Commons:Valued image candidates/Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 02

Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 02.jpg

declined

Image
Nominated by	Christian Ferrer (talk) on 2013-07-15 18:18 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault, France. Bascule bridge in closed position. From Southeast.
Used in	Global usage
Review (criteria)	The bridge is symmetrical and transparent. I think the scope should be wider, without SE. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC) I don't understand the term "wider", must I delete "from southeast" in the scope? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Yes, this is what I suggest. If more views appear to be useful, a set sould be made. --Ikar.us (talk) 21:17, 16 July 2013 (UTC) Oh sorry, now I see that your other candidate had a differing scope. So I was in error when making it a MVR. --Ikar.us (talk) 22:24, 16 July 2013 (UTC) But anyway, why not a set with 03? --Ikar.us (talk) 22:25, 16 July 2013 (UTC) I want in first to promote theses images one by one, I was thinking that possible with differents scopes and after with a set because there will be another pictures of this bridge (view from other positions, closes details, opening positions) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC) I think it's possible to have individual valued images with different scope, and when I will have enough views of this bridge, I will propose a set. So now can we takes these two images to VI in normal procedure? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Hm, VI customs are changing over time… --Ikar.us (talk) 19:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC) But, even if I assume that such scopes are possible, I'm sorry to  Oppose because: The direction should IMO be expressed in relation to the object, i.e. side view, not southeast. The bridge is still rather small on the image. --Ikar.us (talk) 20:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)  Info Thanks to good quality, created a concurring nomination: Commons:Valued image candidates/Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault - side.jpg --Ikar.us (talk) 21:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC) Result: 0 support, 1 oppose => declined. Jolly Janner (talk) 16:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)