Commons:Valued image candidates/Prairie nymph -- Herbertia lahue.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Prairie nymph -- Herbertia lahue.jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Jim Evans (talk) on 2021-03-05 13:45 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Herbertia lahue (Prairie nymph) - blossom
Used in Global usage
Reason Back so soon you say! I have flower pictures. I forgot about them. I'll try a few and see how it goes. More competition here. -- Jim Evans (talk)
Review
(criteria)

 Comment, Best in scope. But camera location is missing.--Rocky Masum (talk) 18:46, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment That will be true of many of my flower pictures. I did not keep records of the locations, and do not use the coordinates feature because it uses battery. Some I remember where I took them others I don't. This is a wildflower and the picture was taken in a field in a park, but I don't remember which park. -- Jim Evans (talk) 00:49, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It is useful for the flowers to know the location if they are endemic wild forms. If so, the county name may suffice. On the other hand, what is imperative is that you only show the flower: you must reduce the scope to "Flower". If you want your botanical images to be useful and used, take care of your caption! Inspiration from what has already been done. (Good shoot) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 6 March 2021 (UTC)Texte en italique[reply]
  •  Comment I have added the county to the file description, is that what you meant? I don't understand what you mean by "what has already been done." If you mean other flowers proposed, I have seen so few, and don't remember how they were formatted. I have added blossom to the scope wording. -- Jim Evans (talk) 13:55, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment you have degraded your scope which is incompressible, reread what is written. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:02, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support OK now, just look at the formalization of the scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Thank you -- Jim Evans (talk) 12:46, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]