Not bad. Unlike some other images, ist shows both station and trains. Request Please identify station, add category and location. --Ikar.us (talk) 14:50, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Picture is tilted on purpose to show detail in the wall. Moreover, long exposures and tripods are not permitted in the DPRK. In any event, the metro station is in fact a fairly dark place; a reality this photo conveys. --Lawboy25 (talk) 15:59, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The photo you link to is nothing short of terrible. Not only is it done very badly with a flash, but has the heads of foreign tourists in the foreground. --78.109.182.813:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I dare to Support it even for the wide scope. It's the only image of a station which shows trains, a part of the wall unhided, splendiferous decorations, political paintings, acceptable lighting and no tourists. --Ikar.us (talk) 13:53, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am pleased to hear you understand that it is simply not possible in this country to take staged photos. The lighting in reality is dim, thus a photo which shows dim lighting should hardly be problematic: it is an accurate representation of the subject. --Lawboy25 (talk) 14:58, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support this choice, and entirely agree with Ikar.us's reasons. IMO, The technical quality is maybe better in the other one, but it's not our problem here, for most valuables images. --Jebulon (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I learned that the one stop metro ride from the railway main station to this end of the line belongs to guided tours. Perhaps tourists aren't allowed to leave the station? --Ikar.us (talk) 22:11, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
