Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 17 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Fence_near_Engelstor,_Schönbrunn_01.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination East of Engelstor, Schönbrunn, there is an interesting piece of fence. --Herzi Pinki 08:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  OpposeSorry, I disagree, the shadows are much too dark. Please check the monitor. Easy to fix! --Hubertl 08:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI for me - yes right side is a bit dark, but IMO there is no strong reason for brightning --Isiwal 09:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I inspected the image at the EIZO calibrated monitor and found that the dark region between the trees at the right side of the lamp post has lost the details and is partly posterizing (see note). I suggest to crop tighter, to get the issue resolved (see note). beside that, all is ok with the quality. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk)
     Comment I have uploaded a new version, a bit brighter (maximum possible). But still there are dark areas to the right. I did not crop, as the lamp is part of the composition and needs some margin to the right. --Herzi Pinki 13:42, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • changed to  Support now. Thanks for reprocessing. Even when the result is not really convincing. Raising shadows does not mean raising everything. --Hubertl 14:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 17:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:35_Gym_in_front_of_Hesperia_and_Arethusa,_gardens_of_Schönbrunn.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Statue of Hesperia and Arethusa in the gardens of Schönbrunn. Looking along the Finstere Allee (Dark alley) with a school class doing gym in between. --Herzi Pinki 08:37, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion  Support Good quality. --Johann Jaritz 08:47, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I disagree, the shadows are much too dark. Please check the monitor. Easy to fix! --Hubertl 08:53, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support For me clear QI, great composition, the photographer has taken all the profit of the situation, I checked in LR, technically OK from my point of view, IMO brightning makes it inexpressively --Isiwal 09:13, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment I inspected the shadows with the EIZO calibrated monitor and found enough details to accept the shadows. However, the image will benefit from a tighter crop which reduces the foreground shadows and the oof park bench (see my note). I am ready to support the cropped image. Please resolve the two redlinks. --Cccefalon 14:33, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment uploaded a new version, cropped, a bit brighter --Herzi Pinki 14:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support changed so support now. --Hubertl 14:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --C messier 18:00, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:VDNKh Pavilion No 26 Transport.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Moscow. VDNKh. Pavilion No. 26 Transport of the USSR. --Dmitry Ivanov 07:57, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose There is banding in the sky Poco a poco 20:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  • . Comment A new version of the image was uploaded: an attempt to reduce the banding in the sky was made. Dmitry Ivanov 14:56, 8 September 2015 (UTC).
    •  Comment It is better but I am not convinced, I'd appreciate a second opinion, to me is  Neutral Poco a poco 19:27, 9 September 2015 (UTC).
  •  Support. I don't sure about FP, but I think the photo good enough to be a QI. --Brateevsky 14:50, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Hyoscyamus albus-IMG 9339.jpg[edit]

 Comment Not direct disturbing, IMO. --C T Johansson 17:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 Comment Posterization too. Whatever other people say, never is this work (or this editing) a QI. --Hockei 18:12, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 Comment By reducing sharpening you can reduce noise levels (and also the black lining under the flower) and a red hot pixel (note). --C messier 17:36, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
 Comment I don't care any more; see my comment --C T Johansson 17:41, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support QI to me. Bokeh somewhat disturbing due to overcompensated spherical abberation, but is not an issue. --Esquilo 13:10, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support --Jebulon 20:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:58, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Gunnarstenarna.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Gunnarstenarna is a small group of islets at the very south of Stockholm archipelago. --Esquilo 07:18, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Oppose It lacks detail, sorry, not a QI to me --Poco a poco 20:09, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Enough detail to crop out details like File:Altarskär, Gunnarstenarna.jpg. --ℇsquilo 13:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support Good enough, IMO. An english description should help a poor Frenchie like me...
Missing signature. --Hockei 07:00, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 Support Sorry, I am the poor Frenchie who forgot to sign...--Jebulon 20:59, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Info English description added. Unforunatly, Gunnarstenarna does not have an english article yet. --Esquilo 13:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Support The tower could be a bit sharper but all in all I find the picture not bad. --Hockei 06:57, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Weak  Support some minor unsharpness in the middle. stitching not 100% perfect? but not a big problem -- Smial 10:23, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 3 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Promoted   --Hubertl 05:57, 16 September 2015 (UTC)