the bird of the other species in the other candidate picture is distracting, therefore I changed the original, so that only one species is visible. -- Kersti (talk)
Comment I don't understand your vote. If the scope would be "Drawing of John Gerrard Keulemans (1842–1912) concerning Pachyramphus albogriseus" or "historical drawing concerning Pachyramphus albogriseus" I would understand, as ist is no longer the original - But as the scope I have chosen - see headline and don't change the skope! - is "Pachyramphus albogriseus", I would prefer mine, as it illustrates the bird much better. --Kersti (talk) 20:43, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The issue is twofold: the bird and illustration. If you are right for the bird, you distorted the picture. That said without controversy because I am very appreciative of the work you have done, and I know the time you spent there. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:49, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The skope is the bird, not the illustration itself or the scientific illustration type John Gerrard Keulemans produced in his time. And I didn't "distort" the picture I made a new picture using elements of the old one.--Kersti (talk) 18:54, 24 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That's a good try, the picture is nice seen in miniature (or thumb), but I'm really disturbed by those areas when the drawing is seen from near, and I prefer the original one. :/ Totodu74 (talk) 17:32, 26 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
