Commons:Valued image candidates/Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf

Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf

promoted to Valued image set: Wayside Cross Villenstraße, Bonn-Dottendorf, Germany

Images	Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf, Germany Base Wayside Cross Villenstraße Bonn-Dottendorf with Inscription
Description	Deutsch: Steinwegkreuz Bonn-Dottendorf, Hausdorff-/Villenstraße, Baudenkmalnummer A 661, errichtet 1733, (Inschrift/Inscription: 1733__(?)TOM__ARD*BART__HOLOMÆUS__WASSERFASs__CANONICUS__BONNENSIS - Ohne Gewähr/Without guarantee for the correctness) English: Wayside Cross in Bonn-Dottendorf, Hausdorff-/Villenstraße, Germany, cultural heritage monument # A661, built 1733
Nominated by	Caecilius Mauß (talk) on 13:11, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued set of images on Wikimedia Commons within the scope: :Wayside Cross Villenstraße, Bonn-Dottendorf
Review (criteria)	Some fixes  Done. --Ikar.us (talk) 08:35, 12 June 2013 (UTC) On images of inscriptions, I prefer to have their text in the description. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:45, 17 June 2013 (UTC)  Info Me too. I ´ve been searching several sources for further information, but found nothing yet. (E.g. Landschaftverband Rheinland, Monument Conservation Office, Land Registry Office, Deutsche Inschriften Online, Urban Administration of Bonn). I could do it myself, but that would be without profound scientific knowledge. So i pass on for scientific reasons. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 12:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC) Do we need scientific knowledge to copy latin letters? --Ikar.us (talk) 21:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)  Done --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 14:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)  Support --Ikar.us (talk) 21:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)  Comment The scope is not valid (it does not lead to a live scope page, or any page). The set cannot be promoted until a valid scope exists.-Godot13 (talk) 17:39, 4 August 2013 (UTC)  Comment I have created a new (sub)category, but this is marked as "empty". I don´t know, wether this is the right way. (The former category has been deleted, I don´t know why. Maybe because it was marked as "empty" too. As far as I remember, I created the former category the same way like today.) --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 18:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)  Done some fixes, including VALID SCOPE. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 16:53, 5 August 2013 (UTC) Result: 1 support, 0 oppose => promoted. --VT98Fan (talk) 21:30, 31 August 2013 (UTC)--