Commons:Valued image candidates/Dominik Puchała (cropped).jpg

Dominik Puchała (cropped).jpg

promoted

Image
Nominated by	Andrei (talk) on 2020-08-11 06:26 (UTC)
Scope	Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope: Dominik Puchała
Used in	Global usage wikidata
Review (criteria)	Question No Wikipedia article is linked from the category page. How notable is he? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:10, 13 August 2020 (UTC) As a local activist, organizer of the Equality March in Częstochowa. He is present in local media coveregre (some international too). --Andrei (talk) 07:54, 13 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Thank you. Best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:49, 13 August 2020 (UTC)  Oppose Not sufficiently notable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:30, 14 August 2020 (UTC) I do not think it is a part of the official VIC criteria --Andrei (talk) 18:06, 14 August 2020 (UTC)  Comment I'm satisfied that he's notable enough, but your argument seems to be that "Portrait of Joe Schmoe" would be an acceptable scope and notability is irrelevant. That isn't logical, is it? Otherwise, have a look at Commons:Valued image scope#Examples of suitable scopes: "A portrait of a notable person" is given as an example of a suitable type of scope; "A portrait of an unknown person" is not. If you'd like to make more explicit that notability is a factor in judging the scopes of portraits, we can discuss the addition of new words, but claiming that it's not a basis for judgment at all, I submit, is something we can summarily dismiss. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 14 August 2020 (UTC)  Support Per Ikan Kekek ; I do agree with him and especially with his long, accurate and relevant explanation. --PJDespa talk 11:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC) Result: 2 support, 1 oppose => promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2020 (UTC)