Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 12 2015

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Vana-Vigala mõisa allee 04.JPG[edit]

 I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --Hubertl 07:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Мойщики окон.JPG[edit]

  • Nomination Window cleaners.The building in Dushanbe --Шухрат Саъдиев 16:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 18:11, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Composition interesting, but too many jpeg/noise artifacts. --C messier 19:25, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Blurry, compression artifacts. --Magnus (talk)
  •  Oppose Per others. I guess the "support" vote is in prevention of futur opposes due to the "perspective distortion" argument...It is good "because" it is distorted--Jebulon 14:01, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Declined   --C messier 17:25, 11 September 2015 (UTC)