File:FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection (IA costbenefitnalys1094510041).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 3.59 MB, MIME type: application/pdf, 94 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Cost benefit analysis of government furnished equipment versus contract furnished equipment for the procurement and integration of the MK-44 chain gun with the United States Marine Corps Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Howard, James E.
Collins, Patrick B.
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Cost benefit analysis of government furnished equipment versus contract furnished equipment for the procurement and integration of the MK-44 chain gun with the United States Marine Corps Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle
Publisher
Monterey, California: Naval Postgraduate School
Description

The Direct Reporting Program Manager (DRPM) for the USMC's Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle (EFV) is conducting an analysis of two acquisition tactics concerning the commercial procurement of the MK-44 to be integrated with the EFV. The EFV is manufactured by General Dynamics (GD) and the MK-44 chain gun is manufactured by Alliant Techsystems Inc. (ATK). The analysis is the topic of this thesis and will assist the DRPM in determining which of two tactics the Government should use for the procurement of the MK-44. The two arrangements of acquiring and integrating the MK-44 are 1) to procure the MK-44 as government furnished equipment (GFE) or 2) to procure the MK-44 as contractor furnished equipment (CFE). The fundamental difference is that a GFE arrangement will provide a direct contractual relationship between the Government and ATK, whereas, a CFE contract will eliminate that relationship as ATK will become a sub-contractor to GD, the prime contractor for the EFV. These two options present a variety of issues, both tangible and intangible, for analysis in determining which approach is most advantageous, with respect to cost and risk, to the Government.


Subjects: Defense contracts
Language English
Publication date March 2005
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
costbenefitnalys1094510041
Source
Internet Archive identifier: costbenefitnalys1094510041
https://archive.org/download/costbenefitnalys1094510041/costbenefitnalys1094510041.pdf
Permission
(Reusing this file)
This publication is a work of the U.S. Government as defined in Title 17, United States Code, Section 101. As such, it is in the public domain, and under the provisions of Title 17, United States Code, Section 105, may not be copyrighted.

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current09:03, 16 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 09:03, 16 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 94 pages (3.59 MB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection costbenefitnalys1094510041 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #12470)

Metadata