Opposeas not yet eligible for VI status. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it cannot at present become a valued image since it currently fails valued image criterion 4 (is not fully described on the image page). Please specify which of them is a male, and which is a female. I have not reviewed the nomination against all the criteria, but if you are able to fix this issue and would like me to re-evaluate the image please leave me a message on my talk page. -- Rastaman3000 (talk) 15:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC) - fixed by Lycaon. Rastaman3000 (talk) 16:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info Previous comment has been addressed by Lycaon. I'm ready to support, but is it necessary to add "male and female" as a subscope? There was no subscope for this one and it looked natural to me. Just a question. --Eusebius (talk) 15:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Scope changed from Argyroneta aquatica (Diving bell spider), male and female to Argyroneta aquatica (Diving bell spider) --Lycaon (talk) 08:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please notify previous voters of this change. Remember: "A support vote that was made before a change of scope is not counted unless it is reconfirmed afterwards; an oppose vote is counted unless it is changed or withdrawn".
