Info No location added, the pictures are taken at my home and the location gives no useful information.
Support Criteria 1,2, and 3 are OK for the set. For criterion 3 I would comment, that the very beginning of the sequence is missing, but this is not a ground for oppose in my oppinion. Criteria 4 and 6 are ok as well. For 5 I agree with the nominator: Geocoding would not add any information. -- Dr. Schorsch (talk) 19:09, 9 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose for now. I'm not really satisfied with criterion 4: full description on the image page. More information is needed on the time line as well on the other versions. Additionally, Species names should—by convention—always be in italics. And finally, the use in projects is not indicated. Lycaon (talk) 06:49, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
InfoNow species name in italics, all linked in "other versions". Which information do you miss in the timeline? What exactly do you mean with "the use in projects is not indicated"? --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:41, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for that already. With time line I mean that the timings of the hatching process should also be in the description of the files. And use in projects is the 6th parameter of this nomination |usedin=. Lycaon (talk) 07:46, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. -- Berthold Werner (talk) 07:39, 14 August 2008 (UTC)
Review closed prematurely (no earlier than seven days after the promotion).
Resetting the nomination period and changed back to supported. -- Slaunger (talk) 23:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
