Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 11 2023

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:The_Old_Tower_at_Nuenen_-_Vincent_Van_Gogh.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Old Tower at Nuenen - Vincent Van Gogh --GoldenArtists 16:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Oppose Blown highlights, CA. --Peulle 11:08, 4 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Support Looks ok to me. --Palauenc05 07:31, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose upper part is blurry (DoF issue) in addition to highlights --Virtual-Pano 07:33, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per Peulle and Virtual-Pano. Also chroma noise and not good lighting. --Smial 11:38, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek 18:23, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel 22:40, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Treviso_-_Porta_San_Tommaso_-_2023-09-04_18-22-54_003.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Treviso - Porta San Tommaso --Liridon 08:30, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Support Good quality. --Ercé 08:38, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I have to oppose. The resolution ist not bad, but the ghost effects due to the passengers are unfortunately too prominent --PantheraLeo1359531 13:20, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Perspective correction needed. --Palauenc05 07:26, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose per others.--Peulle 12:32, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per PantheraLeo1359531 + a perspective distortion --Jakubhal 04:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 4 oppose → Declined   --Mike Peel 22:39, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Lighting_near_Schönbrunn,_Vienna.jpg[edit]

Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:37, 10 September 2023 (UTC)