Oppose Per Commons:Valued_image_scope#Buildings wich says: "Not any church is worth a Valued Image scope. Cathedral scopes are OK, but for other churches there should be a good reason, like being a pilgrimage place, being really famous, being architecturally exceptional...". Convince me it's worth a scope. W.S.20:11, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't understand why this ordinary-looking church deserves a scope, among the dozens of similar buildings. Maybe the rule is wrong, then let's change the rules. But for now, it is the rule (criterium 2). Sorry. --Jebulon (talk) 09:37, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
