File talk:Tricholoma portentosum.jpg

Disputed

IMHO this is not Tricholoma portentosum: i suppose it is the Lepista nuda.--Archenzo 21:27, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

P.S.: Please see this and this--Archenzo 17:00, 4 October 2006 (UTC)

I have to agree with Archenzo! This mushroom is very likely Lepista nuda but never Tricholoma portentosum! --Ericsteinert 16:25, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

I am completely agree with Ericsteinert: this mushroom IS certainly an old (and good-taste) sample of Lepista nuda! :-) --Roberto1974 16:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

It's sure that it is not a Tricholoma portentosum (a bit metallic particular gray darker to the center and sometimes nearly black), but only with this photo I'm not sure that it's a Lepista nuda. --Lohen11 07:29, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Please see User_talk:Archenzo#Tricholoma. It's sure that it is a Tricholoma portentosum. I have no doubts! Sanbec ✉ 08:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I agree with Lohen11, this photo is not sufficient. I am sorry for Sanbec but the scientific photos should be absolutely significative. This isn't.--213.140.22.64 --Archenzo 21:08, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

You are not forced to use it if you do not want but either you cannot request more photos of a mushroom that already is digested. Don't worry, the season is close and I will return to the same forest and will make new photos.Sanbec ✉ 07:54, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Hi Sanbec, even you are right with Tricholoma portentosum, this photo is to insufficient: the most typical attribut of T. portentosum, the greyish, black fibers on the cap's surface are not perceptible. -- --Ericsteinert 06:53, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Hola Sanbec, la seta en fotografia es una "Lepista", muy probablemente la "nuda" (pero no se puede excluir que sea la "glaucocana", que se reconoce por su color desteñido y su olor diferente .... que pero en tu foto no logro sentir ;-) ). El Tricholoma portentosum es una seta diferente. Si quieres, estan seguramente muchas imagenes en el web por hacer una comparacion. Por favor, amigo, dejas que la imagen sea renombrada. Y perdona mi Español, soy Italiano! --Al Pereira 08:40, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Tu español es bueno, ya quisiera yo escribir así el italiano ;-) No, la seta es una Tricholoma portentosum, sería un grave error renombrarla a Lepista nuda o glaucocana. Como parece que no va haber acuerdo lo mejor será borrarla. Sanbec ✉ 00:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)