Commons:Valued image candidates/Andernach, Bäckerjungenbrunnen, Markt (2019-08-28 Sp).jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Andernach, Bäckerjungenbrunnen, Markt (2019-08-28 Sp).jpg

promoted
Image
Nominated by Lothar Spurzem (talk) on 2019-09-03 12:15 (UTC)
Scope Nominated as the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bäckerjungenbrunnen in Andernach, wide view from southwest
Used in Global usage
Review
(criteria)

 Comment Given multiple images of the same topic, the scope becomes a determining factor. For a statue, I think two views probably matter the most: its context, and its detail. This to me is the best in relation to context because it shows the statue in an urban square, from the front, and without unnecessary background people, although the verticals could benefit from correction. Fix the scope, and I'll support. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:33, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodhullandemu: Please feel not offenced, but I think that what you say is criticism at a very high level. What is wrong at the scope? And which lines should be corrected? I do not see anything that could be wrong. Best regards -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 08:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Spurzem: Re scope: You have nominated another "view from southwest", but a close-up; so we have different images sharing a scope (barring minor wording differences). As for the verticals, the upper part of the building appears to me to lean outwards. Perhaps it does. ShiftN tells me it could do with minor angle and perspective correction, but so small as to make no appreciable difference, so that is no longer a major consideration, and I withdraw it. But I'd still like you to consider the scope. "wide/context view from the southwest", perhaps? Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:09, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodhullandemu: O. K. Please change the scope so as you think that it is right. But in the lines I see no mistake. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 09:32, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Fine now. Rodhullandemu (talk) 10:22, 6 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
[reply]