Comment I don't know; maybe it is the best, but first you have to better describe the scope (for example: eastern or western facade). We can see the jpg artefacts, image isn't sharp, strange line upset on the bell tower. It all makes me unable to vote for it... Tournasol7 (talk) 22:32, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] Comment First of all thank you for your inputs @Tournasol7. I have redone the post processing from scratch. Image sharpness has been addressed. Hopefully jpeg artifacts is also controlled in this version. The saturation has been toned down overall. This is the view from the north side entrance to the cathedral. Pl review - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 18:45, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] Comment Not bad now, but if you can correct the perspective and clone the birds on the sky, it would be great :) Greetings! Tournasol7 (talk) 11:14, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] Comment - Perspective fixed, Birds removed from sky and some other spots in the sky also cleared. Localized brightness of the showcased building increased. - Subhrajyoti07 (talk) 17:42, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply] Support Thank you very much! I changed the scope to "Northern exposur of the...". Better in scope, useful and used. Tournasol7 (talk) 14:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
