Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives September 10 2018

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Diakonie_Ansbach_Rummelsbergerstrasse_11_HaJN_4880.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Diakonie Ansbach Rummelsbergerstrasse 11 HaJN 4878 --Hans-Jürgen Neubert 07:49, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdrawn
  •  Comment very nice image, good sharpness, but the building is cut off on the right. Is a wider crop possible? --Carschten 08:01, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Sorry, wider view is not possible with this image. At this time 18mm (and this is not the best objective with 18-20mm@FX) was my shortest lens or strongest WA. Right side you will see a modern building, the parking place and cars. I must taken a decision, cut the tree left and keep disturbing cars or cut the dark and not so important side from the building. I keep the tree for compostition. Actually it´s a non documented monument in Ansbach / (bcs. it´s Diakonie) maybee another time - means next year...and how we get results right now?--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 12:59, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment I see what you mean, it's difficult. Nevertheless I tend to oppose because of the too tight crop on the right, but I put this one in the CR. --Carschten 23:48, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose There is something wrong on the lower left side. --Milseburg 10:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 I withdraw my nominationThanks to Milseburg--Hans-Jürgen Neubert 06:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Running total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 1 oppose → Decline?   --Milseburg 10:02, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tractor_Zetor_in_the_Czech_Republic.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Tractor Zetor in the Czech Republic --Adámoz 09:43, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment CA overall and the right crop (a pice of the sign is gone) is not really good --Poco a poco 17:12, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 06:20, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Not a QI to me like this as already said --Poco a poco 17:58, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I don't think the composition is succeeded. --Milseburg 12:11, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per Poco.--Ermell 12:53, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Running total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 3 oppose → Decline?   --C messier 13:37, 9 September 2018 (UTC)