Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 23 2013

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wasserburg Hülshoff.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Burg Hülshoff ia a water castle in Westphalia and birthplace of the poetesse Annette von Droste-Hülshoff.
  • Promotion After ask for review I uploaded an improved version, but no one looked for it.--
    Watzmann Talk 16:24, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks like QI to me. --Dirtsc 19:43, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support to me also. --Ralf Roletschek 11:34, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Not perfect but OK (blown clouds, artifacts in sky around roof, sharpening haloes) --Kreuzschnabel 06:42, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 19:04, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Papilio buddha.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Papilio buddha, a species of swallowtail found in the Western Ghats --Vengolis 18:07, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Great photo, thanks for the generosity in donating this! --Mr.choppers 19:37, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
     OpposeSorry, I beg to differ: insufficient DOF, blur, chromatic aberrations, noise, specially chromatic. --Myrabella 22:32, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose too noise --Rjcastillo 13:42, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose The thumbail is very nice, but the image is noisy and blurry, sorry--Lmbuga 21:18, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 19:02, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Projekt_Heißluftballon-1213.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Shell Deutschland Oil GmbH de:Royal_Dutch_Shell--Jean11 22:43, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Too noisy and chromatic aberrations, sorry. --Myrabella 18:25, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I agree with Myrabella. --Rjcastillo 13:39, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Schweinsberg (Stadtallendorf) (05).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Castle and church in Schweinsberg (Stadtallendorf) --Hydro 07:29, 7 September 2013 (UTC)  Weak oppose A bit blurry and not very sharp at 100%, please try reducing the resolution. A little bit oversaturated and too dark shadows IMO, but improvable. --VT98Fan 12:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment I uploaded a new version. --VT98Fan 12:30, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support --Iifar 08:14, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
     Support here too. Mattbuck 21:34, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI, good IMO--Lmbuga 23:55, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:56, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Station_Brugge-Sint-Pieters_R02.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Brugge-Sint-Pieters train station (Belgium) -- MJJR 21:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion chromatic aberration, see notes --The Photographer 14:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
    You may be right, but I don't see any CA on my screen -- MJJR 16:20, 13 September 2013 (UTC)  Support I don't see any CA --Christian Ferrer 20:36, 14 September 2013 (UTC)When I have promoted it nobody have declined and now nobody have signed for this discuss, IMO, this image must be promoted --Christian Ferrer 20:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:53, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Retranchement_NHKerk_R01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Protestant church in Retranchement (the Netherlands) -- MJJR 21:06, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice shoot, but car is distraying --The Photographer 14:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Yes, car distraying but main subject is entire, enough for QI --Christian Ferrer 08:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)When I have promoted it nobody have declined and now nobody have signed for this discuss, IMO, this image must be promoted --Christian Ferrer 20:58, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:50, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Ciasa_Sompunt_de_sot.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Manor "Sompunt" in Badia --Moroder 20:43, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice picture but building is tilt and chromatic aberration. See notes --The Photographer 14:23, 11 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the appreciation. I fixed the CA (although irrelevant imho) and a little bit of verticals but consider that this house is more then 500 years old and the walls are never vertical.--Moroder 20:49, 11 September 2013 (UTC)  Comment The distortion is too large to maintain this infrastructure in place. I think it takes a larger perspective correction --The Photographer 13:12, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Comment There is no distortion whatsoever, please come and take a look at the building yourself --Moroder 23:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
     Support Old buildings often are leaning without collapsing immediately, see File:Uentrop Dorfkirche IMGP3092 wp.jpg ;-) -- Smial 11:20, 16 September 2013 (UTC): Comment In fact, those iron bars on the wall are set to prevent the falling apart of the building --Moroder 20:39, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
     Support Agree with Smial, around 1500 the vertical was not that important...--Isiwal 18:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:49, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Lueneburg_IMGP9401_wp.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lüneburg, Skillshare 2010. Rathausturm, von der Straße An der Münze gesehen --Smial 12:55, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose it's very noisy (a pity, as I actually like the composition) --A.Savin 18:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
    • New developed from raw. --Smial 00:31, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
      • Cannot change my mind, it's too soft now (denoising!), sorry --A.Savin 08:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
The unsharp areas are caused by DOF. Ok, the bokeh of the lens is not the best. If you compare both versions exactly you will see there is no additional unsharpess by denoising. The pigeon has some motion blur, yes. --Smial 10:19, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Might be a bit soft now but easily meets QI criteria. The pattern on the house to the left is indeed not really nice, due to poor bokeh of the lens. --Kreuzschnabel 15:57, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. --Ralf Roletschek 20:20, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality --High Contrast 19:43, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Leuchtbake_Wriakhörn.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Lighthouse "Wriakhörn" on the island of Amrum --Dirtsc 16:01, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Smial 16:57, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry – nice composition but upper part is blurry and shows considerable artifacts --Kreuzschnabel 17:20, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Kreuzschnabel --The Photographer 17:25, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:45, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Capela_a_Maria_Costadedoi_depent_cun_pastri.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Fresco with shepherds on the cieling of the Saint Mary chapel at Costadedoi in San Ciascian --Moroder 20:39, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion {{o}} Sorry, let's "discuss": the shadow is disturbing (see note)--Lmbuga 23:01, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment I's a wet stain most probably due to water from the roof, I put it into the description --Moroder 17:09, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
    • Ok, but the edges of the spot are too perfect to be humidity IMO--Lmbuga 23:30, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
      •  Support The painting is on the ceiling. Sorry I was thinking that the fresco was on a wall--Lmbuga 11:05, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:44, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Monumento_Neptuno,_Gdansk,_Polonia,_2013-05-20,_DD_04.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Neptune Monument, Gdansk, Poland --Poco a poco 18:36, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Let's "discuss": Perspective distortion. It can be FP, but not QI IMO--Lmbuga 20:25, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
     Support I think this is perfectly fine for QI, otherwise we would not have an entire QI category dedicated to this. --King of Hearts 05:31, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
    *  Oppose I don't have problems with wide angle photography or extreme perspective. But this image has some flaws. Technically: Seems to have some CCW tilt. Composition: The monument is arranged in the center, but the buildings left and right are not symmetric, so the impression is extremely unbalanced. Due to the short focal length the main object is too small. Extreme perspectives may fit to modern buildings, sky scrapers, high towers, but are imo not adequate to these historical facades, they look caricatural. Crop at the bottom is too tight; maybe there are disturbing objects, but the monument has no base. -- Smial 14:14, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
    Agree with the tilt (new version uploaded!) but the lack of symmetry is just due to the fact that the row of buildings on the left are much closer to the fountain than those on the right, the crop at the bottom is on purpose Poco a poco 18:40, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 04.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Miotte fortifications and tower. Bourgeois.A 08:48, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose blurred --A.Savin 10:07, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
    I totaly disegry ! Bourgeois.A 14:26, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sharpness is more or less ok. But I think the composition is questionable with all the branches on the right. --AngMoKio 19:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:33, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Cacique_Yaracuy_I.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Indio Yara --Rjcastillo 02:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose Poor light and not really sharp. --Sfu 11:37, 6 September 2013 (UTC) Comment New version uploaded --Rjcastillo 17:35, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
    Previuos version was better IMO. Brightening the picture doesn't make the poor light good. --Sfu 11:18, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
 Oppose Oversharpening haloes almost everywhere, yellowish.--Jebulon 16:40, 14 September 2013 (UTC)
 Oppose Loss of detail and oversharpened --Kreuzschnabel 05:17, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 19:11, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:St_Matthew's_Church_-_Paisley_-_Interior_-_1.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination St Matthew's Church interior 1 --Colin 12:20, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Sorry, some big areas of photo subject completely black. It is not QI. --Nino Verde 14:47, 6 September 2013 (UTC).
    • Agree. I've reprocessed the image a different way, which has kept the shadows. Please can you re-assess. Thanks. Colin 18:38, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
      •  Support Much better now! --Nino Verde 09:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:30, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-05-04 (9613b) Jaguar SS 100, Bj. 1938.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Jaguar S.S. 100 from 1938 at ADAC Mittelrhein Classic 2013 -- Spurzem 14:06, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  • Pretty, but needs low end darkening to make something black. Mattbuck 15:22, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support I think the exposure of the dark areas is just acceptable and when I add to that a well caught moment and an interesting subject I think it is OK for QI. Let's dicuss. --Slaunger 20:57, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Neutral Very well captured moment, the only thing that keeps me from supporting is the large blown (and posterized) part on the left mudguard. I don’t see anything that I would call not dark enough. --Kreuzschnabel 07:48, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Nice IMO QI --The Photographer 19:54, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Ok for me --Rjcastillo 19:17, 11 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support OK --High Contrast 19:48, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --A.Savin 18:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:13-08-31-wien-redaktionstreffen-EuT-by-Bi-frie-086.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Some pepper cut in different ways (red: diced, green: horizonatally sliced, yellow: vertically sliced, orange: intact pepper). (from User:Bi-frie) --Ralf Roletschek 12:59, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Template:OS --The Photographer 13:17, 6 September 2013 (UTC)  Oppose Oversaturated, IMO.--Jebulon 13:58, 6 September 2013 (UTC) its not my photo. but it isn't saturatet, its original. --Ralf Roletschek 14:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)<br\>Let discuss. Currently  Oppose in case of noise and sharpening halos. --Nino Verde 15:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --A.Savin 18:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

File:20130406_Ely_Cathedral_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination A window of Ely Cathedral --Heuschrecke 09:22, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support - OK --Rjcastillo 13:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose - I disagree, Sorry but I don't like the crop at the top --Moroder 13:20, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support - The top isn't great, but the rest of the image is perfect. Mattbuck 16:54, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support As Mattbuck --Lmbuga 23:49, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Jean11 16:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:13-08-09-hongkong-by-RalfR-135.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Police bus in Hongkong --Ralf Roletschek 18:43, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose It is blurry, sorry --Poco a poco 19:40, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  SupportSharpness could be a bit better but in my opinion it is enough. Therefore I ask for discussion. -- Spurzem 20:01, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose With Poco square.--Jebulon 09:06, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 19:03, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Entrance_to_Information_Centre_at_Periyar_Tiger_Reserve.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Entrance to Information Centre at Periyar Tiger Reserve --Faizking321 19:48, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline QI for me --Dugawan 20:21, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry: unsharp, especially on the left, blown out areas in the sky. (+ sockpuppet's review?)--Myrabella 09:29, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Myrabella, and strong chromatic aberrations--Lmbuga 11:52, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose as Myrabella --AngMoKio 20:02, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 16:34, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:'Chai'_Tea.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination 'Chai' (Hindi for Tea) served in a glass mug in India --Ahmad Faiz Mustafa 06:38, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Good quality. --Dugawan 20:23, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
     Oppose Sorry: unsharp, noisy. (+ sockpuppet's review?)--Myrabella 09:18, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose As Myrabella and a bit of chromatic noise at upper side. I don't like the composition--Lmbuga 11:46, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Myrabella. Besides, a very suspicious first review. --High Contrast 22:40, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Myrabella ...and yeah, smells like socks here. --AngMoKio 20:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Steinsplitter 15:25, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Carpathian Forest, Roger „Nattefrost“ Rasmussen at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 08.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Roger „Nattefrost“ Rasmussen at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 --Jonas Rogowski 22:07, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice composition, but suffers motion blur. --Mattbuck 18:55, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
    to me its sharp and QI -->  Support --Ralf Roletschek 15:23, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support The motion blur adds to the compo, IMO.--Jebulon 09:45, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good IMO and nice--Lmbuga 11:40, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support The face is sharp enough. On stage people are moving most of the time and lighting is mostly very bad. Very good shot under given circumstances. -- Smial 14:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Steinsplitter 15:23, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

File:XXL_-_Asaco_Metal_Fest_2013_-_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Spanish metal band XXL at Asaco Metal Fest 2013, Parla, Spain. --Kadellar 15:23, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Nice, but CAs on the shirt, and it feels very unbalanced. Can you get back anything on the right? Mattbuck 21:57, 29 August 2013 (UTC)
    CA removed, I hadn't seen that. Composition can't be changed, I liked it this way, because I thought that if I showed his left arm, which was low, or something else at his left, his face and expression would be too small in the picture. Thank you for the reviews, Mattbuck. --Kadellar 18:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
    I take it to CR. --Kadellar 19:28, 5 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Because of composition, unsharpness and some overexposed areas on the white parts of the tee-shirt (which should be illegal in France...). I dislike the crops, and I find the structure behind disturbing--Jebulon 09:41, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I like the composition and also the crop, but as for Jebulon: Overexposure on t-shirt and small parts of the face, and this structure in the background too near to the head are very disturbing. -- Smial 11:22, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 21:08, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Church_in_Kolomenskoye_(Moscow).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Church of the Ascension in Kolomenskoye, Moscow, Russian Federation --Nino Verde 16:44, 2 September 2013 (UTC)
  • Decline Overprocessed. --Smial 19:11, 2 September 2013 (UTC)<br\>Can you point what exact is overprocessed here? --Nino Verde 10:08, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
blurred by noise reduction and afterwards somewhat oversharpened. -- Smial 14:30, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Comment In my opinion the colors are oversaturated, but I'm not sure. I don't like it (a bit overprocesed also for me) but it's a good image. It's improvable--Lmbuga 19:14, 3 September 2013 (UTC)
    • ✓ Done Ok, i desaturated and removed some vibrance. --Nino Verde 12:14, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality IMO--Lmbuga 19:48, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Oppose sky overpolarized --The Photographer 13:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
    • It is graduated filter. --Nino Verde 14:54, 6 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me, though I think there's a bit too much sky on top. Óðinn 19:21, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Decline?   --Jean11 21:06, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:3ème_Salon_des_tracteurs_anciens_-_Moulin_de_Chiblins_-_18082013_-_Tracteur_Grunder_15_L_-_1958_-_roue.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tracteur Grunder 15 L - 1958 - roue --Pleclown 11:06, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion

 SupportGood quality. Heuschrecke 18:34, 1 September 2013 (UTC)
 Oppose - Blur on left and at bottom. Mattbuck 18:39, 1 September 2013 (UTC)  Support Main object is sharp, some clipping reflections are not disturbing. -- Smial 14:14, 8 September 2013 (UTC)

Running total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promote?   --Jean11 20:57, 11 September 2013 (UTC)

File:2013-Fort de la Miotte 08.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Miotte fortifications and tower. Bourgeois.A 21:12, 15 August 2013 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose Dust spots need fixing. Mattbuck 20:58, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
  • ✓ Done Better now ? Bourgeois.A 09:26, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support looks good to me.--Jebulon 21:34, 31 August 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support meets all QI criteria in my opinion --J. Lunau 14:39, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support --ComputerHotline 22:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC)
  •  Support Supportable now --High Contrast 22:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Jean11 20:52, 11 September 2013 (UTC)