagt, ...

hätte es mich auch gewundert, wenn Du nicht gleich zu Stelle gewesen wärest: [13]. Bwag (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC) PS: Soll ich jetzt auch Deine Bilder in Ein-Bild-Kategorien einsortieren: [14]? Bwag (talk) 15:32, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

@Bwag Für sinnvolle Kategorien bin ich immer dankbar. Was soll das mit diesem Rückschluss? Ic bin schon sehr lange nicht mehr in Deutsche Wipikedia, wenn du mir also alte Admin-Sünden nach Jahren nacghträgst, zeigt dies nur deine mindere Intelligenz auf, mehr nicht. --A.Savin 18:34, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

Nun denn, wenn das nur Zufall war, dass Du bei dem Disput zw. FDMS4 und mir gleich zur Stelle warst, um FDMS4 ein wenig unter die Arme zu greifen, dann entschuldige ich mich, dass ich das falsch interpretiert habe. Bwag (talk) 21:02, 25 June 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Berlin Schloss Schoenhausen 06-2014.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Schloss Schoenhausen 06-2014.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2014 (UTC)