Nomination Peterskirche, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 06:58, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion OK. --Berthold Werner 08:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination GGB and San Francisco --Mbz1 04:27, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice composition. --Cayambe 08:06, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Male Mallard ducks in a high speed water chase --Relic38 03:16, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion very nice.--Mbz1 04:00, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination San Francisco in fog (please notice the slight distortion of the buildings is due to the atmospheric layer just above the fog and is not a quality problem.) --Mbz1 21:23, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. Please add geotag. --Cayambe 08:09, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A view of Saint-Malo castle. --Eusebius 20:11, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice light, composition is OK. Chould be a bit sharper on the right, but the important parts are sharp enough. --Relic38 03:24, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Breaking wave in slow motion.--Mbz1 18:47, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion gives an impression of the power of the waves --Mbdortmund 20:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Remarkable oak at Saeul, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 15:05, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination San Francisco with two bridges --Mbz1 14:34, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Fantastic view in excellent quality, good for FP -- George Chernilevsky 14:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A Belgian F-16; wasn't good enough for FP, but should be QI, I think. --Airwolf 13:43, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good QI -- George Chernilevsky 14:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination BVG Open Day 2009 with a presentation of typical Berlin trams. --Iotatau 12:16, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion New models (unknown for me), Tatra KT-4, Gotha and others... Very interesting and good quality -- George Chernilevsky 14:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A privately-owned (!) T-55 tank --Airwolf 10:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment I dislike the cropped wind turbine on the right. Maybe it can be recropped? -- JovanCormac 11:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Comment The only thing I can do about it is cut it off completely. This here is the original size o the picture. Airwolf 11:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC) Support Very good QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 14:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Cowper in the Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- H005 22:10, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment Seems poorly cropped to me (loosing the top of the closest one)? --Herbythyme 08:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC) I already thought the same, but on the other hand, if you make it wider to enclose the chimney and the base of the first cowper they become much smaller on the image and less dominant, so actually neither solution is ideal but a compromise - and a matter of taste. Like with Green Mountain WindFarm Fluvanna 2004.jpg that is discussed below - some like it, others not. -- H005 11:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: St Martin's church in Stężyca, Poland --Sfu 07:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment nice kościół, but unhappy shadow --George Chernilevsky 08:33, 20 September 2009 (UTC) I don't understand. Where is it? --Sfu 08:11, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Comment I would say the shadow covering the entrance is a pity --Herbythyme 08:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Papilio cresphontes --ComputerHotline 10:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Both wings are almost completely out of focus. -- JovanCormac 11:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Papilio cresphontes --ComputerHotline 10:03, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. -- JovanCormac 11:25, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Urania-Worldtimeclock at the Alexanderplatz in Berlin, Germany --Kemmi.1 08:35, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Interesting picture, good quality. -- JovanCormac 11:26, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Fountain of peace in Bratislava, there is presidential palace at background. --Frettie 09:07, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Strong tilt (clockwise) and bad crop on bottom. -- JovanCormac 11:27, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Artcarfest--Mbz1 22:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very interesting image with beautiful colors. Might even make FP. -- JovanCormac 11:29, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Almabtrieb --Böhringer 20:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good.--Mbz1 22:42, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old soviet T-16 tractor tows a copper with hot bitumen. Ukraine --George Chernilevsky 19:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Original roadworks image with clear subject presentation. --Iotatau 19:36, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Boeing PT-27A-75N1 Stearman --Airwolf 15:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality for an airplane in flight. -- JovanCormac 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Boeing PT-27A-75N1 Stearman --Airwolf 15:44, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality for an airplane in flight. -- JovanCormac 11:30, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Street in Split's Old City, Croatia --Jos. 13:58, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry. Too dark (but partially overexposed), whitebalance not ok (too much blue), composition not ok (cropped door) --Berthold Werner 14:47, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Croatia, Brela --Jos. 10:08, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry, but the sea water is completely burnt at top, and strong CA (see top right). --Cayambe 14:20, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Pale Tussock caterpillar --Darius Bauzys 09:43, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Amazing animal and excellent shot. --Cayambe 12:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen, "Main gate" --Berthold Werner 09:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 12:06, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, town hall at night --Flominator 09:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Tilted and noisy. A TS lens and a tripod would be helpful. --S[1] 10:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Limmatquai with Wasserkirche and Grossmünster in Zürich (by User:Roland zh). --High Contrast 21:20, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewRequest Tilt CCW, correction need --George Chernilevsky 04:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Shosanbetsu villege wooden torii, Hokkaido by 100yen --Mbdortmund 21:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Great, if it weren't for the distortion of the pagoda and the strong chromatic aberration. -- H005 21:29, 25 September 2009 (UTC)I think the distortion is intended here --Mbdortmund 21:44, 25 September 2009 (UTC) less than 2 MPix --Berthold Werner 11:41, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 09:19, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Angel Ponte Sant Angelo by User:Jastrow --Mbdortmund 21:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent. --Cayambe 09:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Pilgrimage oak at Hersberg, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 20:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Much better light than the previous nomination. For me QI now. --Iotatau 20:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Rose window -- Albertus teolog 20:30, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent. --Cayambe 09:00, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Lydford Gorge in Devon, UK --Nilfanion 18:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Good shot, specially concidering the difficult circumstance that everything is green! --NormanB 20:43, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waymarker cross on eastern Dartmoor, UK --Nilfanion 18:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good shot. --Cayambe 18:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination War Memorial in St John's, Canada --Nilfanion 18:11, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition and otherwise also good. --Cayambe 19:38, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Araneus diadematus --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Shallow DOF and the out of focus leg beside the face spoils it as a portrais for me. Sorry--Korall 17:36, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Araneus diadematus --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment Sorry, but I do not understand where the focus here. Darius Bauzys 10:32, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Araneus diadematus --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose Nice shot, but a small DOF. In the future, try to stitch the 2 shot in a single to increase the DOF. Darius Bauzys 10:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Tachina fera --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good --Korall 17:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chalcolestes viridis --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 09:51, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Polyommatus icarus --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Oppose Not enough of the subject is in focus, plus the distracting foreground objects (grass). --Relic38 18:21, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sympetrum striolatum --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good--Korall 17:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sympetrum striolatum --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry. Very shallow DOF. Flash and higher F-number could have done the trick maybe.--Korall 17:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sympetrum striolatum --ComputerHotline 16:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion interesting composition --Mbdortmund 22:49, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A ship passing under the Hoan Bridge, Milwaukee, Wisconsin. Dori 14:51, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 20:54, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Two Sandhill Cranes flying at sunrise. Dori 14:47, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great work. QI --Jos. 15:55, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bell 407 helicopter. --Airwolf 12:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen, "Maingasse" --Berthold Werner 06:24, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice perspective, good image--Jos. 13:03, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Landmark in Cannobio (IT): the church of Sant'Anna above the cleft in the Cannobino --NormanB 23:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Pretty colours and good composition. Even with the people. Jos. 13:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny - Martin, Slovakia. Blacksmith --Pudelek 18:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline some part total black in shadow and composition error - face poorly visible --George Chernilevsky 13:33, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Clermont State Historic Site overlooking the Hudson River, New York, United States. Juliancolton 19:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Nice subject but it looks a little tilted and the colours look a bit off? (cold) -Herbythyme 12:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Clermont State Historic Site overlooking the Hudson River, New York, United States. Juliancolton 19:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Good BUT chromatic aberration, see tree trunk at left. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 07:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC) And it's tilted ccw. -- H005 14:58, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Old barn in Ontario, Canada --Relic38 03:42, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A privately-owned Hanomag. --Airwolf 21:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Would be a great picture without the van in the background, but acceptable as QI even with it. -- H005 22:13, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The mountain Glaskopf, Taunus, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport} Bit dizzy, otherwise good. -- H005 22:11, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Almabtrieb --Böhringer 19:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry, the "Tunnelblick" might be interesting, but it's not helpful in terms of quality. One can hardly see any details. -- H005 22:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Village Strečno - view from castle --Pudelek 18:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose The composition does not convince me. An unappealing highway in front, but the main part of the village cut of. Info I have added a geocode, please check for its correctness. -- H005 22:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny - Martin, Slovakia. House --Pudelek 18:58, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Anemone blanda --Berthold Werner 15:32, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great macro. -- JovanCormac 16:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sunset fog.--Mbz1 15:10, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Good depiction of Smog! --NormanB 06:58, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Portal of Grenoble cathedral. --Eusebius 08:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline The posts in the foreground bleed color, also the sharpness on the portal itself leaves a little to be desired. -- JovanCormac 16:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen, main street --Berthold Werner 08:00, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Beautiful composition, great quality. Tilted counterclockwise, though, which can be seen using rulers on the house corners closest to the left and right edges of the picture. Should be easy to fix. -- JovanCormac 16:20, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Support I can't see a tilt. These are old houses, you can't expect their walls to be exactly vertical. -- H005 17:25, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Panorama of Saint Peter's Square, Vatican City --Jackzor 07:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good work. -- H005 17:22, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Panorama of Tallinn --Gsitnikov 12:15, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment The horizon isn't horizontal -- JovanCormac 16:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose due to CW tilt, and slightly overexposed causing some blown highlights. Also I would consider a composition with a little less sky as the image is currently split across the middle. --Relic38 11:12, 25 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen, Roter Turm --Berthold Werner 12:11, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. -- Smial 13:58, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Composition is a bit busy/messy with the cars and blue-bin there. It's a shame those wires going into the tower were not a bit neater as well. --Relic38 19:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Question Shouldn't those licence plates be made unreadable for privacy reasons? -- H005 18:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny - wooden church from Rudno --Pudelek 08:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment overcontrasted for me. Too much lighting and some part in very dark shadow --George Chernilevsky 08:59, 23 September 2009 (UTC) Substantial parts of the building are lost in the shadow. This makes me decline. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny - wooden church from Rudno --Pudelek 08:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion The picture is well made. The light conditions have produced very hard contrast also here. But the important parts of the building are visible and not lost in the dark as is the case with the other picture of the same church. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:59, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good QI.--Cayambe 18:47, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Downtown Minneapolis skyline. --Bobak 18:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment Rather noisy. Strange color tones. Both seem to come from removal of haze with photoshop. (?) --Johannes Robalotoff 21:10, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Neutral}I do not find the color strange, but sharpness isn't the greatest. Otherwise it's a great view. -- H005 19:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Spectacular spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums in Rome (Italy) designed by Giuseppe Momo in 1932 --NormanB 23:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Please see the discussion below in the section 'Consensual review' ([link]) Support as discussed. -- H005 06:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Support good, and i agree with H005 --George Chernilevsky 07:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Herds, Ovis aries --Böhringer 20:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good image--Mbz1 00:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Herders --Böhringer 20:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice composition and quality.--Mbz1 00:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Crepuscular Rays --Mbz1 15:35, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very lovely atmosphere and illumination, excellent quality --George Chernilevsky 20:38, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Stężyca, Poland. --Sfu 14:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. There is no real problem with this image. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Panorama of the Wieprz river, Poland. --Sfu 14:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice. Some minor CA in the trees, but not distracting for me. --Relic38 19:10, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Scallop shell Flexopecten ponticus. Possible died out (extinct) approximate in 1990 --George Chernilevsky 10:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good -- Darius Bauzys 13:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny --Pudelek 08:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. -- Sfu 14:02, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good --Mbdortmund 13:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination St. Felizitas-Kirche Lüdinghausen --Mbdortmund 22:38, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good QI --Cayambe 07:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The river Cannobino --NormanB 22:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good QI IMO. --Cayambe 07:39, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Market square "Kornmarkt" in Trier --Berthold Werner 16:42, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok IMO. --Cayambe 07:38, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A good example of a Dartmoor menhir. The picture is not tilted - the stone is leaning :) -Herbythyme 16:19, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Okay, I'm going to believe the creator that it is just the stone that is leaning :) Very good guality, great value too. I wonder, if you know the origin of the small pool. Is it just a rain water? Thanks.--Mbz1 19:36, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Laagna Road, the main artery of the Lasnamäe district of Tallinn. (created by Hannu) --D-Kuru 02:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Same problem as with the other Laagna road picture: Too noisy. JPEG artifacts, especially on the building on the right. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:32, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Laagna Road, the main artery of the Lasnamäe district of Tallinn. (created by Hannu) --D-Kuru 02:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Too noisy. JPEG artifacts, especially on the building on the right. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:29, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Marpesia petreus --Korall 18:53, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice illumination, head good in focus. QI for me --George Chernilevsky 09:07, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A false blister beetle (Oedemera simplex) -- Alvesgaspar 23:23, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose Sorry, but: low resolution, blurred image, controversial framing -- Darius Bauzys 11:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Yerba mate (tea) --Lucash 22:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Review Colour balance very unnatural. Correction Request. And tiny increase sharpness --George Chernilevsky 04:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Fresco - Albertus teolog 09:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment The dark triangle in the bottom right corner should be removed. -- JovanCormac 15:39, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Memorial at Hinzert Concentration Camp, Germany. This is a new version, reprocessed from the original Raw-file, of the candidate picture below. --Cayambe 10:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Nordkirchen, Skulptur --Mbdortmund 21:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very high quality --George Chernilevsky 07:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Nordkirchen, Skulptur --Mbdortmund 21:15, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very high quality --George Chernilevsky 07:52, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Gołąb, Poland. --Sfu 19:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Loretan house in Gołąb, Poland. --Sfu 19:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 06:27, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Argynnis paphia--Korall 16:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good --Mbdortmund 18:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination An example of a Dartmoor waymark cross in a typical Dartmoor setting.--Herbythyme 10:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice composition and good in general. --Cayambe 13:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 08:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good QI IMO. --Cayambe 13:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 08:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good in my opinion. --Cayambe 15:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 08:11, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Also good IMO. --Cayambe 15:14, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Children dancing. Yann 23:46, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good.--Mbz1 18:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Brass band, Geneva. Yann 23:15, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Not bad.--Mbz1 18:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Children painting. Yann 22:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good atmosphere and colours --Mbdortmund 17:29, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Children painting. Yann 22:41, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline crop and the distortion of the face --Mbdortmund 17:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A panorama from southern Dartmoor (UK) annotated to show some of the features that can be seen. The quality evening light may add a dimension :) -Herbythyme 14:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great light, good quality and the walking person make it for me. Very nice composition!--Mbz1 18:59, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Façade of the Town Hall in Trzebiatów --JDavid 15:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion only geocoding is missing --Mbdortmund 22:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Info geocoding added JDavid 22:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Support Good enough for QI IMO. Picture would be even better if a slight perspective correction was done like explained e.g. [here] -- NormanB 20:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Brass band, Geneva. Yann 22:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 07:02, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Beautiful example of dwarf galleries on the façade of the Duomo Santa Maria Cathedral in Pisa (Italy) --NormanB 22:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice composition. --Cayambe 06:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination sculpture in Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 20:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Sommerhausen castle --Berthold Werner 06:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 07:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Male Sympetrum vulgatum --Korall 22:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:57, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Tower of castle in Nové Město nad Metují --Kozuch 13:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok but please add Geocoding --Berthold Werner 17:27, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Coordinates added.--Kozuch 15:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination View of Wieprz river --Sfu 07:14, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. --Cayambe 07:00, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sydney skyline, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 09:33, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good quality and very nice colours --George Chernilevsky 11:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Female American Goldfinch (Carduelis tristis) --Relic38 02:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice --Mbdortmund 04:19, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Common toad --Korall 22:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Fairly sharp, however the composition and somewhat harsh lighting overpower this one. One ot the other versions may have a chance at QI though. --Relic38 02:30, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sculpture of a woman --Mbdortmund 21:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Tottiford Dam on Dartmoor. --Nilfanion 17:49, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice image, the fact that it is a "low water" one makes it more interesting + quality fine. --Herbythyme 18:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Epitoke form of Nereis succinea. -- Lycaon 15:39, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Lovely image -Herbythyme 15:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination 1:1 replica of the European ISS module Columbus on display at the Berlin Air Show (ILA) 2008. --Iotatau 15:25, 20 September 2009 (UTC+)
Promotion Good picture. --Cayambe 20:45, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Down tor stone circle and row on southern Dartmoor. While it is one of many this is a good example. -Herbythyme 13:42, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 19:24, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Shopping mall Linden-Center at Prerower Platz, Berlin. --Iotatau 12:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Both quality and composition are good. -- JovanCormac 13:32, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Entrance to Sommerhausen castle --Berthold Werner 10:39, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok for me, despite a somewhat tight crop at right. --Cayambe 15:06, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Alley with plane trees, main cemetery in Luxembourg City --Cayambe 19:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose Nice mood, but unfortunately sharpness isn't the greatest and there's strong CA to the left. -- H005 16:19, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Gniezno Doors - Albertus teolog 20:21, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment Distortion issue --George Chernilevsky 10:38, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Distortions occur at the object, rather than photographs - Albertus teolog 14:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Painting of Tintoretto, "Assumption of Mary" --Berthold Werner 09:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Castle of Náchod, Czech Republic --Kozuch 21:33, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Quality fall-off towards border but above the QI threshold for me if you add a geocode. --Iotatau 23:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Comment Geocode added.--Kozuch 08:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks. --Iotatau 09:35, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Physalis sp. twins --ComputerHotline 18:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion For garden plants ID enough, quality is good --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Physalis sp. twins --ComputerHotline 18:00, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion For garden plants ID enough, quality is good --George Chernilevsky 08:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen, coats of arm --Mbdortmund 12:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice composition --George Chernilevsky 13:21, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 12:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Schloss Nordkirchen --Mbdortmund 12:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very accurate in trifles --George Chernilevsky 13:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination MAN Lion's City double-decker bus of line 150 passing by. --Iotatau 10:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good quality, nice transport --George Chernilevsky 12:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Ciurana, Spain --Elemaki 21:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionQuestion Can you add a geocode? -- H005 21:40, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Done. --Elemaki 11:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Some clouds a bit blown but otherwise an attractive view. --Iotatau 23:13, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport -- H005 16:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment dislike crop at left and top --George Chernilevsky 12:51, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose as per George -- H005 16:36, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
WithdrawnComment There is CA visible at the left edge of the roof and on the trees far left and right. Possible to fix it? --Johannes Robalotoff20:38, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] I added a note at the possible CA at the roof, can you please check this and add further propably further positions? --Berthold Werner 09:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Added two other positions now, but you already got the most serious one. --Johannes Robalotoff19:49, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Ich frage mich jetzt ob das CA ist oder ein anderes Problem, CA müßte doch eigentlich vor allem in den Ecken auftreten ber nicht wild übers Bild verteilt. --Berthold Werner 08:07, 19 September 2009 (UTC) I will continue in English, so that the rest here will understand us too: If you look closely on the image, you can see that the effect exists also in other regions and increases towards the corners. It is only that it is most visible at edges with high contrast as those that are marked by the notes. --Johannes Robalotoff14:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination Piazza sant'Ignazio, Rome. --Myrabella 11:49, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment The crop is a bit odd, would it be possible to center the doorway a bit more and remove the people in the lower left corner making out? Tiptoety 03:03, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks for your advice. I uploaded a new version, slightly cropped and without the couple of lovers in the corner. --Myrabella 22:37, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Amazing. How did you do that? -- H005 19:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Nicely photoshopped :) -Herbythyme 12:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Marbled rock crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus, female. -- George Chernilevsky 19:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion QI for me. --Iotatau 21:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Center of Luxembourg City.--Cayambe 18:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Something is strange here. Looking at the shadows of the cars and trees, it must have been sunny, but it doesn't look sunny. By the way: there is a tiny speck of dust in the air that you might want to get rid of, see my note. --NormanB 00:36, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Thanks for the comment. The dust spot is now removed. In general: it was a sunny day, in early spring. The atmosphere was like that of the picture... --Cayambe 09:37, 14 September 2009 (UTC) I think it is ok. --Berthold Werner 08:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination St Martin's Church in Stężyca, Poland. Photo by Sfu
Promotion Good. -- Smial 09:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Seal Rocks--Mbz1 05:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality, composition and atmosphere. Nice effect on the water spray. -- JovanCormac 06:56, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A singing man--Mbz1 00:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality, and nice composition as well. -- JovanCormac 06:52, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A fire helicopter with helicopter bucket --Mbz1 00:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good --Mbdortmund 00:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sculptures of dolphins on a bridge--JDavid 01:11, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. -- JovanCormac 06:53, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Fruit of American Ash tree. --Relic38 04:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. Pity that DOF is so low. -- JovanCormac 06:54, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Cichlasomatinae hybrid --KoS 09:34, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline nice fish, but quality very low. Strong CA at top, very noised, not well background (yellow part). I'm sorry, but i decline it --George Chernilevsky 09:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Orangerie Nordkirchen by --Mbdortmund 21:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice, good composition, better crop than the one below. --Relic38 04:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Part of sewer net in Wiesbaden has been under preservation of sites of historic interest since 2003 by paddy --Mbdortmund 21:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Interesting image, good quality -- H005 21:30, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Young swan (Cygnus olor), Lake Geneva. Yann 20:45, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition, etc. --Cayambe 06:15, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Collegiate church in Tum -- Albertus teolog 18:34, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 06:22, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Office buildings in Luxembourg-Hollerich. --Cayambe 17:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Badly tilted. -- JovanCormac 07:01, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Pentatoma rufipes or simply a bug --Alchemist-hp 16:50, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion DOF can be better but I think the image is good for showing the bug. --Korall 17:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC) This is a maximum of DOF without focus stacking. --Alchemist-hp 17:55, 18 September 2009 (UTC)CommentI did promomte, didnt? I? =) Ive tried to take pictures of these bugs too and I know its hard to get very deep dof. --Korall 11:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chapel and curcifix at the main cemetry in Trier --Berthold Werner 17:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Sorry, but there is a large blurry spot in the trees at the very left. --Cayambe 19:22, 17 September 2009 (UTC) This are pollen or seed from from the tree, it's not a dustspot on the lens or sensor --Berthold Werner 17:41, 18 September 2009 (UTC). Ok, a good picture. --Cayambe 20:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good --Mbdortmund 00:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Relief by Lucien Wercollier (1908-2002) on World War II Memorial at Capellen, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 20:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Looks good. Meets the QI-criteria. --High Contrast 13:32, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination One of Dartmoor's best known tors in evening light from a less usual angle, UK.-Herbythyme 11:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality, interesting place. --Mbz1 09:37, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A stream before pump station, estuary --JDavid 09:52, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good infrastructure and landscape image. Exposure handled well (clouds). A bit CA towards borders. --Iotatau 11:18, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Little crab Xantho poressa, female at spawning time --George Chernilevsky 07:04, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Iotatau 11:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A male FootmaN moth (Eilema uniola) -- Alvesgaspar 23:18, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 09:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A sand wasp digging (Bembix oculata) -- Alvesgaspar 23:16, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Cayambe 09:36, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination River Avon on Dartmoor, UK --Nilfanion 23:09, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Erasmusbrug, Rotterdam, the Netherlands --Massimo Catarinella 21:40, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good cityscape. --Iotatau 08:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Elementary school in Germany. --High Contrast 21:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:37, 18 September 2009 (UTC) Comment ... although tight crop and no perspective correction. Put a wide angle lens on your Christmas wish list :-) --Iotatau 11:21, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination a dead hard disc after a head crash --Alchemist-hp 19:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Very nice shot! If the DOF (Depth Of Field) would have been greater it would have been even better, but as a close-up of the platter, this is IMO certainly good enough for QI. -- NormanB 23:48, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The St. Mary's minster in Aldersbach, Bavaria, Germany. --High Contrast 17:29, 17 September 2009 (UTC). Comment There is a slight ACW tilt. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 07:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good now. --Cayambe 08:48, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:19, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Meadow --Sfu 15:07, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Sharpness could be better (flowers). -- JovanCormac 15:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Support very good for me --George Chernilevsky 15:26, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia --Pudelek 10:00, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Salmon Pink birdeater. Go back from my photocamera --George Chernilevsky 09:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion All of these spider shots have good quality. -- JovanCormac 15:27, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Iruya, Argentina --Elemaki 22:17, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Overall quality is too low to be called a QI (sharpness!). -- JovanCormac 15:32, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A small bell tower in Uppsala, Sweden, photo by EnDumEn. -- Smial 22:01, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Image noise is borderline, but in general quality is sufficient IMO. -- JovanCormac 15:34, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Fog at Land's End.--Mbz1 16:30, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Some CA, see rocks at left. Otherwise good. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 20:13, 16 September 2009 (UTC) You mean the big rock, or the rocks in foreground? Thank you.--Mbz1 00:30, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Yes, the rock in the foreground, at left. It can be fixed easily.--Cayambe 09:35, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Any better?--Mbz1 00:57, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Mmh... but after reflection, it's a rather minor flaw. So ok for me.--Cayambe 07:27, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Thomisidae sp. in a flower. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment In both shots, just about the only thing that is in focus are two of the spider's leg pairs. IMO the DOF should encompass at least the entire spider. -- JovanCormac 15:37, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose I know it is difficult to get a wider DOF for such a tiny object, but nonetheless this is far too low. -- H005 18:02, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Suribachikubo Cirque, Mts. Kiso, Honshu, Japan --Σ64 13:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment Chromatic aberration, mainly on the rocks at top left and right. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 14:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Mt. Ho-osan, Mts. Akaishi, Honshu, Japan --Σ64 13:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Mt. Ho-osan, Mts. Akaishi, Honshu, Japan --Σ64 13:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Good, but CA on tree branches at right top. Can you fix it?--Cayambe 19:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
NominationCarcinus aestuarii on a night beach --George Chernilevsky 13:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Sharpness is insufficient in some parts, but overall acceptable for QI. -- H005 18:05, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bismarck tower in Markneukirchen, Germany, photo by Aka. -- Smial 21:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent quality -- H005 21:42, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Pope's balcony on the St.Peter's Basilica in Rome --NormanB 19:48, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. -- H005 20:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The tower of the Palazzo Pubblico in Siena. -- H005 19:49, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Excellent detail. The vertical panorama is interesting :-) --NormanB 19:57, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 18:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The watch tower of the Mogoşoaia Palace, north-west of Bucharest, Romania.Andrei Stroe 07:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Good picture but a bit dark IMO. Can you light it up? Try levels or curves. --Cayambe 13:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC) I made a slight improvement. If I light it up more, it may affect detail and the colours of the sky. Andrei Stroe 15:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Support Not necesary, IMHO light is quite right now. -- H005 16:23, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The ventilation furnaces of the Mogoşoaia Palace kitchen, as seen from the watch tower. By --Radu Ana Maria --Andrei Stroe 07:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC). Same comment as previous. --Cayambe 13:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Done the same fix as previous. :) Andrei Stroe 18:40, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good now, IMO --Cayambe 19:09, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationPorte du Baptistère in Fontainebleau palace. --Eusebius 12:45, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Good picture, but I think it could benefit from a tighter crop. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC) good quality --George Chernilevsky 05:24, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Elfin Lakes in Garibaldi Provincial Park (by User:Radicale) --High Contrast 20:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Please crop that tree out from left hand side. --kallerna 21:11, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Very nice panorama! If you crop that tree off I will support -- NormanB 22:43, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Info I noticed that High Contrast is not the creator of this picture but only the promotor. So I took the liberty of cropping the treetrunk of myself. --NormanB 22:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Support As promised. --NormanB 22:56, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny. Old house --Pudelek 19:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. -- H005 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Open air museum Múzeum slovenskej dediny, Slovakia. Old house --Pudelek 19:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion The shadow is not ideal, but with overall quality it's acceptable. -- H005 16:27, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Ružomberok, Slovakia - Hrabovo (part of city) --Pudelek 19:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Although sharpness is just borderline -- H005 21:50, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Independence square in Minsk, Belarus. —zedlik 00:54, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry. The big shadow spoils the picture. Please return to the spot when the light is appropriate. --Cayambe 08:10, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Unfortunately it was the only chance to get to that spot. —zedlik 09:17, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Ruins of Landstein pilgrimage church, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good.--Cayambe 07:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Ružomberok, Slovakia - Hrabovo (part of city) --Pudelek 19:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 07:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination World War II Concentration Camp Memorial at Hinzert, Germany.--Cayambe 18:30, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion very nice --Pudelek 19:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Göttingen campus in spring (morning mood). --Jonathan Groß 17:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Nice mood, but too noisy + lot of CA. --kallerna 18:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationAnax imperator eclosion --Loz 15:52, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationPogona vitticeps close-up --George Chernilevsky 10:12, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Again a very good animal picture with sand. Dared to correct your German grammar on description page. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:59, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Une marmotte des Alpes (marmota marmota). --Ymaup 09:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Too many overexposed regions, even on the main subject. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:47, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old barn in Rural Ontario, Canada. --Relic38 02:39, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent shot.--Cayambe 15:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Medieval Castle at Sanem, Luxembourg. --Cayambe 16:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Looks good. Tiptoety 03:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chersonesos Taurica. Antique ruins and the Cathedral of Saint Vladimir -- George Chernilevsky 14:28, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Slightly distorted at right, but ok for me. --Cayambe 14:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Trullo Siamese ("Conjoined twin Trullo") in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 11:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 14:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A frog in water. --Korall 20:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Excellent shot, but sorry: the exact ID is needed. Could be arvalis. --Cayambe 15:11, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Now I have asked the question here, ill se if anyone wants to answer. Comment Weel instead of waiting for the answer on DEwiki I did it the evil (though in Sweden not illegal) way. I went to the same spot today, found a frog of the same size that looked like this (and most probably is theis one) one, took in in my hand and took a photograph of the underside of the foot of the frog. The size of the bump of the foot indicates it is an arvalis so ill go with that one.
Promotion Ok and good. --Cayambe 20:56, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Street musicians in Golden Gate Park--Mbz1 18:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice, except the tilted? column. Ok for me.--Cayambe 22:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC) And as you're at it, a reduce of light would be appreciated too. -- H005 23:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC) To what side and how many degrees it should be turned to? Thank you.--Mbz1 23:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC) I do not think it's tilted, the lamppost skewness is probably caused by perspective. -- H005 19:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationCentaurea nigra. Maedin 17:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Unsufficient DOF --Ymaup 11:02, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
WithdrawnComment Could you add bit brightness? --kallerna 08:58, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Done as requested. --Massimo Catarinella15:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Comment Still rather dark IMHO. -- H005 22:48, 12 September 2009 (UTC) That's because the panorama was made with an overcast sky without sunshine. Not every picture has to be made with bright sunny skies. Increasing the brightness now would only make the sky overexposed. --Massimo Catarinella 00:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC) You can make the image brighter without making the sky overexposed. Create a blurred mask on the sky and using this mask for selection do a curve correction on the rest. Takes ten minutes, but you do not loose your rainy clouds then. I tried it on your image and it worked without visible artifacts. --Johannes Robalotoff19:38, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] I've uploaded a new version where the sky is darker and the houses brighter. Took me < two minutes btw, not ten. -- H005 20:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Support Looks good now. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:01, 13 September 2009 (UTC) I'll make a better version when I'll have some free time on my hands. The new edit does reduces the darkness, but greatly increases the noise (look at the tree for instance) which is unnecessary. You can't btw upload a file directly over someone else's. You need to upload it as a derivative. --Massimo Catarinella21:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] I disagree about noise and way of upload, but this is not the place to discuss that. -- H00519:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Promotion Very good too. Keep 'em coming :-) Lycaon 17:22, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good and nice Albertus teolog 09:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination a Polish PZL-104 Wilga --Airwolf 12:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment} Good quality, but I'd crop it more on the right side. -- H005 22:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Comment minor correction request - spots on the sky --George Chernilevsky 12:42, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Done Spots are now taken care of. Maedin 05:51, 15 September 2009 (UTC) Looks OK now. Lycaon 08:01, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Argynnis paphia --Korall 11:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Unfortunate plane of focus. Lycaon 17:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Thomisidae sp. --ComputerHotline 10:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination macro photo of a cross extion of the flower bud of a Common Blue Passion Flower--null 11:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Too small to be considerd. Lycaon 11:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Spring - Bois de Vincenne - Paris - France. --Thesupermat 06:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Belle composition, pourriez-vous ajouter le géocode ? --Ymaup 10:57, 15 September 2009 (UTC) fait --Thesupermat 20:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old Barn in Rural Ontario, Canada --Relic38 00:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. Nothing to complain about. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:55, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Caterpillar of Pseudosphinx tetrio in Guadeloupe --KoS 15:23, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Could use some denoise of the backgrond but quality overall is sufficient for me. Nice caterpillar.--Korall 18:25, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Air show in San Franciso . --Mbz1 01:28, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. Would benefit from a crop (too much sky IMO).--Cayambe 14:14, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Skoda Superb II by --Blackfalcon 21:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Domestic geese. --Von.grzanka 20:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Nice birds, but quality is not OK, overexposed --George Chernilevsky 05:17, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Hermit crab Clibanarius erythropus -- George Chernilevsky 19:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Marbled rock crab Pachygrapsus marmoratus, female at spawning time. -- George Chernilevsky 19:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Flawless image, as far as I can see. --Johannes Robalotoff 19:49, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationSorbus aria. Maedin 19:23, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 07:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationPaeonia lactiflora 'Bowl of Beauty'. Maedin 18:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent. Cayambe 07:06, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Baroque architrave at Bad Homburg castle, Germany --Johannes Robalotoff 13:10, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. For documentation it would be interesting to have a separate closeup image of the "coats of arms area" since the golden inscription in this image is hardly readable. --Iotatau 22:13, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment For documentation it's also good to add geocoding --Berthold Werner 06:03, 14 September 2009 (UTC) Geocoding is added now. I will look for the closeup in my image archive. Not sure if I have one. --Johannes Robalotoff 07:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
]] 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination St. Ambrosius, a former riding hall --Berthold Werner 08:51, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Supercell --MatP 05:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Comment Very good, BUT chromatic aberration visible on the wooded horizon at left. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 16:31, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Is it better now? Thanks --MatP 17:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Ok now --Cayambe 17:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Corndon Tor, one of many tors on Dartmoor in the UK.--Herbythyme 16:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment CA (red fringe) on rock at top left. Can you fix it? Otherwise good. --Cayambe 22:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC) How odd :) I could see some blue on the right hand side when I looked closely? Anyway hopefully fixed, thanks -Herbythyme 07:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment The fringe has become blue (top left), but better so. :-). Ok for me now --Cayambe 10:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Grand-Ducal Palace in Luxembourg City. The Palace is in a rather narrow street.--Cayambe 18:44, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion This is a very good picture in terms of composition and technical aspects. I can live with the minor clipping of a pinnacle and some unavoidable distortion effects. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Another very good gecko picture. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:08, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The secret passageway Passetto di Borgo and Castel Sant'Angelo in Rome (Italy) by night at full moon. --NormanB 22:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionCommentThere is a red dust spot on the brick wall, there are several white pixels on the stone in the foreground and the sky is noisy. Howerver, I like the atmosshpere. --Korall 22:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Thnx Korall! I removed the spots and pixels and uploaded a new version. The little noise (when viewed in full screen) is unavoidable concidering the lighting conditions. I could make the sky pitch black, but that looks very unnatural. --NormanB 21:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Support good night view --George Chernilevsky 07:51, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Vanessa cardui --Korall 11:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion DOF borderline, but ok for me --Cayambe 09:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Witch's hat mushroom. --Dschwen 16:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline No comments?! --Dschwen 13:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Yep. Colours are gorgeous but plane of focus is a bit unfortunate Lycaon 07:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waxy Monkey Tree Frogs--Mbz1 02:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Author must be a registered user. -- George Chernilevsky 07:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Mbz1 is Mila, so it's ok. Maedin 08:09, 13 September 2009 (UTC). Good. --Cayambe 09:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Inkerman orthodox cave monastery of St.Clement (VIII-IX century) --George Chernilevsky 21:27, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. Very interesting --Berthold Werner 08:42, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Wayside cross in winter. --UrLunkwill 21:12, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition. --Cayambe 09:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination How to make a fortune teller by user:MichaelPhilip--Korall 20:25, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Fine. --UrLunkwill 21:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Puerto Banús at dusk, re-processed, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 15:08, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Some small problems (stitching) with the boat on the right, if cropped (or fixed) QI. Lycaon 15:21, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Lighthouse in Kustaanmiekka. --kallerna 12:07, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition --Cayambe 15:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Trier, "Altes Zollhaus" (Old Tollhouse) --Berthold Werner 11:18, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Fine, could be even improved with a slight sharpening. Lycaon 13:59, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Done. --Berthold Werner 15:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Regent's Canal --Aqwis 19:26, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition --Cayambe 09:29, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Anigozanthos with dew --Mbz1 16:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Support Something weird I can not really define, but nice shot BTW! Ymaup 09:30, 12 September 2009 (UTC) One would expect a full species id from a botanical garden specimen. Lycaon 13:57, 12 September 2009 (UTC) A full species id is added.--Mbz1 16:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC) note taken. Lycaon 16:56, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Thomisidae sp. in a flower. --ComputerHotline 08:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: The beach of Cerca Nova, Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 21:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Rana arvalis--Korall 19:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Rana arvalis--Korall 19:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: The Door of Oulu Market Hall. --Estormiz 16:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: House and chapel at Ehner, Luxembourg --Cayambe 15:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
.
NominationMenger-Sponge-Iteration-Row from 0 to 4 iterations. --Niabot 19:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport No doubt. Excellent quality! --NormanB 20:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationMenger Sponge after 4 iterations. --Niabot 19:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport No doubt. Excellent quality! --NormanB 20:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Mt. Ainodake, Mts. Akaishi, Honshu, Japan --Σ64 13:52, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 14:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationCarcinus aestuarii on a night beach --George Chernilevsky 13:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Good. Yann 14:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Yet another Red Arrows photo. --Airwolf 11:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 09:23, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination La Adriática Building, Seville, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 08:56, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good. --Dschwen 13:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Support By my means strong FP candidate--Rünno 15:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn Looks tilted slightly CW. Some ghosting (bots moving between exposures, but at that resolution its ok), and a stitching error in the mast below the BENABOLA sign. --Dschwen 13:33, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Very beautifull. But there are a few white pixels in the left (yellow) light reflexion in the water and one in the middle (red) light reflexion that I think you need to fix. --NormanB21:00, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Comment Diliff has re-blended and re-stitched now, so hopefully these things will be fixed in the new version. Withdrawing and will nom the new one. Maedin21:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Decline Tight crop, and the sky is overexposed. Ymaup 07:36, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sparrenburg castle in Bielefeld, Germany. --Dschwen 20:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Technically very good. Would support if slightly cropped and two strange stains in the sky region where removed with clone. (Dirt on sensor?). --Johannes Robalotoff 20:54, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Have removed the dust spots, but I strongly believe the crop is good as it is. --Dschwen 02:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you for removing the dust. The crop thing is a matter of taste, thus I promote it now. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - part of Plague Column --Pudelek 10:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good, as the next one. --Cayambe 10:15, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Vlaming bridge in Bruges, Belgium -- MJJR 19:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Comment The wall at the lower left is IMO 'too long'. Could you crop the lowermost part away? --Cayambe 08:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC) -- DoneMJJR 21:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Ok, but IMO the crop should still be tighter: top (too much skye) and bottom, sorry. If done, I'll support --Cayambe 13:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC) I don't think that a further cropping will improve the image, sorry. -- MJJR 09:51, 12 September 2009 (UTC) Ok IMHO --Berthold Werner 11:22, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Bones of dead animal in Säppi, Pori, Finland. --kallerna 08:47, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Closeup of snag found in Multiharju, Seitseminen. --kallerna 08:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Sallow (Xanthia icteritia). --kallerna 21:09, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Unsufficient DOF. --Ymaup 08:01, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Borowie, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland. --Sfu 08:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good, just the cables are pity. -- H005 16:15, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum --ComputerHotline 07:01, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good picture. I like this most from all these gecko pictures here. But do we really need them all? --Johannes Robalotoff 20:18, 10 September 2009 (UTC), QI is not a best of. The more pictures we can positively review the more choice our "customers" have. --Dschwen 02:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bearded Dragon Pogona vitticeps close up --George Chernilevsky 09:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good.--Rünno 15:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Odd crop, rather poor composition. Juliancolton 13:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion I like this one! --Kirua 16:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination California Sea Lion (Zalophus californianus) at the Bronx Zoo, New York City. Juliancolton 01:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment I think this could benefit from a much tighter crop. -- H005 22:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Done, thanks. Juliancolton 00:29, 11 September 2009 (UTC) Yep, much better now. :-) -- H005 07:12, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination California Sea Lion (Zalophus californianus) at the Bronx Zoo, New York City. Juliancolton 01:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose Too much going on in the background that distracts from the main scene. The other one is much better here. -- H005 22:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Natural Bridges State Park--Mbz1 01:21, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment CW tilt? --Cayambe 06:50, 10 September 2009 (UTC) I believe it is an illusion because of different haight of the duct. I checked the horizon, and it appears to be straight.--Mbz1 13:12, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Mmh.. but ok, because it's really nice --Cayambe 13:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chapel at Hinzert, World War II concentration camp, Germany. --Cayambe 20:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion ok --Pudelek 14:39, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Withdrawn Heavy CA (see tree branches), visible in the thumb pic. Can you remove it? --Cayambe12:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] Comment That's pretty strange at f/22.. What lens did you use? --Mr.checker17:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply] CA should not be affected by the aperture. It is the 24-105 L-lens from Canon. It was at 24mm and there is lots of contrast between sky and branches. I suppose I could remove it. But that might take some time. I'll change this to withdraw for now. --Dschwen02:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination Chalcolestes viridis --ComputerHotline 10:52, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline sky -Pudelek 14:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Beach of Karhuluoto. --kallerna 11:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Germany, Trier, the market place called "Kornmarkt" --Berthold Werner 10:49, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good picture, nothing to complain about. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Portrait of a Sympetrum vulgatum--Korall 22:58, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Ciconia ciconia nest --Korall 21:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Composition is really nice, but birds seems little underexposed --Cesco77 08:37, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Fine with me.--Mbz1 23:22, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Kuninkaanportti in Kustaanmiekka, Suomenlinna. --kallerna 20:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry but this lacks clarity & the sharpness could be better, good but not "quality". --Shizhao 18:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC) For me, sharpness is no problem at all here (better than a picture with software sharpening artifacts). But a missing English description or hint for relevance of the subject makes me oppose too. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:27, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Helix pomatia --Korall 16:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Bicycle, Amsterdam, the Netherlands --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good quality. Maedin 19:30, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Domtoren, Utrecht, the Netherlands --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion It is a shame about the strong shadow on the rest of the church, but the tower itself is very good. Maedin 19:29, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Taquile Island, Titicaca Lake (Perú) --Elemaki 10:52, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment I'm missing a geocode. -- H005 11:01, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Comment I do not know what a geocode is or how it works. --Elemaki 12:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC) CommentHere you get everything you want to know about geocoding. Be that as it may, Geocoding is no criteria for a QI-image. --High Contrast 23:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC) True, but I usually do not promote (albeit neither decline) images that should ahve a geocode but don't. Anyway, I believe this is also lacking sharpness. -- H005 20:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Piaggio Douglas PD.808, a rare airplane type of which only 29 planes have ever been built. -- H005 09:48, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok --Pudelek 14:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Borowie. --Sfu 08:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice place --Pudelek 14:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - city castle (Mestský hrad) --Pudelek 21:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Very nice picture. Very usable, good quality. Note: Geocoding would be appreciated! --NormanB 22:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination File:Kremnica - The Plague Column.jpg --Pudelek 21:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 19:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Geocoding would be appreciated! --NormanB 22:23, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Helvetinjärvi at the Helvetinjärvi National Park. --kallerna 11:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Overexposed, strong stitching error (see image note). The use of a polar filter would have made it better, too. -- H005 20:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Some lepidoptera are eating banana juice --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Intersting -- H005 20:49, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Wood bridge in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. Lycaon 10:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion This photo remind me a fantasy atmosphere, really good! --Cesco77 08:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Waterfalls in Plitvicka National Park --Romanceor 06:43, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Looks very artificial and is not very well cropped. Lycaon 10:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Alamo in San Antonio. --Dschwen 19:32, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good in every aspect. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Île Louët - Morlaix's bay - Finistère - France --Thesupermat 19:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Belle photo ! Yann 10:42, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Raindrops on a blade of grass. --Dschwen 16:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Any idea what kind of grass it is? I mean, it is a beautiful picture with good quality but I think we have the policy that organisms should be identified. -Korall 21:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Uh oh... ...uhm.. ..the kind that grows on the shore of Lake Michigan? --Dschwen 21:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC) I'd tend to promote as the subject here is more the raindrops than the grass species. Lycaon 10:05, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Plate compactor --Mr.checker 15:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Well done. There are small overexposed regions, but these do not damage any details or color tones. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Aglais urticae --Korall 11:07, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Strong overexposure on the right wing, especially in the red channel, spoils colours. Wings are very reflecting with this special kind of butterfly, hence the problem. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya) - part of Plague Column --Pudelek 10:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 06:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old clapper bridge in central Dartmoor, UK (cropped version).--Herbythyme 09:47, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Dschwen 15:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Comment You might concider decreasing the colorsaturation a bit. --NormanB 15:35, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old clapper bridge in central Dartmoor, UK.--Herbythyme 08:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Blown sky (maybe croppable?). Lycaon 09:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Thanks - I was after critiques, I'll play with it & maybe try again :) -Herbythyme 09:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Comment You might concider decreasing the colorsaturation a bit. --NormanB 15:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Corbels cut for the use of the old London bridge at a granite quarry on Dartmoor, UK.--Herbythyme 08:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Interesting subject and good quality.--Mbz1 21:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Palazzo Farnese in Rome, Italy. --Myrabella 08:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good exposure, sharpness. Not perfect with respect to noise and composition, but certainly good enough to deserve quality image status. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Belfort in Brugge, Belgium. --Adiel lo 06:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice. Maedin 06:53, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Germany, Trier, "Alter Krahnen" (Old crane) --Berthold Werner 12:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Unfortunate light: Main subject in the shadow below a bright sky. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Colosseum seen trough the columns of the Temple of Venus and Rome, Rome. --Marcok 22:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Image Composition: Much sky, buildings dropped to lower image border. Unclear subject: Neither Colosseum nor Temple of Venus adequately represented. Distracting fence in foreground. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:29, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Outlet glacier --Böhringer 10:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Excellent picture. --NormanB 16:10, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationAgalychnis callidryas close up, Las Horquetas, Costa Rica. Lycaon 08:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Amazing eye.--Mbz1 15:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Germany, Trier, "Haus Venedig" (Venice house) --Berthold Werner 08:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Kremnica (Kremnitz, Körmöcbánya), Slovakia - old man and old street --Pudelek 21:01, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A statue into a wind farm, Sedini, Sardinia, Italy.--Cesco77 18:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
Nomination: Lighthouse in Kustaanmiekka. --kallerna 14:37, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Kiruna church, Sweden. --Rünno 20:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Quality is not so good in the corners, and the cut-off top spoils it for me. --Dschwen 20:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A Belarusian Su-27UBM. The aircraft crashed two days after the photo was taken. Picture re-nominated after an upgrade of quality. --Airwolf 19:24, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice, clear picture. --NormanB 00:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Pelecanus crispus at Beijing Zoo. --Shizhao 18:33, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 08:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old fortifications at the Salbert hill. --ComputerHotline 17:42, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Not really FP but definitely QI. --Korall 15:55, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Luxembourg gardens seen from the Montparnasse Tower, Paris--Kirua 15:01, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 16:59, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Holy Trinity´s sculpture situated on Náměstí Míru, Czech Republic--Elemaki 13:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 16:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Menhir in Luxembourg --Cayambe 10:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 12:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sculpture in Soest --Mbdortmund 21:48, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good.--Mbz1 17:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Sobolew, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland --Sfu 12:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good--Rünno 21:07, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Thomisidae sp. --ComputerHotline 08:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Red channel entirely blown. Lots of lost detail. Maedin 16:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Thomisidae sp. in a flower. --ComputerHotline 08:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Red channel entirely blown. Lots of lost detail. Maedin 16:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Thomisidae sp. in a flower. --ComputerHotline 08:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Red channel entirely blown. Lots of lost detail. Maedin 16:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Caterpillar of the Banded Tussock Moth (Halysidota tessellaris. --Dschwen 20:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionCommentGood quality overall but there is a black dot on the right of the lower right black tassel that might or might not be a dust spot.--Korall 20:11, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Yep. Removed. --Dschwen 16:22, 7 September 2009 (UTC) Then I promote --Korall 18:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Rana arvalis--Korall 19:16, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Low DOF but great light. Good for QI IMO --Kirua 08:14, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Castle of São Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Really nice and great size. Maedin 19:21, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Helvetinkolu at the Helvetinjärvi National Park. --kallerna 11:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Cemetery chapel in Parysów, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland. --Sfu 09:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 19:13, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Church in Borowie, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland. --Sfu 09:39, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
WARNING: third template parameter added – please remove.
Nomination Papilionidae --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Animals from a zoo (i.c. butterfly garden) need a better id. Will support if corrected. Lycaon 06:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Morpho sp. --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Animals from a zoo (i.c. butterfly garden) need a better id. Will support if corrected. Lycaon 06:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Papilionidae --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Animals from a zoo (i.c. butterfly garden) need a better id. Will support if corrected. Lycaon 06:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
WithdrawnComment Strong tilt - see roof of the house -- H005 22:21, 3 September 2009 (UTC)Comment I prepare a better version of this photo --Pudelek12:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination A Belarusian Su-27UBM. The aircraft crashed two days ago. --Airwolf 09:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Again, very nice, but the patchy cloning needs to be fixed. Do you have an original I can work with or a better version? Maedin 17:49, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chalcolestes viridis --ComputerHotline 06:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion I like this image.--Mbz1 02:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Village center of Calmus, Luxembourg, with ancient wash-house --Cayambe 19:37, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Blurry blue patches in the sky, some of them with straight edges. What happened? Maedin 17:52, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great shot! --NormanB 01:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Banská Štiavnica (Schemnitz, Selmecbánya), Slovakia - old bulding in center --Pudelek 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
PromotionCommentI think it would have looked batter if dark parts of the building on the right where croped --Sfu 12:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)Info new version --Pudelek 09:18, 8 September 2009 (UTC) ok --Sfu 13:27, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice details --Cesco77 12:00, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Central Bearded Dragon Pogona vitticeps --George Chernilevsky 07:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 09:57, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Fisrt facade door of San Mark Basilika of Venice --Romanceor 00:34, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionRequest minor editing. Exist horizontal stitching line through mosaic. Overall very nice --George Chernilevsky 07:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC) I really don't understand where that came from... even the photoshop file had it ! --Romanceor 08:43, 8 September 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry... It is my download error. I re-downloaded this image now, all OK. Support it is good for FP --George Chernilevsky 08:56, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bürstegg and Biberkopf Panorama --Böhringer 21:01, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good.--Mbz1 21:38, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Oulun Kärpät player Juhamatti Aaltonen shot the puck straight on Porin Ässät goalkeeper Eero Kilpeläinen. EtäKärppä 15:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline The head of one player is missing, and also part of the legs of the one in front --Cayambe 16:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationPlatycapnos tenuiloba at el Perelló, Spain. -- Lycaon 13:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Cruiser "Moskva", the largest warship of Russian Navy in the Black sea. --George Chernilevsky 05:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 07:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A twenty-segmented millipede (Oxidus gracilis) -- Alvesgaspar 21:57, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent IMO Cayambe 08:07, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Blankenberge (Belgium): the Pier -- MJJR 19:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Looks nice to me--Korall 20:13, 6 September 2009 (UTC)New crop looks good to, ill promote anyone of them. Korall 20:23, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Meetkerke (Belgium): country lane -- MJJR 19:49, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bufo bufo--Korall 18:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Excellent! Possible FP --George Chernilevsky 18:43, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Witch's hat mushroom. --Dschwen 16:03, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 08:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Gondola lifts in Yllästunturi skiresort --Estormiz 13:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Nice composition, but blurry & noisy. --kallerna 16:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC) Comment There is some annoying CA, which should be corrected, but sharpness and noise is imho acceptable. -- Smial 23:54, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Baptismal ewer. --Lestath 09:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good job --Cayambe 14:48, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Hotel Bulwar in Toruń. --Lestath 09:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Two Red Arrows' BAe Hawks "kissing" in mid air at a speed of about 600 kph each. This is an improved version of the photo which was justly declined today. Airwolf 19:37, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Gebirgsimpressionen --Böhringer 20:37, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionQuestion Very good. I just wonder why the drops are falling diagonally??? -- H005 21:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)No idea why--Böhringer 10:19, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Das Bild ist interessant, haste mal nen etwas engeren Beschnitt versucht? --Mbdortmund 13:15, 4 September 2009 (UTC) nein, habe ich nicht - die Tropfen fallen trotzdem schräg ins Bild und ich weiss nicht warum das so ist. :-( --Böhringer 22:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC) Nice work. The crop is ok for me --Cayambe 09:56, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Elephant Rock in Sardinia, natural sculptur with a Domus de janas inside of it --Cesco77 09:20, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Gassho-zukuri farmhouse, Japan --Bgag 10:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Composition could be better with more place on the left (croped because of the overexposed car?). Nice anyway --sfu 12:33, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Mynäjoki (river in Finland) --EtäKärppä 17:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry, under size requirements. --kallerna 17:33, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sparklers with a slow shutter speed. --kallerna 17:18, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Cool! Shame it's cut off top and right, but don't think it's a big problem. Maedin 10:17, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Estádio do Sport Lisboa e Benfica, Lisbon, Portugal --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice! --kallerna 17:50, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Munttoren, Amsterdam, the Netherlands --Massimo Catarinella 16:21, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very nice. Maedin 10:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Un jeune bouquetin (Capra ibex) sous la Tournette. --Ymaup 15:20, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionSupport Great! Might be FP. Yann 20:42, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Two Red Arrows' BAe Hawks "kissing" in mid air at a speed of about 600 kph each. --Airwolf 12:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Good, and I would have promoted, but the dust spot cloning has been done very poorly. You can see blocks and patches in the sky where cloning was performed. If you would like to try again? Or, upload the original and I will do it for you. Maedin 10:13, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Cuban flags, La Habana --Elemaki 10:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionQuestion Why are all the poles tilted? I'm missing a geocode. -- H005 11:00, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Are tilted because of the wind, but if you see, the flags are not tilted. I do not know what a geocode is. --Elemaki 12:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC) With the help of Sites like this you can find out a location-code, which leads to a map, which shows where you took the picture --Mbdortmund 14:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Good image, technically absolutely enough. The inclined flags do not disturb. In contrary - it underlines what flag masts often are: not vertical. --High Contrast 23:06, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A Belarusian Su-27UBM during a training flight; the very same airplane crashed two days fter the photo was taken. --Airwolf 10:11, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion QI, tiny detali are good visible --George Chernilevsky 10:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Swiss SAR helicopter in the alps --Ikiwaner 19:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Quite nice. The flashes near the rotor are a bit disturbing, but it's nothing you could do anything about. Airwolf 23:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination SAR helicopter hovering --Ikiwaner 19:30, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion helicopter well shown, QI --George Chernilevsky 09:08, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Israelies bathing in a pond of the Yarkon river. --MathKnight 19:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition and significant shot --Cesco77 19:52, 3 September 2009 (UTC) What about geocoding? --Berthold Werner 08:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Added. --MathKnight 13:02, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Municipal hall Hirschlanden, Germany --Harke 18:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --Berthold Werner 08:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A wind farm in Sardinia. --Cesco77 18:38, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Nice objects, but quality too low: bad crop at top, not sharp enough, distortion like tilt, CA. --George Chernilevsky 10:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Porin merivartioasema Kallossa. --kallerna 11:59, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Comment Looks slightly tilted CCW. -- Smial 12:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Comment Definitely tilted CCW. --Relic38 17:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Info Fixed. --kallerna 06:28, 4 September 2009 (UTC) Support, I think now is good --Cesco77 07:51, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Granary in Górzno, Masovian Voivodeship, Poland. --Sfu 09:42, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good -- Smial 12:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Hong Kong Skyline, by User:Diliff. Maedin 06:41, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Attacus atlas --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Sharp, good colour, OK composition. --Relic38 16:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination COA of the Lee Family ZooFari 23:51, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Looks nice, I see no issues. Maedin 10:09, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The "Langer Eugen", housing the United Nations campus in Bonn. -- H005 20:19, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionComment Please crop out bit from bottom right, distracting foreground. Otherwise QI. --kallerna 20:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Better now? I wanted to keep the crop, so I've simply deleted the leaves. -- H005 20:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC) Great job! --kallerna 12:03, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination PAST building in Warsaw, Poland. --Sfu 12:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --H005 22:14, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Welcome to Multiharju old forest. --kallerna 12:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok, though needs a crop, I think. Maedin 10:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Mira Flores Dock, Panama Channel --Elemaki 12:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. --kallerna 09:55, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination European garden spider (Araneus diadematus). --kallerna 12:34, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Could just be my monitor, but seems rather dark. Could you brighten it a little? Maedin 06:51, 3 September 2009 (UTC) Any better now (it was really dark in the forest)? --kallerna 12:07, 3 September 2009 (UTC) I'm sorry, this has brought out the noise, which is present in the original, too. May be too much for QI? :( Feel free to ask second opinion. Maedin 10:04, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Andrej Kmeť statue in Banská Štiavnica --Pudelek 11:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok. Maedin 10:07, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chalcolestes viridis --ComputerHotline 06:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion DOF very shallow, but appropriate in this case. Maedin 10:01, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chalcolestes viridis --ComputerHotline 06:56, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good enough IMO --Cayambe 20:31, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The bay of São Martinho do Porto, Portugal, view from north -- Alvesgaspar 18:21, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Should be ok. --kallerna 09:58, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Finnish ice hockey team Kärpät. PS: Not my taken photo. EtäKärppä 16:03, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline The resolution i far too low for QI. Sorry. --Korall 10:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Banská Štiavnica (Selmecbánya, Schemniz). Andrej Kmeť street --Pudelek 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Banská Štiavnica (Selmecbánya, Schemniz), Slovakia - relief in city center --Pudelek 16:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: A girder recovered from the World Trade Center. --J.smith 20:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: A girder recovered from the World Trade Center. --J.smith 20:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: A girder recovered from the World Trade Center. --J.smith 20:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: A girder recovered from the World Trade Center. --J.smith 20:27, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Town hall in Schöckingen, Germany --Harke 18:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 21:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Kochenmühle near Stuttgart, Germany --Harke 18:25, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 21:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Stepping-stone bridge between Ingleborough and Whernside --Papa November 11:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: The Trullo Sovrano in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 10:13, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Crocodylus cataphractus. --Thesupermat 10:06, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Trulli in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 09:11, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. --Cayambe 08:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Trulli in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 07:58, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Cayambe 08:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination:Chalybura urochrysia at Rara Avis, Costa Rica. Lycaon 07:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
NominationThalurania colombica at Rara Avis, Costa Rica. Lycaon 07:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good enough for me, I guess the small bird was kind of far away and I think it is hard to d better consithering the circumstances.--Korall 19:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationHeliodoxa jacula at Rara Avis, Costa Rica. Lycaon 07:21, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Im sorry but it lacks sharpness. --Korall 19:55, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Trulli in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 07:16, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination Imperial thermæ in Trier. --Berthold Werner 06:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good - --Cayambe 21:54, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination "Vozes de Almodovar": a traditional coral group performing at Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 23:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion OK, although the flashlight and the contrasting dark background are not ideal. -- H005 22:25, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Misquamicut Beach, Rhode Island. Juliancolton 20:50, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Tilted CCW which should be easily fixable. --Relic38 10:28, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Should be fixed. Juliancolton 17:37, 24 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Still has a CCW tilt, based on the horizon. --Relic38 16:08, 25 August 2009 (UTC) There's land at the horizon, which could be causing the effect of tilt. Juliancolton 23:24, 25 August 2009 (UTC) No, it's clearly a strong tilt on the the horizon / waterline. -- H005 22:23, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Background is not actually its natural habitat, but photographic quality is very good. -- H005 08:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Common Loon --Cephas 11:32, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline composition is good but some parts very dark --Mbdortmund 20:35, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Too dark, the head is hardly visible, sorry. -- H005 08:49, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Gletscherimpressionen --Böhringer 20:40, 2 September 2009 (UTC
Promotion Excellent -- H005 21:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Exotic lepidoptera --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Needs better identification. Some kind of Heliconiinae / Heliconius? --Korall 14:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Danaus plexippus --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good --Mbdortmund 13:32, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Exotic lepidoptera --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Needs better ID. Some kind of Marpesia??--Korall 14:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Review Are you sure about the ID ? From the shape of the head, the spines, and the '3rd eye' at the top of the skull it looks more like an iguana species. --Ianare 04:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC) I think you are right I, I will move it to Iguana category maybe someone will figure out what is it. Or may be I will go back to the zoo and look it up. --Jarekt 03:38, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: European Michaelmas Daisy (Aster amellus) (created by Aka) --D-Kuru 11:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: European Michaelmas Daisy (Aster amellus) (created by Aka) --D-Kuru 11:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination:Trapelus sanguinolenta on a piece of a petrified wood --Yuriy75 03:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
NominationSympetrum flaveolum showing wings--Korall 15:04, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion I Think it's good--Cesco77 10:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Brugge (Belgium): the Goudenhand canal and bridge -- MJJR 21:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion QI. Lycaon 00:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Brugge (Belgium): the Augustijnen canal and bridge -- MJJR 21:04, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good. Lycaon 00:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Common field grasshopper (Glyptobothrus brunneus). --kallerna 19:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good but please correct the name. Lycaon 00:14, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Im impressed.--Korall 18:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Living Statue in Montmartre, Paris --Kirua 13:40, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good --Schlurcher 16:33, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Notre Dame de Paris and the Seine River --Kirua 13:29, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Ok, it's a hard subject. Nice colours. --kallerna 19:38, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Custom House, Dublin --Elemaki 13:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice picture --Pudelek 13:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plant. --kallerna 12:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Unfortunate composition with the bushes and the windmill. Should be done from a different viewpoint. -- H005 20:23, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Olkiluoto Nuclear Power Plants 1 & 2 (BWRs with 860 MWe each). --kallerna 12:45, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Not actually the sharpest image, but OK. -- H005 20:21, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Panama Channel --Elemaki 12:35, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Great image but unfortunate crop and tilted CW. Lycaon 00:16, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Common toad (Bufo bufo). --kallerna 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice composition, DOF could be better but I think its allright.--Korall 15:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Banská Štiavnica - new castle (nový zámok) --Pudelek 11:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Might have been a tad sharper, but still QI. Lycaon 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Banská Štiavnica - new castle (nový zámok) --Pudelek 11:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Sorry, too tight crop and strong distortion spoil this otherwise excelent and interesting image. -- H005 20:58, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Cahabon River, Guatemala --Elemaki 10:48, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Too low resolution (1,600 × 1,200), too much contrast. --kallerna 19:41, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationRubus idaeus, Rubus fruticosus --Ernie 19:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Very good image. Not so fond of the file name though (which is no criterion for QI). Lycaon 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC). Not true, "Quality images must [...] have a meaningful title [...] -- H005 21:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationSympetrum danae, yong female --Loz 09:39, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Looks good to me. --Korall 20:40, 29 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Could use brightening up a notch; shadow on top half of fish and overall image is rather dark. --Editor at Large 12:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Pentax ZX-M and 50mm f/2. Collard 21:38, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Too dark. --kallerna 12:52, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Stone plate at Konstanz church, Germany --Harke 16:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: La Rua in Piazza dei Signori, Vicenza, Italy. --Marcok 22:18, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Review needed
Nomination: Waves in the beach of Cerca Nova, Porto Covo, Portugal -- Alvesgaspar 08:22, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
ReviewComment Tilted. See the stripe of clouds on the sky. -- H005 05:28, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Palm against church wall in Auckland, New Zealand --Bjankuloski06en 02:59, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Review not convinced about the composition, upper windows are cropped in the middle, a little dark; other opinions? --Mbdortmund 18:42, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Comment Windows are background and palm is the subject, hence they are cropped. I believe that the slight darkness adds to it in this case. (After all it's volcanic stone) --Bjankuloski06en 08:53, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Schöckingen castle, Germany --Harke 20:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good work. -- MJJR 21:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Schöckingen castle, Germany --Harke 20:03, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Good composition and light. -- MJJR 21:49, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Israeli Dabur class patrol boat (number 881) in bay of Eilat. --NatanFlayer 13:40, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment Should be denoised -Kirua 13:46, 31 August 2009 (UTC) Oppose Too noisy, significant JPEG artifacts. I don't think postprocessing can make it QI. --Eusebius 15:16, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Female mallard, Lake Geneva. Yann 20:20, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline I am sorry but I do not think it is sharp enough.-- Korall 20:42, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Potsdamer Platz, Soest --Mbdortmund 19:33, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion good and useful --Mbdortmund 19:55, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Soest, Dom --Mbdortmund 20:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great shot and good detail. J.smith 04:14, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
Nomination sculpture of a swan, Soest, about 1800 --Mbdortmund 20:56, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Great shot! The chipped paint and other imperfections that are easy to see in this picture really make it interesting to look at. --J.smith 04:14, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Trulli in Alberobello, Italy. --Marcok 01:29, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Technicly a perfict picture, but I think the composition leaves something to be desired. The main subject (building) is cropped in a way that really detracts from the image. --J.smith 04:14, September 1, 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Soest, Germany, market --Mbdortmund 22:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment nice view. Bit tilt --George Chernilevsky 15:26, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Edible fungi. Trophies of a mushroom hunting. --George Chernilevsky 07:37, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
Review Comment This is a good illustration of the subject, but it would have been better without the pocket knife. --Relic38 10:19, 24 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Eastbourne, UK, by User:Diliff. —Maedin 12:24, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion looks perfect --Mbdortmund 23:18, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Excavated cremation pit of Holocaust victims --Juliux 07:26, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Very distorted (see the trees on the top!). Location info missing. -- H005 07:19, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Crosseye stereopair of Mount Hood. --Carnildo 05:37, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Review What a neat idea. I don't quite believe the separation is a mile though. What was the time difference between shots and what type of plane were you on (passenger plane makes 400mph, that means 9seconds between shots for a mile. That is pretty long.)? --Dschwen 16:38, 25 August 2009 (UTC) 737 on descent to the Portland airport, shots were taken about six seconds apart. I wasn't sure about the correct separation, so I took a series of pictures and tried pairs until I found two that looked good. --Carnildo 19:11, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The Stephen Leacock House museum. --Jcart1534 01:36, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion not shure about the white balance, some parts of the walls lean to green. --Mbdortmund 18:34, 20 August 2009 (UTC) Comment I readjusted a bit. Is it better? --Jcart1534 22:27, 20 August 2009 (UTC) looks OK now --Mbdortmund 23:19, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Freiberg, Cathedral St. Marien --Leviathan1983 05:57, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
DeclineOppose severe perspective distortion, the tops of the spires are too blurry --Ianare 03:56, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
Neutral The "perspective distortion" is simply due to the perspective correction of the verticals (i.e. the elimination of converging parallels) and is the same effect as obtained with professional view cameras or with shift lenses; so it's a quality and not a flaw IMO. The spires are rather blurry indeed (that's the reason why I vote 'neutral'), and the crop is a little bit too tight (bottom and left). Otherwise a very nice image. -- MJJR 20:56, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
File:ComputerHotline - The spirit of the king (of the pop) (by).jpg[edit]
Nomination The spirit of the king (of the pop) in the sky. --ComputerHotline 18:52, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline Maybe quality could have been better but quite an unusual cloud.--Two+two=4 04:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC) The quality is not there. This is QI after all. Lycaon 21:24, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose It's a funny picture, and rather uncanny - shot just a few days after his death! :-) But I agree it's not QI. -- H005 20:27, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Funny shot, but not a QI IMO -- Kirua 09:01, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I withdraw my nomination, it is impossible to repair the tilt without getting a crop which is really too tight
--Mbdortmund19:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, it's a good image, but I find it too distorted. You should stitch it with a different projection method. -- H005 11:17, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
New version uploaded. It's a huge building, so there is no (easy at least) way to make it not distorted. --Sfu 18:57, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
Not sure, in theory anything with an angle of less than 180° can be projected without distortion, but I acknowledge that there are practical limits. I'd take the challenge if you want to send me the original photos via e-mail. -- H005 17:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
If I use straight line projection (is this what you think of?), I get a very blury edges. I think this picture looks worst with sharp middle and blury edges than distorted one. --Sfu 18:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Yep, I think that's the right direction, despite the loss of detail much better IMHO. Except that on the very rigth and left it's too ssttrreettcchheedd, even the Corolla to the left has become a stretch limousine. ;-) -- H005 19:55, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
I think tight crop might make a not very nice impresion when looking at the image in articles. If you think of different projection, I think, it is possible to make the cars look more natural (but I have no such projection in hugin). But on the other hand that this projection should have made windows in the building being larger when near to the center of image, and small in opposite case. I don't think that is a good idea. --Sfu 18:10, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Support OK for me.--Kirua 09:12, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Please count my vote as Neutral, not oppose. -- H005 21:58, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Weiming Lake in Peking University.HDR -- Charlie fong Submitted in June with wrong year, so the bot archived it, so resubmiting it --Tony Wills 09:24, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Heavy CA, not the best details and some noise. Lycaon 10:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Info Tried to recover applying some filters (not shure it's enough). --Marcok 13:26, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Noise level ok, still significant CA, very disturbing "blurry" effect. --Eusebius 06:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination A Ferrari F430 -- Rama 17:41, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Comment Unforunately the reflections of windows of the building behind makes the left part of the car look green even though I guess the car is really black. Have you tried a different shooting angle?--Korall 19:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Support There are too few images of such rare cars that are perfect - this one has an appealing background, good light and sharpness, all that mitigates for the unfortunate reflections. -- H005 20:50, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunate reflections and somewhat harsh lighting. --Relic38 15:34, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Comment Reflections are ok for this car. It is very natural. But the stone blocks looks bit overexplosed for me. Overall it is hard object for good photo --George Chernilevsky 14:29, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Overexposed indeed. --Eusebius 06:44, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Loch Ness and Urquhart castle. --Eusebius 14:45, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Comment Slight CW tilt (see line of water). Dust particle on sensor in left upper part. Otherwise good. Cayambe 20:25, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't see the dust, can you help me? About the tilt: the line of water cannot be taken as a reference since the coastline is far from orthogonal to the line of sight. It's not the horizon. There's no horizontal line on the picture, and the castle can hardly be taken as a reference, it's too small. I've done my best to make the image look natural, but feel free to propose a new tilt. --Eusebius 21:13, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I also think it's tilted. If you follow the opposite coastline from left to right, it leads pretty much away from the camera, thus it should rise on the photo rather than go down. (The castle is not too small, but too old, hence may not be vertical.) -- H005 07:00, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Info I've applied a 0,5° CCW tilt. --Eusebius 06:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Support good result considering the difficult light situation, I'm not shure about the tilt, the only criterion should be the castle imo --Mbdortmund 09:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Better now, very nice. --Cayambe 21:39, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose There is a large black spot in the water near the base of the arch structure that looks like it should not be there. There are also minor blemishes in the water that might be better if removed, but those are not bad. --Relic38 17:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
For me, any edits not need --George Chernilevsky 11:54, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Great shot although crop could have been a bit better! Black spot does not disturb me in any waw --Ymaup 15:30, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Great shot IMO --Cayambe 14:17, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Lycaon --George Chernilevsky 06:27, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nice picture but too much noise, sorry. --Eusebius 06:43, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I disagree about the microphone comment; I believe that the microphone is inherent to a singer and in this specific picture does not cover large parts of the face. I understand the noise concern, but I don't think I have the time to fix it. Can somebody give it a try? Bryan 21:42, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Info Removed noise. Please revise. --Marcok 22:46, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Morpho sp. --ComputerHotline 13:23, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Support Very nice, sharp where it needs to be. One improvement would be cloning out the bright out-of-focus spot at the bottom-center edge, but it's not overly distracting for me. --Relic38 16:16, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose From zoo pictures it is not too much asked to get a complete identification. Lycaon 11:59, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Per Lycaon. --kallerna 08:08, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Almer Mater statue in winter, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. --Dschwen 19:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Support Very good --Cayambe 20:33, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I like composition and scene, but the image is compromised by overexposure with loss of detail in regions with snow. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:37, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, snow is white ;-), and I think I managed the exposure quite well. There is plenty of detail in the snow, even though it is not the main subject here. --Dschwen 21:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
OK, it might be also a matter of taste. I could agree with you if not looking at it with large magnification. But at high resolution, I dislike even the snowy edges on the main subject, let alone the snowy regions below the pedestal. Perhaps underexposure with later curve correction would have avoided the problem? In my eyes, snow is not only white ... But it is not a too serious issue. Let us wait if I will be outvoted here... --Johannes Robalotoff 18:03, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment IMO it would benefit from a slight crop, just below the pedestal. Anyway, I continue to support --Cayambe 07:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support the exposure is good for QI --George Chernilevsky 08:48, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Araneus diadematus --ComputerHotline 08:30, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Too low DOF. --kallerna 10:55, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Support This is QI, no FP and I think we must consither what is technically possible to achive. This seems like a photo of a living spider in the wild exposed at 1/60th sec at ISO 200. Higher ISO could give noise and we cant expect the spider to be still much longer than that. I think the picture was taken in a correct way with focus at the right place, so I think its ok.--Korall 13:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose use a stonger flash then, or bring it closer, and go from f/11 to f/22. This is no excuse. You can also use a tripod and increase exposure time to make the backgound lighter then. Dschwen 19:31, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry but DOF is too low. Kirua 08:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose DOF, per others --Cayambe 18:17, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
worse than the others --Schlurcher 16:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
By what criteria is worse? Too generalised phrase. I do not agree. --George Chernilevsky 06:22, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
* Oppose I don't want to see 7 QI's of almost the same subject. --kallerna 12:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Uniqueness is not a criterion for QI, but only judging , if the quality is OK or not. Kallerna's voting is very similar to personal hostility. It is inadmissible in Commons. --George Chernilevsky 13:33, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment We already discussed this problem and our guidelines clearly point out that the task of QI is not to find the best picture of a certain object but only to judge if the quality of a picture is good or not:
"The purpose of quality image status is to recognize that at the moment of creation, a Commoner skillfully achieved a desirable level of quality, a recognition that is not erased by later advances. There is no restriction on the number of similar quality images and there is no formal mechanism for delisting quality images." (from our guidelines)
We should not use the review of a single picture to change our guidelines and I beg Kallerna to withdraw this and the other voting because of it's wrong reasons for the refusal. thx --Mbdortmund 14:55, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Correct image. Lycaon 06:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Support QI for me. Kirua 08:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
NominationSalaria pavo Peacock blenny the same old male showing able to change colour (at black spots). --George Chernilevsky 19:27, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
worse than the others --Schlurcher 16:32, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
By what criteria is worse? Too generalised phrase. I do not agree. --George Chernilevsky 06:09, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
With the direct Top View, it look as if the black at the bottom of the fish is some kind of shadow and it is not clear that it is part of the color of the fish. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:31, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
The Nature (or God) have given such colouring to this fish. The fin has a dark edge --George Chernilevsky 06:50, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Support The background is a little minus, but you had good reasons to use it --Mbdortmund 21:44, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
* Oppose I don't want to see 7 QI's of almost the same subject. --kallerna 12:43, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Uniqueness is not a criterion for QI, but only judging , if the quality is OK or not. Kallerna's voting is very similar to personal hostility. It is strong inadmissible in Commons. --George Chernilevsky 13:34, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
I don't want to be unfriendly, I just think that these photos are too similar. There is nothing personal with my votes, I'm sorry if it feels like that. --kallerna 14:49, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
By way: Kallerna has 5 QI of common Hedgehog and some more nominations photos of Hedgehog, but not say self I don't want to see some QI's of almost the same subject. I welcome all Kallerna's uploads --George Chernilevsky 14:40, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I think it would be cool if we had hundreds or thousands or more QI:s of every subject on commons, that would make commons a pretty cool media database. The more the better for me. --Korall 10:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
I completely disagree with you about this, but this is not the place to discuss this matter. -- H005 10:40, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Maybe we should discuss of changing the guidelines. --kallerna 16:44, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment To all: discussed misunderstanding now finished. The good friendship is good for Commons Wikimedia. --George Chernilevsky 17:25, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Correct image. Lycaon 06:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Une carcasse d'âne (Equus Asinus). --Ymaup 12:04, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Support interesting --Mbdortmund 22:26, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting, yes, but too much CA for QI. Lycaon 18:05, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Support Maybe I'm missing on something, but I see CA only around the shadows of the rocks. If it is really the case they cuold be cut off IMO. In any case CA is not the problem in this image IMO.--Mbz1 22:53, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Weak support agree with Mbz1 --George Chernilevsky 10:15, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Support IMHO the picture is interesting and definitely good enough for QI. (Maybe not for FP, but that is not the issue here.) --NormanB 21:59, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Chalice of St. Adalbert -- Albertus teolog 13:14, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
I am in doubt: DOF is too low, since base of cup is not sharp, but cup itself is good --NormanB 15:20, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Good enough IMHO. -- H005 22:47, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per NormanB, not QI for me. I'm sorry --George Chernilevsky 08:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose noise in the background too strong, lower parts of the cup unsharp, colours of the background and of the cup partially mix on the borders, sorry, nice object --Mbdortmund 10:16, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Gletscherimpressionen --Böhringer 20:42, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Support Significant flare, but nonetheless excellent atmosphere. -- H005 21:50, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose IMO quality isn't enough - noise and over- & underexposed parts. --kallerna 12:02, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose i agree with Kallerna about quality. But really sad, it is rare photo --George Chernilevsky 12:43, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose per others, sorry for the job --Cayambe 14:22, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Info reduced noise and lens flare, please revise. --Marcok 23:21, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Support IMO this place is so interesting, and the conditions of taking the image were rather harsh, that some extra credit should be given.--Mbz1 22:47, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Valued Image Candidates is the place for such extra credit. --Dschwen 17:11, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
who has the courage to go in there and make a picture that shows the inside view? The upper glacier entrance was already broken.--Böhringer 21:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
You have the courage. Its what makes this picture a good candidate for VI. But the technical standards of QI are completely unaffected by this. --Dschwen 18:42, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination OChurch at Niembro on the Northern Spanish coast.--Herbythyme 08:42, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Support OK for me. Lycaon 09:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Picture would benefit a lot from some cropping (see my image note) and some curves correction --NormanB 16:01, 9 September 2009 (UTC)}
Support Fine with me.--Mbz1 23:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
If cropped (but with more room preserved at the left side than suggested), I would support. (Would not suggest the curves correction.) --Johannes Robalotoff 19:01, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Now cropped - thoughts/comments welcome, regards -Herbythyme 08:46, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Would have cropped a bit different as stated above, but support now. --Johannes Robalotoff 12:43, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
I actually agree with you but that let in the stray aerial above the trees so a little tighter seemed better if that is what was wanted :), thanks -Herbythyme 17:53, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Original promoted. Lycaon 17:54, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Flamingo marina, Everglades NP. --Dschwen 16:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Support Good quality.--Mbz1 16:31, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Comment mayby too much sky? --Pudelek 14:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Are you opposing this or not. If not I'd ask you to revert the change to discuss please as it just creates more work. There are plenty of pixels in the image (12MP) so the subject is certainly not too small. Cropping would ruin the composition by cutting off the cloud, cropping more would cut of the antenna on the right. --Dschwen 17:08, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
InfoI'm neutral and I am sending to the discussion :) --Pudelek 23:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I am less worried about the sky but the percepctive is not very appealing. Looks like being shot from the backyard (it's probably not, but anyway), the main subject should rather be shot showing the entrance front. -- H005 07:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
it is shot from the front. I wanted the typical national park style sign to be visible. And this is the perspective that every approaching person sees. --Dschwen 13:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I think the "front" is directed to the waterside, probably they expected more customers to come by boat than by car. Taken from some meters to the left (e.g. the landing stage) you still would be able to see the sign and the parking lot front and the real front. Sorry, looking at the image I always feel some discomfort and the desire to go left to see the shop's entrance side, I can't help it. -- H005 16:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
After further consideration I change my vote to Neutral. Photographic quality is good, and the perspective thing is probably a matter of personal taste. -- H005 08:05, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Support The quality is there for me. As to "perspective" - it is what it is, a honest picture of a valid subject. -Herbythyme 14:34, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I see no problems. Lycaon 17:31, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: I like very much the mood of this panorama and hope it becomes my 300th QI! -- Alvesgaspar 22:02, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Review
Support Yeah! Congratulations with #300! -- MJJR 21:26, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry to spoil the party, but very visible stiching error. --kallerna 11:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Question -- Where? -- Alvesgaspar 12:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Is it really? I'm not sure myself. Of course, it not possible to freeze the wave motion before the shots are made and some creative work is always necessary to fix the stiching marks. In this case, the job was done slow and carefully. -- Alvesgaspar 16:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Here, I think Juliancolton 14:02, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
I added a note. --kallerna 09:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Info OK, the stiching error was fixed and the lightness/contrast improved a little -- Alvesgaspar 18:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Monumental Axis in Brasilia, Brazil. This is an improved version of the one that was previously withdrawn (see Sept. 2) --Cayambe 21:04, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline Are you sure? The strange blurred area seems to be the same as before. See my image annotation. -- H005 21:35, 8 September 2009 (UTC) Stiching error. --kallerna 17:53, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Comment There is no stitching error, simply because this is one single, wide angle shot. --Cayambe 09:25, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Nonetheless it is a significant flaw, whereever it comes from, sorry! -- H005 17:53, 17 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Aeshna cyanea laying eggs--Korall 18:20, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Beautiful composition, but the DOF is way too low. Eg laying action is blurry. f/2.8 seems to open for this kind of shot. --Lycaon 10:08, 8 September 2009 (UTC).
Actually I think that was my comment. --Dschwen 13:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Great colors and details of the eye. Fine with me.--Mbz1 15:49, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Of course a better photographer than me could have done better capturing the moment but the ones I tried with flash turned out horrible so this is the best I could come ut with.--Korall 21:12, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Moving to discuss because I want to force some advice on you ;-). What kindof flash do you have? I reccomend getting an external one and getting a flash cable. That allows you to position the flash as you like and emulate natural light sources. Check out File:Fly Fox Ridge 2.jpg that was basically point and shoot (testing my flash setup) on a walk last weekend. I attached a tissue over my flash with a rubber band, that softens the shadows quite a bit. --Dschwen 13:43, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much for your advice! For this photo series I used the built-in flash with very bad results, but my mother was inte photography before and has a lot of minolta stuff so I found an external minolta auto 200x flash that works with my camera, but it does not work well with the settings of my camera because everything gets totally overexposed. The idea of a flash cable seems very nice (especially since I cannot move the flash in different directions when I have it on the camera), ill have a look around at ebay and see if I can find one for a reasonable price. =). -- Korall 15:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
I'm using an old flash from my Pentax analog SLR as well. No TTL no nothing, I shoot in fully manual mode. Those flash cables (without the TTL contacts) are dirt cheap. --Dschwen 03:23, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I added the french translation of that pitcure. I also corrected the scientific name from Aesna Cyanea to Aeshna CyaneaYmaup 10:40, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Thank you very much Ymaup, I guess my keyboard is just to lazy to record all the letters I write sometimes. --Korall 18:46, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Lazy keyboard... Ymaup 9:45, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Old village of Hallsands in South Devon, UK. Much of this was washed into the sea in the 20th Century--Herbythyme 08:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Review
Comment I like you use of image notes, but the technical quality is borderline (sharpness issues, and a slight tilt). --Dschwen 15:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Thanks but where is the tilt - roof line of houses on top of the cliff are fine (below they are not level due to the sea? -Herbythyme 20:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Nice place, but the houses look overexposed. Yann 09:18, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Diver is cleaning aquarium in California Academy of Scinces.jpg[edit]
Nomination: Diver is cleaning aquarium in California Academy of Scinces --Mbz1 23:51, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Review
Oppose Not sharp and above all oversaturated. Lycaon 12:02, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I believe it is sharp enough for the very hard shooting conditions.The diver is sharp, and we cannot expect all small fast moving fishes to be sharped too.If oversaturation is even present, it is a correctabale problem.--Mbz1 13:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I'm satisfied with the sharpness, but a crop to remove the wood at the bottom might be beneficial. –Juliancolton | Talk 16:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment, Juliancolton. I replaced the bottom versus cropping it. If I did crop the crop for the diver hand would have been too tight. I did add "retouched picture" template to the image description.My edit does not shop up in preview mode yet, but you could see it in the full resolution :)--Mbz1 19:27, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Support A good subject nicely portrayed. The sharpness seems fine to me, I do not see oversaturation. -Herbythyme 14:32, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Un bouquetin (Capra ibex) devant le lac d'Annecy. --Ymaup 15:27, 4 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Comment Great! But CA on the rock at the left. Can you fix it? --Cayambe 21:57, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I don't really know how to do it! --Ymaup 11:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment In Photoshop go to: Filter.. Distort.. Lens correction.. Chromatic aberration. This feature exists in ?every image processing software --Cayambe 14:15, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Support CA are tiny, good enough for me --George Chernilevsky 07:45, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Great composition, but not QI. --kallerna 18:26, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment why not ? -- Ymaup 10:16, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Noisy, blurry, CA. Qualityproblems... --kallerna 17:55, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I like the composition --Mbdortmund 22:38, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Composition is very good. Sharpness and noise are not perfect, but good enough for QI in my opinion. Slight overexposure of the rocks in foreground does not spoil anything here. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Bridge (opened 1861) over Petrusse valley in Luxembourg City. --Cayambe 15:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Comment The main subject (the bridge) is a very small part of the image. A tighter crop would be beneficial. --Juliancolton 17:54, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Incorrect user name for the Decline! --Cayambe 21:47, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment now fixed javascript error. It is Juliancolton's vote (see history). --George Chernilevsky 05:25, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Crop done, new upload. --Cayambe 06:44, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Looks ok to me now. --Iotatau 13:43, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Support --Herbythyme 13:03, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Sabellastarte sp.--Mbz1 02:27, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Comment Author must be a registered user. And full ID need -- George Chernilevsky 07:37, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I provided the ID that was written next to the tank. I tend to believe it is a full ID.Thanks.--Mbz1 12:57, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Very nice, but full binominal name of this worm still undefined. --George Chernilevsky 17:48, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment As I said before I provided the full name that was written next to the tank. I hope that Lycaon might be able to clarify, if it is enough.--Mbz1 20:33, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Ok for me --Cayambe 17:02, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose ID might be sufficient (as no more was given in the zoo), but sharpness is definitely insufficient. Lycaon 17:27, 14 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose as per Lycaon -- H005 19:35, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination The "White Tower" at Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, Germany. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Warum zwei leicht verschiedene Geocodes? --Mbdortmund 16:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Einer für die Kamera, einer für den Turm - vollkommen richtig so. I recommend centering the tower and reducing some noise, otherwise good. -- H005 16:32, 19 September 2009 (UTC) Right of the tower is a rather dark tree. Left of the tower we can see parts of a baroque building. Therefore the tower was deliberately not centered completely. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:23, 19 September 2009 (UTC). Support Composition and explanation are ok IMO. --Cayambe 09:08, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose It may be a matter of taste, but IMHO if you want to show the tower and the building, the image should cover both entirely. For the tower only, it should be centered. -- H005 09:28, 20 September 2009 (UTC) Just to ensure that I am understood correctly: The purpose was not to show the tower and the building. The tower is the only main subject. But the surrounding looks more interesting this way, and better than it would with more of the dark tree. This justified the tower to be moderately out of center in my opinion. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:51, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Supportconcerning the geocode I would prefer camera position + direction. The composition is imo OK. --Mbdortmund 04:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Good quality. -- Smial 10:02, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Orangerie Nordkirchen by --Mbdortmund 21:11, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Oppose Nice, but the crop is unfortunate. --Relic38 04:27, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Good showing central part of building, Support --George Chernilevsky 09:35, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Very good, but tilted by 1 degree clockwise. Will support if rotated. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Agree with George and Johannes though it's not tilt but converging verticals, i.e. need for a slight perspective correction. --Iotatau 21:08, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
tried to correct it --Mbdortmund 21:30, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Not enough yet. In Photoshop CS3 "Lens correction" with -4 works for me, with PTLens plugin +5. --Iotatau 21:45, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Could you apply that for me? --Mbdortmund 22:38, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
I have prepared a new version but a Commons server bug currently prevents me from uploading it, see discussion at COM:VP, "Problem with uploading a new version over an old one". --Iotatau 10:05, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment What bothers me more than QA and noise (these are difficult conditions indeed) is the crop - I'd cut away the lower part where you can only see the handrail. -- H00517:49, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I included the handrail on purpose, because I felt it increased the sense of depth. But I have uploaded an alternative version without it, for comparison. -- NormanB00:12, 18 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Question From the above comments I conclude that there is not enough support for the original picture, but that there is support for the alternative. How does this work in the QI section? Can the alternative be promoted as is, or should I make a new nomination for it? -- NormanB19:43, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I propose a separate nomination, as otherwise the bot will get completely confused and a lot of stuff it usually does would have to be done manually. (Thus I have also deleted your copy of the QICtotal template, it is correct but for technical reasons there should be only one per nomination.) -- H00520:24, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Info I hereby withdraw the nomination for the original. I have created a nomination from scratch for the alternative. H005, can I count on your support? :-) -- NormanB23:22, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nomination A Polish An-2 --Airwolf 12:55, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion Nice shot and good details, but can you upload another version without the artifacts in the sky, maybe caused by dust on the lens? --Cesco77 13:41, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Info I've uploaded a new version; since the flaw you are referring to was in the corner, I simply cut it off. --Airwolf 13:45, 9 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose I'd prefer a version that is not underexposed. --Dschwen 15:13, 9 September 2009 (UTC) CommentYes, it is little underexposed, but it can adjusted easly --Cesco77 07:04, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Support I think the underexpose can be adjusted --Cesco77 19:58, 10 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose Yes, it can be adjusted, but as long as this is not done, I'm opposing. -- H005 11:09, 19 September 2009 (UTC)Support Very good now. -- H005 11:18, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I corrected the exposure. Yann 09:12, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support It is good for QI now. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:13, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Pieris napi--Korall 16:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion
Commenttoo dark at the moment --Mbdortmund 18:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
CommentInfo I shed some light but now the noise in the backgrond is very distubing. --Korall 20:03, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment When I klick on the full solution, I still get the dark picture. Do you understand that? --Mbdortmund 22:01, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment It is because I reverted. The result of my edits were horible. --Korall 22:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I took a shot at adjusting it while keep the noise down somewhat. Any better Mbdortmund? --Relic38 02:49, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Now it is good, many thanks to Relic38 --George Chernilevsky 09:04, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
CommentThank you very much Relic38 but the thing is that making the picture more bright seems to lead to loss of detail in the highlights of the hindwing. Seeing the individual wing scales of butterflies is kind of the goal in my photography and I might prefer the somewhat darker version if there is no other way to keep the detail in the highlights of the hindwing. Im somehow both happy or sorry about the current version. --Korall 16:28, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Info Moving to Discussion. It looks like I pushed some pixels just past overexposure (11871 to be exact). I can take a less aggressive approach. --Relic38 18:31, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
SupportDone I am happy with the result as there are virtually no blown pixels in the wing ribs. --Relic38 19:12, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Well thank you very much it looks nice now. I tried to do it myself earlier today but then I went out for some beer.--Korall 00:35, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Working on the bed of the gave de Pau 1.jpg[edit]
Nomination Maintenance work on the bed of the gave de Pau in France clearing debris from the spring melt water--Herbythyme 08:38, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion nice picture, could you please check if its slightly tilted CW, I'm not sure --Mbdortmund 12:37, 20 September 2009 (UTC) The far bank of the river looks pretty level to me (it is almost a lake at that point), is it an illusion caused by the near bank? Thanks -Herbythyme 12:41, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Support IMO it is not tilted, and it is a great image!--Mbz1 13:37, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Support good QI --Cayambe 15:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I agree with Mbdortmund that there is a slight clockwise tilt, maybe 1°. The far bank needn't be level since the viewing direction isn't orthogonal to it. But I wonder if it's worth fixing: it's not an architecture image, the emphasis is on the maintenance work. --Iotatau 11:54, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Nicely caught quality image --Herbythyme 15:59, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunate composition. The big boulder in front of the singer spoils the picture, it's too close and literally seems to stop him. What or who is he playing to? - Till.niermann 04:35, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Till.niermann. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:23, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose As per Till.niermann. --NormanB 23:28, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
File:Stow Lake with pagoda, pigeons and the Moon.jpg[edit]
Nomination Stow Lake --Mbz1 15:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)
DeclineComment Very interesting composition and mood, but it leaves me puzzled what this is about - the dead tree, the doves, the pagoda and the moon, all seems to be placed very carefully, but I can't figure out how they are related. Looks a bit like if someone placed a fresh apple, a screwdriver, a painting and a diamond bracelet on a table, beautifully arranged, and takes a photo of that composition. Each item is beautiful, all placed well but the composition is still meaningless. -- H005 16:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC) Review at last! Thanks. The pagoda is nicely framed in the dead tree. It calls a natural frame. The pigeons are often sitting on that dead tree and waiting for the food. IMO they are making the image alive. The Moon just happened to be there the day I took the images, so I decided to get the Moon in my frame too. As you said it is a mood shot, I would add it is my mood :) shot. I wonder, if you'd rather prefer the image with the dead tree, pigeons and pagoda with no Moon? Thanks.--Mbz1 20:15, 16 September 2009 (UTC) No, the moon is just a detail. I don't know what to do with this image, the photographic quality is good and it's in a way very unique and interesting, but on the other hand I believe viewers won't figure out what all this is about. Thus I'm moving it to "discuss" to get more room and wait for more opinions. -- H005 17:44, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Thank you very much. I'd like to learn more opinions about the image.--Mbz1 21:04, 17 September 2009 (UTC) Oppose The guidelines for QI say "The arrangement of the subject within the image should contribute to the image. Foreground and background objects should not be distracting.". IMO there is no clear subject in this picture. Maybe the pagoda was meant to be the subject, but I think it is too far in the background. Yet it is too prominent and colorful to disregard, and so it distracts my attention from the pigeons. Since there is no subject and since there are distracting objects, I think this can not be QI -- NormanB 00:05, 18 September 2009 (UTC) I believe the composition was made accordingly to the w:Rule of thirds--Mbz1 01:14, 18 September 2009 (UTC) I'm not convinced of the rule of thirds, it's good to consider but not always the best solution. I've made an annotation to the image, maybe it would be better with this crop? -- H005 16:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for your comment. I'd rather take another image with no Moon than to change this one. The tree and pagoda are always there, the pigeons are often too, but the Moon with a pigeon flying next to it was kind of special in that particalar day.--Mbz1 00:06, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Interesting picture and disk. I like it, because/although its someway excentric. --Mbdortmund 22:41, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Looks underexposed. Composition not convincing. Lycaon 13:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Sharp, original composition. Yann 09:20, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with composition issues as explained above. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:42, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination EDK pump in a hospital. --Dschwen 18:46, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Sorry, excessive noise --Cayambe 12:51, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, it is a 12MP image. Minimum size here is 2MP. It seems illogical that I could easily defeat the argument by downsampling the image. The result would be noiseless and would certainly get promoted, but the overall quality of the high resolution shot would still be superior. --Dschwen 14:48, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Noise is not really an issue here. -- H005 16:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I know that you are kidding when talking about downsampling, but noise can be reduced without sacrificing size (or quality). That should be tried IMO. Lycaon 16:25, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Not shure about the white-balance. Does it lean to red? --Mbdortmund 15:16, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Agree with Mbdortmund, white balance is off. With a corrected WB the image gets a different character. If Dschwen agrees I'll upload a corrected version. --Iotatau 21:20, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose not really sharp -- Smial 10:08, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I would support if whitebalance were corrected. -- NormanB 20:13, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Noise is no problem, but whitebalance is not good and DOF is borderline. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:07, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Brass band, Geneva. Yann 22:23, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Promotion blown out sky --Mbdortmund 17:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Actually we can't see the sky here. It is the roof of the tent. Yann 17:46, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
sorry, you are right, but I still don't like this white area --Mbdortmund 22:04, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Yes, agreed, but I couldn't do otherwise. Yann 13:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I like this picture but the top does look over exposed (I accept it is a tent). Is it worth a crop to remove some of the top/whiteness? --Herbythyme 13:06, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Done That much I can do. Yann 15:53, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Looks fine to me, the white doesnt bother me too much, afterall its mainly about the brass band and they are correctly exposed --Korall 20:33, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Old Customs house in Exeter, Devon. It was built in 1681 & is a Grade 1 listed building.--Herbythyme 16:40, 20 September 2009 (UTC)
PromotionOppose Too tight crop, oversaturated. -- H005 22:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC) I don't object to the "crop" comment but it was a very bright day, saturation is untouched --Herbythyme 07:44, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I belive the saturation is fine.--Mbz1 18:05, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I do not think I've ever seen bricks of such a colour. Whatever, the crop issue alone already makes me oppose. -- H005 21:43, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
I assure you that is the colour of those bricks though your comment on the crop is noted. Bricks like that are quite common in the UK. --Herbythyme 08:31, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Well, maybe. I've been to England a lot, and what recall is more like this or this. But of course I do not know this particular house here. -- H005 09:58, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
After further consideration I'm changing to Neutral. I can't really assess the saturation issue, I'm in doubt but in dubio pro reo, and the rest of the image is good enough to be a counterweight to the not ideal crop. -- H005 11:30, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Of course the crop could have been better, but otherwise great quality and value.--Mbz1 18:52, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Anisoptera sp. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I guess I could ID this one if i go to the library but I dont think I have time for that before the weekend. --Korall 14:19, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment @Lycaon please do not remove my comments when you decline. I think I can help computer hotline with ID if we let the pictures stay a couple of days. I have to go to the library anyway.--Korall 14:37, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
OK, thanks for helping. Lycaon 20:10, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
CommentI am very sorry but I have not found the time to go to the library. Last saturday I could have had time but I prioritated going out and taking pictures myself. Now I have to focus on school again, so I dont mind removing the series of pictures. --Korall 13:39, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Anisoptera sp. on my finger. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Please let them stay at discuss a couple of days so we can help CH with ID. The detail and the quality of this picture series gives good hope of finding exact ID soon.--Korall 14:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Head of an anisoptera sp. on my finger. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Please let them stay at discuss a couple of days so we can help CH with ID. The detail and the quality of this picture series gives good hope of finding exact ID soon.--Korall 14:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Anisoptera sp. on my hand. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Please let them stay at discuss a couple of days so we can help CH with ID. The detail and the quality of this picture series gives good hope of finding exact ID soon.--Korall 14:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination Egg of an anisoptera sp. on my hand. --ComputerHotline 12:32, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Decline
Oppose Not ID'ed. Lycaon 14:20, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Please let them stay at discuss a couple of days so we can help CH with ID. The detail and the quality of this picture series gives good hope of finding exact ID soon.--Korall 14:47, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Nomination: Strandkorbs at the beach of Eckernförde, Germany -- H005 22:13, 11 September 2009 (UTC)
Review
Oppose Strandkorbs in focus are cut by lower image border, all other strandkorbs are out of focus. --Johannes Robalotoff 15:36, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Yep, exactly how I wanted it to be. With wider crop and DOF it looks boring. -- H005 17:55, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment Does not convince me. But let us ask for another opinion --Johannes Robalotoff 20:45, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
Support I like it! -- Ymaup 10:27, 15 September 2009 (UTC)
Question Is there no one else to comment? -- H005 21:16, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose I'm sorry, H005, but i oppose. It is big work, but not QI: bad crop, low DOF, CA, incorrect white balance (some blue, correct it please) :(Versuchen Sie, es noch einmal zu machen --George Chernilevsky 06:34, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Hi George, thanks, I value your opinion. Just as a comment, the DOF and crop may be a matter of taste (the idea of both is supporting the impression that there is no start and no end in this line of strandkorbs, they start anywhere close to the viewer and get lost in the distance.) But where do you see CA? I can't see any. And the white balance is just right, it was a very cloudy day, and the colurs are exactly how it looked that day. -- H005 07:17, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
About CA - look in the middle. Number 24?W: next at the left and from below. Possible, idea is nice, but unfortunate crop and weather have spoilt result. --George Chernilevsky 07:37, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment From our guidelines: 'Value. Our main goal is to encourage quality images being contributed to Wikicommons, valuable for Wikimedia projects.'
Support I can see this picture being used, which supports the main goal. The technical quality is IMO defintely good enough for QI (I can't find the CA) so no reason to not support. I personally like the crop and DOF. --NormanB 20:22, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
Weak Support Crop and DOF noted, the image does illustrate the subject well. --Relic38 03:35, 28 September 2009 (UTC) Sorry, late support, image was already catalogued as undecided. Lycaon 06:03, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
Comment I dislike the cropped wind turbine on the right. Maybe it can be recropped? -- JovanCormac 11:24, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Support Very good QI for me -- George Chernilevsky 14:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
![* Nomination Germany, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, town hall at night --Flominator 09:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC) * Decline Tilted and noisy. A TS lens and a tripod would be helpful. --S[1] 10:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/RodT_Rathaus_bei_Nacht7069.jpg/120px-RodT_Rathaus_bei_Nacht7069.jpg)
Request Tilt CCW, correction need --George Chernilevsky 04:50, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot, but a small DOF. In the future, try to stitch the 2 shot in a single to increase the DOF. Darius Bauzys 10:13, 26 September 2009 (UTC)
Info I have added a geocode, please check for its correctness. -- H005 22:09, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
-- JovanCormac 16:21, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Question Shouldn't those licence plates be made unreadable for privacy reasons? -- H005 18:17, 24 September 2009 (UTC)
Neutral}I do not find the color strange, but sharpness isn't the greatest. Otherwise it's a great view. -- H005 19:59, 18 September 2009 (UTC)![* Nomination Spectacular spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums in Rome (Italy) designed by Giuseppe Momo in 1932 --NormanB 23:19, 23 September 2009 (UTC) * Promotion Comment Please see the discussion below in the section 'Consensual review' ([link]) Support as discussed. -- H005 06:57, 24 September 2009 (UTC) Support good, and i agree with H005 --George Chernilevsky 07:18, 24 September 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3d/Rome_-_Vatican_Museum_-_Spiral_Staircase_by_Giuseppe_Momo_-_0673_v2_cropped.jpg/103px-Rome_-_Vatican_Museum_-_Spiral_Staircase_by_Giuseppe_Momo_-_0673_v2_cropped.jpg)
![* Nomination Façade of the Town Hall in Trzebiatów --JDavid 15:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC) * Promotion only geocoding is missing --Mbdortmund 22:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Info geocoding added JDavid 22:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Support Good enough for QI IMO. Picture would be even better if a slight perspective correction was done like explained e.g. [here] -- NormanB 20:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a0/Trzebiatow_Town_Hall_facade_2009-04.jpg/96px-Trzebiatow_Town_Hall_facade_2009-04.jpg)
Done Geocode added.--Cayambe 07:22, 21 September 2009 (UTC)
![]] 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/44/Dimitri_Torterat_-_Patrouille_Acrobatique_de_France_passing_by_%28French_Bastille_Day_2009%29_-_%284%29.jpg/120px-Dimitri_Torterat_-_Patrouille_Acrobatique_de_France_passing_by_%28French_Bastille_Day_2009%29_-_%284%29.jpg)
]] 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)
.
I withdraw my nomination --George Chernilevsky 06:08, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
![* Nomination Rubus idaeus, Rubus fruticosus --Ernie 19:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC) * Promotion Very good image. Not so fond of the file name though (which is no criterion for QI). Lycaon 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC). Not true, "Quality images must [...] have a meaningful title [...] -- H005 21:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/e5/AD2009Aug13_Rubus_01.jpg/120px-AD2009Aug13_Rubus_01.jpg)
-Relic38.JPG)
.jpg)
_(3).jpg)
![* Nomination Germany, Rothenburg ob der Tauber, town hall at night --Flominator 09:29, 26 September 2009 (UTC) * Decline Tilted and noisy. A TS lens and a tripod would be helpful. --S[1] 10:41, 27 September 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:RodT_Rathaus_bei_Nacht7069.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
-Relic38.jpg){kind=small}
-Relic38.JPG)
![* Nomination Façade of the Town Hall in Trzebiatów --JDavid 15:02, 20 September 2009 (UTC) * Promotion only geocoding is missing --Mbdortmund 22:03, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Info geocoding added JDavid 22:42, 21 September 2009 (UTC) Support Good enough for QI IMO. Picture would be even better if a slight perspective correction was done like explained e.g. [here] -- NormanB 20:07, 22 September 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:Trzebiatow_Town_Hall_facade_2009-04.jpg)
.jpg)
-Relic38.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.jpg)
_Fruit_(12786)-Relic38.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(4).jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
-Relic38.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
-Relic38.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
![]] 22:03, 13 September 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:Dimitri_Torterat_-_Patrouille_Acrobatique_de_France_passing_by_(French_Bastille_Day_2009)_-_(4).jpg)
.JPG)
_-_Plague_Column_(part2).JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
_-_Mestsk%C3%BD_hrad.jpg)
_(34).jpg)
_-_the_Plague_Column_(part).jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.JPG)
_(1).jpg)
.jpg)
_(5).jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
_flower_petals.jpg)
.JPG)
_(30).jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
_(3).jpg)
_(6).jpg)
_-_ulica_Andreja_Kme%C5%A5a.jpg)
_-_relief.JPG)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
_(3).jpg)
_(10).jpg)
_-_town_hall.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
![* Nomination Rubus idaeus, Rubus fruticosus --Ernie 19:28, 1 September 2009 (UTC) * Promotion Very good image. Not so fond of the file name though (which is no criterion for QI). Lycaon 11:54, 1 September 2009 (UTC). Not true, "Quality images must [...] have a meaningful title [...] -- H005 21:15, 1 September 2009 (UTC)](/wiki/File:AD2009Aug13_Rubus_01.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
_(1).jpg)
_(4).jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.JPG)
.jpg){kind=link}
_(by).jpg){kind=link}
_(24).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(5).jpg){kind=link}
_(4).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(1).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg)
_(by).jpg)
_(24).jpg)
_(2).jpg)
.JPG)
.JPG)
.jpg)
|
_(5).jpg)
|
_(4).jpg)
_(3).jpg)
_(2).jpg)
_(1).jpg)
.jpg)
