File:Cost Analysis for a Dedicated Search and Rescue Capability for Commander Strike Fighter Wing U.S. Pacific Fleet (IA costanalysisford1094515549).pdf

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Go to page
next page →
next page →
next page →

Original file(1,275 × 1,650 pixels, file size: 452 KB, MIME type: application/pdf, 22 pages)

Captions

Captions

Add a one-line explanation of what this file represents

Summary[edit]

Cost Analysis for a Dedicated Search and Rescue Capability for Commander Strike Fighter Wing U.S. Pacific Fleet   (Wikidata search (Cirrus search) Wikidata query (SPARQL)  Create new Wikidata item based on this file)
Author
Biros, Russ
Corpuz, Noel
Hines, Cade
Riggs2, Tinsika
image of artwork listed in title parameter on this page
Title
Cost Analysis for a Dedicated Search and Rescue Capability for Commander Strike Fighter Wing U.S. Pacific Fleet
Publisher
Monterey, California ; Naval Postgraduate School
Description

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Lemoore is a Master Jet Base, but is one of the few on the West Coast without an in-house, dedicated Search and Rescue (SAR) capability. The lack of SAR at Lemoore is a growing concern due to the increase in the number of squadrons at Lemoore, the new Lemoore Military Operating Airspace (MOA), and the need to use the Offshore Warning Areas for more training due to increased congestion in other airspaces. As a result, Commander Naval Air Forces (CNAF) is examining the issue of returning a dedicated SAR capability to Naval Air Station Lemoore (NASL). The objective of this project is to provide a cost comparison and analysis of the pros and cons of different models for providing Lemoore with dedicated SAR. A key assumption is made that the Navy has a sufficient inventory of helicopters. Thus, the cost of procuring new helicopters is not considered. A second assumption is that due to high workload for Fleet Helicopter Wings, detachments from these Helicopter Wing squadrons in support of a full-time SAR detachment at NAS Lemoore are not feasible. Due to time constraints for this project, only the five most viable SAR models are considered. Data was gathered from multiple DoD, Federal Government, and civilian organizations. A spreadsheet analysis of the data was conducted, and then used to make meaningful, equivalent comparisons of the five viable SAR models. The results show that the two least expensive models for returning dedicated SAR capability to Lemoore are to establish a SAR detachment for Lemoore from an already existing Navy SAR unit, followed closely by the slightly more expensive model of using the government acquisition process to procure contract SAR for Lemoore from a commercial entity. Analyses support the recommendation for the Navy to procure contract SAR for Lemoore via the government acquisition process. Contracts for civilian SAR offer both low cost and the flexibility of one-year options, which would allow the service to be easily discontinued if funds are cut. Precedence for contract helicopter services exists at Marine Air-Ground Task Force Training Command (MAGTFTC), Twentynine Palms, CA. Fleet & Industrial Supply Center (FISC) personnel have offered assistance in drafting the Statement of Work and Source Selection Board Plan. The Department of Interior’s Aviation Management Office exists to perform inspections and certifications of commercial helicopter providers and has offered to do so for the Navy. Contract SAR would be operational 6 months after Request for Proposal (RFP) announcement. 4


Subjects:
Language English
Publication date March 2009
Current location
IA Collections: navalpostgraduateschoollibrary; fedlink
Accession number
costanalysisford1094515549
Source
Internet Archive identifier: costanalysisford1094515549
https://archive.org/download/costanalysisford1094515549/costanalysisford1094515549.pdf

Licensing[edit]

Public domain
This work is in the public domain in the United States because it is a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code. Note: This only applies to original works of the Federal Government and not to the work of any individual U.S. state, territory, commonwealth, county, municipality, or any other subdivision. This template also does not apply to postage stamp designs published by the United States Postal Service since 1978. (See § 313.6(C)(1) of Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices). It also does not apply to certain US coins; see The US Mint Terms of Use.

File history

Click on a date/time to view the file as it appeared at that time.

Date/TimeThumbnailDimensionsUserComment
current08:52, 16 July 2020Thumbnail for version as of 08:52, 16 July 20201,275 × 1,650, 22 pages (452 KB) (talk | contribs)FEDLINK - United States Federal Collection costanalysisford1094515549 (User talk:Fæ/IA books#Fork8) (batch 1993-2020 #12445)

Metadata