File:ExoplanetDiscoveries-Histogram-20160510.jpg
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Size of this preview: 800 × 598 pixels. Other resolutions: 320 × 239 pixels | 640 × 478 pixels | 1,024 × 766 pixels | 1,030 × 770 pixels.
Original file (1,030 × 770 pixels, file size: 279 KB, MIME type: image/jpeg)
File information
Structured data
Captions
Summary[edit]
DescriptionExoplanetDiscoveries-Histogram-20160510.jpg |
English: The histogram shows the number of planet discoveries by year for more than the past two decades of the exoplanet search. The blue bar shows previous non-Kepler planet discoveries, the light blue bar shows previous Kepler planet discoveries, the orange bar displays the 1,284 new validated planets. |
Date | |
Source | http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/thumbnails/image/kepler_fig2_0.jpg |
Author | NASA Ames/W. Stenzel; Princeton University/T. Morton |
Licensing[edit]
Public domainPublic domainfalsefalse |
This file is in the public domain in the United States because it was solely created by NASA. NASA copyright policy states that "NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". (See Template:PD-USGov, NASA copyright policy page or JPL Image Use Policy.) | ||
Warnings:
|
File history
Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.
Date/Time | Thumbnail | Dimensions | User | Comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
current | 17:58, 10 May 2016 | 1,030 × 770 (279 KB) | Sdgedfegw (talk | contribs) | User created page with UploadWizard |
You cannot overwrite this file.
File usage on Commons
The following page uses this file:
File usage on other wikis
The following other wikis use this file:
- Usage on ca.wikipedia.org
- Usage on en.wikipedia.org
- Usage on mk.wikipedia.org
- Usage on pt.wikipedia.org
Metadata
This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong.
Author | CHOU, FELICIA (HQ-NG000) |
---|---|
Date and time of data generation | 08:26, 10 May 2016 |
Width | 1,030 px |
Height | 770 px |
Bits per component |
|
Pixel composition | RGB |
Orientation | Normal |
Number of components | 3 |
Horizontal resolution | 96 dpi |
Vertical resolution | 96 dpi |
Software used | Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh) |
File change date and time | 09:53, 10 May 2016 |
Exif version | 2.21 |
Date and time of digitizing | 08:26, 10 May 2016 |
DateTimeOriginal subseconds | 06 |
DateTimeDigitized subseconds | 06 |
Color space | Uncalibrated |
Date metadata was last modified | 05:53, 10 May 2016 |
Unique ID of original document | 475E9010CDB33CD793E6536F70C927D8 |
Hidden category: