Talk:Book
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is a horrible gallery. why do people bother to create horrible galleries. 90% of these images are duplicates, not representational, or just plain ugly. i cant believe its been this way since day one for the most part. Im telling you, The Commons is definitely a victim of the Tragedy of the Commons.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 04:04, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
- started a basic makeover, removed the poor images, added some interesting ones, restructured it.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
- Good job! Your reconstruction of this page is very nice, you've done a fine piece of work. It might be nice to add a brief section near the end containing symbolic representations of books (although perhaps that actually belongs on its own page, linked from the See Also section). —RP88 10:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
- thank you, its nice to be noticed for this possibly obscure work (i dont really know how many people view these galleries). I plan to do a little more documentation of the images (descriptions for "books in art"). and if you have a specific file you think is a good symbol, i wouldnt object, and might add it myself, if its a good one. (actually, just added some symbols as part of an experiment, please let me know if this is close to what you were imagining)Mercurywoodrose (talk) 02:14, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
- Good job! Your reconstruction of this page is very nice, you've done a fine piece of work. It might be nice to add a brief section near the end containing symbolic representations of books (although perhaps that actually belongs on its own page, linked from the See Also section). —RP88 10:45, 17 November 2013 (UTC)