Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 18 2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Wittensee,_Klein_Wittensee_(LRM_20200425_184600).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Vie over Lake Wittensee from Klein-Wittensee --MB-one 07:20, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Too noisy and lacks detail, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 09:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support A bit noisy indeed but a very good composition. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 09:49, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry but the image looks like it is splitted in half. --Vincent60030 14:55, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Noise and lack of detail are limitations of many cellphone images. Looks good on a small screen, but does not stand up to 1:1 zoom on a bigger screen. Cropping to move the horizon upwards would improve the composition for me. --Tagooty 01:36, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --Peulle 07:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:0_Maincy_-_Château_de_Vaux-le-Vicomte_(2).JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Maincy - Château de Vaux-le-Vicomte (de Jean-Pol GRANDMONT) Sebring12Hrs 22:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:22, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. It's leaning in a bit ans not sharp enough IMO. --Tournasol7 08:26, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support The image is apparently not taken with a $1.000++ lens, but sharpness and resolution is sufficient for an A3 size printout. If there is something leaning, it is only by a few pixels and it is not disturbing. Colours look natural, also good lighting, and composition. --Smial 09:43, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support -- Spurzem 17:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
  •  Support Good image quality --Tagooty 01:43, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Peulle 07:10, 17 September 2020 (UTC)