Comment Hmm, difficult. This is an excellent image showing the interior of the fungus, but it leaves one clueless about how it looks from the outside, which is how you usually see it. There are many other images who do so, even an FP (File:Cracked Mushroom.jpg), but then these show only the exterior. -- H00521:27, 8 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think a better name of the scope would be cross-section, not inside because I think cross-section describes what the image is about more than inside, but maybe i think too much in mathematical terms. --Korall (talk) 10:50, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
Comment Hmmm, two scopes for a single fungus seem a bit narrow even for me. I'd rather have a single image showing both interior and exterior, i. e. your cross-section and next to it the exterior view photographed in the same style and quality. Or two separate images of the same quality and style nominated as an image set. -- H00521:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
--George Chernilevskytalk 08:55, 14 October 2009 (UTC)
Support I would not prefer two images joined togherther, I prefer the flexibility of separate images. The scope is now good and I think the criteria are met. --Korall (talk) 11:26, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support - there is already a VI for "exterior". This image shows is the best one showing the "interior" IMO --Rastaman3000 (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2009 (UTC) - somebody removed my vote for an unknown reason. --Rastaman3000 (talk) 18:50, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
