MediaWiki talk:Pagetitle
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
 | MediaWiki:Pagetitle/qqq: $1 - Wikimedia Commons This interface message or skin may be documented on MediaWiki.org or translatewiki.net. The page forms part of the MediaWiki interface, and can only be edited by administrators. To request a change to the page, add {{Edit protected}} to this page, followed by a description of your request. |  |
Edit for categories[edit]
{{Editprotected}} Please change this to:
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Category|{{PAGENAME}}|$1}} - Wikimedia Commons
It might make it easier for users to visualize what is meant at Commons:Village_pump#Categories:_the_primary_way_to_search.2Fnavigate_Commons. If it's a problem we could still revert it later. I tested the markup, it worked. -- Docu at 18:57, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
- I will advertise this requested change on COM:AN and make the change if there are no oppositions in between 7 days. -- RE rillke questions? 11:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Will this have negative implications on search indexers? -- RE rillke questions? 16:47, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- Indexing as such isn't changed (robots.txt etc). In any case, I don't think so. Possibly it will improve things.
- Seven days having passed, would you implement it? -- Docu at 17:02, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) Yes, it may well do, since indexers may use page titles in a number of ways. This request is probably a bad idea, with uncertain consequences, potentially causing confusion, and no obvious benefits. I would straight reject the request (which has no consensus at the VP discussion), except I think I agreed a while back not to handle Docu's edit requests. Rd232 (talk) 17:04, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- I tested it, so we can be sure about its effect. If it's a problem, we can still revert it later. -- Docu at 17:42, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- And the effect on search engine indexing was what? (Leave aside you've yet to persuade anyone of the advantages of the idea.) Rd232 (talk) 22:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- I wonder if you are sticking to what you stated at 17:04. -- Docu at 06:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I guess this is your typically cryptic way of asking if I'm "handling" your edit request by commenting on it? No, I'm not. The edit request remains live. Rd232 (talk) 14:34, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- I wonder if you are sticking to what you stated at 17:04. -- Docu at 06:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- And the effect on search engine indexing was what? (Leave aside you've yet to persuade anyone of the advantages of the idea.) Rd232 (talk) 22:41, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
I withdraw what I said and let the decision to someone else. Sorry for the confusion, I think I need a break. -- RE rillke questions? 20:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
After reading some new contributor's comments, I don't think it's a good idea to add more confusion for them. -- Rillke(q?) 13:53, 26 September 2012 (UTC)