Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 2006

• 
  • Nomination View of Szydłowiec (Poland) --Pko 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion I think it's ok --Wikimol 13:09, 15 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mont Sant-Michel --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline better pictures on the topic on Commons. Ugly foreground. Diligent 03:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Church in Inkoo, Finalnd --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Big and dull mass filling area of photo, worsened by a too harsh perspective. Alvesgaspar 20:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Groß St. Martin (Köln) --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Beautiful & serene. Diligent 03:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Jezioro Kamienne ("Stone Lake") and Devil's Stone, Poland --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Interesting. I like that the picture diagonal is also underlined by the stones from water to Devil's Stone. Diligent 03:18, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Tulip Stairs and lantern at the Queen's House in Greenwich --Pko 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion good light, resolution and colors CyrilB 10:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Xerocomus chrysenteron fungi --Pko 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors, subject well separated from background CyrilB 10:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Papilio demoleus butterfly --Pko 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp and well light CyrilB 10:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Stone carving at Engaku-ji Temple --Pomakis 20:41, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Harsh light CyrilB 10:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination The Spodek multipurpose sports arena at night in Katowice. --Lestat 17:15, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good nigh shot, clearly shows the building CyrilB 10:34, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
• * Nomination Common Hawker Dragonfly --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC) * Decline good image, declined due to image name Qi requires images to named appropriately Gnangarra 00:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Nomination Common Hawker Dragonfly --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline good image, declined due to image name Qi requires images to named appropriately Gnangarra 00:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• * Nomination Yellow-Winged Darter Dragonfly --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC) * Decline good image, declined due to image name Qi requires images to named appropriately Gnangarra 00:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Nomination Yellow-Winged Darter Dragonfly --Pko 09:51, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline good image, declined due to image name Qi requires images to named appropriately Gnangarra 00:21, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Aster amellus flowers --Pko 09:59, 26 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline uncategorised image Gnangarra 00:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination desert rose --Luigi Chiesa 09:52, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Lack of sharpness CyrilB 19:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sauvignon blanc wine grape --Pko 09:17, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Illustrative, and good technical quality CyrilB 19:19, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Franciscan church in Salzburg --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Clear view of a complicated ceiling CyrilB 19:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nikolaikirche in Stralsund --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline image size,to small but its a nice composition Gnangarra 13:54, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Orthodox church in Białystok --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Interresting view, but resolution and contrast are too low CyrilB 19:23, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Garden at Braniccy palace in Białystok]] --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline image size, to small I would support a larger version of this Gnangarra 13:57, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Interior in Museum in Bielsko-Biała --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice balanced composition with the table setting off centre, other photographers could learn how to compose images from this Gnangarra 13:47, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination St. Anne's church in Warsaw --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline To many small annoyances any one by itself could be ignored but..., lights on the right side of the image, scaffolding, too much shadow, people dont add dimension to the subject, soft focus, Gnangarra 13:50, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Potocki Mausoleum in Warsaw --Pko 15:38, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline decline for now could be edited to improve perspective tilt, and contrast Gnangarra 13:52, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Marienkiche in Stralsund --Pko 15:36, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Sharp and contrasty details Crushinator 00:32, 24 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Plane tree of Hippocrates.--Steven Fruitsmaak 02:37, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Subject is unclear CyrilB 12:06, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination View of Toruń --Pko 17:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Illustrative CyrilB 12:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Roadside shrine in Poland --Pko 17:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colors CyrilB 12:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Persian Walnut nuts --Lestath 21:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Informative CyrilB 12:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City gate in Ingolstadt --Pko 17:53, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Simple and Illustrative CyrilB 12:04, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination photo by User:Airunp Low resolution and small size but some photos are to valuable to be ignored. Gnangarra 02:22, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very illustrative picture, good colors, and the dark patch at the bottom is not a big issue CyrilB 11:49, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Banksia menziesii -- Gnangarra 13:32, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Although the leaves are cropped, the flower is interresting and has good resolution CyrilB 12:05, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Meersburg. --Richardfabi 18:41, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline The image is dull CyrilB 11:55, 23 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination double effect distillation plant --Luigi Chiesa 15:29, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion good detail and exposure, considering its a fine day and the construction material theres very little overexposed regions Gnangarra 15:50, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Hooded crow (please verify). --Adamantios 09:59, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Subject lost into the background Gnangarra 15:47, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nice colour/ligthening --Fred Chess 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good composition, minor shadow in foreground isnt distracting Gnangarra 15:42, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Nice colour/ligthening --Fred Chess 21:44, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Good excposure levels details clear in the white walls Gnangarra 15:44, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Good size comparison human/telescope --startaq 23:03, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Also nice colours, and good compostion. copy2FPC --Wikimol
• 
  • Nomination Pancake Rocks limestone formations --Kiwimandy 05:47, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Horizon tilted/unbalanced even if its a lens affect curvature should be balanced Gnangarra 15:46, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Milford Sound --Kiwimandy 05:49, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline I'm afraid it's flat. It could have been great under different conditions. --Adamantios 08:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination I think it's a pretty good photo. --^{Brandt Luke Zorn}_{talk to me} 05:28, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Technically it lacks in composition, lighting and exposure. The subject is nice though. --Adamantios 08:28, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Mount Arrowsmith panorama --KenWalker 07:22, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline I believe it's flat and blurry. Is it shaken? --Adamantios 07:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Banksia ashbyi -- Gnangarra 13:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Maybe it's the bug on the first twig to the left. --Adamantios 07:58, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Wellington Bay --Kiwimandy 06:12, 1 September 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion A bit foggy and some demosaicing artifacts, but otherwise good IMO. --Wikimol 20:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lycaena virgaureae --Nemo5576 22:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Very nice, unfortunately only 1400px. --Wikimol 20:54, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sympetrum sanguineum --Nemo5576 22:42, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline Focal point body and wing fine but the head area is blurred the eye is naturally attracted to the head eye region Gnangarra 15:40, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Dragonfly, Sympetrum sanguineum :) --Nemo5576 05:45, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Wow, if species name will be identified, certain FP candidate. --Wikimol 09:37, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Lovely looking teddy bear ;-) --Crushinator 09:35, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline The subject is not framed properly. Not to mention that it looks bored :) --Adamantios 07:43, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination A forge with nice sparcs while blwoing --Metoc 13:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Really nice --Wikimol 16:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Masked loudspeaker --Metoc 13:35, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Well done isolation. --Wikimol 16:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination City panoramic --Wikimol 16:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Thumb doesn't do the image justice.
    - Very nice composition with sharp details. --Crushinator 21:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Sunset... --Wikimol 16:58, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Nice colour good sharp focus on silohuettes Gnangarra 02:25, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination Donkey Orchid -- Gnangarra 05:52, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Decline I'm afraid the subject doesn't stand out (underexposure?). --Adamantios 07:36, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
• 
  • Nomination renomination larger size up loaded as per earlier nomination request 00:09, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Promotion Very nice photo; the version uploaded earlier was prevented from promotion only by being too small. -- Infrogmation 21:54, 27 August 2006 (UTC)
    - And it is still too small --IbRas 12:34, 30 August 2006 (UTC)

Consensual review

• Nomination Craesus septentrionalis on birch leaf --Pko 21:17, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
• Decline Uncategorised image Gnangarra 00:16, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• I put the image to categories Category:Craesus septentrionalis and Category:Betula. Anyway, I think this is not good thing to reject picture only because it isn't categorized, if it has correct description and is in appropriate gallery. Pko 14:17, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• there is 10,000+ uncategorised images on commons, these images are effectively useless they also consume a lot of editor time trying to place these images. QI recognised this problem and has made it a requirement for all QI's to be categorised. That done I have no other issue with the image will support promotion. Gnangarra 14:35, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• OK, but AFAIK, there is some "tradition" concerning photos depicting plants; these images are palced on pages, not necessarily in categories: In the bio-sector, the tradition has grown that families are categories, images are in articles/galeries. (from Commons:Village pump#Removal of category tags because image is in a gallery?. Do you really think images are "effectively useless" if they are placed on a page instead of category? Pko 16:45, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
• Before answering, please see Commons talk:Quality images candidates#Modification of guidelines. Pko 19:23, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

• Nomination: Animation of WWII developments in Europe by San Jose --Thermos 01:36, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
• Review needed

• This animation has a rendering incurred due to wiki engine not being capable of reducing large size gif's to small size, I would think that it gets declined for not being viewable(note this was the basic reasons for failed FA) but at full size its a wonderful presentation. Gnangarra 13:54, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• this is working at 150px so I'm inclinded to promote conditional on it being displayed at this resolution. Gnangarra 10:36, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

Result - Promoted