Commons talk:Featured pictures/Plants

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Why there is fungi in "plants" category? – linnea (talk) 19:55, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't be of course Lycaon 20:41, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
They're more closely related to animals than plants, so it would make just as much if not more sense to lump them in with the animals. Richard001 02:18, 16 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Split article between flowers and other plant photos[edit]

This page list many photo of flower, more than it should to be comfortably called a page about “plants”. It's a bit like if the similar page about people contained 95% photos of penises and labias. Would you keep the page unchanged “it's part of people”. Since flowers are a large part of the photos made from plants, I think they deserve their own page, while other photos of plants, like trees or grass, could stay on this page. Flower may be part of plants, but by the same taxonomical reasoning, why aren't people in the animal section? Besides, this split would allow more photo of plants in their normal state without overloading this page. Heinrich Zweihänder (talk) 23:04, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Can we have a section for seedlings and young plants shown in pictures/Plants?[edit]

who cares who authored the request for photographs of young plants and seedlings? My name is Samuel Muldoon. here is my IP address (73.14.72.177) — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 73.14.72.177 (talk) 23:38, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]